1 d 0 patients with active ulcerative colitis (UC) treated with up o 10 apheresis sessions using an adsorptive column containng cellulose acetate beads. Fifty patients improved, of which 4 went into remission, and the courses of treatment allowed eduction in steroid intake by the steroid-dependent patients. hese data resemble those published by several other authors 2–4]. In this commentary, we discuss the theory behind using eucocytapheresis to treat IBD, its different forms, the way in hich these remove leucocytes, and the indications, efficacy, afety, and possible future role of leucocytapheresis. One of the key pathogenic processes in IBD is the loss f the gut’s normal tolerance to luminal bacteria, resulting n an inflammatory response with influx into the mucosa of arge numbers of neutrophils and monocytes. Removal of ctivated circulating leucocytes, and their replacement with leucocytes, either by passing venous blood through an adsorptive system, or by centrifugation. Of the two commonly used adsorptive systems, one contains cellulose acetate beads (Adacolumn, Japan Immunoresearch Laboratories, Takasaki, Japan) and the other, a polyester fibre filter (Cellsorba, Asahi Medical Company, Tokyo, Japan). The mechanisms and consequences of leucocyte removal differ between the systems. Interaction between blood and cellulose acetate beads causes complement activation and the production of active fragments such as C3a and C5a, which are potent neutrophil activators. These fragments, along with immunoglobulin, bind to the beads causing leucocytes expressing Fc R or complement receptors to be adsorbed [9]; the system removes about 65% of neutrophils, 55% of monocytes and 2% of lymphocytes. The polyester fibre filter system not only removes leucocytes by adsorption but also mechanically filters blood cells. This one marrow-derived unactivated leucocytes is, therefore, a herapeutically attractive principle. Apheresis appears to acomplish this goal; although the overall number of circulatng leucocytes may not be decreased by leucocytapheresis, he proportion of neutrophils with an immature phenotype results in the removal of almost 100% of neutrophils and monocytes, and 20–60% of lymphocytes [10]. Centrifugation is at least as effective at removing leucocytes as adsorptive columns [4] and has been claimed to be more effective in the treatment of UC [11].