Abstract Introduction Due to the high prevalence of hypertensive blood pressure response to exercise (HER) during stress echocardiography (SE), the unclear prognostic significance, and the possible impact on SE results, it seems appropriate to analyze the prevalence of HER in outpatients and inpatients. Additionally, it is essential to identify the influence of HER on the results of the modern SE protocol. Aim To evaluate the incidence of HER during SE with physical activity on a treadmill or horizontal bicycle ergometer in patients and the impact of HER on the results of five-step SE. Materials and methods This single-center study included 193 patients who underwent five-step SE according to clinical indications. The steps in the protocol are as follows: Step A: Evaluates local contractility abnormalities; Step B: Assesses B-lines/diastolic function; Step C: Measures the contractile reserve of the left ventricle; Step D: Assesses the reserve coronary blood flow velocity in the anterior interventricular branch; Step E: Evaluates heart rate reserve. The blood pressure (BP) response to exercise was assessed as hypertensive with a systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥190 mm Hg on the treadmill and 200 mm Hg on a bicycle ergometer in women, and ≥210 mm Hg and 220 mm Hg, respectively, in men. Alternatively, HER was defined as an increase in SBP ≥180 mm Hg from the second stage of the test or when SBP rises relative to the baseline by ≥60 mm Hg in men and ≥50 mm Hg in women. The incidence of HER during the SE study and the relationship of HER with positive outcomes of the study protocol steps were examined. Results The prevalence of HER in patients undergoing SE was 36.3% (70 patients). Patients with HER were significantly more likely to have low exercise tolerance (p=0.013). Blood flow velocity in the coronary artery, both at rest and under load, and the amount of contractile reserve were significantly higher in patients with HER (p=0.009, p=0.008, and p=0.002, respectively). There was a trend towards a greater value of relative LV wall thickness in patients with HER (p=0.070). Among patients with HER, a decrease in contractile reserve was less common than among patients with an adequate blood pressure response: 45 (64.3%) versus 99 (80.5%) (p=0.013). Conclusion An excessive increase in blood pressure may be a limiting factor, leading to premature termination of testing. Patients with HER are significantly more likely to have poorer exercise tolerance and require more careful monitoring and control of risk factors. There is a relationship between the response of blood pressure to exercise and the results of SE, particularly the effect of peak blood pressure on contractile reserve. The relationship between BP response to exercise and SE steps, as well as its prognostic significance, requires further study.
Read full abstract