STOPP Criteria Research Articles

Prevalence and factors associated with preventable drug-related emergency department visits (DREDp) in elderly patients

BackgroundThe prevalence of emergency department (ED) visits among the elderly is high and increasing. While emergency services for the elderly involve many factors, drug-related problems (DRPs) that can worsen patient conditions are less frequently discussed. This study investigates the prevalence of preventable drug-related ED visits (DREDp) and the characteristics of DRPs in elderly ED patients through a comprehensive medication review.MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted at a non-trauma ED of a university-affiliated tertiary-care hospital. All adult patients aged 60 years and older who were on medications and visited the ED were included. A clinical pharmacist conducted comprehensive medication reviews for each patient. Patients were classified as experiencing drug-related ED visits (DRED) if their primary reason for the visit was associated with a DRP, as determined by both the physician and pharmacist. DRPs attributed to medication errors were categorized as preventable, while other DRPs were assessed for preventability using modified Schumock and Thornton criteria.ResultsThe study involved 351 patients with a mean age of 75.5 years (SD 9.3) and an equal male-to-female ratio of ED visits. The median number of comorbidities was five (IQR 3–6), with about half of the patients taking ten or more medications. The interdisciplinary team classified 43 patients (12.3%) as DREDp, accounting for 58.1% of the 74 (21.1%) drug-related ED visits. All medication errors categorized as causing harm (level E and higher) occurred within the DREDp group, constituting approximately half of all DREDp (22 cases, 51.2%). Approximately two-thirds of drug-related ED visits were associated with adverse drug events (ADEs), predominantly involving antithrombotics, oral hypoglycemic agents, and antineoplastics. Multivariable analysis identified that ED visits involving potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) according to the STOPP criteria and the presence of multiple comorbidities (six or more concurrent diseases) were significantly associated with DREDp.ConclusionsAbout one in ten elderly patients visited the ED due to preventable DRPs. The majority of DRPs leading to ED visits were ADEs. Both the prescription of PIMs and the presence of multiple comorbidities were significantly associated with DREDp.

Potentially inappropriate prescription of medications to older adults who access a community pharmacy in Peru

Polypharmacy in older adults is associated with a higher incidence of medication-related problems, such as pharmacological interactions, adverse reactions, and medication errors. This study aimed to identify and evaluate potentially inappropriate prescription of medications (PIP) using the screening tool of older persons’ prescriptions/screening tool to alert doctors to right treatment (STOPP/START) criteria in a representative community pharmacy in Trujillo, Peru. The population sample consisted of 158 subjects, with 66.5% between 65 and 69 years old, 53.8% male, and 77.9% receiving between 3 and 4 medications. Medical prescriptions were analyzed using the explicit STOPP/START version 2 criteria, revealing that 93.7% of patients presented STOPP criteria (to stop medication) and 53.8% presented START criteria (to start medication). The most frequently identified STOPP criterion was the gradual withdrawal of benzodiazepines, while the most frequently identified START criterion was the initiation of antihypertensive treatment in patients with systolic blood pressure > 160 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure > 90 mmHg. Principal component analysis showed that the high prevalence of PIP was significantly associated (p < 0.05) with the number of prescribed medications and as age decreases, the number of medical diagnoses also decreases. It is concluded that there is a high prevalence of PIP in the studied population, posing a greater challenge in older adults, highlighting the importance of addressing prescribing practices with greater involvement of community pharmacists.

Under-Prescription of Drugs in the Elderly Population of Western Romania: An Analysis Based on STOPP/START Version 2 Criteria.

Background/Objectives: Numerous European countries, including Romania, are facing the concern of rapid ageing of their populations. Moreover, Romania's life expectancy ranks among the lowest in the European Union. In light of this, it is imperative that the assessment of medication-related harm be given national priority in order to secure and enhance pharmacotherapy and the medical act. In this study, we sought to describe and evaluate the under-prescribing practices among the Romanian elderly population. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study in urban areas of two counties in Western Romania (Timis and Arad) from November 2017 to February 2019. We collected chronic electronic prescriptions issued for elderly patients (>65 years old) with chronic conditions. The medication was prescribed by generalist or specialist physicians for periods ranging between 30 and 90 days. To assess inappropriate prescribing behaviours, a multidisciplinary team of specialists applied the Screening Tool of Older Persons' Prescriptions/Screening Tool to Alert to Right Treatment (STOPP/START) v.2 criteria to the collected prescriptions. Results: Within the 1498 prescriptions included in the study, 57% were issued to females, the mean age was 74.1 ± 6.95, and the average number of medicines per prescription was 4.7 ± 1.51. The STOPP criteria most commonly identified were the (1) long treatment duration (23.6%) and (2) prescription of neuroleptics (14.6%) or zopiclone (14.0%) as medications that increase the risk of falls. According to START criteria, the following medicines were under-prescribed: (1) statins (47.4%), (2) beta-blockers (24.5%), (3) antiresorptive therapy (10.0%), and (4) β2-agonists and muscarinic antagonists for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (4.5%). Within our study group, the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications was 18.58%, whereas the prevalence of potential prescribing omissions was 49.2%. Conclusions: To decrease medication-related harm and morbid-mortality, and to increase the quality of life for elderly people in Romania, immediate actions are needed from national authorities. These actions include reinforcing primary care services, providing periodic training for physicians, implementing medication review services by pharmacists, and utilising electronic health records at their full capacity.

Application of STOPP/START criteria in older patients in primary care using RStudio®

ObjectivesTo estimate the frequency of potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) in outpatients according to STOPP/START criteria, and to identify risk factors. For this purpose, an algorithm was developed and validated in RStudio® based on the information collected in the electronic prescription.MethodsThe data corresponds to dispensations from two pharmacies in Spain made to patients over 18 years, over 4 years. For the analysis, only patients aged ≥ 65 years who are targeted by the STOPP/START criteria are included. The statistical programming language RStudio® was used to develop the algorithm. The STOPP criteria used as models for the implementation of the method were L2 and B12. A logistic regression analysis was performed.ResultsA total of 15,601 treatment plans were obtained from 2312 patients ≥ 65 years (56% women), of whom 46.6% had polypharmacy (≥ 5 drugs) and 9.3% had excessive polypharmacy (≥ 10 drugs). In this group, PIPs were detected in 57% of patients and in 38% of their treatment plans; of these PIPs the most common were those related to the use of benzodiazepines for more than 28 days (D5 criterion) in 25.9% of patients, followed by the use of opioids prescribed without an associated laxative (L2 criterion) in 13.8% and finally, drugs duplication (A3 criterion) in 5.7%. The most numerous duplications related to criterion A3 were benzodiazepines (39%) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (37.4%).ConclusionsThe method developed and validated in RStudio® with different STOPP criteria allows us to analyse the pharmacological treatment of many patients using different databases and to identify those at risk of suffering a PIP according to the STOPP criteria.Our results indicate a high prevalence of PIPs in patients ≥ 65 years, with polypharmacy being the most common risk factor affecting PIP.

A - 101 Anticholinergic Drug Use in Older Adults with Dementia: a Systematic Review

Abstract Objective This systematic review examined the prevalence of anticholinergic medication use, a known risk factor for cognitive impairment, among older adults with dementia. Data Selection PubMed and Embase were searched in February 2023 and March 2024 for studies reporting on the prevalence of anticholinergic medication use in older adults (age 65+) with a pre-existing diagnosis of dementia. We appraised 560 peer-reviewed manuscripts to determine they met inclusion criteria. The systematic review was conducted, designed and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P). Results Twenty-nine studies met the inclusion criteria. Anticholinergic medication use rates among adults aged 65 or older with dementia ranged from 4.4% to 63.4% across studies. The median prevalence was 23.1%. In addition to several versions of the Beers Criteria and STOPP Criteria, a range of potentially inappropriate medication criteria were used. Conclusions Anticholinergic medications were widely used among older adults with dementia. Compared to a prior systematic review published in 2019, the current results indicate an increase in the frequency of anticholinergic use among older adults with dementia. Given the presence of cognitive impairment in this population, healthcare providers should closely monitor anticholinergic burden in their older adult patients and consult with prescribers to consider risks and benefits associated with such medications. Future research examining the prevalence of anticholinergic use among a broader population of older adults (e.g., those with mild cognitive impairment) appears warranted.

Potentially inappropriate prescribing in polymedicated older adults with atrial fibrillation and multimorbidity: a Swedish national register-based cohort study.

Current research on potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) in polymedicated older adults with atrial fibrillation (AF) and multimorbidity is predominantly focused on PIP of oral anticoagulants (OAC). Our study aimed to assess (i) the overall prevalence of PIP in older multimorbid adults with AF, (ii) potential associated factors of PIP, and (iii) the association of PIP with adverse health outcomes in a nationwide sample of Swedish older adults. Swedish national registries were linked to establish a cohort with a 2-year follow-up of older adults (≥65y) who, on 1 January 2017, had a diagnosis of AF and had at least one comorbidity (n = 203,042). PIP was assessed using the reduced STOPP/START version 2 screening tool. The STOPP criteria identify potentially inappropriate prescribed medications (PIM), while the START criteria identify potential prescribing omissions (PPO). PIP is identified as having at least one PIM and/or PPO. Cox regression analyses were conducted to examine the association between PIP and adverse health outcomes: mortality, hospitalisation, stroke, bleeding, and falls. PIP was highly prevalent in older adults with AF, with both polypharmacy (69.6%) and excessive polypharmacy (85.9%). In the study population, benzodiazepines (22.9%), hypnotic Z-medications (17.8%) and analgesics (8.7%) were the most frequent PIM. Anticoagulants (34.3%), statins (11.1%), vitamin D and calcium (13.4%) were the most frequent PPO. Demographic factors and polypharmacy were associated with different PIM and PPO categories, with the nature of these associations differing based on the specific type of PIM and PPO. The co-occurrence of PIM and PPO, compared to appropriate prescribing, was associated with an increased risk of adverse health outcomes compared to all appropriately prescribed medications: cardiovascular (CV) (Hazard ratio (HR) [95% confidence interval] = 1.97 [1.88-2.07]) and overall mortality (HR = 2.09 [2.03-2.16]), CV (HR = 1.34 [1.30-1.37]) and overall hospitalisation (HR = 1.48 [1.46-1.51]), stroke (HR = 1.93 [1.78-2.10]), bleeding (HR = 1.10 [1.01-1.21]), and falls (HR = 1.63 [1.56-1.71]). The present study reports a high prevalence of PIP in multimorbid polymedicated older adults with AF. Additionally, a nuanced relationship between prescribing patterns, patient characteristics, and adverse health outcomes was observed. These findings emphasise the importance of implementing tailored interventions to optimise medication management in this patient population.

Review of Current Clinical Options for the Management of Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia.

Dementia is a disease most prevalent in the older adult population. The cognitive symptoms of dementia include impairments in problem-solving, memory, and language. Some patients experience noncognitive symptoms in addition to the cognitive symptoms of dementia. These noncognitive symptoms are called behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia or BPSD. The primary objective of our study was to examine the therapeutic options, guidelines, and clinical considerations for the management of BPSD. The existing literature about BPSD was reviewed with searches in PubMed, MEDLINE, and online search platforms. Dysregulation of neurotransmission involving acetylcholine, dopamine, and serotonin has been shown to cause behavioral and psychological symptoms of Alzheimer's disease. BPSD can include hallucinations, agitation, delusions, anxiety, apathy, abnormal body movements, irritability, depression, disinhibition, and sleep or appetite changes. Pharmacologic therapies used in the treatment of BPSD include antidepressants, antipsychotics, anxiolytics, and anticonvulsants. Treatment can be tailored to the specific noncognitive symptoms that are experienced. The use of these agents may be limited based on recommendations from the Beers Criteria®, STOPP criteria, treatment guidelines, and FDA warnings.

Multidisciplinary medication review during older patient hospitalization according to STOPP/START criteria reduces potentially inappropriate prescriptions: MoPIM cohort study

PurposeMultimorbidity and polypharmacy in older adults converts the detection and adequacy of potentially inappropriate drug prescriptions (PIDP) in a healthcare priority. The objectives of this study are to describe the clinical decisions taken after the identification of PIDP by clinical pharmacists, using STOPP/START criteria, and to evaluate the degree of accomplishment of these decisions.MethodsMulticenter, prospective, non-comparative cohort study in patients aged 65 and older, hospitalized because of an exacerbation of their chronic conditions. Each possible PIDP was manually identified by the clinical pharmacist at admission and an initial decision was taken by a multidisciplinary clinical committee. At discharge, criteria were re-applied and final decisions recorded.ResultsFrom all patients (n = 674), 493 (73.1%) presented at least one STOPP criteria at admission, significantly reduced up to 258 (38.3%) at discharge. A similar trend was observed for START criteria (36.7% vs. 15.7%). Regarding the top 10 most prevalent STOPP criteria, the clinical committee initially agreed to withdraw 257 (34.2%) prescriptions and to modify 93 (12.4%) prescriptions. However, the evaluation of final clinical decisions revealed that 503 (67.0%) of those STOPP criteria were ultimately amended. For the top 10 START criteria associated PIDP, the committee decided to initiate 149 (51.7%) prescriptions, while a total of 198 (68.8%) were finally introduced at discharge.ConclusionsThe clinical committee, through a pharmacotherapy review, succeeded in identifying and reducing the degree of prescription inadequacy, for both STOPP and START criteria, in older patients with high degree of multimorbidity and polypharmacy.Trial RegistrationNCT02830425.

Identification of Potentially Inappropriate Medication in Geriatric Patients at Wangaya Hospital, Denpasar City with Beers Criteria and Stopp Criteria in 2023

Identification of Potentially Inappropriate Medication in Geriatric Patients at Wangaya Hospital, Denpasar City with Beers Criteria and Stopp Criteria in 2023

Comparison of four criteria for potentially inappropriate medications in older patients with newly diagnosed non-small cell lung cancer

ABSTRACT Background Potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use is a common problem among older patients. This study aimed to compare the prevalence of PIMs in older patients with newly diagnosed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and to identify the correlates of PIMs. Research design and methods A secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study was conducted. Patients were enrolled from January 2014 to December 2020 and information were extracted from patients’ electronic medical records (EMRs). We evaluated the PIMs using four different PIM criteria. The concordance among the four PIM criteria was calculated using kappa tests. The possible risk factors associated with PIMs were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression. Results The prevalence of at least one PIM identified by the four criteria ranged from 25.1% to 48.2% among 514 patients. There was moderate consistency between the GO-PIM scale and the AGS/Beers criteria, while poor consistency with the other criteria (the STOPP criteria and the Chinese criteria). Polypharmacy was found to be significantly associated with the occurrence of PIMs in all criteria (p < 0.001). Conclusions Our results showed a high prevalence of PIMs in older patients with NSCLC, which was significantly associated with polypharmacy, and the consistency across the four criteria was poor-to-moderate.

Appropriateness of direct oral anticoagulant prescribing in older subjects with atrial fibrillation discharged from acute medical wards.

Knowledge on the prescriptive practice of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in older subjects with atrial fibrillation (AF) hospitalized in acute medical wards is limited. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and appropriateness of DOAC prescriptions in hospitalized older subjects with AF, discharged from acute medical wards. We analysed a cohort of 609 subjects with AF, aged ≥65 years (mean age 85 years) enrolled from 39 geriatric and nephrology wards in Italy. DOAC prescriptive appropriateness was evaluated according to the summary of product characteristics (smPC), 2019 Beers and STOPP criteria, and drug-drug interactions (DDIs). At hospital discharge, 33% of patients with AF were prescribed with DOAC, 26% with vitamin-K antagonist, while 41% did not receive any anticoagulant. Among subjects on DOAC therapy, 31% presented a violation of the smPC criteria (mainly underdosage-17%), while 48% and 18% presented a Beers/STOPP inappropriate prescription, or a DDI, respectively. Older age, lower body mass index (BMI), cancer and higher estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were independently associated with DOAC underdosage or missed prescription (age: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.06, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.00-1.12 for underdosage; eGFR: aOR 1.04, 95% CI 1.02-1.07 for underdosage; BMI: aOR 0.95, 95% CI 0.91-0.99 for missed prescription; cancer: aOR 1.93, 95% CI 1.19-3.13 for missed prescription). This study showed a suboptimal DOAC prescriptive practice in older in-patients, with frequent missed prescription and DOAC underdosage. Contrary to current recommendations, physicians appear overly concerned by bleeding risk in real-life older and frailer subjects. Strategies should be developed to promote appropriate DOAC prescription in the hospital setting.

Comparing AGS Beers 2019, STOPP version 2, and EU(7)-PIM list in Portuguese older adults in primary health care

PurposeThis study aims to identify PIM prevalence in older adults according to the 2019 Beers criteria, Screening Tool of Older Person’s Prescriptions version 2 (STOPP v2) criteria, and the Portuguese EU(7)-PIM list and also to analyze the concordance between these criteria.MethodsA retrospective study was conducted among 1200 Portuguese older adults (≥ 65 years old), users of primary health care. Demographic, clinical, and pharmacological data were collected concerning the period between April 2021 and August 2022. A comparative analysis was performed between the three PIM identification criteria, and the concordance was determined according to the Lin concordance correlation coefficient.ResultsThe mean age was 76.3 (SD 7.7) years old and 57.6% of the older adults were females. Our findings indicate varying prevalence rates among these criteria with 63.8% (95% CI 61.0–66.6%), 66.8% (95% CI 64.1–69.5%), and 50.1% (95% CI 47.2–53.0%) of the older adults take at least one PIM according to the EU(7)-PIM list, Beers 2019, and STOPP v2 criteria, respectively. The highest prevalence observed was for proton pump inhibitors according to EU(7)-PIM list (30.1%, 95% CI 27.6–32.9) and Beers criteria (30.1%, 95% CI 27.6–32.9) and alprazolam according to STOPP v2 criteria (10.1%, 95% CI 8.4–11.9%). A poor concordance between criteria was observed (< 0.834). The highest concordance coefficient was found between the EU(7)-PIM list and the Beers criteria (0.833), and the lowest between the EU(7)-PIM list and STOPP criteria (0.735).ConclusionThis study reveals varying prevalence rates of PIM in older adults, as assessed by different criteria, and highlights the need for targeted interventions and improved prescribing practices. In the future, studies should focus on the occurrence of negative outcomes in older adults associated with PIM consumption.

Enhanced STOPP/START Criteria: A Tool for Managing Polypharmacy in Older Population

Polypharmacy in geriatric patients is associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes. Therefore, several instruments for prescription analysis and optimization can be used to enhance the safety and efficacy of pharmacotherapy in old age population. STOPP/START criteria is one of the most popular screening tools in the Russian Federation and abroad that list potentially inappropriate drugs for use in older patients (STOPP criteria) and potentially prescribed for certain clinical cases (START criteria). Two previous versions of the STOPP/START criteria were published in 2008 and 2015. Released in 2023, the newest (third version) demonstrates the evolution of evidence-based pharmacotherapy for older and oldestold patients, featuring 133 STOPP and 57 START criteria. Expanding the base of STOPP/START criteria should support optimization of prescriptions and reducing ADRs risk in older patients. This article introduces translation of STOPP/START criteria, version 3.

Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing and Potential Prescribing Omissions and Their Association with Adverse Drug Reaction-Related Hospital Admissions.

This study aimed to determine the prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) and potential prescribing omissions (PPOs) and their association with ADR-related hospital admissions in patients aged ≥ 65 years admitted acutely to the hospital. Information on medications and morbidities was extracted from the Adverse Drug Reactions in an Ageing Population (ADAPT) cohort (N = 798: N = 361 ADR-related admissions; 437 non-ADR-related admissions). PIP and PPOs were assessed using Beers Criteria 2019 and STOPP/START version 2. Multivariable logistic regression (adjusted odds ratios (aOR), 95%CI) was used to examine the association between PIP, PPOs and ADR-related admissions, adjusting for covariates (age, gender, comorbidity, polypharmacy). In total, 715 (90%; 95% CI 87-92%) patients had ≥1 Beers Criteria, 555 (70%; 95% CI 66-73%) had ≥ 1 STOPP criteria and 666 patients (83%; 95% CI 81-86%) had ≥ 1 START criteria. Being prescribed at least one Beers (aOR = 1.66, 95% CI = 1.00-2.77), or meeting STOPP (aOR = 1.07, 95% CI = 0.79-1.45) or START (aOR = 0.72; 95%CI = 0.50-1.06) criteria or the number of PIP/PPO criteria met was not significantly associated with ADR-related admissions. Patients prescribed certain drug classes (e.g., antiplatelet agents, diuretics) per individual PIP criteria were more likely to have an ADR-related admission. There was a high prevalence of PIP and PPOs in this cohort but no association with ADR-related admissions.

Potentially inappropriate prescribing in elderly patients with epilepsy at two referral hospitals in Ethiopia.

The prevalence of drug therapy problems in patients with epilepsy has been reported to be as high as 70-90%. Moreover, elderly patients with epilepsy are highly vulnerable to inappropriate therapies. This study aimed to evaluate potentially inappropriate prescriptions (PIP) in elderly patients with epilepsy at the adult neurology clinics of two referral hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. A cross-sectional study was conducted on 81 patients with epilepsy and the medication appropriateness index (MAI), the Beers, and Screening Tool of Older Persons' Prescriptions and Screening Tool to Alert to the Right Treatment (STOPP/START) criteria were used to assess PIP. Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25. Of the 81 study participants, 41(50.6%) were male, and the mean age was 67.33 ± 17.43 years. One-fourth of the study participants (25.9%) had polypharmacy and drug-drug interactions (DDIs) were documented in 64 (79%) patients. Based on the MAI, of the 263 medications that were prescribed for elderly epileptic patients, 110 (41.8%) had drug interactions, 44 (16.7%) had inappropriate indications, 31 (11.8%) were ineffective, and 12 (4.6%) were prescribed incorrect doses. Based on the STOPP and START criteria, PIP was reported in 31(38.3%) and 13(16.1%) patients, respectively. Polypharmacy and DDIs are common in elderly epilepsy patients. The MAI, Beer's criteria, and STOPP/START criteria indicate a high prevalence of PIP in elderly patients with epilepsy.

Time-dependent association between STOPP and START criteria and gastrointestinal bleeding in older patients using routinely collected primary care data

Purpose Only few studies have assessed the preventive effect of the STOPP/START criteria on adverse events. We aim to quantify 1) the association between nonadherence to STOPP/START criteria and gastrointestinal bleedings, and 2) the association between exposure to the potentially harmful START-medications and gastrointestinal bleedings. Design A retrospective cohort study using routinely collected data of patients aged ≥ 65 years from the electronic health records (EHR) of 49 general practitioners (GPs) in 6 GP practices, from 2007 to 2014. The database is maintained in the academic research network database (AHA) of Amsterdam UMC, the Netherlands. Methods Gastrointestinal bleedings were identified using ICPC codes and free text inspections. Three STOPP and six START criteria pertaining to gastrointestinal bleedings were selected. Cox proportional hazards regression with time-dependent covariate analysis was performed to assess the independent association between nonadherence to the STOPP/START criteria and gastrointestinal bleedings. The analysis was performed with all criteria as a composite outcome, as well as separately for the individual criteria. Results Out of 26,576 participants, we identified 19,070 Potential Inappropriate Medications (PIM)/Potential Prescribing Omission (PPO) instances for 3,193 participants and 146 gastrointestinal bleedings in 143 participants. The hazard ratio for gastrointestinal bleedings of STOPP/STARTs, taken as composite outcome, was 5.45 (95% CI 3.62–8.21). When analysed separately, two out of nine STOPP/STARTs showed significant associations. Conclusion This study demonstrates a significant positive association between nonadherence to the STOPP/START criteria and gastrointestinal bleeding. We emphasize the importance of adherence to the relevant criteria for gastrointestinal bleeding, which may be endorsed by decision support systems.

Beers versus STOPP criteria and the possible implications of the Beers criteria's Spanish adaptation

Beers versus STOPP criteria and the possible implications of the Beers criteria's Spanish adaptation

50 Employing Shared Decision Making (SDM) to reduce NSAID-related harm and hospitalisations, in at-risk patients in primary care

Abstract Background 10% of hospital admissions in Ireland are Adverse Drg Reaction (ADR) related, and 71% of these are potentially avoidable. NSAID-related ADRs have been implicated in up to 30% of all ADR-related admissions. Addressing NSAID related STOPP criteria may prevent hospital admissions with bleeding, Cerebrovascular (CV) events and renal impairment. If stopping NSAID is not possible, dose reductions or drug switches can minimise the risk of harm. Preferred NSAIDs are naproxen (lower CV risk) or ibuprofen &amp;lt;1,200 mg/day (lower CV and gastrointestinal bleed risk). Methods Patients aged ≥65 years with valid prescriptions for NSAIDs were identified via software search using the M01 ATC classification system code. Each patients file was reviewed for NSAID related STOPP criteria. Specific software searches using additional ATC classification system codes were undertaken to identify those at high risk of harm e.g. NSAID with anticoagulant. Patients were engaged in Shared Decision Making (SDM) with the practice pharmacist and prescription changes were agreed and enacted by the GP. Results 63 patients&amp;gt;65 yrs had a valid prescription for an NSAID. 42 had ≥1 NSAID related STOPP criteria. 35 were deemed appropriate for intervention. 7 were prescribed a preferred NSAID and had mild hypertension only. 23 were deemed at high risk of harm. Software searches identified the same 23 high risk patients. 35 patients were engaged in SDM. 100% of these agreed to a change to their prescription. 51% stopped their NSAID whilst 40% changed or dose reduced their NSAID and 9% agreed to addition of gastroprotection. This achieved an overall 60% STOPP resolution rate. A higher average 91% resolution rate was achieved in the higher-risk patients. Conclusion SDM achieves higher STOPP resolution rates in patients at higher risk of harm who are identifiable though specific GP practice software searches. These software searches can be employed annually to effectively and efficiently prioritise patients for SDM interventions.

ASSESSMENT OF THE RATIONALITY OF PHARMACOTHERAPY IN ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES USING STOPP/START NON-COMPLIANCE MODELS

Elderly patients, due to involutive changes in the body, have peculiarities of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, which must be taken into account when prescribing drugs. There are various tools for individualizing therapy: use the 7-step algorithm, STOPP/START criteria, anticholinergic load scales, assessment of triggers of undesirable events - GerontoNet scale, Brighton Adverse Drug Reactions Risk scale. The article examined the use of STOPP/START criteria by physicians in practical activities. It is determined that doctors pay more attention to STOPP criteria when treating the patient and prescribing drugs. It is determined that doctors pay more attention to STOPP criteria when treating the patient and prescribing drugs. Based on the data obtained during the assessment of the use of the rational pharmacotherapy tool, prognostic non-compliance with the criteria was calculated and the factors affecting this were determined: BMI for (for STOPP criteria) and a score on the Age Not Hindrance questionnaire (for START criteria).

Potentially Inappropriate Medication at Admission and at Discharge: A Geriatric Study in an Internal Medicine Service in Portugal.

Aging is associated with an increase in the prevalence of chronic diseases and polypharmacy, and with the prescription of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs). This study aimed to analyze the variation in PIMs from hospital admission to discharge. A retrospective cohort study was conducted on inpatients of an internal medicine service. According to the Beers criteria, 80.7% of the patients had been prescribed at least one PIM at admission and 87.2% at discharge; metoclopramide was the most-prescribed PIM from admission to discharge, and acetylsalicylic acid was the most-deprescribed one. According to the STOPP criteria, 49.4% of patients had been prescribed at least one PIM at admission and 62.2% at discharge; quetiapine was the most-prescribed PIM from admission to discharge, and captopril was the most-deprescribed one. According to the EU(7)-PIM list, 51.3% of patients had been prescribed at least one PIM at admission and 70.3% at discharge, and bisacodyl was the most-prescribed PIM from admission to discharge and propranolol the most-deprescribed one. It was found that the number of PIMs at discharge was higher than at admission, suggesting the need to develop a guide with adapted criteria to be applied in an internal medicine service.