Surgical Treatment Strategies Research Articles

Hereditary Colorectal Cancer: From Diagnosis to Surgical Options

AbstractHereditary colorectal cancer (CRC) syndromes account for up to 5% of CRC. Patients have an increased risk of CRC and extracolonic cancers, both of which develop at an early age. The main polyposis syndromes include familial adenomatous polyposis, MYH-associated polyposis, Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, juvenile polyposis syndrome, and PTEN hamartoma syndrome. The non-polyposis syndromes include Lynch syndrome and familial colorectal cancer type X. Each of the syndromes have distinct but sometimes overlapping phenotypes. Clinical evaluation and ultimately the underlying germline genetic pathogenic variants define the syndromes. Each syndrome has polyp, CRC, and extracolonic risks and management is based on early and timely surveillance with therapeutic and often extended prophylactic surgery. Surgical intervention strategies are individualized, considering not only the earlier onset of malignancies and heightened risks for metachronous cancers but also the patient's needs and quality of life. This article reviews the different diagnostic approaches to hereditary CRC and highlights subsequent disease-specific management and surgical decision-making strategies.

Circumferential correction of spinal deformity and instability secondary to bacterial spondylodiscitis

BackgroundSpinal deformity as a sequela of non-tuberculous spondylodiscitis is a rarely discussed clinical entity. Sagittal plane deformity, segmental instability, and persistently active infection overlap in these patients resulting in severe restriction in activity and quality of life. The presence of multiple medical co-morbidities restricts surgical options but nonoperative care may be ineffective and result in persistent, refractory discitis for years. We describe our experience with vertebrectomy and long-segment fixation for patients with post-infectious thoracic or lumbar deformity. MethodsA retrospective chart review of 23 consecutive patients who underwent vertebrectomy and long-segment fixation for thoracic or lumbar deformity secondary to nontuberculous bacterial spondylodiscitis was performed. Pre-, peri- and postoperative data is compiled and analyzed with a focus on the perioperative management algorithm to safely perform an extensive reconstruction in this very sick patient population. ResultsExtremely low preoperative quality of life was evident with 87% (20/23) of patients bedridden primarily due to pain despite 70% (16/23) of patients being strong enough to ambulate (Frankel D or E). Most patients (87%) already had an identified infection under adequate treatment either through blood cultures, prior biopsy or decompressive surgery. A single-stage posterior-only was the primary surgical approach utilized in the majority (83%) of cases. Complications were present in 100% of patients, most commonly perioperative anemia and hypotension requiring vasopressor support and aggressive blood product replacement. One in-hospital mortality occurred secondarily to pulmonary embolism. Mean preoperative segmental angle was 18±10 degrees of kyphosis which was corrected to 1±9 degrees of lordosis (p=0.001). The mean correction of the segmental angle was 19 degrees (standard deviation 23 degrees). Visual analogue scale scores improved from a pre-operative value of 8.8±0.9 to a post-operative value of 2.5±1.4 (p<0.001), which was obtained at the last outpatient follow-up (mean 631 days after surgery). Full self-care including ambulation was achieved in 18/23 (78%) patients, and the infection was successfully treated in 22/23 (96%) patients after long-term antibiotics. ConclusionsPatients with refractory spondylodiscitis on appropriate care and antibiotics are typically considered extremely poor surgical candidates despite non-operative care often being ineffective. Post-infectious deformity may also be so severe as to preclude a limited surgical treatment strategy. This study suggests that extensive circumferential reconstruction for deformity secondary to bacterial spondylodiscitis can be effective in restoring these extremely sick patients to self-care and ambulatory status.

Multimodality imaging applications in the diagnosis of and surgical treatment strategy for intravenous leiomyomatosis: a case description and literature analysis

Multimodality imaging applications in the diagnosis of and surgical treatment strategy for intravenous leiomyomatosis: a case description and literature analysis

Non-invasive imaging techniques for diagnosis of pelvic deep endometriosis and endometriosis classification systems: an International Consensus Statement.

The International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) and International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group, the European Endometriosis League (EEL), the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE), the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE), the International Society for Gynecologic Endoscopy (ISGE), the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists (AAGL) and the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) elected an international, multidisciplinary panel of gynecological surgeons, sonographers and radiologists, including a steering committee, which searched the literature for relevant articles in order to review the literature and provide evidence‐based and clinically relevant statements on the use of imaging techniques for non‐invasive diagnosis and classification of pelvic deep endometriosis. Preliminary statements were drafted based on review of the relevant literature. Following two rounds of revisions and voting orchestrated by chairs of the participating societies, consensus statements were finalized. A final version of the document was then resubmitted to the society chairs for approval. Twenty statements were drafted, of which 14 reached strong and three moderate agreement after the first voting round. The remaining three statements were discussed by all members of the steering committee and society chairs and rephrased, followed by an additional round of voting. At the conclusion of the process, 14 statements had strong and five statements moderate agreement, with one statement left in equipoise. This consensus work aims to guide clinicians involved in treating women with suspected endometriosis during patient assessment, counseling and planning of surgical treatment strategies

Non-invasive imaging techniques for diagnosis of pelvic deep endometriosis and endometriosis classification systems: an International Consensus Statement.

The International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) and International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group, the European Endometriosis League (EEL), the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE), ESHRE, the International Society for Gynecologic Endoscopy (ISGE), the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists (AAGL) and the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) elected an international, multidisciplinary panel of gynecological surgeons, sonographers, and radiologists, including a steering committee, which searched the literature for relevant articles in order to review the literature and provide evidence-based and clinically relevant statements on the use of imaging techniques for non-invasive diagnosis and classification of pelvic deep endometriosis. Preliminary statements were drafted based on review of the relevant literature. Following two rounds of revisions and voting orchestrated by chairs of the participating societies, consensus statements were finalized. A final version of the document was then resubmitted to the society chairs for approval. Twenty statements were drafted, of which 14 reached strong and three moderate agreement after the first voting round. The remaining three statements were discussed by all members of the steering committee and society chairs and rephrased, followed by an additional round of voting. At the conclusion of the process, 14 statements had strong and five statements moderate agreement, with one statement left in equipoise. This consensus work aims to guide clinicians involved in treating women with suspected endometriosis during patient assessment, counselling, and planning of surgical treatment strategies.

Low-grade glioma of the temporal lobe and tumor-related epilepsy in children.

Low-grade glioma is the most common brain tumor among children and adolescents. When these tumors arise in the temporal lobe, patients frequently present with seizures that are poorly controlled with antiepileptic drugs. Here we summarize the clinical features, pathophysiology, preoperative evaluation, surgical treatment, and outcomes of pediatric patients with low-grade gliomas in the temporal lobe. We reviewed the literature on pediatric low-grade gliomas in the temporal lobe, focusing on cohort studies and systematic reviews that described surgical treatment strategies and reported both oncologic and epilepsy outcomes. The differential diagnoses of pediatric low-grade gliomas in the temporal lobe include ganglioglioma, dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumor, desmoplastic infantile ganglioglioma, papillary glioneuronal tumor, pilocytic astrocytoma, pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma, angiocentric glioma, and polymorphous low-grade neuroepithelial tumor of the young. There is no consensus on the optimal surgical approach for these tumors: lesionectomy alone, or extended lesionectomy with anterior temporal lobectomy, with or without removal of mesial temporal structures. Gross total resection and shorter preoperative duration of epilepsy are strongly associated with favorable seizure outcomes, defined as Engel Class I or Class II, approaching 90% in most series. The risk of surgical complications ranges from 4 to 17%, outweighing the lifetime risks of medically refractory epilepsy. Pediatric patients with temporal low-grade glioma and tumor-related epilepsy are best managed by a multidisciplinary epilepsy surgery team. Early and appropriate surgery leads to prolonged survival and a greater likelihood of seizure freedom, improving their overall quality of life.

Surgical Treatment Strategy of Functional Tricuspid Regurgitation

Surgical Treatment Strategy of Functional Tricuspid Regurgitation

Assessment of Safe Early Fixation Strategies in a Cohort Polytraumatized Patients – How is the Surgical Treatment Influenced by the Injury Pattern?

Abstract Background While the inital assessment and the intial treatment of potentially life-threatening injuries is well-described, the surgical treatment strategy following initial resuscitation remains controversial. Timepoint of surgery and type of surgery still reamin topic of discussions. Various, different strategies for optimal timing of fracture fixation in polytrauma patients exist. Aims This study tests the hypothesis that a concept of clearing patients for early definitive surgery that relies on anatomical and physiologic parameters is influenced by the injury distribution. Methods Polytrauma patients treated at a Level 1 trauma center (01.01.2016 - 31.12.2018). Inclusion: primary admission, injury severity score (ISS) ≥16points, requirement of surgical fixation of major extremity or a truncal injury. Exclusion: death &amp;lt;72h after admission, severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Stratification according to surgical fixation concept: Early total care (ETC, all surgeries &amp;lt;24 h), safe definitive surgery (SDS, staged surgeries &amp;lt;72h), and damage control orthopaedics (DCO, definitive care after stabilization). Endpoints: mortality, complication rates. Parameters of interest: Injury severity and distribution (ISS/AIS), pathophysiologic parameters of hemorrhagic shock, coagulopathy, hypothermia, soft tissue trauma. Results 527 patients, mean age 54.8 SD19.9 years, mean ISS 26.9 SD9.0 points, mortality 20.5%. Group ETC (n=21, 3.9%), Group SDS (n = 284, 53.9%), Group DCO (n = 222, 42.1%). Abdominal and spinal injuries associated with ETC (AIS Abdomen; OR 2.1, 95%CI 1.1 to 4.0, p = 0.026: AIS Spine OR 2.0, 95%CI 1.2 to 3.4, p = 0.007). Extremity and pelvic injuries associated with SDS (OR 1.8, 95%CI 1.1 to 2.8, p = 0.012 and OR 1.3, 95%CI 1.0 to 1.7, p = 0.036), head injuries associated with DCO (OR1.5, 95%CI 1.3 to 1.8, p &amp;lt;0.001). Head injuries were most relevant for mortality and were associated with patients undergoing DCO (29.7%) (ETC; 23.8%, SDS; 13.0%). Conclusion The concept of staged early fixation for major extremity and axial injuries (SDS) was successfully applied in the majority of patients. Predominant head and abdominal injuries were associated with ETC or DCO. The injury distribution influences decision making towards surgical management that is associated with a low complication rate.

Surgical Treatment Strategies for Residual or Recurrent Intracranial Aneurysms Following Endovascular Embolization.

To explore how to effectively manage the residual or recurrent intracranial aneurysms after embolization. The authors retrospectively reviewed our experience of endovascular interventional therapy, surgical clipping, and cerebrovascular bypass surgery in the treatment of residual or recurrent aneurysms after embolization at the authors' institution from 2018 to 2022. The Glasgow Outcome Scale of 28 patients after the procedure and at discharge showed that 24 recovered well, 3 had severe disability, and 1 died. During the 24-month follow-up, 26 had a good recovery, 1 suffered from disability, and 1 died. Two cases of aneurysm recurrence were detected, and both were treated through endovascular therapy. Among them, 1 case underwent a repeat endovascular embolization, and 1 case was switched to surgical clipping. No residual aneurysms were observed in the remaining patients who underwent bypass surgery, and their bypass grafts were all patent. Based on the clinical status of patients, aneurysmal characteristics, surgical risk, and possibility of rerupture of aneurysms, an individualized strategy was proposed for residual or recurrent aneurysms after embolization. The use of endovascular interventional therapy or surgical clipping can be safely and effectively managed, and cerebrovascular bypass surgery can effectively manage complex aneurysms.

Assessing the benefits of repeated esophagogastroduodenoscopy at a specialized center before gastric and esophageal cancer surgery.

The surgical treatment of gastric and esophageal cancer in Denmark is centralized in four specialized esophagogastric cancer (EGC) centers. Patients are referred after an esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) at a secondary healthcare facility. The EGD is repeated at the specialized EGC center before determining a surgical treatment strategy. This multicenter retrospective study aimed to investigate the quality of EGDs performed at a secondary healthcare facility and evaluate the clinical value of repeated EGD at a specialized center when determining the surgical treatment strategy. Patients from three of the four centers, who underwent esophagectomy or gastrectomy with curative intent from 1 June 2016 to 1 May 2021, were included. EGD reports from the referral facilities and EGC centers were compared based on a predefined checklist. Furthermore, endoscopist experience, the time between examinations, and histology were registered. Finally, it was assessed whether the specialized EGD led to any substantial changes in surgical treatment. Baseline characteristics and differences in EGD reports were described and McNemar's chi-square test was performed. A logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify risk factors for a change in surgical strategy. The study included 953 patients who underwent both an initial EGD and EGD at referral to a specialized center. In 644 cases (68%), the information from the initial EGD was considered insufficient concerning preoperative tumor information. In 113 (12%) cases, the findings in the specialized EGD would lead to a significant alteration in the surgical strategy compared with the primary EGD. The findings suggest that repeated EGD at a specialized center is of clinical value and helps ensure proper surgical treatment for patients undergoing curative surgery for gastroesophageal cancer.

Non-Invasive Imaging Techniques for Diagnosis of Pelvic Deep Endometriosis and Endometriosis Classification Systems: An International Consensus Statement

The International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) and International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group, the European Endometriosis League (EEL), the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE), the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE), the International Society for Gynecologic Endoscopy (ISGE), the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists (AAGL) and the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) elected an international, multidisciplinary panel of gynecological surgeons, sonographers and radiologists, including a steering committee, which searched the literature for relevant articles in order to review the literature and provide evidence-based and clinically relevant statements on the use of imaging techniques for non-invasive diagnosis and classification of pelvic deep endometriosis. Preliminary statements were drafted based on review of the relevant literature. Following two rounds of revisions and voting orchestrated by chairs of the participating societies, consensus statements were finalized. A final version of the document was then resubmitted to the society chairs for approval. Twenty statements were drafted, of which 14 reached strong and three moderate agreement after the first voting round. The remaining three statements were discussed by all members of the steering committee and society chairs and rephrased, followed by an additional round of voting. At the conclusion of the process, 14 statements had strong and five statements moderate agreement, with one statement left in equipoise. This consensus work aims to guide clinicians involved in treating women with suspected endometriosis during patient assessment, counseling and planning of surgical treatment strategies.

Non-invasive imaging techniques for diagnosis of pelvic deep endometriosis and endometriosis classification systems: an International Consensus Statement.

The International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) and International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group, the European Endometriosis League (EEL), the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE), the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE), the International Society for Gynecologic Endoscopy (ISGE), the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists (AAGL) and the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) elected an international, multidisciplinary panel of gynecological surgeons, sonographers and radiologists, including a steering committee, which searched the literature for relevant articles in order to review the literature and provide evidence-based and clinically relevant statements on the use of imaging techniques for non-invasive diagnosis and classification of pelvic deep endometriosis. Preliminary statements were drafted based on a review of the relevant literature. Following two rounds of revisions and voting orchestrated by chairs of the participating societies, consensus statements were finalized. A final version of the document was then resubmitted to the society chairs for approval. Twenty statements were drafted, of which 14 reached strong and three moderate agreement after the first voting round. The remaining three statements were discussed by all members of the steering committee and society chairs and rephrased, followed by an additional round of voting. At the conclusion of the process, 14 statements had strong and five statements moderate agreement, with one statement left in equipoise. This consensus work aims to guide clinicians involved in treating women with suspected endometriosis during patient assessment, counselling and planning of surgical treatment strategies.

Treatment and prognosis study of spontaneous rupture hemorrhage in hepatocellular carcinoma: Recommendations for adding the A1 stage to the BCLC staging system.

The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system is an internationally recognized clinical staging system for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, this staging system does not address the staging and surgical treatment strategies for patients with spontaneous rupture hemorrhage in HCC. In this study, we aimed to investigate the prognosis of patients with BCLC stage A undergoing liver resection for HCC with spontaneous rupture hemorrhage and compare it with the prognosis of patients with BCLC stage A undergoing liver resection without rupture. Clinical data of 99 patients with HCC who underwent curative liver resection surgery were rigorously followed up and treated at Shandong Provincial Hospital from January 2013 to January 2023. A retrospective cohort study design was used to determine whether the presence of ruptured HCC (rHCC) is a risk factor for recurrence and survival after curative liver resection for HCC. Prognostic comparisons were made between patients with ruptured and non-ruptured BCLC stage A HCC (rHCC and nrHCC, respectively) who underwent curative liver resection. rHCC (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.974, [p] = 0.016) and tumor diameter greater than 5 cm (HR = 2.819, p = 0.022) were identified as independent risk factors for overall survival (OS) after curative resection of BCLC stage A HCC. The postoperative OS of the spontaneous rupture in the HCC group (Group I) was shorter than that in the BCLC stage A group (Group II) (p = 0.008). Tumor invasion without penetration of the capsule was determined to be an independent risk factor for recurrence-free survival (RFS) after liver resection for HCC (HR = 2.584, p = 0.002). HCC with concurrent spontaneous rupture hemorrhage is an independent risk factor for postoperative OS after liver resection. TheBCLC stage A1 should be added to complement the current BCLC staging system to provide further guidance for the treatment of patients with spontaneous rupture of HCC.

Comparative analysis of liver resection in Non-B Non-C and hepatitis virus-associated hepatocellular carcinoma

BackgroundThe incidence of non-hepatitis B and non-hepatitis C hepatocellular carcinoma (NBNC-HCC) is increasing in our country. This study assesses the feasibility of employing an identical surgical treatment strategy for resectable NBNC-HCC as that for hepatitis virus-associated HCC (HV-HCC). MethodsA retrospective analysis (1993–2023) of 1321 curative liver resections for HCC at a single institution was performed. Propensity score matching ensured a balanced comparison of preoperative clinical factors, including tumor status and background liver condition. ResultsThe proportion of NBNC-HCC cases has gradually increased, reaching up to 70 %. After matching, 294 of 473 NBNC-HCC patients and 294 of 848 HV-HCC patients were compared. Operative outcomes, including operation time, blood loss, type of surgical procedure, and morbidity, were comparable. Long-term outcome analysis showed similar recurrence-free survival (HR: 0.86, 95 % CI: 0.70–1.06, P = 0.167) and overall survival (HR: 0.98, 95 % CI: 0.79–1.23, P = 0.865) for NBNC-HCC. Multivariable analysis identified ICGR15 ≥ 15 %, ALBI grade 2 or 3, aspartate aminotransferase ≥40, tumor size > 5 cm, multiple tumors, macrovascular invasion, and microvascular invasion as independent prognostic factors for overall survival, while hepatitis B or C virus status lost significance. ConclusionsDespite the increasing incidence of NBNC-HCC, comparable outcomes were achieved between the two groups of matched cohort.

Outcomes of surgical treatment for enterovesical fistula in Crohn's disease.

Enterovesical fistula (EVF) in Crohn's disease (CD) often does not improve with medical treatment and requires surgical treatment. The surgical treatment strategy for EVF in CD is definitive resection of the intestinal tract side, and performing a leak test using dye injection into the bladder after EVF dissection to determine the appropriate surgical procedure for the bladder side. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of surgical treatment for EVF in CD. Twenty-one patients who underwent surgery for EVF between 2006 and 2021 were included and retrospectively evaluated for clinical background, surgical procedures, and postoperative complications. The most common origin of EVF was the ileum (17 cases; 81%), and the most common site of EVF formation was the apex (12; 57%). Surgical approaches were laparotomy in 11 (52%) cases and laparoscopy in 10 (48%). Surgical procedures on the bladder side were fistula dissection in 13 (62%) cases and sutured closure of fistula in 8 (38%). A comparison of approaches revealed no significant difference in operative time, but the amount of blood loss was significantly less in the laparoscopy (p < 0.01). There was no significant difference in the occurrence of postoperative complications between approaches. Postoperative anti-TNF-α antibody agents were used in 17 (81%) cases, and there were no cases of recurrent EVF. In conclusion, definitive resection of the intestinal tract and minimal treatment on the bladder side were sufficient to achieve satisfactory outcomes for EVF in CD.

Comparison of the efficacy of different surgical strategies in the treatment of patients with initially resectable gastric cancer liver metastases

Objective: To examine the impact of varied surgical treatment strategies on the prognosis of patients with initial resectable gastric cancer liver metastases (IR-GCLM). Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study. Employing a retrospective cohort design, the study selected clinicopathological data from the national multi-center retrospective cohort study database, focusing on 282 patients with IR-GCLM who underwent surgical intervention between January 2010 and December 2019. There were 231 males and 51 males, aging (M(IQR)) 61 (14) years (range: 27 to 80 years). These patients were stratified into radical and palliative treatment groups based on treatment decisions. Survival curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method and distinctions in survival rates were assessed using the Log-rank test. The Cox risk regression model evaluated HR for various factors, controlling for confounders through multivariate analysis to comprehensively evaluate the influence of surgery on the prognosis of IR-GCLM patients. A restricted cubic spline Cox proportional hazard model assessed and delineated intricate associations between measured variables and prognosis. At the same time, the X-tile served as an auxiliary tool to identify critical thresholds in the survival analysis for IR-GCLM patients. Subgroup analysis was then conducted to identify potential beneficiary populations in different surgical treatments. Results: (1) The radical group comprised 118 patients, all undergoing R0 resection or local physical therapy of primary and metastatic lesions. The palliative group comprised 164 patients, with 52 cases undergoing palliative resections for gastric primary tumors and liver metastases, 56 cases undergoing radical resections for gastric primary tumors only, 45 cases undergoing palliative resections for gastric primary tumors, and 11 cases receiving palliative treatments for liver metastases. A statistically significant distinction was observed between the groups regarding the site and the number of liver metastases (both P<0.05). (2) The median overall survival (OS) of the 282 patients was 22.7 months (95%CI: 17.8 to 27.6 months), with 1-year and 3-year OS rates were 65.4% and 35.6%, respectively. The 1-year OS rates for patients in the radical surgical group and palliative surgical group were 68.3% and 63.1%, while the corresponding 3-year OS rates were 42.2% and 29.9%, respectively. A comparison of OS between the two groups showed no statistically significant difference (P=0.254). Further analysis indicated that patients undergoing palliative gastric cancer resection alone had a significantly worse prognosis compared to other surgical options (HR=1.98, 95%CI: 1.21 to 3.24, P=0.006). (3) The size of the primary gastric tumor significantly influenced the patients' prognosis (HR=2.01, 95%CI: 1.45 to 2.79, P<0.01), with HR showing a progressively increasing trend as tumor size increased. (4) Subgroup analysis indicates that radical treatment may be more effective compared to palliative treatment in the following specific cases: well/moderately differentiated tumors (HR=2.84, 95%CI 1.49 to 5.41, P=0.001), and patients with liver metastases located in the left lobe of the liver (HR=2.06, 95%CI 1.19 to 3.57, P=0.010). Conclusions: In patients with IR-GCLM, radical surgery did not produce a significant improvement in the overall prognosis compared to palliative surgery. However, within specific patient subgroups (well/moderately differentiated tumors, and patients with liver metastases located in the left lobe of the liver), radical treatment can significantly improve prognosis compared to palliative approaches.

Validity of a preoperative scoring system for surgical management of periprosthetic hip infection: one-stage vs. two-stage revision.

There are no widely accepted algorithms for determining optimal treatment for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Our study aimed to confirm the validity of a previously published scoring system in a larger number of patients to support a rational surgical treatment strategy for periprosthetic hip infection. Between February 2001 and December 2020, we performed 155 consecutive revision total hip arthroplasties (THAs) for PJI, with mean follow-up of 6 years. One-stage revision THA was performed in 56 hips and two-stage revision THA in 99 hips. Prosthesis survival from recurrent infection was determined by Kaplan-Meier analysis, using implant removal as the endpoint. The pre-operative scoring system (full score of 12 points), including 6 essential elements, was retrospectively evaluated. The 10-year survival rates were 98% for one-stage (95% confidence interval [CI], 94-100) and 87% (95% CI, 79-96) for two-stage revision THA. Multivariate Cox regression analysis provided a total preoperative score as an independent risk factor for implant removal (hazard ratio, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.06-0.49; p < 0.001). The sensitivity and specificity at the cut-off of 4 points on the scoring system were 80% and 91%, respectively. The average score for one-stage revision THA in successful and failed cases were 8.9 and 6.0, and for two-stage revision THA were 6.5 and 3.9, respectively. We found significant differences between successful cases in one- and two-stage revision THA (p < 0.05). The preoperative scoring system was useful for managing PJI. One-stage revision THA is recommended in patients scoring ≥ 9 points, and meticulously performed two-stage revision THA is encouraged for patients scoring ≥ 4 points.

"Pressure kills kidneys": protection of the upper urinary tract through neuro-urological management

Low compliance is not an independent disease but a severe manifestation resulting from various disorders of the storage and excretory function of the bladder. Reduced distensibility of the detrusor muscle can lead to a pressure load on the upper urinary tract but also to urge-dominant LUTS and urinary tract infections. Neurogenic causes, especially spinal cord injury/spina bifida but also iatrogenic damage or subvesical obstruction, can contribute to the development. This article is intended to provide information about the epidemiology and complex pathogenetic mechanisms as well as the necessary diagnostic steps. Various medical, interventional and surgical treatment strategies are evaluated on the basis of current scientific findings, thus supporting the reader in the care of this complex patient group.

Holistic approaches to living well with endometriosis

Endometriosis is a common chronic condition for which there is currently no cure. Those suffering from endometriosis-related pelvic pain (ERPP) may struggle with side effects and/or risks presented by conventional medical and surgical treatment strategies, or not get pain relief. Increasing numbers of endometriosis patients wish to explore holistic management with fewer side effects, however it is important that medical professionals maintain an evidence-based practice for recommended treatments. We present up-to-date evidence of holistic strategies used for managing ERPP including nutritional strategies, body and mind therapies, acupuncture, traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) and the use of adjunct devices such as phallus length reducers and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). Recent findings Nutrition: Gluten-free, low-nickel and high intake of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids diets improve ERPP. Low FODMAP (fermentable oligo-, di-, monosaccharides and polyols) is helpful in those with concurrent irritable bowel syndrome. Body and mind: Cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) is particularly beneficial in postoperative pain reduction, whilst mindfulness has been shown to reduce pain scores and dyschezia. Progressive muscle relaxation therapy and regular yoga sessions improve ERPP and Quality of life. Acupuncture: 15 randomised control trials assessing acupuncture and moxibustion show improved pain scores when compared to those receiving conventional therapies alone. Adjunct devices: TENS improves deep dyspareunia and lessens the number of days pain is experienced. Conclusions Holistic management strategies for ERPP should be incorporated into routine counselling when discussing conservative, medical and or surgical treatments for endometriosis. The growing evidence presented for the use of holistic management strategies gives hope to those patients who cannot have, or don’t respond to conventional approaches and as an adjunct alongside standard treatments.

Surgical strategies for treatment of endometriosis

Surgical strategies for treatment of endometriosis