Previous articleNext article FreeCurrent ApplicationsHeritage PreservationL. W. BartonL. W. Barton Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUSFull Text Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmailQR Code SectionsMoreVisions for the Past from the Chickasaw NationOnce the purview of looters, collectors, antiquarians, and thieves, the material remains of the Chickasaw past increasingly rest in the hands of the Chickasaw Nation—a democratic tribal republic in south‐central Oklahoma, home to many Chickasaw people. With the recent amicable appropriation of both private lands and archaeological collections, the Chickasaw leadership charges itself with the responsibility for stewardship and exploration of its material heritage. Now, as both sponsors and visionaries, the Chickasaw Nation generates the energy behind the reinvention of a scattered historical legacy.Figure 1. Eighteenth‐century stone pipes from Chickasaw sites around Tupelo, Mississippi (courtesy of the Chickasaw Nation Heritage Preservation Division; photo Ian W. Brown, courtesy of the Peabody Museum and the President and Fellows of Harvard University).View Large ImageDownload PowerPointForcibly removed to Indian Territory by the U.S. government in the 1830s, the Chickasaw people left both their ancestral landscape and the material remains of its occupation to expansion and development. Today, the leaders of the Chickasaw Nation, headquartered in Ada, Oklahoma, are working to reconnect it to its history by acquiring properties near Tupelo, Mississippi, the center of Chickasaw territory during the eighteenth century. This program does not end with acquisition: the Chickasaw Nation also sees to the protection of these properties and sponsors research on the cultural history of its ancestral home.In 2003 a delegation from the Governor’s Office of the Chickasaw Nation met with a group of Tupelo‐area collectors and researchers from the Cobb Institute of Archaeology at Mississippi State University. Assembled at the behest of tribal historian Richard Green, the meeting led to an agreement to transfer an enormous collection of Chickasaw cultural effects, mostly funerary items, salvaged by the collectors Julian Riley, Steve Cook, and Buddy Palmer to the Chickasaw Nation.As urban expansion in northern Mississippi ripped through the buried remains of the Chickasaw past, Riley, Cook, and Palmer—all lifelong students of local Indian artifacts and history—initially amassed their collections by picking through the bulldozed back‐dirt of highways and housing projects. They self‐published their findings regarding the locations of the abandoned Chickasaw villages in 1980 and attempted to enlist professional archaeologists in enhancing their part‐time research. However, because of the political, legal, and ethical complications surrounding the possession and trade of Native American grave goods, university archaeologists were reluctant to participate. Finally, as a result of Chickasaw Governor Bill Anoatubby’s persistence, Riley, Cook, and Palmer agreed to donate their holdings to the Chickasaw Nation in exchange for legal indemnity and compensation for their scholarly efforts. No money was exchanged for the artifacts themselves. The Chickasaw Nation then contracted with the Cobb Institute of Archaeology to catalog, curate, and assign provenience data to the remains. According to Cobb archaeologist Brad Lieb, the locational information provided by the collectors expands “our understanding of Chickasaw settlement patterns during the seventeenth, eighteenth, and nineteenth centuries,” while the collections “provide an invaluable material reference for the life‐ways of the Chickasaw people … up to the point of removal.”In 2005, with the help of a grant from the Chickasaw Nation, the Archaeological Conservancy purchased a 35‐acre parcel near Tupelo—a portion of a ridgetop historically occupied by the Chickasaw that has significant archaeological potential. By leasing it from the conservancy the Chickasaw Nation preserves its access and connection to an ancestral landscape.According to Anoatubby, “Archaeological acquisition, conservation, and research are a vital part of our overarching efforts to expand the scope of knowledge of Chickasaw history, heritage, and culture.” He says that he feels a responsibility to do everything he can to assist those who are working to advance and expand the knowledge of the tribe’s history and culture. The Chickasaw Nation, he says, “will continue to explore every avenue available, because everything we learn about Chickasaw history inspires us to continue our quest to discover more.” Previous articleNext article DetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Current Anthropology Volume 48, Number 3June 2007 Sponsored by the Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/517589 Views: 240Total views on this site Citations: 1Citations are reported from Crossref PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Miwa Tsuji, Yuji Higashi, Yoshiaki Iwase, Toshiro Fujimoto, Masaki Sekine, Toshiyo Tamura, Yoshio Mitsuyama , Journal of Life Support Engineering 21, no.44 (Jan 2009): 158–163.https://doi.org/10.5136/lifesupport.21.158
Read full abstract