Stereotactic Radiosurgery In Patients Research Articles

Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Patients with Brain Metastases from Hepatopancreaticobiliary Cancers.

The role of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for patients with brain metastases from hepatopancreaticobiliary (HPB) cancers has yet to be established. The authors present a single-institution experience of patients with HPB cancers who underwent SRS when their cancer spread to the brain. We surveyed our Gamma Knife SRS data base of 18,000 patients for the years 1987-2022. In total, 19 metastatic HPB cancer patients (13 male) with 76 brain metastases were identified. The median age at SRS was 61 years (range: 48-83). The primary cancer sites were hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC, 11 patients), cholangiocarcinoma (CCC, 2 patients), and pancreatic carcinoma (PCC, 6 patients). The median Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) was 80 (range: 50-90). Two patients underwent pre-SRS whole-brain fractionated radiation therapy (WBRT) and eight patients underwent pre-SRS surgical resection. All SRS was delivered in single session. The median margin dose was 18 Gy (range: 15-20). The median cumulative tumor volume was 8.1 cc (range: 1.0-44.2). The median patient overall survival (OS) after SRS was 7 months (range 1-79 months). Four patients had documented local tumor progression after SRS at a median time of 8.5 months (range: 2-15) between SRS and progression. Out of 76 treated tumors, 72 tumors exhibited local control. The local tumor control rate per patient was 78.9%. The local tumor control per tumor was 94.7%. Four patients developed new brain metastases at a median of 6.5 months (range: 2-17) after SRS. No patient experienced adverse radiation effects (AREs). At the last follow-up, 18 patients had died, all from systemic disease progression. Metastatic spread to the brain from HPB cancers occurs late in the course of the primary disease. In this study, all deceased patients ultimately died from primary disease progression. SRS is a non-invasive strategy that maximally preserves quality of life, and our results reported favorable outcomes compared to the existing literature. SRS should be considered as one of the primary management strategies for patients with brain metastatic spread from HPB cancer.

Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Patients with Spinal Metastases from Thyroid Cancer: A 20-Year Experience

Primary thyroid cancer metastasizing to the spine portends poor survival and low quality of life. Current management strategies continue to evolve. This single-institution retrospective study analyzes outcomes after spinal stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for patients with spinal metastases from thyroid cancer. Nineteen patients (median age: 64.5 years) were treated with SRS for spinal primary thyroid metastases (40 metastases, 47 vertebral levels) between 2003-2023. Nineteen (47.5%) lesions had epidural involvement, and 20 (50%) lesions were classified as potentially unstable or unstable via the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score. The median tumor volume per lesion was 33 cc (range: 1.5-153). The median single-fraction prescription dose was 20 Gy (range: 12-23.5). The median follow-up period was 15 months (range: 2-40). Five (12.8%) lesions locally progressed at a median of 9 months (range: 4-26) after SRS. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year local tumor control rates per lesion were 90.4%, 83.5%, and 75.9%, respectively. On univariate analysis, age at SRS > 70 years (p=0.05, HR: 6.86, 95% CI: 1.01-46.7) was significantly correlated with lower rates of local tumor control. The median overall survival was 35 months (range: 2-141). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survival rates were 73.7%, 50.4%, and 43.2%, respectively. For 33 lesions initially associated with pain, patients reported pain improvement (22 lesions, 66.7%), stability (10 lesions, 30.3%), and worsening (1 lesion, 3.0%) after SRS. One patient developed dysphagia 4 months after SRS treatment. SRS can be utilized as an effective and safe primary and adjuvant treatment option for primary thyroid metastases to the spine.

Long-Term Intracranial Outcomes With Combination Dual Immune-Checkpoint Blockade and Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Patients With Melanoma and Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Brain Metastases

The intracranial benefit of offering dual immune-checkpoint inhibition (D-ICPI) with ipilimumab and nivolumab to patients with melanoma or non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases (BMs) is unknown. We hypothesized that D-ICPI improves local control compared with SRS alone. Patients with melanoma or NSCLC treated with SRS from 2014 to 2022 were evaluated. Patients were stratified by treatment with D-ICPI, single ICPI (S-ICPI), or SRS alone. Local recurrence, intracranial progression (IP), and overall survival were estimated using competing risk and Kaplan-Meier analyses. IP included both local and distant intracranial recurrence. Two hundred eighty-eight patients (44% melanoma, 56% NSCLC) with 1,704 BMs were included. Fifty-three percent of patients had symptomatic BMs. The median follow-up was 58.8 months. Twelve-month local control rates with D-ICPI, S-ICPI, and SRS alone were 94.73% (95% CI, 91.11%-96.90%), 91.74% (95% CI, 89.30%-93.64%), and 88.26% (95% CI, 84.07%-91.41%). On Kaplan-Meier analysis, only D-ICPI was significantly associated with reduced local recurrence (P = .0032). On multivariate Cox regression, D-ICPI (hazard ratio [HR], 0.4003; 95% CI, 0.1781-0.8728; P = .0239) and planning target volume (HR, 1.022; 95% CI, 1.004-1.035; P = .0059) correlated with local control. One hundred seventy-three (60%) patients developed IP. The 12-month cumulative incidence of IP was 41.27% (95% CI, 30.27%-51.92%), 51.86% (95% CI, 42.78%-60.19%), and 57.15% (95% CI, 44.98%-67.59%) after D-ICPI, S-ICPI, and SRS alone. On competing risk analysis, only D-ICPI was significantly associated with reduced IP (P = .0408). On multivariate Cox regression, D-ICPI (HR, 0.595; 95% CI, 0.373-0.951; P = .0300) and presentation with >10 BMs (HR, 2.492; 95% CI, 1.668-3.725; P < .0001) remained significantly correlated with IP. The median overall survival after D-ICPI, S-ICPI, and SRS alone was 26.1 (95% CI, 15.5-40.7), 21.5 (16.5-29.6), and 17.5 (11.3-23.8) months. S-ICPI, fractionation, and histology were not associated with clinical outcomes. There was no difference in hospitalizations or neurologic adverse events between cohorts. The addition of D-ICPI for patients with melanoma and NSCLC undergoing SRS is associated with improved local and intracranial control. This appears to be an effective strategy, including for patients with symptomatic or multiple BMs.

Synergistic effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination with stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with lung cancer and brain metastases: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is the mainstay treatment for brain metastases (BMs) from lung cancer. In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been applied to metastatic lung cancer and have contributed to improved outcomes. The authors investigated whether SRS with concurrent ICIs for lung cancer BMs prolongs overall survival (OS), improves intracranial disease control, and raises safety concerns. Patients who underwent SRS for lung cancer BMs at Aizawa Hospital between January 2015 and December 2021 were included. Concurrent use of ICIs was defined as no more than 3 months between SRS and ICI administration. The two treatment groups, which had a similar likelihood of receiving concurrent ICIs, were generated by propensity score matching (PSM; match ratio 1:1) based on 11 potential prognostic covariates. Patient survival and intracranial disease control were compared between the groups with and without concurrent ICIs (ICI + SRS vs SRS) by time-dependent analyses, taking into account competing events. Five hundred eighty-five patients with lung cancer BM (494 with non-small cell lung cancer and 91 with small cell lung cancer) were eligible. Of those patients, 93 (16%) received concurrent ICIs. Two groups, each with 89 patients (ICI + SRS group and SRS group), were generated by PSM. The 1-year survival rates of the ICI + SRS and SRS groups after the initial SRS were 65% and 50% and the median survival times were 16.9 and 12.0 months, respectively (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.44-0.87, p = 0.006). The 2-year cumulative neurological mortality rates were 12% and 16%, respectively (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.28-1.10, p = 0.091). The 1-year intracranial progression-free survival rates were 35% and 26% (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.53-0.99, p = 0.047). The 2-year local failure rates were 12% and 18% (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.32-1.61, p = 0.43) and the 2-year distant recurrence rates were 51% and 60% (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.55-1.23, p = 0.34). Severe adverse radiation events (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE] grade 4) occurred in 1 patient in each group, and CTCAE grade 3 toxicities were observed in 3 patients in the ICI + SRS group and in 5 in the SRS group (OR 1.53, 95% CI 0.35-7.7, p = 0.75). The present study found that SRS with concurrent ICIs for patients with lung cancer BMs was associated with longer survival and durable intracranial disease control, with no apparent increase in treatment-related adverse events.

Is there an optimal time to administer postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery in patients with brain metastases? A systematic review of the literature and meta‐analysis

AbstractPostoperative stereotactic radiosurgery improves local tumor control in patients with metastatic brain cancer. However, the influence of timing on its therapeutic efficacy is unclear. In this study, we performed a meta‐analysis and systematic literature review examining publications that reported the timing of postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for patients with intracranial metastases. Our primary outcomes included median overall survival and rates of local and regional failure, while secondary outcomes examined the incidence of treatment‐related adverse events. Correlations between median SRS timing and these variables were assessed using linear regression and publication bias was appraised via Egger's test. Our study resulted in 22 articles comprising 1338 patients. The median timing of adjuvant SRS spanned 14.5 to 41 days. There was a significant negative study‐level correlation of median time to SRS with regional failure (p = 0.043, R2 = 0.32) but not with overall survival (p = 0.54, R2 = 0.03) or local failure (p = 0.16, R2 = 0.14). Additionally, there was significant heterogeneity within the reports (p&lt;0.0001). In conclusion, our analysis demonstrated that postoperative SRS timing did not influence local failure rates which may in part be due to significant variability between individual study designs and patient demographics. Further research is warranted to elucidate the role of timing for postoperative SRS on oncologic outcomes.

Health-related quality of life after stereotactic radiosurgery in patients with brain metastases.

This study aimed to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and to identify factors associated with this. HRQoL was measured pre-SRS, at 3- and 6-month follow-up. Physical functioning, cognitive functioning, role functioning, and fatigue were analyzed with the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Motor dysfunction, future uncertainty, visual disorder, communication deficit, and headaches were analyzed with the EORTC QLQ-BN20. Clinically important symptom or functional impairment was assessed following set thresholds. Factors associated with impairment were identified through multivariable logistic regression analyses. At baseline, 178 patients were included; 54% (n=96) completed questionnaires at 3 months and 39% (n=70) at 6 months. Before SRS, 29% of linear accelerator (LINAC) patients reported physical and cognitive impairment, while 25% reported impairment for fatigue. At 6 months, 39%, 43%, and 57% of LINAC patients reported impairment respectively. Forty-five percent of Gamma Knife (GK) patients reported impairment pre-SRS for physical, cognitive functioning, and fatigue. At 6 months, 48%, 43%, and 33% of GK patients reported impairment respectively. Except for role functioning, pre-SRS symptom and functioning scores were associated with impairment at 3 months, whereas scores at 3 months were associated with impairment at 6 months. Age, gender, systemic therapy, and intracranial progression were not associated with clinically important impairment. As 33-57% of patients with brain metastases reported symptom burden and functional impairments that were of clinical importance, it is recommended to pay attention to the HRQoL outcomes of these patients during clinical encounters.

The Role of Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Patients With Brain Metastases From Colorectal Cancers.

The role of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in patients with brain metastases (BMs) from colorectal cancers (CRCs) has not been established. The authors present a single-institution experience of patients with CRC who underwent SRS with metastatic brain spread. We retrospectively analyzed 111 patients with metastatic CRC (64 female, 57.7%), with 449 BMs treated with Gamma Knife SRS between 2000 and 2022. The median age during SRS was 63 years (range: 28-86), and the median Karnofsky Performance Scale was 80 (range: 60-100). The primary sites were colon (85 patients, 76.6%) and rectal (26 patients, 23.4%). Three patients underwent hypofractionated SRS (3 sessions) with a median margin dose of 27 Gy (range: 27-30). All other patients underwent single-session SRS with a median margin dose of 18 Gy (range: 13-20). The median patient survival after SRS was 7 months (range: 1-174). Ninety-eight (88.3%) patients expired at last follow-up and 15 patients (15.3%) died related to progressive intracranial disease. A Karnofsky Performance Scale of <80 at SRS presentation ( P = .02, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.6, 95% CI: 0.4-0.9) and no previous surgical resection ( P < .01, HR: 0.4, 95% CI: 0.3-0.7) were associated with inferior overall survival using multivariate analysis. Seventeen patients (15.3%) had documented local tumor progression after SRS, at a median time of 7 months (range: 3-34) between SRS and progression. Twenty-six patients (23.4%) developed new BMs at a median of 5 months (range: 2-26) between SRS and new tumor detection. Less than three BMs at SRS presentation ( P = .02, HR: 2.6, 95% CI: 1.2-5.6) were associated with better distant tumor control on multivariate analysis. The incidence of adverse radiation effects was 5.4%. SRS effectively controls BMs from CRC with low risk of treatment-related toxicity. During follow-up, the development of additional metastases can be safely treated by repeat SRS.

Survival and Radiation Dose Differences Between Single Versus Multi-Session Gamma Knife Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Patients Treated for Multiple (≥10) Brain Metastases.

To explore whether treatment with multiple Gamma Knife sessions (mGK) resulted in different survival outcomes or cumulative radiation doses compared to single session Gamma Knife (sGK) in patients who have been treated for ≥10 brain metastases (BMs). Thirty-five patients with ≥10 BMs treated with Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery (GK SRS) were identified and separated into sGK vs. mGK cohorts. Survival outcomes and dosimetry data were compared between the two groups. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) classes were used to further stratify patients. mGK patients survived longer from the first GK treatment (p<0.009). By RPA class, patients with class 1 had a prolonged survival from BM diagnosis than those in classes 2 and 3 (p=0.004). However, survival was not significantly different between the classes from the first GK treatment (p=0.089). Stratified by mGK vs. sGK and RPA classes, sGK patients in RPA class 1 had the longest survival from BM diagnosis but the worst survival from GK treatment. mGK patients in any RPA class had the best survival from the first GK treatment. For patients with RPA class 2+3, mGK was associated with longer survival from both BM diagnosis and first treatment. Statistical but not clinical differences between the mGK vs. sGK groups were observed in the max dose to the targets and cochlea, and the V40Gy whole brain dose. mGK may be beneficial if GK is initiated early at first BM diagnosis vs. sGK initiated late. Future research is required to confirm these findings and explore additional areas of interest, such as quality-of-life and economic considerations.

Stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with brain metastases from gastroesophageal cancers.

The prognosis of patients with brain metastases from gastroesophageal (GE) cancers remains unclear despite recent advances in systemic therapies. The authors present a large single-institution experience in the use of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). A retrospective review of 71 GE cancer patients (64 male, 90.14%) who underwent Gamma Knife SRS was conducted. Overall, 243 brain metastases were treated and the median number of metastases per patient was 2 (range:1-21). The median age at SRS was 66 years (range: 26-85) and the median treatment day KPS was 80 (range: 50-100). The median cumulative tumor volume was 6.7cc (range: 0.27-104.76) and the median single-session margin dose was 18Gy (range: 12-20). The median overall survival after SRS was 7 months (range: 1-64). At last follow up, 54 (76.06%) patients were deceased, 8 of whom (14.81%) expired secondary to their intracranial metastases. Four patients (5.63%) experienced local tumor progression at a median time of 8 months (range: 2-13) after SRS. Ten patients (14%) experienced new remote tumor development at a median time of 4 months (range: 0-14) after SRS. Whole-brain radiation therapy (2 patients, 20%) and repeat SRS (8 patients, 80%) were used for newly developed tumors. The incidence of transient adverse radiation effects was 8.45%. In this study, the 12-month local tumor control rate was 90%. Incidences of adverse radiation effect rates were rare. The median overall survival of 7 months indicates the poor prognosis of patients with brain spread of their GE cancer.

Concurrent Administration of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Single Fraction Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Melanoma, and Renal Cell Carcinoma Brain Metastases

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are highly effective treatments for brain metastases, particularly when these therapies are administered concurrently. However, there are limited data reporting the risk of radiation necrosis (RN) in this setting. Patients with brain metastases from primary non-small cell lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma, or melanoma treated with SRS and ICI were considered. Time-to-event analyses were conducted for any grade RN and symptomatic RN (SRN) with death incorporated as a competing risk. As a secondary analysis, recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was used for model development, and a loop of potential models was analyzed, with the highest-fidelity model selected. Brain V12 Gy thresholds identified on RPA were then incorporated into the competing risks analysis. Concurrent SRS and ICI administration. Six hundred fifty-seven patients with 4182 brain metastases across 11 international institutions were analyzed. The median follow-up for all patients was 13.4 months. The median follow-up was 12.8 months and 14.1 months for the concurrent and nonconcurrent groups, respectively (P=.03). The median patient age was 66 years, and the median Karnofsky Performance Status was 90. In patients with any grade RN, 1- and 2-year rates were 6.4% and 9.9%, respectively. In patients with SRN, 1- and 2-year rates were 4.8% and 7.2%, respectively. On RPA, the highest-fidelity models consistently identified V12 Gy as the dominant variable predictive of RN. Three risk groups were identified by V12 Gy: (1) < 12 cm3; (2) 20 cm3 ≥ V12 Gy ≥ 12 cm3; (3) V12 Gy > 20 cm3. In patients with any grade RN, 1-year rates were 3.7% (V12 Gy < 12 cm3), 10.3% (20 cm3 ≥ V12 Gy ≥ 12 cm3), and 12.6% (V12 Gy > 20 cm3); the 2-year rates were 7.5% (V12 Gy < 12 cm3), 13.8% (20 cm3 ≥ V12 Gy ≥ 12 cm3), and 15.4% (V12 Gy > 20 cm3) (P < 0.001). In patients with any SRN, 1-year rates were 2.4% (V12 Gy < 12 cm3), 8.9% (20 cm3 ≥ V12 Gy ≥ 12 cm3), and 10.3% (V12 Gy > 20 cm3); the 2-year rates were 4.4% (V12 Gy < 12 cm3), 12.4% (20 cm3 ≥ V12 Gy ≥ 12 cm3), and 13.1% (V12 Gy > 20 cm3; P< 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in rates of any grade RN or SRN when accounting for therapy timing for all patients and by V12 risk group identified on RPA. The use of SRS and ICI results in a low risk of any grade RN and SRN. This risk is not increased with concurrent administration. Therefore, ICI can safely be administered within 4-weeks of SRS. Three risk groups based on V12 Gy were identified, which clinicians may consider to further reduce rates of RN.

Upfront and Repeated Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Patients With Brain Metastases From NSCLC

IntroductionApproximately 40% of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients develop brain metastases (BM). Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) instead of whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) is increasingly administered as an upfront treatment to patients with a limited number of BM. We present outcomes and validation of prognostic scores for these patients treated with upfront SRS. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 199 patients with a total of 268 SRS courses for 539 brain metastases. Median patient age was 63 years. For larger BM, dose reduction to 18 Gy or hypofractionated SRS in 6 fractions was applied. We analyzed the BMV-, the RPA-, the GPA- and the lung-mol GPA score. Cox proportional hazards models with univariate and multivariate analyses were fitted for overall survival (OS) and intracranial progression-free survival (icPFS). ResultsSixty-four patients died, 7 of them of neurological causes. Thirty eight patients (19,3%) required a salvage WBRT. Median OS was 38, 8 months (IQR: 6-NA). In univariate analysis as well as multivariate analysis, the Karnofsky performance scale index (KPI) ≥90% (P = 0, 012 and P = 0, 041) remained as independent prognostic factor for longer OS. All 4 prognostic scoring indices could be validated for OS assessment (BMV P = 0, 007; RPA P = 0, 026; GPA P = 0, 003; lung-mol GPA P = 0, 05). ConclusionIn this large cohort of NSCLC patients with BM treated with upfront and repeated SRS, OS was markedly favourable, in comparison to literature. Upfront SRS is an effective treatment approach in those patients and can decidedly reduce the impact of BM on overall prognosis. Furthermore, the analysed scores are useful prognostic tools for OS prediction.

Is There an Optimal Time to Administer Postoperative Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Patients with Brain Metastases? A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis

Is There an Optimal Time to Administer Postoperative Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Patients with Brain Metastases? A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis

Feasibility of linac-based fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy and stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with up to ten brain metastases

BackgroundLinac-based fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (fSRT) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) are increasingly being used to manage patients with multiple metastases. This retrospective cohort study aimed to compare the outcomes after linac-based fSRT and SRS between three patient groups classified based on the number of brain metastases (BMs): 1 BM, 2–4 BM, 5–10 BM.MethodsThe data of consecutive patients with 1–10 BMs treated with fSRT or SRS between July 2016 and June 2018 at a single institution were collected. Patients with previous whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT), concurrent use of WBRT, or surgical resection were excluded from the analysis. A total of 176 patients were classified into three groups according to the number of BMs: 78, 67, and 31 patients in 1 BM, 2–4 BM, and 5–10 BM, respectively. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate overall survival (OS) curves, and the cumulative incidence with competing risks was used to estimate local control (LC), distant intracranial failure (DIF), and radiation necrosis (RN).ResultsMedian OS was 19.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 10.2–27.5), 7.3 months (4.9–11.1), and 5.1 months (4.0–9.0) in 1 BM, 2–4 BM, and 5–10 BM, respectively. Compared to 2–4 BM, 1 BM had significantly better OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.59, 95% CI 0.40–0.87; p = 0.0075); however, 5–10 BM had comparable OS (HR 1.36, 95% CI 0.85–2.19; p = 0.199). There was no significant difference in LC, DIF, and RN between tumor number groups, but DIF was lower in 1 BM. RN of grade 2 or higher occurred in 21 patients (13.5%); grade 4 and 5 RN were not observed.ConclusionsThe linac-based fSRT and SRS for patients with 5–10 BMs is comparable to that for patients with 2–4 BMs in OS, LC, DIF, and RN. It seems reasonable to use linac-based fSRT and SRS in patients with 5–10 BMs.

Neurocognitive functioning after Gamma Knife and LINAC stereotactic radiosurgery in patients with brain metastases.

Brain metastases (BM) themselves and treatment with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) can influence neurocognitive functioning. This prospective study aimed to assess neurocognitive decline in patients with BM after SRS. A neuropsychological test battery was assessed yielding ten test outcomes. Neurocognitive decline at 3 and 6months post SRS was compared to measurement prior to Gamma Knife (GK) or linear accelerator (LINAC) SRS. Reliable change indices with correction for practice effects were calculated to determine the percentage of neurocognitive decline (defined as decline on ≥ 2 test outcomes). Risk factors of neurocognitive decline were analyzed with binary logistic regression. Of 194 patients pre-SRS, 40 GK and 29 LINAC patients had data accessible at 6months. Compared to baseline, 38% of GK patients declined at 3months, and 23% declined at 6months. GK patients declined on attention, executive functioning, verbal memory, and fine motor skill. Of LINAC patients, 10% declined at 3months, and 24% at 6months. LINAC patients declined on executive functioning, verbal memory, and fine motor skills. Risk factors of neurocognitive decline at 3months were high age, low education level and type of SRS (GK or LINAC). At 6months, high age was a risk factor. Karnofsky Performance Scale, BM volume, number of BM, tumor progression and neurocognitive impairment pre-SRS were no risk factors. Neurocognitive decline occurs in a considerable proportion of patients with BM treated with GK or LINAC SRS. Overall, high age appears to be a risk factor for neurocognitive decline after SRS.

Hemorrhage Risk after Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Patients with Unruptured Brain Arteriovenous Malformation: Significance of Vascular Compactness

<h3>Purpose/Objective(s)</h3> Our purpose was to investigate whether the morphology (i.e., compact/ diffuse) of brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVMs) correlates with the incidence of hemorrhagic events in patients with unruptured bAVMs after receiving non-invasive stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). <h3>Materials/Methods</h3> This study retrospectively included 264 adult patients with unruptured bAVMs undergoing upfront SRS from multi-institutions. Two senior neurosurgeons confirmed the unruptured presentation. The follow-ups were performed in a 6-month interval. Hemorrhagic events were defined as bleeding signs on computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance images (MRI). The morphology of bAVMs was evaluated using fully automated segmentation, which calculated the proportion of vessel, brain tissue, and cerebrospinal fluid in bAVMs on T2-weighted MRI. Compactness index, defined as a ratio of vessel to brain tissue, was proposed and further dichotomized based on Youden indices to classify the bAVMs into compact or diffuse type. Cox proportional hazard model was used to identify the independent factors for the occurrence of post-SRS hemorrhage. <h3>Results</h3> The median follow-up duration was 62.1 months. Post-SRS hemorrhage occurred in 14 (5.3%) patients with 2 bAVMs bleeding twice, incurring an annual bleeding risk of 0.9%. Multivariable analysis with stepwise backward variable selection method revealed that bAVM morphology (compact versus diffuse), bAVM volume and prescribed margin dose were significant predictors for post-GKRS hemorrhage. The incidence density of post-GKRS hemorrhage in the compact and diffuse bAVMs were 4.9 and 11.8 (hemorrhagic events/ 1000 person-years (P-Ys)). Among the diffuse bAVMs (n=153), the post-GKRS hemorrhage rate was lower for smaller bAVM volume, <15ml versus 15-30ml versus >30ml (2.2 versus 13.5 versus 26.3 hemorrhagic events/ 1000 P-Ys; p=0.044) and for bAVMs receiving margin dose >16.6 Gy versus <16.6 Gy (5.2 versus 25.8 hemorrhagic events/ 1000 P-Ys; p=0.004). For the compact bAVMs (n=111), the post-GKRS hemorrhage rate was not significantly different between the dose and volume groups. <h3>Conclusion</h3> Compact and smaller bAVMs, with higher prescribed margin dose harbor lower risks of post-SRS hemorrhage. Among the diffuse bAVMs, post-GKRS hemorrhage risk varied with bAVM volume and margin dose. The finding could help guide GKRS treatment decision-making for the unruptured bAVMs.

Efficacy and Safety of Primary Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Patients With Intraventricular Meningiomas

PurposePrimary stereotactic radiosurgery for intraventricular meningiomas remains controversial owing to the potential for life-threatening peritumoral edema and lack of long-term follow-up data. We review the literature and present the largest series to assess efficacy and safety of primary stereotactic radiosurgery. Methods and MaterialsA systematic review of the literature for primary stereotactic radiosurgery for intraventricular meningiomas was conducted. The retrospective series presented here comprised 33 patients who received primary stereotactic radiosurgery between 1999 and 2015 for a radiologically detected intraventricular meningioma. Demographic, diagnostic, and therapeutic data were extracted from medical records, imaging, and treatment-planning systems. Both standalone and pooled analysis were performed. ResultsThe mean patient age was 53 years, and 24 patients (73%) were female. The median Karnofsky performance status pretreatment was 80 (range, 60-100). The majority of lesions were located in the lateral ventricles (n = 32; 97%). The mean tumor volume was 8.7 cm3 (range, 0.6-44.55 cm3). The mean delivered dose was 1390.9 cGy. Complete imaging follow-up data were available for 21 patients (64%). Of those, 14 (67%) showed partial or marginal response, 7 (33%) had stable disease, and no patient progressed per Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria. On last follow-up, 32 patients (97%) had significant improvement in performance status and a decrease in pretreatment symptoms. No high-grade Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 5.0) toxicity was observed with the dose range employed. ConclusionsPrimary stereotactic radiosurgery for intraventricular meningiomas shows excellent treatment efficacy and low toxicity in patients with a long follow-up period. The best therapeutic algorithm remains to be established leveraging further clinical investigation.

Effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination with stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with brain metastases from renal cell carcinoma: inverse probability of treatment weighting using propensity scores.

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is the mainstay for treating brain metastases (BMs) from renal cell carcinoma (RCC). In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been applied to metastatic RCC and have contributed to improved outcomes. The authors investigated whether SRS with concurrent ICIs for RCC BM prolongs overall survival (OS) and improves intracranial disease control and whether there are any safety concerns. Patients who underwent SRS for RCC BMs at the authors' institution between January 2010 and January 2021 were included. Concurrent use of ICIs was defined as no more than 3 months between SRS and ICI administration. The time-to-event analysis of OS and intracranial progression-free survival (IC-PFS) between the groups with and without ICIs (ICI+SRS and SRS, respectively) was performed using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) based on propensity scores (PSs) to control for selection bias. Four baseline covariates (Karnofsky Performance Scale score, extracranial metastases, hemoglobin, and number of BMs) were selected to calculate PSs. In total, 57 patients with 147 RCC BMs were eligible. The median OS for all patients was 9.1 months (95% CI 6.0-18.9 months), and the median IC-PFS was 4.4 months (95% CI 3.1-6.8 months). Twelve patients (21%) received concurrent ICIs. The IPTW-adjusted 1-year OS rates in the ICI+SRS and SRS groups were 66% and 38%, respectively (HR 0.30, 95% C 0.13-0.69; p = 0.005), and the IPTW-adjusted 1-year IC-PFS rates were 52% and 16%, respectively (HR 0.30, 95% CI 0.14-0.62; p = 0.001). Severe tumor hemorrhage (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE] grade 4 or 5) occurred immediately after SRS in 2 patients in the SRS group. CTCAE grade 2 or 3 toxicity was observed in 2 patients in the ICI+SRS group and 5 patients in the SRS group. Although the patient number was small and the analysis preliminary, the present study found that SRS with concurrent ICIs for RCC BM patients prolonged survival and provided durable intracranial disease control, with no apparent increase in treatment-related adverse events.

PL01.6.A Radiomics outperforms semantic features for prediction of response to stereotactic radiosurgery in brain metastases

Abstract Background Brain metastases show different patterns of contrast enhancement, potentially reflecting hypoxic and necrotic tumor regions with reduced radiosensitivity. An objective evaluation of these patterns might allow a prediction of response to radiotherapy. We therefore investigated the potential of MRI radiomics in comparison with the visual assessment of semantic features to predict early response to stereotactic radiosurgery in patients with brain metastases. Material and Methods In this retrospective study, 150 patients with 308 brain metastases from solid tumors (NSCLC in 53% of patients) treated by stereotactic radiosurgery (single dose of 17-20 Gy) were evaluated. The response of each metastasis (partial or complete remission vs. stabilization or progression) was assessed within 180 days after radiosurgery. Patterns of contrast enhancement in the pre-treatment T1-weighted MR images were either visually classified (homogenous, heterogeneous, necrotic ring-like) or subjected to a radiomics analysis. Random forest models were optimized by cross-validation and evaluated in a hold-out test data set (30% of metastases). Results In total, 221/308 metastases (72%) responded to radiosurgery. The optimal radiomics model comprised 10 features and outperformed the model solely based on semantic features in the test data set (AUC, 0.71 vs. 0.56; accuracy, 69% vs. 54%). The diagnostic performance could be further improved by combining semantic and radiomics features resulting in an AUC of 0.74 and an accuracy of 75% in the test data set. Conclusion The developed radiomics model allowed prediction of early response to radiosurgery in patients with brain metastases and outperformed the visual assessment of patterns of contrast enhancement.

Low-rank fusion convolutional neural network for prediction of remission after stereotactic radiosurgery in patients with acromegaly: a proof-of-concept study.

Artificial intelligence approaches to analyze pathological images (pathomic) for outcome prediction have not been sufficiently considered in the field of pituitary research. A total of 5,504 hematoxylin & eosin-stained pathology image tiles from 58 acromegalic patients with a good or poor outcome were integrated with other clinical and genetic information to train a low-rank fusion convolutional neural network (LFCNN). The model was externally validated in 1,536 patches from an external cohort. The primary outcome was the time to the first endocrine remission after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). The median time of initial endocrine remission was 43 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 13-60 months) after SRS, and the 24-month initial cumulative remission rate was 57.9% (IQR: 46.4-72.3%). The patient-wise accuracy of the LFCNN model in predicting the primary outcome was 92.9% in the internal test dataset, and the sensitivity and specificity were 87.5 and 100.0%, respectively. The LFCNN model was a strong predictor of initial cumulative remission in the training cohort (hazard ratio [HR] 9.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.89-23.59; p < 0.001) and was higher than that of established prognostic markers. The predictive value of the LFCNN model was further validated in an external cohort (HR 9.06, 95% CI 1.14-72.25; p = 0.012). In this proof-of-concept study, clinically and genetically useful prognostic markers were integrated with digital images to predict endocrine outcomes after SRS in patients with active acromegaly. The model considerably outperformed established prognostic markers and can potentially be used by clinicians to improve decision-making regarding adjuvant treatment choices. © 2022 The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with small-cell lung cancer brain metastases

Despite the continuous implementation of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for patients with limited (≤4) brain metastases from various solid tumours1 and despite the increasing evidence of neurocognitive toxicity from whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT),2 patients with brain metastases from small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) are still considered typical candidates for WBRT. International guidelines and surveys on care patterns still regard WBRT as a standard of care for this setting in clinical practice. Several studies in various cancers have shown that postoperative SRS instead of additional WBRT can be associated with high control and survival rates and could preserve neurocognitive functioning;3,4 therefore, SRS has replaced WBRT as the standard of care for patients with limited brain metastases from most solid tumours, and its safety and efficacy is suggested for as many as ten targetable lesions.