You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 Apr 2023MP23-12 CLINICAL EFFICIENCY OF THULIUM FIBER LASER FOR RIRS IN LARGE VOLUME STONES (15-25MM): A MULTICENTRIC EXPERIENCE Abhishek Singh, Soundarya Ganesan, Rohan Batra, Abhijit Patil, Arvind Ganpule, Ravindra Sabnis, Mahesh Desai, and ChandraMohan Vaddi Abhishek SinghAbhishek Singh More articles by this author , Soundarya GanesanSoundarya Ganesan More articles by this author , Rohan BatraRohan Batra More articles by this author , Abhijit PatilAbhijit Patil More articles by this author , Arvind GanpuleArvind Ganpule More articles by this author , Ravindra SabnisRavindra Sabnis More articles by this author , Mahesh DesaiMahesh Desai More articles by this author , and ChandraMohan VaddiChandraMohan Vaddi More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003248.12AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: The Thulium fiber laser (TFL) is a promising new tool in the field of endoscopic laser lithotripsy, but is it efficacious in managing large stones using flexible ureteroscopy remains to be seen. Our objective was to analyse the clinical efficiency of TFL in large volume stones during retrograde intrarenal surgery. METHODS: Patients with large volume renal stones (>1000 mm3) and size of 15-25 mm, operated at two different centers, from May 2020 to April 2021, were enrolled in this study. Retrograde intrarenal surgery was performed using 60 W Superpulse thulium fiber laserTM (IPG Photonics, Russia). Demographic data, stone parameters, lasing time, total operating time were recorded, laser efficacy(J/mm3) and ablation speed(mm3/sec) were calculated. Complications were assessed using Clavien Dindo grading. NCCT KUB was done at 1month post operatively to calculate stone free rate. RESULTS: A total of 76 patients were included and analysed in the study. Mean stone volume was 1860.79±1172.61 (1169.27-2193.25) mm3, mean stone density was 1099.80 ± 313.65 (875.00-1317.00) HU, mean laser time was 537.79±689.89 (21.00-1080.00) sec, mean total operating time was 43.38±12.96 (35.00-51.25) min, mean laser efficacy was 20.30±15.5 (8.88-25.57) J/mm3, mean ablation speed was 1.32±0.7 (0.82-1.64) mm3/sec. A strong positive correlation between stone volume and ablation speed (r=0.659, p=0.000), a moderate negative correlation between volume and laser efficacy (J/mm3) (r=-0.392, p=0.000). With increasing volume of the stone, J/mm3 decreased significantly and ablation speed increased significantly (p<0.001). Complications occurred in 21.05% (16/76) patients, most of which were Clavien grades 1-2. Overall SFR is 96.05%. CONCLUSIONS: With an increase is stone volume, laser efficiency increases as less energy is required to ablate every mm3 of stone. Source of Funding: None © 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 209Issue Supplement 4April 2023Page: e311 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Abhishek Singh More articles by this author Soundarya Ganesan More articles by this author Rohan Batra More articles by this author Abhijit Patil More articles by this author Arvind Ganpule More articles by this author Ravindra Sabnis More articles by this author Mahesh Desai More articles by this author ChandraMohan Vaddi More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract