Storz C-MAC Research Articles

Comparison of the glidescope, CMAC, storz DCI with the Macintosh laryngoscope during simulated difficult laryngoscopy: a manikin study

BackgroundVideolaryngoscopy presents a new approach for the management of the difficult and rescue airway. There is little available evidence to compare the performance features of these devices in true difficult laryngoscopy.MethodsA prospective randomized crossover study was performed comparing the performance features of the Macintosh Laryngoscope, Glidescope, Storz CMAC and Storz DCI videolaryngoscope. Thirty anesthesia providers attempted intubation with each of the 4 laryngoscopes in a high fidelity difficult laryngoscopy manikin. The time to successful intubation (TTSI) was recorded for each device, along with failure rate, and the best view of the glottis obtained.ResultsUse of the Glidescope, CMAC and Storz videolaryngoscopes improved the view of the glottis compared with use of the Macintosh blade (GEE, p = 0.000, p = 0.002, p = 0.000 respectively). Use of the CMAC resulted in an improved view compared with use of the Storz VL (Fishers, p = 0.05). Use of the Glidescope or Storz videolaryngoscope blade resulted in a longer TTSI compared with either the Macintosh (GLM, p = 0.000, p = 0.029 respectively) or CMAC blades (GLM, p = 0.000, p = 0.033 respectively).ConclusionsUnsurprisingly, when used in a simulated difficult laryngoscopy, all the videolaryngoscopes resulted in a better view of the glottis than the Macintosh blade. However, interestingly the CMAC was found to provide a better laryngoscopic view that the Storz DCI Videolaryngoscope. Additionally, use of either the Glidescope or Storz DCI Videolaryngoscope resulted in a prolonged time to successful intubation compared with use of the CMAC or Macintosh blade. The use of the CMAC during manikin simulated difficult laryngoscopy combined the efficacy of attainment of laryngoscopic view with the expediency of successful intubation. Use of the Macintosh blade combined expedience with success, despite a limited laryngoscopic view. The limitations of a manikin model of difficult laryngoscopy limits the conclusions for extrapolation into clinical practice.

Nasotracheal intubation in a difficult airway using the Storz C-MAC Videolaryngoscope, the Boedeker Bougie endotracheal introducer, and the Boedeker curved forceps.

Airway management has multiple indications for nasotracheal intubation. In this study, we focus on its indication in difficult airways. This work describes a modified procedure of nasotracheal intubation using the new Storz CMAC® Videolaryngoscope, the malleable Boedeker Bougie and the curved Boedeker Forceps in the intubation of a difficult airway manikin.

Comparison of different video laryngoscopes for emergency intubation in a standardized airway manikin with immobilized cervical spine by experienced anaesthetists. A randomized, controlled crossover trial

BackgroundThe aim of the present study was to evaluate whether different video laryngoscopes (VLs) facilitate endotracheal intubation (ETI) faster or more secure than conventional laryngoscopy in a manikin with immobilized cervical spine. MethodsAfter local ethics board approval, a standard airway manikin with cervical spine immobilization by means of a standard stiff collar was placed on a trauma stretcher. We compared times until glottic view, ETI, cuff block and first ventilation were achieved, and verified the endotracheal tube position, when using Macintosh laryngoscope, Glidescope Ranger, Storz C-MAC, Ambu Pentax AWS, Airtraq, and McGrath Series5 VLs in randomized order. Wilcoxon signed-rank test and McNemar's test were used for statistical analysis; p<0.05 was considered as significant. ResultsTwenty-three anaesthetists (mean age 32.1±4.9 years, mean experience in anaesthesia of 6.9±4.8 years) routinely involved in the management of multitrauma patients participated. The primary study end point, time to first effective ventilation, was achieved fastest when using Macintosh laryngoscope (21.0±7.6s) and was significantly slower with all other devices (Airtraq 33.2±23.9s, p=0.002; Pentax AirwayScope 32.4±14.9s, p=0.001; Storz C-MAC 34.1±23.9s, p<0.001; McGrath Series5 101.7±108.3s, p<0.001; Glidescope Ranger 46.3±59.1s, p=0.001). Overall success rates were highest when using Macintosh, Airtraq and Storz C-MAC devices (100%), and were lower in Ambu Pentax AWS and Glidescope Ranger (87%, p=0.5) and in McGrath Series5 device (72.2%, p=0.063). ConclusionWhen used by experienced anaesthesiologists, video laryngoscopes did not facilitate endotracheal intubation in this model with an immobilized cervical spine in a faster or more secure way than conventional laryngoscopy. However, data was gathered in a standardized model and further studies in real trauma patients are desirable to verify our findings.

Success rates and endotracheal tube insertion times of experienced emergency physicians using five video laryngoscopes

No randomised controlled trial has yet compared different video laryngoscopes in respect of the success rates and the time taken to achieve endotracheal intubation in trapped car accident victims. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether five video laryngoscopes facilitate tracheal intubation more quickly or more securely than conventional laryngoscopy. Prospective, controlled, randomised crossover trial. An airway manikin was placed on the driver's seat of a compact car. Access was possible only through the opened driver's door. Twenty-five experienced anaesthetists. Tracheal intubation in a simulated trapped patient using video laryngoscopes in a typical out-of-hospital setting. Times to achievement of a view of the glottis, tracheal intubation, cuff inflation, first ventilation and tracheal tube position were compared using a standard Macintosh laryngoscope or Glidescope Ranger, Storz C-MAC, Ambu-Pentax AWS, Airtraq and McGrath Series 5 video laryngoscopes in a randomised order. Wilcoxon signed-rank test and McNemar test were used for statistical analysis. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Twenty-five anaesthetists (35.1 ± 7.3 years; 16 male, nine female) with an intubation experience of 374 ± 96 intubations per year and an experience of 9.1 ± 7.3 years participated. Glottic view, tracheal intubation, cuff inflation and first ventilation were achieved most rapidly with the Macintosh laryngoscope, although the Airtraq and Pentax AWS video laryngoscopes were not significantly slower. Times were significantly longer when the Glidescope Ranger, McGrath Series 5 or Storz C-MAC video laryngoscopes were used (P < 0.05), failure to place the endotracheal tube correctly was significantly commoner with the McGrath Series 5 than with the Macintosh (P = 0.031). When attempting to intubate a trapped car accident victim, video laryngoscopes provide a better view of the glottis, but some delay tracheal intubation significantly. The devices with a tube guide (Airtraq and Ambu Pentax AWS) enable tracheal intubation to be achieved significantly faster and with a lower failure rate than devices without a tube guide. No video laryngoscope outperformed direct laryngoscopy with a Macintosh laryngoscope in this simulation study.

The Storz C-MAC video laryngoscope: description of a new device, case report, and brief case series

A new video laryngoscope and its early clinical application are presented. The device is a portable, battery operated video laryngoscope that resembles a standard Macintosh blade. The intubation technique is identical to conventional Macintosh laryngoscopy with the additional aid of a magnified video view.

The combined use of Skype and the STORZ CMAC video laryngoscope in field intubation training with the Nebraska National Air Guard.

This study examined the feasibility of using Skype technology in basic manikin intubation instruction of Nebraska National Air Guard personnel at a Casualty Training Exercise. Results show that the Skype monitor provided clear sound and visualization of the airway view to the trainees and the combination of VoIP technology and videolaryngoscopy for intubation training was highly valued by study participants.

Performance of the New C-MAC Video Laryngoscope

The Storz C-MAC video laryngoscope is a traditional Macintosh blade laryngoscope that has been modified near the junction of the middle and distal thirds of the blade with the addition of a digital video camera, which transmits an image of the glottic view to a portable LCD monitor. Researchers in Germany report early …