Stimulation Of Primary Motor Cortex Research Articles

The polarity of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation affects the planning and execution of movement sequences.

Noninvasive brain stimulation of the primary motor cortex has been shown to alter therapeutic outcomes in stroke and other neurological conditions, but the precise mechanisms remain poorly understood. Determining the impact of such neurostimulation on the neural processing supporting motor control is a critical step toward further harnessing its therapeutic potential in multiple neurological conditions affecting the motor system. Herein, we leverage the excellent spatio-temporal precision of magnetoencephalographic (MEG) imaging to identify the spectral, spatial, and temporal effects of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) on the neural responses supporting motor control. Participants (N = 67) completed three HD-tDCS visits (anode, cathode, sham), with each involving 20 min of left primary motor cortex stimulation and performance of a simple/complex motor sequencing task during MEG. Whole-brain statistical analyses of beta oscillatory responses revealed stimulation-by-task interaction effects in the left primary motor cortex, right occipitotemporal, and the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortices. Broadly, anodal stimulation induced significantly stronger beta oscillatory responses in these regions during simple movement sequences, while neural responses to complex sequences were not affected by stimulation. En masse, these data suggest that the beta oscillations serving motor planning (i.e., pre-movement) are particularly sensitive to the polarity of noninvasive stimulation and that the impact varies based on the difficulty of the movement sequence.

Comparing the effects of anodal and cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation of primary motor cortex at varying intensities on motor learning in healthy young adults.

Inconsistent results are observed in the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) with different montages on motor learning. This study aimed to compare the effects of anodal and cathodal tDCS (c-tDCS) over primary motor cortex (M1) at different intensities on motor learning in healthy young adults. The participants were randomly divided into: (1) 1mA M1 c-tDCS, (2) 1mA M1 anodal tDCS (a-tDCS), (3) 2mA M1 c-tDCS, (4) 2mA M1 a-tDCS and (5) M1 sham tDCS groups. The groups received 20-min stimulation with serial reaction time task (SRTT) incidentally, while the tDCS was turned off after 30 s in the sham tDCS group. Response time (RT) and error rate (ER) during SRTT were assessed prior, during and 72 h after the intervention. The results of the paired t-test indicated that online learning occurred in all groups (p< 0.05), except in M1 c-tDCS (1mA) (p> 0.05). One-way ANOVA analysis also indicated that there were differences in offline learning (RT (F(DF) =5.19(4); p< 0.001; and ER (F(DF) =9(4), p< 0.0001) among groups, with more offline learning in 1mA M1 a-tDCS, 2mA M1 c-tDCS and 2mA M1 a-tDCS groups (p< 0.05). On the other hand, the 1mA M1 c-tDCS group did not indicate any consolidation effect or even a trend toward negative offline learning. M1 a-tDCS with different intensities and also 2mA M1 c-tDCS may be helpful for the enhancement of motor learning in young healthy adults. This study enhances our understanding of tDCS intensity and polarity effects on motor learning, with potential for optimizing therapeutic protocols.

Application of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Treatment of Restless Legs Syndrome: A Pilot Study

To explore effects of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on patients with restless legs syndrome (RLS). In total, 18 patients with primary RLS were divided into rTMS group and sham stimulation group. The rTMS treatment group received 15-Hz high-frequency rTMS to stimulate the leg motor representative area of the frontal cortex for 14 days, and the sham stimulation group received 15 Hz high-frequency rTMS sham stimulation in primary motor cortex for 14 days. After rTMS, RLS severity scale score, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA), as well as Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 24 (HAMD24) in rTMS treatment group were significantly lower than before treatment; 1 month and 2 months after treatment, the score remained at low level. Meanwhile, no significant changes have been observed in the aforementioned index before rTMS stimulation for the sham stimulation group after 14 days or after 1 month and 2 months. In addition, the results of correlation analysis suggested for all the 18 patients with RLS, there was a positive correlation between PSQI score and HAMA as well as HAMD24 scores before and after rTMS stimulation. In addition, the RLS severity score was also positively correlated with PSQI, HAMA, and HAMD24 scores. High-frequency rTMS stimulation reduces the frequency and severity of RLS; improves the quality of sleep, anxiety, as well as depression of the patients; and the curative effect can be sustained for 2 months. High-frequency rTMS may be used as an alternative treatment option for improving the quality of life of patients with RLS.

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of Primary Motor Cortex over Multiple Days Improves Motor Learning of a Complex Overhand Throwing Task.

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) applied to the primary motor cortex (M1) improves motor learning in relatively simple motor tasks performed with the hand and arm. However, it is unknown if tDCS can improve motor learning in complex motor tasks involving whole-body coordination with significant endpoint accuracy requirements. The primary purpose was to determine the influence of tDCS on motor learning over multiple days in a complex over-hand throwing task. This study utilized a double-blind, randomized, SHAM-controlled, between-subjects experimental design. Forty-six young adults were allocated to either a tDCS group or a SHAM group and completed three experimental sessions on three consecutive days at the same time of day. Each experimental session was identical and consisted of overhand throwing trials to a target in a pre-test block, five practice blocks performed simultaneously with 20 min of tDCS, and a post-test block. Overhand throwing performance was quantified as the endpoint error. Transcranial magnetic stimulation was used to obtain motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) from the first dorsal interosseus muscle to quantify changes in M1 excitability due to tDCS. Endpoint error significantly decreased over the three days of practice in the tDCS group but not in the SHAM group. MEP amplitude significantly increased in the tDCS group, but the MEP increases were not associated with increases in motor learning. These findings indicate that tDCS applied over multiple days can improve motor learning in a complex motor tasks in healthy young adults.

Spectrum of motor responses elicited by electrical stimulation of primary motor cortex: A polygraphic study in patients with epilepsy

To study the neurophysiology of motor responses elicited by electrical stimulation of the primary motor cortex. We studied motor responses in four patients undergoing invasive epilepsy monitoring and functional cortical mapping via electrical cortical stimulation using surface EMG electrodes. In addition, polygraphic analysis of intracranial EEG and EMG during bilateral tonic-clonic seizures, induced by cortical stimulation, was performed in two patients. (a) Electrical cortical stimulation: The motor responses were classified as clonic, jittery, and tonic. The clonic responses were characterized by synchronous EMG bursts of agonist and antagonistic muscles, alternating with silent periods. At stimulation frequencies of <20Hz, EMG bursts were of ≤50ms duration (Type I clonic). At stimulation frequencies of 20-50Hz, EMG bursts were of >50ms duration and had a complex morphology (Type II clonic). Increasing the current intensity at a constant frequency converted clonic responses into jittery and tonic contractions. (b) Bilateral tonic-clonic seizures: The intracranial EEG showed continuous fast spiking activity during the tonic phase along with interference pattern on surface EMG. The clonic phase was characterized by a polyspike-and-slow wave pattern. The polyspikes were time-locked with the synchronous EMG bursts of agonists and antagonists and the slow waves were time-locked with silent periods. These results suggest that epileptic activity involving the primary motor cortex can produce a continuum of motor responses ranging from type I clonic, type II clonic, and tonic responses to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures. This continuum is related to the frequency and intensity of the epileptiform discharges with tonic seizures representing the highest end of the spectrum.

The perturbational map of low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of primary motor cortex in movement disorders

The perturbational map of low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of primary motor cortex in movement disorders

Comparison of thresholding methods for transcranial magnetic stimulation of primary motor cortex

Comparison of thresholding methods for transcranial magnetic stimulation of primary motor cortex

Transcranial direct current stimulation of primary motor cortex during hand clenching induced low-frequency transient modulation

Transcranial direct current stimulation of primary motor cortex during hand clenching induced low-frequency transient modulation

Safety of Deep Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (drTMS) against Medical Refractory Symptoms in Parkinson Syndromes: First German Real-World Data with a Specific H5 Coil.

So far, deep repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (drTMS) has shown promising results as an add-on treatment for Parkinson's disease (PD) but not for non-idiopathic Parkinson Syndromes (PS). We aimed to investigate the safety and feasibility of drTMS application in patients with different Parkinson Syndromes and medical refractory symptoms. Multifaceted real-world data (n = 21) were retrospectively analyzed regarding adverse effects as well as short-term effects of the drTMS treatment on patients' self-rated symptom severity and motor, cognitive, and emotional functions. The drTMS treatment with H5 coil included a sequential 1 Hz primary motor cortex stimulation contralateral to the more-affected body side and a bilateral 10 Hz stimulation of the prefrontal cortex. Overall, drTMS could be safely administered to patients with different PSs and medical refractory symptoms, but large variation was apparent in the rate and severity ratings of the reported adverse event/adverse device effect. The treatment significantly decreased the subjective main symptom severity. This effect was more pronounced in older patients with PD. Furthermore, analysis showed an improvement in depression, but no effect could be established in terms of cognitive performance. drTMS can be safely administered to patients with PS and medical refractory symptoms and can decrease the subjective motor symptom severity and depression.

Characterizing cortical responses to short-term multidisciplinary intensive rehabilitation treatment in patients with Parkinson's disease: A transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroencephalography study.

Combined transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) is a powerful non-invasive tool for qualifying the neurophysiological effects of interventions by recording TMS-induced cortical activation with high temporal resolution and generates reproducible and reliable waves of activity without participant cooperation. Cortical dysfunction contributes to the pathogenesis of the clinical symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD). Here, we examined changes in cortical activity in patients with PD following multidisciplinary intensive rehabilitation treatment (MIRT). Forty-eight patients with PD received 2 weeks of MIRT. The cortical response was examined following single-pulse TMS over the primary motor cortex by 64-channel EEG, and clinical symptoms were assessed before and after MIRT. TMS-evoked potentials were quantified by the global mean field power, as well as oscillatory power in theta, alpha, beta, and gamma bands, and their clinical correlations were calculated. After MIRT, motor and non-motor symptoms improved in 22 responders, and only non-motor function was enhanced in 26 non-responders. Primary motor cortex stimulation reduced global mean field power amplitudes in responders but not significantly in non-responders. Oscillations exhibited attenuated power in the theta, beta, and gamma bands in responders but only reduced gamma power in non-responders. Associations were observed between beta oscillations and motor function and between gamma oscillations and non-motor symptoms. Our results suggest that motor function enhancement by MIRT may be due to beta oscillatory power modulation and that alterations in cortical plasticity in the primary motor cortex contribute to PD recovery.

The impact of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of primary motor cortex on motor learning in older adults with low levels of activity

Background/aims Older adults with different physical activity levels have often demonstrated individual differences in motor performance and learning. Serial reaction time task training and anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex were used in this study to evaluate how these interventions affected motor learning in older adults with low activity levels. Methods In this randomised controlled trial, 28 healthy, right-handed, older adults with low activity levels, with a mean age of 69.92 years, were randomly allocated to an anodal transcranial direct current stimulation group (n=14) or sham transcranial direct current stimulation group (n=14), based on a simple non-probability sampling method. The experimental group was exposed to 20 minutes of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex, using a tDCS device, alongside eight sequenced or randomised blocks of serial reaction time task activities, for 5 consecutive days. In the control group, the tDCS device was automatically switched off after 1 minute. To assess implicit motor learning, the response time and error rate of two sequenced blocks of serial reaction time task activities were collected before, immediately following, 1 day and 1 week after the completion of the intervention. Results Immediately following the end of the intervention, at day 5, the mean response time and error rate were 925.09 and 2.55 in the experimental group, and 1016.52 and 4.10 in the control group. At 1 day after the completion of the intervention, the mean response time and error rates were 927.40 and 3.03 in the experimental group and 1021.91 and 4.34 in the control group. At 1 week after the completion of the intervention, the mean response time and error rates were 942.26 and 3.63 in the experimental group and 1050.08 and 5.11 in the control group. These findings indicate that response time and error rate were significantly decreased in both stimulation groups at different time points (P&lt;0.001). At the same time, there were no significant differences in the response time and error rate between the two groups at different time points: immediately (P=0.07, P=0.31), 1 day (P=0.06, P=0.41) and 1 week (P=0.04, P=0.35) after the completion of the intervention respectively. Conclusions Serial reaction time task training, with or without applying anodal transcranial direct current stimulation, can improve motor learning in low-activity older adults. Therefore, it appears that anodal transcranial direct current stimulation did not affect or improve motor learning in older adults with low motor activity. Motor learning training can be used alone as a practical and helpful intervention to improve performance and implicit motor skill learning with long-lasting effects in older adults with low levels of activity.

Optogenetic stimulation of primary motor cortex regulates beta oscillations in the basal ganglia: A Computational study

The primary motor cortex (M1) contains interconnected and diverse layers that play an important role in motor execution. In recent years, M1 has emerged as one of the hot targets for optogenetic stimulation in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease (PD). In this paper, we explore potential optogenetic stimulation targets in M1 based on the M1-basal ganglia-thalamus network model. The results show that excitatory optogenetic stimulation of layer 5 pyramid-tract (PT) neurons effectively activates hyper-direct pathways, which disrupts synchronous bursting behavior within the basal ganglia and reduces beta oscillations in globus pallidus pars interna (GPi). Upon this, we propose a new stimulation strategy that combines the stimulation of layer 5A intratelencephalic (IT) neurons and layer 5 PT neurons. We find that simultaneous excitation of IT neurons in layer 5A and inhibition of PT neurons effectively activates direct pathways and reduces abnormal beta oscillations within the GPi. Finally, we analyze the excitatory optogenetic stimulation of somatostatin (SOM) interneurons in the M1. Excitation of SOM neurons in layer 5 can inhibit PT and IT neurons in layer 5, thereby reducing beta oscillations in GPi via direct pathways, while excitatory stimulation of SOM neurons in layer 2/3 is ineffective. Overall, these results theoretically demonstrate that these three optogenetic stimulation strategies all have an inhibitory effect on abnormal rhythmic oscillations in PD.

Focal clonic movements elicited by electrical cortical stimulation of primary motor cortex (P1-1.Virtual)

Focal clonic movements elicited by electrical cortical stimulation of primary motor cortex (P1-1.Virtual)

Neuromodulation of somatosensory pain thresholds of the neck musculature using a novel transcranial direct current stimulation montage: a randomized double-blind, sham controlled study.

Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of primary motor cortex (M1) and cathodal of the primary sensory cortex (S1) have previously shown to modulate the sensory thresholds when administered with the reference electrode located over the contralateral supraorbital area (SO). Combining the two stimulation paradigms into one with simultaneous stimulation of the two brain areas (M1+S1-tDCS) may result in a synergistic effect inducing a prominent neuromodulation, noticeable in the pain thresholds. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of the novel M1+S1-tDCS montage compared to sham-stimulation in modulating the pain thresholds in healthy adults. Thirty-nine (20 males) subjects were randomly assigned to either receiving 20min. active M1+S1-tDCS or sham tDCS in a double-blinded single session study. Thermal and mechanical pain thresholds were assessed before and after the intervention. There were no significant differences in the pain thresholds within either group, or between the M1+S1-tDCS group and the Sham-tDCS group (p>0.05), indicating that the intervention was ineffective in inducing a neuromodulation of the somatosensory system. Experimental investigations of novel tDCS electrode montages, that are scientifically based on existing studies or computational modelling, are essential to establish better tDCS protocols. Here simultaneous transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex and primary sensory cortex showed no effect on the pain thresholds of the neck musculature in healthy subjects. This tDCS montage may have been ineffective due to how the electrical field reaches the targeted neurons, or may have been limited by the design of a single tDCS administration. The study adds to the existing literature of the studies investigating effects of new tDCS montages with the aim of establishing novel non-invasive brain stimulation interventions for chronic neck pain rehabilitation. North Denmark Region Committee on Health Research Ethics (VN-20180085) ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04658485).

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Fibromyalgia: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in fibromyalgia on the domains of pain, depression, anxiety and quality of life. Publications were searched with the keywords "repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation" and "fibromyalgia" for randomized controlled trials that compare rTMS with sham stimulation for treating pain, depression, anxiety, and quality of life. Trials available until April 2021 were searched through PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. The postintervention scores after 4 weeks for pain, depression, anxiety, and quality of life were extracted to compare the effects of rTMS and sham. Subgroup analysis was conducted based on the stimulation site. From 265 screened articles, 11 eligible randomized controlled trials involving 303 patients were included. The results show that rTMS is more effective than sham stimulation in improving pain (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -0.35; 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.62 to -0.08; p = .01) and quality of life (SMD = -0.51; 95% CI = -0.78 to -0.23; p = .0003). It is not more effective than sham stimulation for depression, and anxiety. After sensitivity analysis, subgroup analysis revealed that primary motor cortex stimulation was more effective than sham for improving pain (SMD = -0.57; 95% CI = -0.91 to -0.23; p = <0.01). Neither dorsolateral prefrontal cortex nor primary motor cortex stimulation was more effective than sham in improving depression and anxiety. rTMS is more effective than sham in improving pain and quality of life, but it does not demonstrate reduction in depression or anxiety.

Is Allodynia a Determinant Factor in the Effectiveness of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in the Prophylaxis of Migraine?

Allodynia, the clinical marker of central sensitization, affects even simple daily living activities and increases the tendency for migraine to be more resistant to treatment and have a chronic course. Migraine that impairs quality of life can often be treated with variable pharmaceutical agents, but with various side effects. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a potential alternative treatment for migraine prophylaxis. Seventy-seven patients diagnosed with migraine (48 with allodynia and 29 without allodynia) were included in the study. Randomly, 41 of the 77 patients received sham stimulation and 36 patients underwent three sessions of anodal left primary motor cortex stimulation for 2mA, 20 min. Migraine attack characteristics (frequency, severity, and duration) and analgesic drug use were followed with headache diaries for one month after the stimulation. After tDCS, migraine attack frequency (p=0.021), the number of headache days (p=0.005), duration of attacks (p=0.008), and symptomatic analgesic drug use (p=0.007) decreased in patients receiving active tDCS, compared to the sham group. The therapeutic gain of tDCS was calculated as 44% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 22-60%) for headache days and 76% (95% CI: 55-86) for headache duration. Response to tDCS treatment was higher in patients without allodynia (60% vs. 24%; p=0.028) and allodynia came out as an independent predictor of response to tDCS with logistic regression analysis. Side effects were rare and similar to the sham group. tDCS is a safe, efficacious, and fast method for migraine prophylaxis. However, the administration of tDCS before allodynia occurs, that is, before central sensitization develops, will provide increased responsiveness to the treatment. tDCS is more effective before the development of allodynia, but it also improves the quality of life even after the development of allodynia.

Corticospinal recruitment of spinal motor neurons in human stroke survivors.

Muscle weakness after stroke results from damage to corticospinal fibres that structurally and functionally connect cerebral cortex to the spinal cord. Here, we show an asymmetry in corticospinal recruitment of spinal motor neurons that is linked to maximal voluntary output of hand muscles weakened by stroke. Spike timing-dependent plasticity of synapses between corticospinal and spinal motor neurons transiently reversed recruitment failures in some survivors. These modulatory effects were strongly associated with recruitment asymmetry and hand impairment. Our findings highlight the functional relevance of spinal motor neuron recruitment by corticospinal inputs and the viability of corticospinal motor neuronal synapses for restoring activation of lower motor neurons after stroke. Corticospinal input to spinal motor neurons is structurally and functionally altered by hemiparetic stroke. The pattern and extent to which corticospinal recruitment of spinal motor neurons is reorganized and whether such changes are linked to the severity of motor impairments is not well understood. Here, we performed experiments using the triple stimulation technique to quantify corticospinal recruitment of spinal motor neurons serving paretic and non-paretic intrinsic hand muscles of humans with longstanding motor impairment secondary to stroke (n=13). We also examined whether recruitment failures could be transiently reversed by strengthening corticospinal-motoneuronal synaptic connectivity via targeted, temporally controlled non-invasive stimulation to elicit spike timing-dependent plasticity (STDP). Asymmetries were detected in corticospinal recruitment of spinal motor neurons, central conduction time and motor-evoked potential (MEP) latency. However, only recruitment asymmetry correlated with maximal voluntary motor output from the paretic hand. STDP-like effects were observed as an increase in spinal motor neuron recruitment. Control experiments to isolate the locus of plasticity demonstrated a modulation in MEPs elicited by electrical stimulation of primary motor cortex but not F-wave size or persistence, suggesting that plasticity was mediated through enhanced efficacy of residual corticospinal-motor neuronal synapses. The modulation in recruitment was strongly associated with baseline recruitment asymmetry and impairment severity. Our findings demonstrate that asymmetry in corticospinal recruitment of spinal motor neurons is directly related to impairments experienced by stroke survivors. These recruitment deficits may be partially and transiently reversed by spike timing-dependent plasticity of synapses between upper and lower motor neurons in the spinal cord, downstream of supraspinal circuits damaged by stroke.

Changes in beta and high-gamma power in resting-state electrocorticogram induced by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of primary motor cortex in unanesthetized macaque monkeys

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is now widely used as a means of neuromodulation, but the details of the mechanisms by which rTMS works remain unclarified. As a step forward to unveiling the neural phenomena occurring underneath the TMS coil, we conducted an electrophysiological study using awake and unanesthetized monkeys with subdural electrocorticogram (ECoG) electrodes implanted over the primary motor cortex (MI). We evaluated the effects of low-frequency (1 Hz) and high-frequency (10 Hz) rTMS on the resting-state ECoG signals in the stimulated MI, as well as the motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in the contralateral hand. Following the 1-Hz rTMS application, the ECoG beta band power and the MEP amplitude were significantly decreased. Following the 10-Hz rTMS application, the ECoG high-gamma power and the MEP amplitude significantly increased. Given that beta and high-gamma activities in the ECoG reflect the synchronous firing and the firing frequency of cell assemblies, respectively, in local neural circuits, these results suggest that low-frequency rTMS inhibits neural activity by desynchronizing the firing activity of local circuits, whereas high-frequency rTMS facilitates neural activity by increasing the firing rate of cell assemblies in the local circuits.

Asymmetric transcallosal conduction delay leads to finer bimanual coordination

It has been theorized that hemispheric dominance and more segregated information processing have evolved to overcome long conduction delays through the corpus callosum (transcallosal conduction delay - TCD) but that this may still impact behavioral performance, mostly in tasks requiring high timing accuracy. Nevertheless, a thorough understanding of the temporal features of interhemispheric communication is lacking. Here, we aimed to assess the relationship between TCD and behavioral performance with a noninvasive directional cortical measure of TCD obtained from transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-evoked potentials (TEPs) in the motor system. Twenty-one healthy right-handed subjects were tested. TEPs were recorded during an ipsilateral silent period (iSP) paradigm and integrated with diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and an in-phase bimanual thumb-opposition task. Linear mixed models were applied to test relationships between measures. We found TEP indexes of transcallosal communication at ∼15ms both after primary motor cortex stimulation (M1-P15) and after dorsal premotor cortex stimulation (dPMC-P15). Both M1-and dPMC-P15 were predicted by mean diffusivity in the callosal body. Moreover, M1-P15 was positively related to iSP. Importantly, M1-P15 latency was linked to bimanual coordination with direction-dependent effects, so that asymmetric TCD was the best predictor of bimanual coordination. Our findings support the idea that transcallosal timing in signal transmission is essential for interhemispheric communication and can impact the final behavioral outcome. However, they challenge the view that a short conduction delay is always beneficial. Rather, they suggest that the effect of the conduction delay may depend on the direction of information flow.

Transcranial direct current stimulation of primary motor cortex modulates post-contraction potentiation

Surface electromyographic activity (sEMG) of the biceps brachii (BB) during weak elbow flexion has been reported to immediately increase after strong elbow flexion even while exerting consistent force; this phenomenon is called “post-contraction potentiation” (PCP). To determine whether the central nervous system is involved in PCP, we investigated the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the primary motor cortex (M1) during PCP. Initially, the participants were instructed to perform successive muscle contraction tasks with different forces: 2% (Test 1); then 25%, 50%, or 100% (conditioning contraction [CC]); and again 2% (Test 2) of maximum voluntary contraction (MVC). In subsequent experiments, the CC intensity was set at 50% MVC, and tDCS (anodal, cathodal, and sham) was applied to the M1 before the task. In the last experiment, TMS was applied to M1 to evaluate the excitability of the corticospinal tract during Tests 1 and 2. The CC intensity at 50% or 100% MVC generated PCP, but didn’t at 25% MVC. Anodal tDCS significantly decreased the magnitude of PCP, while cathodal tDCS showed an increase in magnitude compared to sham tDCS. The BB motor-evoked potential amplitude during Test 2 was lower compared to that during Test 1. These findings suggest that changes in the excitability of the corticospinal tract and resultant changes in the activation pattern of motor unit activity play a role in generating PCP.