Background: Early recognition of sepsis is a critical challenge in emergency medicine, particularly in resource-constrained settings, where timely intervention is essential to improve patient outcomes. Objective: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of different Early Warning Scores (EWS), including the National Early Warning Score (NEWS), Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS), quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA), and Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS), in predicting outcomes such as mortality, ICU admission, and septic shock in the emergency departments of Pakistan. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted at the Emergency Department of Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar, from January to December 2024. Patients diagnosed with sepsis based on Sepsis-3 criteria were included. The predictive performance of each EWS was assessed using AUROC, logistic regression, and calibration plots. Results: NEWS demonstrated superior predictive accuracy for in-hospital mortality (AUROC: 0.873) and ICU admission (AUROC: 0.890) compared to MEWS, qSOFA, and SIRS. It showed robust sensitivity (88%) and specificity (75%) and was identified as an independent predictor of mortality and ICU admission through multivariate analysis. Conclusion: In resource-limited settings, NEWS proved to be the most effective tool for early risk stratification in sepsis patients. Its adoption could significantly enhance sepsis management and improve outcomes in emergency departments with constrained resources.
Read full abstract