Transcranial slow oscillation stimulation (tSOS) has been shown to have an impact on EEG. It acts upon memory consolidation during sleep and on memory encoding during wakefulness [2] , [1] . The goal of our study was to reproduce the stimulation protocol of Kirov et al. during daytime to investigate whether we could find effects on EEG, sleepiness and alertness. We performed a randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind cross over trial with 20 healthy individuals. Every subject was stimulated during 2 visits with a washout phase of at least 10 days in between. Subjects were stimulated during daytime and received either real or sham stimulation. We stimulated with anodal tSOS ( f = 0.75 Hz, waveform: sinus, current: 250 μA, DC offset: 130 μA, current density: 13.8 μA/cm 2 , electrode positions: (F3)/(F4)-mastoids, stimulator: Neuroconn DC Stimulator Plus) and with sham mode provided by manufacturer. Group A ( n = 10) received only one stimulation per visit whereas group B ( n = 10) received 3. One stimulation session consisted of 5 blocks of stimulation, each with a length of 5 min and a stimulation free interval of 1 min after each block. Several cognitive tests were performed before and after stimulation (PVT, DSST, Digit Span, KSS). EEG was recorded before, during and after stimulation. The data were analyzed using Matlab, EEGLab and Fieldtrip. In both groups neither in the cognitive performance tests nor in EEG power relevant significant differences between real and sham stimulation were found. We observed a slight, however non-significant increase in theta power in the stimulation free intervals as well for active as for sham stimulation. This effect was only of a short duration. A possible reason for the lacking improvement of cognitive performance might be the stimulation during quiet wakefulness. It has been shown that the response to tSOS depends on the brain state. Increased memory encoding due to tSOS, for instance, can be reached by stimulation during learning. Effects of tSOS are known to be short-lasting, maybe too short-lasting to have an impact on the cognitive tests performed afterwards. The slight increase of theta activity matches with previous studies. The lacking significance may be due to the stimulation with a lower current density. Furthermore we used the sham mode provided by the manufacturer of our stimulator, which applies an impedance check with a frequency of 2 Hz. It might have an influence on EEG similar to our active stimulation. Further studies discarding these problems are necessary and might be able to reproduce results of previous studies. This study was funded by the European project HIVE within the 7th framework program.