Over past four decades, scholars in southern studies have images of two different Lillian Smiths. (1) The first is Smith liberal humanist, moralist, and therapist, whose worldview derives equally from secularized vision of Christian brotherhood and spiritualized vision of psychoanalysis. She believes in universal human nature, affirms aesthetic value but not ontological reality of difference, and regards equality as human birthright, something that would be self-evident had not neuroses and oppressive social structures--above all, the race/sex/sin spiral endemic to southern culture (Killers 121)--poisoned otherwise spontaneous and healthy relationships. Fond of tributes to human spirit and possessing what Jay Garcia calls transnational dimensions (60), Smith frames South's predicament within global anticolonial struggles and, more abstractly, within imperative that she calls the Twentieth Century dialogue ... [of] relationships not systems (Killers 233). Though committed to civil rights movement and possessing indubitable moral courage, she believes that lasting social change will come neither as result of pragmatic efforts to seize power, nor as consequence of more accurate theory, but rather as sum of individual awakenings, as oppressors and oppressed discover their mutual humanity and learn to form constructive relationships. This is Smith portrayed by Richard King, who finds in her work a moral authority that far outweighed her institutional connections (176), and from different vantage point by Mab Segrest, who lauds her as an important lesbian precursor to contemporary Southern women's literature of wholeness (40). And while this Smith, assimilable to mainstream liberalism of mid-twentieth century, is undoubtedly appealing, she also stands accused of essentialism, naivete, and platitude. Moreover, moral and therapeutic lens through which she views sexuality threatens to render it unsexy, as does soporific earnestness of her prose style. The second Lillian Smith, on other hand, is savvy and transgressive, dissector and connoisseur of grotesque who anticipates obsessions of early twenty-first century academy and reveals, even against her intentions, ideological charade of liberal humanism--all while secretly suspecting, like an appropriately disillusioned post-1968 intellectual, futility of any alternative political program. This Smith, McKay Jenkins claims, is fully engaged with notions that are now considered staples of postmodern racial thought, that constructions of 'Otherness' ... are not only not apart from subject but are located specifically within subject, are indeed something on which subject depends for its very existence (123). One implication of such claim is that Smith resembles Cathy Caruth more than Freud, refusing fantasy that one might ever assimilate one's traumas or be cured of one's neuroses. No matter how often her writing waxes universal and holds out possibility of healed humanity, she does not transcend horrific particularity of South, for her experience--indeed, her body--cannot permit it. In Patricia Yaeger's words, For Smith, to be white southerner is to know and be grotesque--to overwrite, overread, and participate in an economy of cruelty, defensiveness, reaction formation, and overcompensation (246-247). However one might strive against one's immersion in racist system, there can be no escape from grotesque as self-stunting habitus (247), delicious, frightening riddle, space of permeable, ongoing disturbance (249). Whereas first Smith seems like Church Lady, this one seems like an S&M enthusiast. Both of these versions of Smith draw much of their justification from Strange Fruit and Killers of Dream, which remain her most widely-read texts. Their popularity is understandable, for interlocking problems at center of two works--racism, segregation, sexual repression, misogyny and its mirror image, gyneolatry--may indeed be investigated either as crimes that arise when difference is elevated to an essence and made to obscure common humanity, or as illustrations of how differences, no matter how constructed they may be, remain intractably vexing, alluring, and as real as blow to spine. …
Read full abstract