BackgroundThe ability to respond effectively to balance perturbations is crucial for fall prevention. Subsensory electrical stimulation (SES) applied to the skin leads to improved proactive balance control but there is limited evidence on the SES effect on reactive balance control. Research QuestionsTo test the efficiency of SES in improving reactive balance control against unpredictable support surface perturbations and to compare the effects of SES applied to the trunk and the lower legs. MethodsTwenty-three young adults stood on a treadmill while recovering from 15 forward and 15 backward surface translations of increasing magnitude to determine the backward and forward stepping thresholds (BSTh and FSTh). Then, they recovered from three repetitions of forward and backward perturbations of fixed magnitude to determine the characteristic of the compensatory step (i.e., step time, step length, step delay and Margin of Stability - MOS). Each test was conducted with no stimulation (NS), leg stimulation (LS), or trunk stimulation (TS) equal to 90% of the sensory threshold. Repeated-measures ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc tests were used to analyze the main and interaction effects of stimulation and repetition. ResultsTS and LS increased the BSTh by 31.5% (p=0.002) and 16.4% (p=0.028), respectively, with greater effects of TS; (ii) during backward perturbations, TS reduced compensatory step time by 9.0%, step length by 17.1%, and MOS at compensatory heel strike by 17.7% (p<0.016); and (iii) during forward perturbations, LS and TS reduced the step time by 4.5% and 3.5% (p<0.017), and increased the minimum MOS by 7.8% and 4.5%, respectively (p<0.048). SignificanceThis is the first study that showed how the application of SES affects reactive balance control during support surface perturbations. TS was more effective than LS during backward perturbations. TS may be an effective strategy to enhance balance control during reactive postural tasks, thus potentially reducing fall risk.