Antirheumatic Research Articles

Resolution versus persistence of childhood idiopathic nephrotic syndrome-A population-based study.

To determine the duration of relapsing childhood idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS). In this population-based study, we retrospectively analysed the computerised database of Israel's largest health maintenance organisation. Children (age 2-10 years) with a new INS diagnosis and a corticosteroid (CS) prescription between 2000 and 2010 were included. NS category was determined, according to CS and/or steroid-sparing agents (SSA) purchases. Out of 1 669 977 eligible children, 608 fulfilled inclusion criteria. Patients in the fourth quartile of purchases (n = 132) had an older age at last relapse (17.9 ± 6.3 vs. 11.3 ± 5.9 years, p < 0.001) and more SSA use (78.8% vs. 20%, p < 0.001) compared to the remaining three quartiles. A single episode occurred in 84 patients. Of the remaining 524 patients (males 66%, diagnosis age: 4.8 ± 2.2 years, SSA prescribed: 35%) who were followed for 15.5 ± 5.1 years, 113 (21.6%) had a continuing disease at an age of 19.3 ± 6.3 years. The leftover 411 entered long-lasting treatment-free remission at age 11.2 ± 5.7 years. In this multicentre study, we identified INS disease course by medication delivery. NS long-standing remission occurs at age 11.2 ± 5.7 years in most cases. However, the disease continues into adulthood in a fifth of the relapsing patients, implicating the need for proper transition to adult care.

Peripheral blood immunophenotypic diversity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and its impact on therapeutic responsiveness

ObjectiveConsidering the diverse aetiologies and immunodysregulatory statuses observed in each patient with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), stratification based on peripheral blood immunophenotyping holds the potential to enhance therapeutic responses to molecular...

Possible sex and racial disparities in myasthenia gravis care.

Given the importance of early diagnosis and treatment of myasthenia gravis (MG), it is critical to understand disparities in MG care. We aimed to determine if there are any differences in testing, treatment, and/or access to neurologists for patients of varying sex and race/ethnicity with MG. We used a nationally representative healthcare claims database of privately insured individuals (2001-2018) to identify incident cases of MG using a validated definition. Diagnostic testing, steroid-sparing agents, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), plasma exchange (PLEX), and thymectomy were defined using drug names or CPT codes. Steroid use was defined using AHFS class codes. We also determined whether an individual had a visit to a neurologist and the time between primary care and neurologist visits. Logistic regression determined associations between sex and race/ethnicity and testing, treatments, and access to neurologists. Female patients were less likely to get a computed tomography (CT) chest (odds ratio (OR) 0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.64-0.83), receive steroids (OR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.75-0.97), steroid-sparing agents (OR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.72-0.97), and IVIG or PLEX (OR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.67-0.95). Black patients were less likely to receive steroids (OR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.63-0.96). No significant disparities were seen in access to neurologists. We found healthcare disparities in MG treatment with female and Black patients receiving less treatment than men and those of other races/ethnicities. Further research and detailed assessments accounting for individual patient factors are needed to confirm these apparent disparities.

Effect of apremilast on hand and whole-body MRI assessments of inflammation in patients with psoriatic arthritis (MOSAIC): a phase 4, multicentre, single-arm, open-label study.

The Psoriatic Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring System (PsAMRIS) and MRI Whole-Body Scoring System for Inflammation in Peripheral Joints and Entheses in Inflammatory Arthritis (MRI-WIPE) have not been used together to assess treatment of psoriatic arthritis in a clinical trial. We aimed to assess the effect of apremilast treatment on inflammation, with outcomes measured by PsAMRIS and MRI-WIPE. MOSAIC was a phase 4, multicentre, single-arm, open-label study conducted at 29 sites across ten countries (Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Germany, Italy, Russia, Spain, Switzerland, the UK, and the USA). Adults aged 18 years or older with a documented diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis for a duration of 3 months to 5 years self-enrolled and were included if they met the classification criteria for active psoriatic arthritis at screening. Patients were required to have at least three swollen and three tender joints with hand involvement and at least one active enthesitis site according to the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada enthesitis index or the Leeds enthesitis index. Patients were excluded if they had previous treatment with a biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug or previous treatment with more than two conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. After a 5-day titration period, patients received apremilast 30 mg orally twice per day. Concomitant stable methotrexate up to 25 mg per week was permitted. The primary endpoint was change from baseline to week 24 in a composite inflammation score of bone marrow oedema, synovitis, and tenosynovitis in the hand as assessed by PsAMRIS. The full analysis set and safety population included all enrolled patients who received at least one dose of apremilast. This completed study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03783026). Between Feb 6, 2019, and May 11, 2022, 123 patients were enrolled in the MOSAIC study. Of these 123 patients, 122 (99%) were treated with apremilast and included in the full analysis set and safety population. 67 (55%) of 122 patients were female, 55 (45%) were male, and 116 (95%) were White. 80 (66%) of 122 patients completed 48 weeks of treatment. The least squares mean change from baseline to week 24 in the composite inflammation score of bone marrow oedema, synovitis, and tenosynovitis as assessed by PsAMRIS was -2·32 (95% CI -4·73 to 0·09). 95 (78%) of 122 patients had at least one treatment-emergent adverse event. Six (5%) patients had a severe treatment-emergent adverse event and six (5%) patients had a serious treatment-emergent adverse event. No serious treatment-emergent adverse events were considered to be related to apremilast. Apremilast improved inflammation in joints and entheses on assessment of MRI measures in the hand and the whole body. Our findings encourage the use of MRI, including whole-body MRI, as an objective outcome measure in trials in patients with psoriatic arthritis. Amgen.

Fumaric acid per se and in combination with methotrexate arrests inflammation via moderating inflammatory and oxidative stress biomarkers in arthritic rats

Objective: Fumaric acid is a dicarboxylic acid that belongs to the phenolic class enriched in fruits and vegetables that are traditionally used for the treatment of various ailments. The research was planned to find out the anti-inflammatory and anti-arthritic activities of fumaric acid using in-vitro and in-vivo assays. Moreover, safety study was also done. Materials and methods: The 0.1 ml complete Freund’s adjuvant was injected in left hind paw in all Wistar rats except normal rats at day 1 to induced arthritis. The treatment with fumaric acid at 10, 20, 40, and fumaric acid 40 mg/kg together with methotrexate (MTX) was administered to immunized rats at 8th day via oral gavage and continued till 28th day though, MTX was administered as standard control. Results: The fumaric acid notably (p < 0.0001) lessened the paw edema and arthritic scoring, reinstated body and immune organ weight, and oxidation status in treated rats. Fumaric acid notably restored altered C-reactive protein, rheumatoid factor, liver function tests, ESR, WBCs, RBCs and Hb levels in treated rats. The fumaric acid in combination noticeably (p < 0.01–0.0001) suppressed the expression of TNF- α, IL-6, IL-1β, NF-kβ, and COX-2, and over expressed IL-4, and IL-10 in contrast to other treated groups. Fumaric acid had presented a dose-dependent antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and anti-arthritic activities while notable activity exhibited by fumaric acid in combination with MTX. The fumaric acid exhibited non-significant clinical signs of toxicity and mortality in acute toxicity study. The LD50 was more than 2000 mg/kg. Conclusion: Fumaric acid in combination can be used as disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug but it will need extensive pre-clinical and clinical studies.

Methotrexate, Tofacitinib, and Biologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug Safety and Effectiveness Among Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis in Japan: CorEvitas Registry Observational Study.

The evolution of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has improved patient prognosis. However, more real-world safety/effectiveness data comparing methotrexate (MTX), tofacitinib, tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi), and non-TNFi biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs)are warranted. The CorEvitas RA Japan registry was used to identify patients with rheumatologist-diagnosed RA who initiated MTX/tofacitinib/TNFi/non-TNFi bDMARDs. Safety outcomes included incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), total cardiovascular disease, total serious infections, total herpes zoster, and total malignancies (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer). Effectiveness outcomes included change from baseline (Δ) in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) and proportion of patients achieving a minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in CDAI at month6. Adjusted regression models were fit; marginal means were estimated. Overall, 1972 patients were included in the safety cohort: MTX (N = 298); tofacitinib (N = 253); TNFi (N = 663); non-TNFi (N = 758). Mean follow-up time was 3.8, 2.9, 3.0, and 2.9years for MTX, tofacitinib, TNFi, and non-TNFi, respectively. Adjusted incidence rates (IRs, patients with events/100 patient-years [95% confidence intervals]) for MACE and total cardiovascular disease, respectively, were numerically lower for MTX (0.34 [0, 0.83]; 0.42 [0, 0.92]) and TNFi (0.09 [0, 0.27]; 0.61 [0.15, 1.07]) versus tofacitinib (0.48 [0, 1.20]; 2.30 [0.38, 4.22]) and non-TNFi (0.77 [0.35, 1.19]; 1.28 [0.73, 1.82]). Serious infections were numerically higher for non-TNFi (4.47 [3.38, 5.56]); herpes zoster was higher for tofacitinib (7.41 [4.52, 10.29]), versus other groups. IRs for malignancies were comparable between groups. Mean ΔCDAI and rates of achieving MCID in CDAI at month6 were generally greater with tofacitinib versus other groups. Some variations in incidence of safety outcomes were observed between treatments, while certain effectiveness outcomes favored tofacitinib. Sample size variation between groups and low number of safety events limited the analysis. Further studies are warranted to investigate observed differences. GOV: NCT05572567.

Efficacy of formic acid in combination with cDMARDs in rheumatoid arthritis.

The immune system of the body mistakenly targets its own joints in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), a chronic autoimmune disease that causes pain, inflammation, and damage. The complexity of RA often requires the simultaneous use of several different management strategies. This study examines the potential enhancement of conventional RA treatments, specifically conventional Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (cDMARDs), by the addition of formic acid, a naturally occurring substance that may possess anti-inflammatory properties. A total of 90 children diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis were examined at our hospital from 2020 to 2022. We segregated them into two cohorts, each consisting of 45 children. One cohort was administered conventional rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatments, referred to as cDMARDs, which specifically included methotrexate and leflunomide. The other group was administered the standard treatments in addition to a low dosage of a specialized medication known as all-trans retinoic acid. We conducted follow-up assessments on the children at 6 months and 1-year post-treatment. We sought to evaluate the efficacy of the treatments by assessing the subjective reports of the children and their physicians, analyzing the outcomes of medical examinations, and examining diagnostic images, such as X-rays. Furthermore, we took measures to ensure the safety of the treatments. Among the cohort exclusively administered cDMARDs, approximately 26.7% exhibited significant improvement, 24.4% demonstrated moderate improvement, and 6.7% displayed minor improvement after a duration of 6 months. Approximately 57.8% of the children in this group experienced positive outcomes as a result of the treatment. The group that received retinoic acid also demonstrated superior outcomes. Approximately one-third (33.3%) of the participants demonstrated significant improvement, while another one-third showed moderate improvement. Additionally, 11.1% of the participants displayed minor improvement after a period of six months. Upon comparing the two groups, it was observed that the group receiving retinoic acid demonstrated a significantly superior outcome (p<0.05). Overall, the incorporation of all-trans retinoic acid alongside conventional treatments for children with RA appears to enhance their efficacy.

Multicenter observational study on the efficacy of selective Janus Kinase-1 inhibitor upatacitinib in rheumatoid arthritis.

Upadacitinib (UPA) is a selective, reversible Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) approved for the treatment of RA. However, there is still no solid evidence on the long-term efficacy of UPA in treated patients. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of UPA to obtain remission or low disease activity (LDA) in a series of UPA patients in patients with RA after 6 and 12 months of treatment in a real-world setting. A series of 111 consecutive patients treated with UPA in 23 rheumatology centers were enrolled. Personal history, treatment history and disease activity at baseline, after 6 and 12 months were recorded. Intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses assessed achievement of remission or LDA or defined as DAS28 <2.6 and ≤3.2, respectively. Logistic regression analysis examined the role of several independent factors on the reduction of disease activity after 6 months of treatment. Of the initial group of 111 subjects at baseline, 86 and 29 participants completed clinical assessments at 6 and 12 months. According to ITT analysis, the rates of remission and LDA were 18% and 18% at 6 months and 31.5% and 12.5% at 12 months, respectively. PP analysis showed higher rates of remission and LDA at 6 (23.3% and 19.8%) and 12 months (55.2% and 20.7%). Results of multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that a low DAS28 score (P=0.045) was the only predictor of achieving remission at 6 months. None of the baseline factors predicted remission/LDA at 6 months. RA patients treated with UPA achieved a significant rate of disease remission or LDA in a real-world setting. The 6-month response was found to depend only on the baseline value of DAS28, while it was not influenced by other factors such as disease duration, line of treatment or concomitant therapy with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) or corticosteroids.

Efficacy and safety of filgotinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: week 156 interim results from a long-term extension study

BackgroundJanus kinase inhibitors are an effective option for achieving sustained remission or low disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) following inadequate response to conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs....

Biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs improve body composition in rheumatoid arthritis patients more than conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs: Results from the PRESENT study.

The effects of biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) and conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) on body composition and muscle function in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients requiring treatment enhancement were compared. This multicenter, prospective, observational study (PRESENT Study) divided RA patients non-randomly into a csDMARD group (n = 100) and a b/tsDMARD group (n = 100). Changes in body composition and muscle function were examined in 80 patients in each group followed for 52 weeks. The percentages of new-onset and improved sarcopenia over 1 year were investigated. Patients in the b/tsDMARD group were divided into three groups by drug type: TNF inhibitors (n = 30), non-TNF inhibitors (n = 23), and JAK inhibitors (n = 27). Baseline median age and disease duration were 70.0 and 4.0 years, respectively. Changes in weight (24 and 52 weeks) and muscle mass (52 weeks) were significantly higher in the b/tsDMARD group (p = .035, p < .001, and p = .002, respectively). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, b/tsDMARD treatment (OR 3.21, p = .002), DAS28-ESR (OR 0.65 p = .011), and muscle mass (OR 0.90, p = .023) were independently associated with increased muscle mass at 52 weeks. The percentages of new-onset and improved sarcopenia were almost equal. There were no significant differences in the time-dependent changes (52 weeks) of clinical status, body composition, muscle function, and status of sarcopenia among TNF inhibitors, non-TNF inhibitors, and JAK inhibitors. Weight and muscle mass increased significantly more with b/tsDMARD than with csDMARD treatment. There were no differences in body composition changes by mode of action with b/tsDMARDs.

Efficacy and Safety of Biologics in Polymyalgia Rheumatica: A Retrospective Study.

The study aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in the treatment of polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) complicated by rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Patients with PMR which could be classified as RA and who were treated with bDMARDs were included in the analysis. The primary endpoint was the clinical Polymyalgia Rheumatica Activity Score (Clin-PMR-AS) after 26weeks of treatment, and the secondary endpoint was adverse events during the observation period. A total of 203 patients with PMR which was resistant or intolerant to glucocorticoids and could be classified as RA were receiving bDMARDs and were enrolled in the study. There were 83, 82, and 38 patients in the tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi), interleukin-6 receptor inhibitor (IL-6Ri), and cytotoxic Tlymphocyte-associated antigen-4-immunoglobulin(CTLA4-Ig) groups, respectively. Twenty-six weeks after bDMARD initiation, Clin-PMR-AS levels were significantly lower in the IL-6Ri group as compared to other groups. Multiple regression analysis was performed with Clin-PMR-AS as the objective variable. Body mass index (BMI), history of bDMARDs, and IL-6Ri use were identified as factors involved in Clin-PMR-AS. After adjustment for group characteristics using inverse probability of treatment weighting with propensity scores, the Clin-PMR-AS score at 26weeks was significantly lower in the IL-6Ri group (9.0) than in both the TNFi (12.4, p = 0.004) and CTLA4-Ig (15.9, p = 0.003) group. IL-6Ri may potentially improve the disease activity of PMR compared to other bDMARDs.

Agreement of Medication Information Derived From EHR Data Compared to Medicare Insurance Claims: An Analysis of Biologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs.

Few studies have reported the agreement between medication information derived from ambulatory EHR data compared to administrative claims for high-cost specialty drugs. We used data from a national EHR-enabled registry, the Rheumatology Informatics System for Effectiveness (RISE), with linked Medicare claims in a population of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) to investigate variations in agreement for different biologic disease-modifying agents (bDMARDs) between two data sources (RISE EHR data vs. Medicare claims), categorized by drug, route of administration, and patient insurance factors (dual eligibility). Patients ≥ 65 years old, with ≥ 2 visits in RISE with RA ICD codes ≥ 30 days apart, and continuous enrollment in Medicare Parts B and D in 2017-2018 were included. We classified patients as bDMARD users or nonusers in Medicare claims or EHR data in 2018, and we calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive predicted value (PPV), and negative predicted value (NPV) of EHR data for identifying bDMARD users, using Medicare as the reference standard. We also calculated these metrics after stratifying by clinic-administered (Part B) versus. pharmacy-dispensed (Part D) bDMARDs and by patient dual-eligibility. A total of 26 097 patients were included in the study. Using Medicare claims as the reference standard, EHR data had a sensitivity of 75.0%-90.8% for identifying patients with the same medication and route. PPV for Part B bDMARDs was higher compared with Part D bDMARDs (range 94.3%-97.3% vs. 51.0%-69.6%). We observed higher PPVs for Part D bDMARDs among patients who were dual-eligible (range 82.4%-95.1%). The risk of misclassification of drug exposure based on EHR data sources alone is small for Medicare Part B bDMARDs but could be as high as 50% for Part D bDMARDs, in particular for patients who are not dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid.

Another Notch in the Belt of Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Notch ligands and receptors, including JAG1/2, DLL1/4, and Notch1/3, are enriched on macrophages (MΦs), fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLS), and/or endothelial cells in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) compared with normal synovial tissues (ST). Power Doppler ultrasound-guided ST studies reveal that the Notch family is highly involved in early active RA, especially during neovascularization. In contrast, the Notch family is not implicated during the erosive stage, evidenced by their lack of correlation with radiographic damage in RA ST. Toll-like receptors and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) are the common inducers of Notch expression in RA MΦs, FLS, and endothelial cells. Among Notch ligands, JAG1 and/or DLL4 are most inducible by inflammatory responses in RA MΦs or endothelial cells and transactivate their receptors on RA FLS. TNF plays a central role on Notch ligands, as anti-TNF good responders display JAG1/2 and DLL1/4 transcriptional downregulation in RA ST myeloid cells. In in vitro studies, TNF increases Notch3 expression in MΦs, which is further amplified by RA FLS addition. Specific disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs reduced JAG1 and Notch3 expression in MΦ and RA FLS cocultures. Organoids containing FLS and endothelial cells have increased expression of JAG1 and Notch3. Nonetheless, Methotrexate, interleukin-6 receptor (IL-6R) antibodies, and B cell blockers are mostly ineffective at decreasing Notch family expression. NF-κB, MAPK, and AKT pathways are involved in Notch signaling, whereas JAK/STATs are not. Although Notch blockade has been effective in RA preclinical studies, its small molecule inhibitors have failed in phase Iand II studies, suggesting that alternative strategies may be required to intercept their function.

No sex-based differences in odds of starting or time to treatment of generalized myasthenia gravis: A single center cohort study.

Females with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) report lower quality of life (QoL) and have more severe disease than males. Sex differences in disease characteristics exist, however whether there are sex differences in the treatment of gMG that may contribute to QoL disparities is unknown. Our objective is to determine whether there are sex differences in the treatment of gMG. We performed a single-center retrospective study of people diagnosed with gMG at the University of Calgary between 1997 and 2021. Primary outcome was proportion starting treatment and secondary outcome was time from diagnosis to treatment initiation. Treatments included pyridostigmine, prednisone, steroid sparing therapies (azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil [MMF], methotrexate [MTX], or tacrolimus), intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), plasmapheresis, rituximab, eculizumab, cyclosporine, stem cell transplantation, and thymectomy. Multivariable logistic and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to examine treatment associations with sex, adjusted for time from onset to diagnosis, age at diagnosis, presence of thymoma, and antibody status. A total of 179 people with gMG were included (41.9% female). Odds of starting treatment were not statistically associated with sex after adjustment for confounders and correction for multiple testing. Results of the secondary analysis using time to treatment initiation as the outcome were similar. We found no sex differences in odds of starting treatment or time to treatment initiation that might explain previously observed sex-based differences in QoL. Future work should capture physician and patient treatment preferences that may influence disease management.

The Effect of Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) on the Expression and Methylation Status of the FOXO1 gene in Newly Diagnosed Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Background: The expression of forkhead box O (FOXO) was found to be connected with developing rheumatoid arthritis (RA), an inflammatory autoimmune disorder. The current study is intended to assess the expression and methylation status of the FOXO1 gene in individuals with recently diagnosed RA, before and after the administration of customary disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Methods: Twenty participants were investigated in this study. The assessment of the FOXO1 gene expression in peripheral blood was done by real-time PCR, and the status of FOXO1 promoter methylation was ascertained via quantitative methylation-specific PCR (Q-MSP) before and after the administration of DMARDs for six months. Results: Following DMARDs treatment, the study discovered a decrease in FOXO1 gene expression. However, the decline did not meet the criteria for statistically meaningful (P = 0.087). The expression of the FOXO1 gene was positively correlated with RA disease activity pre- and post-treatment with DMARDs (P = 0.009, r = 0.567 and P = 0.001, r = 0.656, respectively). Moreover, the study showed no alterations in the amount of DNA methylation of the FOXO1 promoter in newly diagnosed RA patients who had not yet received DMARDs, as compared to DMARDs-treated RA patients. Conclusion: Altogether, this study suggests that DMARDs treatment may reduce FOXO1 gene expression, potentially helping to alleviate the pro-inflammatory effects associated with this gene.

Efficacy and safety of first-line biological DMARDs in rheumatoid arthritis patients with chronic kidney disease

ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of first-line biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with chronic kidney disease (CKD), including those undergoing haemodialysis (HD).MethodsThis retrospective...

Prevalence of Axial Spondyloarthritis in Young People With Chronic Low Back Pain at a Hospital-Based Health Management Organization: A 10-Year Database Study.

There is scarce information on the prevalence of axial spondylarthritis (axSpA) using the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) criteria and even less in Latin America. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of axSpA by applying the ASAS 2009 criteria to a medical records review study of young people with chronic low back pain (LBP) at a university hospital-based health management organization. Electronic medical records from the Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires health management organization were reviewed to estimate the prevalence of axSpA (radiographic axSpA [r-axSpA] and nonradiographic axSpA [nr-axSpA]) using the ASAS 2009 axSpA criteria in all patients with chronic LBP (≥3 months) aged <45 years at the first LBP appointment, observed between 2009 and 2019. Among 795 young people with CLBP, the estimated prevalence of axSpA was 5.78% (r-axSpA, 2.76%; nr-axSpA, 3.02%). Ten of 46 patients (21.74%) with axSpA (all nr-axSpA) were undiagnosed, with an undiagnosed axSpA prevalence of 1.26%. The median interval between the first LBP appointment and diagnosis was 34.6 months for axSpA (58.7 vs. 23.1 months for r-axSpA vs. nr-axSpA). Previously diagnosed r-axSpA and nr-axSpA patients had comparable use of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) (45% vs. 36%) and delays between nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug failure and bDMARD initiation (median, 2.76 vs. 2.66 months). In our cohort of young persons with chronic LBP, the prevalence of axSpA was approximately 6%, with a high prevalence of undiagnosed axSpA, which could explain the low prevalence of axSpA reported in previous studies in Latin America.

Exploring the effect on primary endpoints in trials testing targeted therapy interventions for rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-epidemiological study on the appropriate use of a core outcome set

ObjectivesTo explore which core domain is best associated with the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% response in trials assessing the effect of targeted interventions in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).MethodsA meta-epidemiological...

Tocilizumab for cystoid macular edema secondary to retinitis pigmentosa

PurposeTo describe the effect of tocilizumab (TCZ) on cystoid macular edema (CME) and retinal vascular leakage (RVL) in retinitis pigmentosa (RP).MethodsRetrospective case series.ResultsWe present 2 cases of RP with marked inflammatory features in the form of CME and RVL. There was initial diagnostic uncertainty with posterior uveitis. Both patients were treated with corticosteroids, conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (cDMARDs), and biological DMARDs (bDMARDs) for the inflammatory features with partial and inconsistent treatment response. When treatment was switched to intravenous (IV) TCZ, dramatic reduction in CME and RVL were observed in both patients. Diagnosis of RP was eventually made based on findings of ancillary tests (macular spectral-domain optical coherence tomography, visual fields, full-field electroretinogram). Genetic testing led to a molecular diagnosis of EYS-related autosomal recessive RP in patient 1, while patient 2 had negative gene panel results.ConclusionsIV TCZ can be an effective treatment option in RP-related CME and RVL. Whether this treatment strategy has an effect on prognosis remains to be established, but it is possible considering chronic CME-related retinal damage is a major driver of central vision loss in RP.

Managing RS3PE: Diagnostic approach, initial steroid response, and long-term management with DMARDs

Background. RS3PE, or Remitting Seronegative Symmetrical Synovitis with Pitting Edema, is a unique and relatively rare form of inflammatory arthritis that predominantly affects older adults. It is distinguished by its hallmark features: symmetrical swelling of the joints, significant pitting edema in the extremities, and a negative serological profile for common markers associated with rheumatoid arthritis, such as rheumatoid factor (RA factor) and anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (anti-CCP). This condition is often characterized by a remitting course, meaning that symptoms may improve or resolve over time, particularly with appropriate treatment. The condition usually affects older adults and can sometimes be associated with other underlying health issues, such as malignancies or infections. The “remitting” aspect of RS3PE refers to the fact that the symptoms often improve or resolve over time, particularly with appropriate treatment, which usually involves corticosteroids or other anti-inflammatory medications. Case report. This case study details the clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management of a 56-year-old female patient with known hypertension who presented with bilateral dorsal hand swelling, pain, and early morning stiffness over a 15-day period. The patient’s initial examination revealed bilateral pitting edema and active arthritis in the proximal interphalangeal joints, with significant warmth and tenderness. Laboratory tests showed elevated ESR and CRP, normocytic normochromic anemia, and negative rheumatoid factor and anti-CCP antibodies. Imaging studies, including X-ray, ultrasound, and mammogram, showed no erosive changes or malignancy, while a Pap smear and serum CA-125 levels were within normal limits. The clinical picture, combined with the exclusion of other conditions, supported the diagnosis of RS3PE. Treatment commenced with intravenous low-dose dexamethasone, which led to significant symptomatic improvement. This was followed by a transition to oral prednisolone, and the patient initially showed complete resolution of symptoms. However, recurrence of symptoms occurred upon discharge, prompting the introduction of steroid-sparing agents: methotrexate and hydroxychloroquine, alongside continued oral steroid treatment. Over a two-month follow-up period, the patient experienced no signs of relapse. This case fits the clinical and investigative criteria for RS3PE. The patient showed symptomatic improvement after treatment with low-dose steroids.