Mother's curse refers to male-biased deleterious mutations that may accumulate on mitochondria due to its strict maternal inheritance. If these mutations persist, males should ideally compensate through mutations on Y-chromosomes given its strict paternal inheritance. Previous work addressed this hypothesis by comparing coevolved and non-coevolved Y-mitochondria pairs placed alongside completely foreign autosomal backgrounds, expecting males with coevolved pairs to exhibit greater fitness due to Y-compensation. To date, no evidence for Y-compensation has been found. That experimental design assumes Y-chromosomes compensate via direct interaction with mitochondria and/or coevolved autosomes are unimportant in its function or elucidation. If Y-chromosomes instead compensate by modifying autosomal targets (or its elucidation requires coevolved autosomes), then this design could fail to detect Y-compensation. Here we address if Y-chromosomes ameliorate mitochondrial mutations affecting male lifespan in Drosophila melanogaster. Using three disparate populations we compared lifespan among males with coevolved and non-coevolved Y-mitochondria pairs placed alongside autosomal backgrounds coevolved with mitochondria. We found coevolved pairs exhibited lower mortality risk relative to non-coevolved pairs. In contrast, no such pattern was observed when coevolved and non-coevolved pairs were placed alongside non-coevolved autosomes, as with previous studies. These data are consistent with Y-compensation and highlight the importance of autosomes in this capacity. However, we cannot fully exclude the possibility that Y-autosomal coevolution independent of mitochondrial mutations contributed to our results. Regardless, modern practices in medicine, conservation, and agriculture that introduce foreign Y-chromosomes into non-coevolved backgrounds should be used with caution, as they may disrupt Y-autosome coadaptation and/or inadvertently unbridle mother's curse.
Read full abstract