Introduction: Larger volume thrombi are associated with a lower probability of functional independence defined as a modified Rankin Score (mRS) ≤2 and a higher number of retrieval attempts. A subanalysis of the TIGER study data was performed in order to assess the effectiveness and safety of Tigertriever in small and large clot sizes. Methods: The TIGER study was a single arm, prospective, multi-center trial assessing the efficacy and safety of the Tigertriever, a radially-adjustable stent retriever, for LVO-related stroke. The trial enrolled 160 subjects, of which 150 had successful mTICI 2b-3 revascularization (94%) at end of all procedures. The interventionalists evaluated the clot length angiographically prior to the treatment, and analysis was performed to compare the Tigertriever performance in short clots with long clots. Results: Data is available from 135 (78 males) out of the 160 subjects enrolled in the study.The median clot length was 9mm with a range of 1-50mm. Subjects were divided into two subgroups: Group A; subjects with small clot length, ≤9mm (n=69) and group B, subjects with large clot length, >9mm (n=66). Baseline NIHSS was significantly smaller in group A compared to group B (16.9 vs.19, respectively, P=0.02). Median clot size in group A was 6.1mm and 16.5mm in group B. The mean number of passes with Tigertriever to achieve successful revascularization (mTICI 2b-3) was slightly higher in group B, but not statistically different (1.7 in group A vs. 2 in group B, P=0.07). First pass effect (63% vs. 50% NS), good clinical outcome (62% vs. 53% NS), sICH (1.4% vs. 3% NS) and ENT (Embolization to new territory 2.9% vs. 1.5% NS) were comparable in group A and group B, respectively. Conclusions: Despite the impaired neurological functioning as indicated by significantly higher baseline NIHSS in subjects admitted with larger clot length, Tigertriever efficacy and safety were maintained when treating these large clots compared to small clots.