Straight Electrode Array Research Articles

Is the Position of the Basal-Most Electrode Depending on Electrode Array Design and Influencing Postoperative Speech Perception? A Retrospective Analysis of 495 Ears.

The objective of this study is to examine the influence of electrode array design on the position of the basal-most electrode in cochlear implant (CI) surgery and therefore the stimulability of the basal cochlea. Specifically, we evaluated the angular insertion depth of the basal-most electrode in perimodiolar and straight electrode arrays in relation to postoperative speech perception. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 495 patients between 2013 and 2018 using the Cochlear™ Contour Advance® (CA), Cochlear™ Slim Straight® (SSA), or Cochlear™ Slim Modiolar® (SMA) electrode arrays, as well as the MED-EL Flex24 (F24), MED-EL Flex28 (F28), and MED-EL FlexSoft (F31.5) electrode arrays. Cochlear size and the position of the basal-most electrode were measured using rotational tomography or cone beam computed tomography, and the results were compared with postoperative speech perception in monosyllables and numbers. The straight electrode arrays, specifically the F31.5 (31.5 mm length) and the F28 (28 mm length), exhibited a significantly greater angular insertion depth of the basal-most electrode. No significant correlation was found between cochlear morphology measurements and the position of the basal-most electrode artifact. Cochleostomy-inserted electrode arrays showed a significantly higher insertion depth of the basal-most electrode. Nevertheless, the position of the basal-most electrode did not have a significant impact on postoperative speech perception. Straight electrode arrays with longer lengths achieved deeper angular insertion depths of the basal-most electrode. Cochlear morphology does not have a substantial influence on the position of basal-most electrode. The study confirms that the basal area of the cochlea, responsible for high-frequency range during acoustic stimulation, is not the primary region for speech understanding via electrical stimulation with CI.

Towards inferring positioning of straight cochlear-implant electrode arrays during insertion using real-time impedance sensing.

Cochlear-implant electrode arrays (EAs) are currently inserted with limited feedback, and impedance sensing has recently shown promise for EA localisation. We investigate the use of impedance sensing to infer the progression of an EA during insertion. We show that the access resistance component of bipolar impedance sensing can detect when a straight EA reaches key anatomical locations in a plastic cochlea and when each electrode contact enters/exits the cochlea. We also demonstrate that dual-sided electrode contacts can provide useful proximity information and show the real-time relationship between impedance and wall proximity in a cadaveric cochlea for the first time. The access resistance component of bipolar impedance sensing has high potential for estimating positioning information of EAs relative to anatomy during insertion. Main limitations of this work include using saline as a surrogate for human perilymph in ex vivo models and using only one type of EA.

The association between electrode impedance and short-term outcomes in cochlear implant recipients of slim modiolar and slim straight electrode arrays

Objectives Electrode impedance measurements from cochlear implants (CI) reflect the status of the electrode array as well as the surrounding cochlear environment, and could provide a clinical index of functional changes with the CI. The goals of this study were to examine (1) the impact of electrode array type on electrode impedance, and (2) the relationship between electrode impedance and short-term hearing preservation and speech recognition outcomes. Methods Retrospective study of 115 adult hearing preservation CI recipients of a slim modiolar or slim straight array. Common ground electrode impedances, pre- and post-operative hearing thresholds and CNC word recognition scores were retrieved. Results Electrode impedances were significantly higher for recipients of the straight electrode array. Within individuals, electrode impedances were stable after the first week post-activation. However, increased standard deviation of electrode impedances was associated with greater loss of low frequency hearing at initial activation, and with poorer speech recognition at 6 months post-implantation. Conclusions Results demonstrate that electrode impedances depend on the type of implanted array. Findings also suggest that there may be a role for the variability in electrode impedance across electrodes as an indicator of changes in the intracochlear environment that contribute to outcomes with a CI.

Features of processor fitting in patients with different types of cochlear implant electrode array

Introduction. The results of cochlear implantation in patients with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss are influenced by many factors, including the type of electrode array. The location of the electrodes in relation to neurons of spiral ganglion affects on levels of perception of the patient's hearing sensations.Aim. To evaluate the dependence of electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) thresholds values and comfortable levels depends on electrode array type.Materials and methods. 26 patients with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss with cochlear implantation systems were examined. The patients were divided into 2 groups: 1) patients with a straight electrode array (n = 14); 2) patients with a perimodiolar electrode array (n = 12). We tested speech intelligibility and ECAP thresholds. The difference in the values of both parameters was estimated.Results. For both groups of patients, the relationship between the threshold's profiles of ECAP thresholds and maximum comfortable stimulation levels was detected. For patients from the first group (straight electrode array), the differences in values between the studied parameters were 30.6 ± 6.1%. In patients from the second group, the differences in the values of the thresholds for ECAP thresholds and the levels of comfortable stimulation ranged 2.4 ± 2.1%.Conclusion. The perimodiolar electrode array is located closer to the neurons of the spiral ganglion, which may explain the greater relationship between the values of the ECAP thresholds and the levels of comfortable stimulation. This pattern must be considered when programming the processor of the cochlear implantation system.

Electrode array positioning after cochlear reimplantation from single manufacturer

Objective To investigate whether revision surgery with the same device results in a change in three key indicators of electrode positioning: scalar location, mean modiolar distance (), and angular insertion depth (AID). Methods Retrospective analysis of a cochlear implant database at a university-based tertiary medical center. Intra-operative CT scans were obtained after initial and revision implantation. Electrode array (EA) position was calculated using auto-segmentation techniques. Initial and revision scalar location, , and AID were compared. Results Mean change in for all ears was −0.07 mm (SD 0.24 mm; P = 0.16). The mean change in AID for all ears was −5° (SD 67°; P = 0.72). Three initial implantations with pre-curved EAs resulted in a translocation from Scala Tympani (ST) to Scala Vestibuli (SV). Two remained translocated after revision, while one was corrected when revised with a straight EA. An additional five translocations occurred after revision. Conclusions In this study examining revision cochlear implantation from a single manufacturer, we demonstrated no significant change in key indicators of EA positioning, even when revising with a different style of electrode. However, the revision EA is not necessarily confined by the initial trajectory and there may be an increased risk of translocation.

Intraoperative Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential Growth and Maximum Amplitudes in Hearing Preservation Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Electrically evoked compound action potentials (eCAPs) obtained from cochlear implant (CI) recipients reflect responsiveness of the auditory nerve to electrical stimulation. The recent use of atraumatic electrode arrays and expansion of CI candidacy to listeners with greater residual hearing may lead to increased clinical utility of intraoperative eCAP recordings. To examine the effect of electrode array (slim modiolar versus slim straight) on suprathreshold intraoperative eCAP recordings in hearing preservation CI recipients. A secondary goal was to examine potential clinical applications of intraoperative eCAPs for predicting immediate hearing preservation and speech perception outcomes. Retrospective study of 113 adult hearing preservation CI candidates implanted from 2015 to 2019 with either a slim modiolar or slim straight electrode array. Intraoperative eCAP growth functions and maximum amplitudes were obtained at several intracochlear electrodes and examined as a function of implanted array and hearing preservation status, while controlling for electrode impedance. From basal to apical electrodes, progressively larger eCAP amplitudes and steeper slopes were recorded. Steeper eCAP slopes at apical electrodes were also seen for recipients of the slim modiolar array (versus slim straight). Suprathreshold eCAP responses did not differ as a function of hearing preservation and were not associated with speech recognition. More robust eCAP responses were obtained from apical electrodes, which is consistent with better low-frequency thresholds in hearing preservation recipients. This effect was compounded by type of electrode array. Results also suggest that intraoperative, suprathreshold eCAPs cannot be used to predict the success of hearing preservation surgery or performance with the CI.

OPTIMISING THE PARAMETERS OF COCHLEAR IMPLANT IMAGING WITH CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY.

With computed tomography (CT), the delicate structures of the inner ear may be hard to visualise, which a cochlear implant (CI) electrode array can further complicate. The usefulness of a novel cone-beam CT device in CI recipient's inner ear imaging was evaluated and the exposure parameters were optimised to attain adequate clinical image quality at the lowest effective dose (ED). Six temporal bones were implanted with a Cochlear Slim Straight electrode array and imaged with six different imaging protocols. Contrast-to-noise ratio was calculated for each imaging protocol, and three observers evaluated independently the image quality of each imaging protocol and temporal bone. The overall image quality of the inner ear structures did not differ between the imaging protocols and the most relevant inner ear structures of CI recipient's inner ear can be visualised with a low ED. To visualise the most delicate structures in the inner ear, imaging protocols with higher radiation exposure may be required.

Dynamic Behavior and Insertional Forces of a Precurved Electrode Using the Pull-Back Technique in a Fresh Microdissected Cochlea.

This study evaluated the utility of the pull-back technique in improving perimodiolar positioning of a precurved cochlear implant (CI) electrode array (EA) with simultaneous insertion force profile measurement and direct observation of dynamic EA behavior. Precurved EAs with perimodiolar positioning have improved outcomes compared with straight EAs because of lowered charge requirements for stimulation and decreased spread of excitation. The safety and efficacy of the pull-back technique in further improving perimodiolar positioning and its associated force profile have not been adequately demonstrated. The bone overlying the scala vestibuli was removed in 15 fresh cadaveric temporal bones, leaving the scala tympani unviolated. Robotic insertions of EAs were performed with simultaneous force measurement and video recording. Force profiles were obtained during standard insertion, overinsertion, and pull-back. Postinsertion CT scans were obtained during each of the three conditions, enabling automatic segmentation and calculation of angular insertion depth, mean perimodiolar distance ( Mavg ), and cochlear duct length. Overinsertion did not result in significantly higher peak forces than standard insertion (mean [SD], 0.18 [0.06] and 0.14 [0.08] N; p = 0.18). Six temporal bones (40%) demonstrated visibly improved perimodiolar positioning after the protocol, whereas none worsened. Mavg significantly improved after the pull-back technique compared with standard insertion (mean [SD], 0.34 [0.07] and 0.41 [0.10] mm; p < 0.01). The pull-back technique was not associated with significantly higher insertional forces compared with standard insertion. This technique was associated with significant improvement in perimodiolar positioning, both visually and quantitatively, independent of cochlear size.

The intraoperative relationship between intracochlear electrical field and excitability of the auditory nerve

A limiting factor of cochlear implant (CI) technology is the electrode-contact overlapping spread of the electrode-generated intracochlear electrical field (EF). While the extent of the spread can be reduced with intracochlear ground electrodes, the stimulation level must be increased to reach similar loudness as with monopolar stimulation utilizing an extracochlear ground. In this study, we investigated the relationship between the monopolar intracochlear EF and the minimum stimulation level required for a measurable neural response assessed with electrically evoked compound action potential (eCAP) thresholds in intraoperative settings. Also, the effect of cochlear diameter on the intracochlear EF was evaluated, as narrower intracochlear EFs were found from larger than smaller cochleae in an earlier study.A total of 171 ears of severely-to-profoundly hearing-impaired patients (ages 0.7–89 years; 42.5 ± 27.8 years, mean ± SD) implanted with a Cochlear Nucleus CI522 or CI622 implant and Slim Straight electrode array or with a Med-El Synchrony implant and Flex 28 electrode array were included in the study. Normal anatomy was established and cochlear diameter was measured for all patients from preoperative imaging. Intraoperative intracochlear EF and eCAP threshold measurements were measured for both Cochlear and Med-El devices with the CIs’ back-telemetry options, and EF and eCAP were compared for Cochlear devices.The peak and width of the intracochlear EF correlated with each other (r = 0.46, p < 0.001), and both had an inverse relationship with eCAP thresholds (r = –0.41, p < 0.001 and r = –0.29, p < 0.001, respectively). The peak amplitudes of the intracochlear EF increased towards the apical part of the electrode array with both Cochlear (r = 0.97, p < 0.001) and Med-El (r = 0.80, p = 0.002) devices. The peak amplitudes of the intracochlear EF were shallower across the electrode array in large than in small cochleae (p < 0.05).Our results indicate that the responsiveness of the cochlear nerve is not only dependent on neural health but is also affected by the physical environment of the electrode array, which can be assessed by measuring the intracochlear EF. Further studies are warranted to investigate the detailed characteristics of the intracochlear current spread in CI recipients with varying anatomical features of the cochlea and with electrode arrays with different locations in the scalae or related to the modiolus in the cochleae.

Speech Recognition Performance Differences Between Precurved and Straight Electrode Arrays From a Single Manufacturer.

Precurved cochlear implant (CI) electrode arrays have demonstrated superior audiometric outcomes compared with straight electrodes in a handful of studies. However, previous comparisons have often failed to account for preoperative hearing and age. This study compares hearing outcomes for precurved and straight electrodes by a single manufacturer while controlling for these and other factors in a large cohort. Retrospective cohort study. Tertiary academic medical center. Two hundred thirty-one adult CI recipients between 2015 and 2021 with cochlear (Sydney, Australia) 522/622 (straight) or 532/632 (precurved) electrode arrays. Postactivation speech recognition and audiometric testing. Speech recognition testing (consonant-nucleus-consonant word [CNCw] and AzBio) was collected at 6 and 12 months postactivation. Hearing preservation was characterized by a low-frequency pure-tone average shift, or the change between preoperative and postoperative low-frequency pure-tone average. Two hundred thirty-one patients (253 ears) with 6-month and/or 12-month CNCw or AzBio testing were included. One hundred forty-nine (59%) and 104 (41%) ears were implanted with straight and precurved electrode arrays, respectively. Average age at implantation was 70 years (interquartile range [IQR], 58-77 y). There was no significant difference in mean age between groups. CNCw scores were significantly different ( p = 0.001) between straight (51%; IQR, 36-67%) and precurved arrays (64%; IQR, 48-72%). AzBio scores were not significantly different ( p = 0.081) between straight (72%; IQR, 51-87%) and precurved arrays (81%; IQR, 57-90%). Controlling for age, race, sex, preoperative hearing, and follow-up time, precurved electrode arrays performed significantly better on CNCw (b = 10.0; 95% confidence interval, 4.2-16.0; p < 0.001) and AzBio (b = 8.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.8-16.0;, p = 0.014) testing. Hearing preservation was not different between electrodes on adjusted models. During the study period, patients undergoing placement of precurved electrode arrays had significantly higher CNC and AzBio scores than patients receiving straight electrodes, even after controlling for age, preoperative hearing, and follow-up time. Understanding the difference in audiometric outcomes between precurved and straight electrode arrays will help to guide electrode selection. To understand differences in speech recognition scores postoperatively by electrode array type (precurved versus straight). To demonstrate a difference in hearing performance postoperatively by electrode type. III. Approved by the Institutional IRB (090155).

Speech recognition as a function of the number of channels for Mid-Scala electrode array recipients.

This study investigated the number of channels needed for maximum speech understanding and sound quality in 15 adult cochlear implant (CI) recipients with Advanced Bionics (AB) Mid-Scala electrode arrays completely within scala tympani. In experiment I, CI programs used a continuous interleaved sampling (CIS)-based strategy and 4-16 active electrodes. In experiment II, CI programs used an n-of-m strategy featuring 16 active electrodes with either 8- or 12-maxima. Speech understanding and sound quality measures were assessed. For CIS programs, participants demonstrated performance gains using up to 4-10 electrodes on speech measures and sound quality ratings. For n-of-m programs, there was no significant effect of maxima, suggesting 8-maxima is sufficient for this sample's maximum performance and sound quality. These results are largely consistent with previous studies using straight electrode arrays [e.g., Fishman, Shannon, and Slattery (1997). J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 40, 1201-1215; Friesen, Shannon, Baskent, and Wang (2001). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110, 1150-1163; Shannon, Cruz, and Galvin (2011). Audiol. Neurotol. 16, 113-123; Berg, Noble, Dawant, Dwyer, Labadie, and Gifford (2020). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 147, 3646-3656] and in contrast with recent studies looking at cochlear precurved electrode arrays [e.g., Croghan, Duran, and Smith (2017). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 142, EL537-EL543; Berg, Noble, Dawant, Dwuer, Labadie, and Gifford (2019b). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 145, 1556-1564], which found continuous improvements up to 16 independent channels. These findings suggest that Mid-Scala electrode array recipients demonstrate similar channel independence to straight electrode arrays rather than other manufacturer's precurved electrode arrays.

Investigating the association of electrically-evoked compound action potential thresholds with inner-ear dimensions in pediatric cochlear implantation

ObjectivesA narrow bony cochlear nerve canal (BCNC), as well as a hypoplastic and aplastic cochlear nerve (CN) have been associated with increased electrically-evoked compound action potential (eCAP) thresholds in some studies, suggesting poorer neural excitability in cochlear implantation. Also, in large cochleae the extent of activated spiral ganglion neurons with electrical stimulation is less than in smaller ones. However, a detailed description of the relationship between eCAP thresholds for a lateral-wall electrode array and dimensions of the inner-ear structures and internal auditory canal (IAC) is missing. DesignThe study subjects were 52 pediatric patients with congenital severe-to-profound hearing loss (27 females and 25 males; ages 0.7–2.0 years; 1.0 ± 0.3 years, mean ± SD) implanted bilaterally with Cochlear Nucleus CI422, CI522, or CI622 implants with full insertion of the Slim Straight electrode array. Diameters of the cochlea and the BCNC as well as the widths and heights of the IAC and the CN were evaluated from preoperative computed tomography and magnetic resonance images. These anatomical dimensions were compared with each other and with the patients’ intraoperative eCAP thresholds. ResultsThe eCAP thresholds increased from the apical to basal direction (r = 0.89, p < 0.001). After sorting the cochleae into four size categories, higher eCAP thresholds were found in larger than in smaller cochleae (p < 0.001). With similar categorization, the eCAP thresholds were higher in cochleae with a larger BCNC than in cochleae with a smaller BCNC (p < 0.001). Neither IAC nor CN cross-sectional areas affected the eCAP thresholds. Correlations were found between cochlea and BCNC diameters and between IAC and CN cross-sectional areas (r = 0.39 and r = 0.48, respectively, p < 0.001 for both). ConclusionsIn the basal part of the electrode array, higher stimulation levels to elicit measurable neural responses (eCAP thresholds) were required than in the apical part. Increased eCAP thresholds associated with a larger cochlear diameter, but contrary to the earlier studies, not with a small size of the BCNC or the CN. Instead, the BCNC diameter correlated significantly with the cochlea diameter.

Electrode array design determines scalar position, dislocation rate and angle and postoperative speech perception

PurposeThe aim of this study is to examine the scalar dislocation rate in straight and perimodiolar electrode arrays in relation to cochlear morphology. Furthermore, we aim to analyze the specific dislocation point of electrode arrays depending on their design and shape and to correlate these results to postoperative speech perception.MethodsWe conducted a comparative analysis of patients (ears: n = 495) implanted between 2013 and 2018 with inserted perimodiolar or straight electrode arrays from Cochlear™ or MED-EL. CBCT (cone beam computed tomography) was used to determine electrode array position (scalar insertion, intra-cochlear dislocation, point of dislocation and angular insertion depth). Furthermore, cochlear morphology was measured. The postoperative speech discrimination was compared regarding electrode array dislocation, primary scalar insertion and angular insertion depth.ResultsThe electrode array with the highest rate of primary SV insertions was the CA; the electrode array with the highest rate of dislocations out of ST was the FlexSoft. We did not find significantly higher dislocation rates in cochleostomy-inserted arrays. The angle of dislocation was electrode array design-specific. A multivariate nonparametric analysis revealed that the dislocation of the electrode array has no significant influence on postoperative speech perception. Nevertheless, increasing angular insertion depth significantly reduced postoperative speech perception for monosyllables.ConclusionThis study demonstrates the significant influence of electrode array design on scalar location, dislocation and the angle of dislocation itself. Straight and perimodiolar electrode arrays differ from each other regarding both the rate and place of dislocation. Insertion via cochleostomy does not lead to increased dislocation rates in any of the included electrode arrays. Furthermore, speech perception is significantly negatively influenced by angular insertion depth.

Relationship Between Intraoperative Electrocochleography and Hearing Preservation.

To compare intraoperative intracochlear electrocochleography (ECochG) with hearing preservation outcomes in cochlear implant (CI) subjects. Intraoperative electrocochleography was performed in adult CI subjects who were recipients of Advanced Bionics' Bionics LLC precurved HiFocus MidScala or straight HiFocus SlimJ electrode arrays. ECochG responses were recorded from the most apical electrode contact during insertion. No changes to the insertions were made due to ECochG monitoring. No information about insertion resistance was collected. ECochG drops were estimated as the change in amplitude from peak (defined as maximum amplitude response) to drop (largest drop) point after the peak during insertion was measured following the peak response. Audiometric thresholds from each subject were obtained before and approximately 1 month after CI surgery. The change in pure tone average for frequencies between 125 Hz and 500 Hz was measured after surgery. No postoperative CT scans were collected as part of this study. A total of 68 subjects from five surgical centers participated in the study. The study sample included 30 MidScala and 38 SlimJ electrodes implanted by approximately 20 surgeons who contributed to the study. Although a wide range of results were observed, there was a moderate positive correlation (Pearson Correlation coefficient, r = 0.56, p < 0.01) between the size of the ECochG drop and the magnitude of pure tone average change. This trend was present for both the MidScala and SlimJ arrays. The SlimJ and MidScala arrays produced significantly different hearing loss after surgery. Large ECochG amplitude drops observed during electrode insertion indicated poorer hearing preservation. Although the outcomes were variable, this information may be helpful to guide surgical decision-making when contemplating full electrode insertion and the likelihood of hearing preservation.

Finite element modelling of the surgical procedure for placement of a straight electrode array: Mechanical and clinical consequences

A cochlear implant is an electronic device implanted into the cochlea to directly stimulate the auditory nerve. Such device is used in patients with severe-to-profound hearing loss. The cochlear implant surgery is safe, but involves some risks, such as infections, device malfunction or damage of the facial nerve and it can result on a poor hearing outcome, due to the destruction of any present residual hearing. Future improvements in cochlear implant surgery will necessarily involve the decrease of the intra-cochlear damage. Several implant related variables, such as materials, geometrical design, processor and surgical techniques can be optimized in order for the patients to partially recover their hearing capacities The straight electrode is a type of cochlear implant that many authors indicate as being the less traumatic.From the finite element analysis conducted in this work, the influence of the insertion speed, the friction coefficient between the cochlear wall and the electrode array, and several configurations of the cochlear implant tip were studied. The numerical simulations of the implantation showed the same pattern of the insertion force against insertion depth, thus indicating the different phases of the insertion. Results demonstrated that lower insertion speeds, friction coefficients and tip stiffness, led to a reduction on the contact pressures and insertion force. It is expected that these improved configurations will allow to preserve the residual hearing while reducing surgical complications.

Correlation Between Cochlear Length, Insertion Angle, and Tonotopic Mismatch for MED-EL FLEX28 Electrode Arrays.

To investigate the relationship between cochlear length, insertion angle, and tonotopic mismatch and to compare the tonotopic mismatches with respect to the spiral ganglion and the organ of Corti. Retrospective. Tertiary referral center with cochlear implant program. Analyses of patients' computed tomography images after cochlear implant surgery. Cochlear implantation with 28-mm-long straight lateral wall electrode arrays. Cochlear length, insertion angle, and insertion depth were assessed using the OTOPLAN software. Tonotopic mismatch for each electrode contact was estimated using the Greenwood (organ of Corti) and the Stakhovskaya (spiral ganglion) maps and compared. 106 cochleae were analyzed. 99% of the electrode arrays were located in the tympanic ramp. The insertion was complete in 96% of cases. The mean cochlear length was 34.5 mm and the mean insertion angle of the apical electrode was 545°. Cochlear length was negatively correlated with the insertion angle of the contacts E1 to E9 (all p < 0.004). The tonotopic mismatch was greater at the organ of Corti than at the spiral ganglion. It was also greater at the organ of Corti in larger cochleae (correlation with mismatch for E1 r = 0.421, p < 0.0001) and in the apical than in the middle and basal regions of the cochlea. Small cochlea size corresponded to higher insertion angle and reduction of tonotopic mismatch on a 28-mm-long straight lateral wall electrode array. Tonotopic mismatch could be minimized preoperatively by choosing electrode arrays according to the individual cochlear morphology and postoperatively by appropriate frequency fitting.

Analysis of Neural Interface When Using Modiolar Electrode Stimulation. Radiological Evaluation, Trans-Impedance Matrix Analysis and Effect on Listening Effort in Cochlear Implantation.

Background: The proximity of the electrode to the modiolar wall may be of interest to investigate the effect of pitch discrimination. This research establishes the relation between these factors and whether perimodiolar positions may provide benefits regarding improved electrode discrimination. Methods: A prospective randomized study including 24 post-lingual deaf adults was performed. A psychoacoustic study was done by using a psychoacoustic research platform. Radiological study, and a cone-beam computed tomography was used to assess post cochlear implantation electrodes’ position. Trans-impedance matrix (TIM) analysis was performed after cochlear implant insertion in all cases, and pupillometry test was also performed. Results: 12 patients received a slim perimodiolar electrode array, and 12 patients received a straight electrode array. Although all the patients showed similar speech test results after 12 months follow-up, those implanted with a perimodiolar electrode obtained better scores in electrode discrimination test and pupillometry test, and showed more homogenous TIM patterns. Conclusions: The better positioning of the electrode array seams to provide a better hearing resolution and less listening effort trans-impedance matrix seems to be a useful tool to analyze positioning of the perimodiolar array.

Speech Recognition Outcomes in Adults With Slim Straight and Slim Modiolar Cochlear Implant Electrode Arrays.

To compare differences in audiologic outcomes between slim modiolar electrode (SME) CI532 and slim lateral wall electrode (SLW) CI522 cochlear implant recipients. Retrospective cohort study. Tertiary academic hospital. Comparison of postoperative AzBio sentence scores in quiet (percentage correct) in adult cochlear implant recipients with SME or SLW matched for preoperative AzBio sentence scores in quiet and aided and unaided pure tone average. Patients with SLW (n = 52) and patients with SME (n = 37) had a similar mean (SD) age (62.0 [18.2] vs 62.6 [14.6] years, respectively), mean preoperative aided pure tone average (55.9 [20.4] vs 58.1 [16.4] dB; P = .59), and mean AzBio score (percentage correct, 11.1% [13.3%] vs 8.0% [11.5%]; P = .25). At last follow-up (SLW vs SME, 9.0 [2.9] vs 9.9 [2.6] months), postoperative mean AzBio scores in quiet were not significantly different (percentage correct, 70.8% [21.3%] vs 65.6% [24.5%]; P = .29), and data log usage was similar (12.9 [4.0] vs 11.3 [4.1] hours; P = .07). In patients with preoperative AzBio <10% correct, the 6-month mean AzBio scores were significantly better with SLW than SME (percentage correct, 70.6% [22.9%] vs 53.9% [30.3%]; P = .02). The intraoperative tip rollover rate was 8% for SME and 0% for SLW. Cochlear implantation with SLW and SME provides comparable improvement in audiologic functioning. SME does not exhibit superior speech recognition outcomes when compared with SLW.

Influence of the Electrode Array Design on Incidence of Vertigo Symptoms and Vestibular Function After Cochlear Implantation.

To evaluate if a specific type of cochlear implant (CI) electrode array (EA) reveals higher rates/prevalence of vestibular symptoms and to characterize their respective relationship to intracochlear position and objective vestibular function. This retrospective study included 71 cochlear implantations in patients older than 18 years. The electrode position within the cochlea, electrode insertion angle, and cochlear coverage were determined from postoperative multiplanar reconstructed cone-beam computed tomography scans. All device manufacturers were represented. Data related to preoperative and postoperative PTA as well as vestibular symptoms in the preoperative and postoperative stages were collected from the patient's records. Twelve of the 71 (16.9%) CI patients experienced vertigo symptoms in the early postoperative period. In 5 (7.0%) patients, the vertigo complaints lasted until the time of the first activation (5-6 weeks postoperative). Postoperative onset of vestibular symptoms was more often seen in patients receiving lateral wall (LW)/straight EAs (19%) compared to perimodiolar/precurved EAs (7%), but this was only a trend and no statistical significance was observed. Moreover, preoperative pathologic caloric responses (CRs) better predicted the postoperative onset of vestibular symptoms. The preoperative consideration of a complicated CI-induced vertigo is important in the counseling particularly of elderly patients. We identified some risk factors for post-CI vertigo that should be considered in the patient's counseling: preoperative pathologic CRs, the extent of surgical trauma, and possibly the use of an LW EA, regardless of the length.

The Effect of Ultra-slow Velocities on Insertion Forces: A Study Using a Highly Flexible Straight Electrode Array.

The present study sought to 1) characterize insertion forces resulting from a flexible straight electrode array (EA) inserted at slow and ultra-slow insertion velocities, and 2) evaluate if ultra-slow velocities decrease insertion forces independent of other variables. Low insertion forces are desirable in cochlear implant (CI) surgery to reduce trauma and preserve hearing. Recently, ultra-slow insertion velocities (lower than manually feasible) have been shown to produce significantly lower insertion forces using other EAs. Five flexible straight EAs were used to record insertion forces into an inelastic artificial scala tympani model. Eleven trial recordings were performed for each EA at five predetermined automated, continuous insertion velocities ranging from 0.03 to 1.6 mm/s. An ultra-slow insertion velocity of 0.03 mm/s resulted in a median insertion force of 0.010 N at 20 mm of insertion depth, and 0.026 N at 24.3 mm-the final insertion depth. These forces represent only 24 to 29% of those measured using 1.6 mm/s. After controlling for insertion depth of the EA into the artificial scala tympani model and trial insertion number, decreasing the insertion velocity from 0.4 to 0.03 mm/s resulted in a 50% decrease in the insertion forces. Using the tested EA ultra-slow velocities can decrease insertion forces, independent of variables like insertion depth. Our results suggest ultra-slow velocities can reduce insertion forces at least 60%, compared with humanly feasible continuous velocities (≥0.9 mm/s).