Stent Era Research Articles

Optic nerve sheath fenestration for treating papilloedema in the era of cerebral venous sinus stenting.

Pseudotumour cerebri (PTC) is the syndrome of intracranial hypertension without intracranial mass or hydrocephalus and is the commonest cause of papilloedema seen in many eye clinics. In the last 10 years, we have increasingly used TSS in patients whose papilloedema was not well controlled with medical treatment and have done fewer ONSFs. Here, we review our experience at Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Sydney with ONSF in 35 patients over the period 2002-2021. Retrospective case series of 35 patients, 30 of whom had primary PTC [i.e., idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH)] and 5 with secondary PTC. Eighteen patients had bilateral ONSF and 17 patients unilateral ONSF, in each case of the worse eye. Thirteen patients then underwent transverse sinus stenting (TSS), in each case following ONSF. The primary outcome measures were visual acuity (VA) and mean deviation (MD) on visual field (VF) testing. MD improved by 5 dB or more in 34 of 70 total eyes (48.6%); VA improved by 0.2 logMAR (two lines on Snellen chart) or more in 21 eyes (30%), and by both in 15 eyes (21.4%). Final MD was -10 dB or better in 38 eyes (54.3%); final VA was 0.3 (6/12) or better in 54 eyes (77.1%), and both in 39 eyes (55.7%). The results confirm that ONSF can relieve papilloedoema in both eyes and improve both VF and VA, even in cases of fulminant PTC with severe acute visual impairment.

Individualized portal pressure gradient threshold based on liver function categories in preventing rebleeding after TIPS

BackgroundThe evidence in Portal pressure gradient (PPG) < 12 mmHg after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) for preventing rebleeding mostly comes from observations in uncovered stents era. Moreover, association between Child–Pugh classes and post-TIPS hepatic encephalopathy (HE) has indicated that tolerance of PPG reduction depends on liver function. This study aimed to investigate the optimal PPG for covered TIPS and explore the optimal threshold tailored to the Child–Pugh classes to find individualized PPG to balance rebleeding and overt HE.MethodsThis multicenter retrospective study analyzed rebleeding, OHE, and mortality of patients associated with post-TIPS PPGs (8, 10, 12, and 14 mmHg) in the entire cohort and among different Child–Pugh classes. Propensity score matching (PSM) and competing risk analyses were performed for sensitivity analyses.ResultsWe included 2100 consecutively screened patients undergoing TIPS. In all patients, PPG < 12 mmHg reduced rebleeding after TIPS (p = 0.022). In Child–Pugh class A, none of the PPG thresholds were discriminative of clinical outcomes. In Child–Pugh class B, 12 mmHg (p = 0.022) and 14 mmHg (p = 0.037) discriminated rebleeding, but 12 mmHg showed a higher net benefit. In Child–Pugh class C, PPG < 14 mmHg had a lower rebleeding incidence (p = 0.017), and exhibited more net benefit than 12 mmHg.ConclusionDifferent PPG standards may be required for patients with different liver function categories. A PPG threshold < 12 mmHg might be suitable for patients in Child–Pugh class B, while < 14 mmHg might be optimal for patients in Child–Pugh class C.Graphical

The impact of chronic kidney disease severity on clinical outcomes after current generation drug-eluting stent implantation for left main distal bifurcation lesions: the Milan and New-Tokyo registry

Objectives. The impact of chronic kidney disease (CKD) on clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for unprotected left main distal bifurcation lesions (ULMD) is not fully understood in current generation drug eluting stent (cDES) era. We assessed clinical outcomes after PCI using cDES for ULMD according to CKD severity based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Design. We identified 720 consecutive patients who underwent PCI using cDES for ULMD at three high volume centers between January 2005 and December 2015. We divided those patients to the following five groups according to eGFR. Each group was defined as follows: no CKD (60 mL/min/1.73 m2 ≤ eGFR), mild CKD (45 ≤ eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2), moderate CKD (30 ≤ eGFR < 45 mL/min/1.73 m2), severe CKD (15 ≤ eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2) and hemodialysis (HD). The primary endpoint was target lesion failure (TLF) at 3 years. TLF was defined as a composite of cardiac death, target lesion revascularization (TLR) and myocardial infarction (MI). Results. TLF occurred more frequently in severe CKD and HD group compared with other three groups. Conclusions. The patients who have severe CKD or are on HD, were extremely associated with worse clinical outcomes after PCI for ULMD even with cDES.

Utility of the ACC/AHA Lesion Classification to Predict Outcomes After Contemporary DES Treatment: Individual Patient Data Pooled Analysis From 7 Randomized Trials.

Background Use of the modified American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) lesion classification as a prognostic tool to predict short- and long-term clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention in the modern drug-eluting stentera is uncertain. Methods and Results Patient-level data from 7 prospective, randomized trials were pooled. Clinical outcomes of patients undergoing single lesion percutaneous coronary intervention with second-generation drug-eluting stent were analyzed according to modified ACC/AHA lesion class. The primary end point was target lesion failure (TLF: composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization). Clinical outcomes to 5 years were compared between patients treated for noncomplex (class A/B1) versus complex (class B2/C) lesions. Eight thousand five hundred sixteen patients (age 63.1±10.8 years, 70.5% male) were analyzed. Lesions were classified as A, B1, B2, and C in 7.9%, 28.5%, 33.7%, and 30.0% of cases, respectively. Target lesion failure was higher in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention of complex versus noncomplex lesions at 30 days (2.0% versus 1.1%, P=0.004), at 1 year (4.6% versus 3.0%, P=0.0005), and at 5 years (12.4% versus 9.2%, P=0.0001). By multivariable analysis, treatment of ACC/AHAclass B2/C lesions was significantly associated with higher rate of5-year target lesion failure (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.39 [95% CI, 1.17-1.64], P=0.0001) driven by significantly higher rates of target vessel myocardial infarction and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization. Conclusions In this pooled large-scale analysis, treating complex compared with noncomplex lesions according to the modified ACC/AHA classification with second-generation drug-eluting stentwas associated with worse 5-year clinical outcomes. This historical classification system may be useful in the contemporary era for predicting early and late outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention.

Prognostic Impact of Target Lesion Revascularization on Long-Term Cardiac Mortality After Current-Generation Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation for Left Main Distal Bifurcation: the Milan and New-Tokyo (MITO) Registry

BackgroundThere are scarce data about the incidence and impact on clinical outcomes of target lesion revascularization (TLR) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for unprotected left main distal bifurcation lesions (ULMD) in current generation drug eluting stent (cDES) era. ObjectivesWe evaluated the incidence and impact on clinical outcomes of TLR after PCI using cDES for ULMD. MethodsWe identified 720 patients treated with cDES for ULMD at New Tokyo Hospital (Matsudo, Japan), San Raffaele Scientific Institute and EMO-GVM Centro Cuore Columbus (Milan, Italy) between January 2005 and December 2015. We divided those patients in 2 groups; TLR group (n = 107), no TLR group (n = 613). The TLR group was comprised patients undergoing a repeat revascularization by PCI or coronary artery bypass grafting of the target lesion. Analysis using propensity score adjustment was also performed. The primary endpoint was cardiac mortality. Additionally, we analyzed the impact of TLR for each main branch (MB) or side branch on cardiac mortality using multivariate Cox regression analysis. ResultsCardiac mortality was significantly higher in TLR group than in no TLR group (adjusted HR 1.96; 95 % CI, 1.50–3.62; p = 0.032). Cardiac mortality was also significantly higher in TLR group after propensity score adjustment. TLR for MB was identified as an independent predictor of cardiac death on multivariate Cox regression analysis. ConclusionsThe TLR, especially the TLR for MB, after PCI even with cDES for ULMD, was strongly associated with worse cardiac mortality.

One-year outcomes of polymer-free amphilimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer zotarolimus-eluting stents in patients with diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis

BackgroundDiabetes mellitus (DM) and cardiovascular diseases often co-exist. Today, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the preferred revascularization procedure for majority of patients with coronary artery disease. Polymer-free amphilimus-eluting stents (AES) represent a novel elution technology in the current era of drug-eluting stents. In this analysis, we aimed to systematically compare the cardiovascular outcomes which are associated with polymer-free amphilimus-eluting stents (AES) versus the durable polymer zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) for the treatment of patients with DM.MethodsHttp://www.ClinicalTrials.gov, EMBASE, Web of Science, MEDLINE, Cochrane database and Google Scholar were searched for publications comparing polymer-free AES versus durable polymer ZES in patients with DM. Selective cardiovascular outcomes were assessed. Statistical analysis was carried out by the latest version of the RevMan software. Risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to represent the data analysis.ResultsFour studies with a total number of 1795 participants with DM whereby 912 patients were assigned to be revascularized by the polymer-free AES and 883 patients were assigned to be revascularized by the durable polymer ZES were included in this analysis. In patients with DM, at one year, polymer-free AES were associated with significantly lower risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) (RR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.54–0.88; P = 0.002) and target lesion failure (TLF) (RR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.48–0.91; P = 0.01) compared to durable polymer ZES. However, there was no significant change in all-cause mortality (RR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.51–1.22; P = 0.28), cardiac death and the other cardiovascular outcomes. Similar risk of total stent thrombosis (RR: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.60–2.13; P = 0.70), including definite stent thrombosis (RR: 1.12, 95% CI: 0.38–3.31; P = 0.84), probable stent thrombosis (RR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.37–2.09; P = 0.76), possible stent thrombosis (RR: 1.19, 95% CI: 0.50–2.87; P = 0.69) and late stent thrombosis (RR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.17–5.72; P = 1.00) as between polymer-free AES and durable polymer ZES in patients with DM.ConclusionsAt 1 year follow-up, polymer-free AES were associated with significantly lower MACEs and TLF compared to durable polymer ZES in these patients with DM, without any increase in mortality, stent thrombosis and other cardiovascular outcomes. However, this analysis is only based on a follow-up time period of one year, therefore, future research should focus on the long term follow-up time period.

Provisional or 2-Stent Technique for Bifurcation Lesions in the Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stent Era.

For bifurcating coronary lesions, a provisional stent technique is recommended compared with a routine 2-stent strategy. However, much of these data are from trials involving first-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) or bare-metal stents where the risk of restenosis with the 2-stent technique is higher. We investigated the efficacy of various 2-stent techniques versus a provisional stent technique for bifurcation lesions with newer-generation DES. PubMed and Embase were searched through May 2022 for randomized control trials investigating bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention techniques using newer-generation DES, and a meta-analysis was conducted. The primary end point was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at the longest reported follow-up time. Our study identified 13 randomized control trials including 4041 patients. Compared with the provisional technique, 2-stent techniques significantly decreased MACE (hazard ratio [HR], 0.76; 95% CI, 0.59-0.97; P = .03), target vessel myocardial infarction (HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.20-0.71; P = .002), and target vessel revascularization (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.47-0.93; P = .02). There were no significant differences in all-cause mortality (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.62-1.45; P = .79), cardiovascular mortality (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.49-1.38; P = .45), myocardial infarction (HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.73-1.37; P = .99), and stent thrombosis (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.52-1.44; P = .58). Of the 2-stent techniques, the double kissing crush technique significantly decreased MACE and target lesion revascularization than other 2-stent techniques. In this era of newer-generation DES, a 2-stent approach, especially the double kissing crush technique, is superior to a provisional stenting technique for a bifurcation lesion, with a significant reduction in MACE, target vessel myocardial infarction, and revascularization.

A Rare Presentation of Coronary Aneurysm following Bare-metal Stent

We present a case of post-percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty with a bare-metal stent to the right coronary artery (RCA). He presented with acute ST-elevation inferior wall myocardial infarction. Coronary angiography showed an aneurysm of proximal RCA extending from the proximal end of the stent to the distal end. There was a 90% discrete lesion beyond the stent with TIMI III flow. The development of coronary artery aneurysms (CAAs) was reported even before the era of stents. CAA can develop after plain balloon angioplasty, after directional coronary atherectomy, and after bare-metal and drug-eluting stents also but not after coronary angiography. Kachru et al. reported an incidence of 0.2% (4 of 2408) per DES without routine angiographic follow-up and Rha et al. reported an incidence of 1.7% (five out of 296) per patient at 6-month routine angiographic follow-up. CAA is an uncommon and often accidental finding, we report a case of CAA which presented as acute myocardial infarction mimicking stent thrombosis.

Clinical Outcomes Following Hemodynamic Parameter or Intravascular Imaging-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the Era of Drug-Eluting Stents: An Updated Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of 28 Randomized Trials and 11,860 Patients

BackgroundCoronary angiography (CAG) is the standard imaging modality for guiding percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Intracoronary imaging techniques such as intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT), and hemodynamic parameter like fractional flow reserve (FFR) can overcome some limitations of CAG.ObjectiveWe sought to explore the clinical outcomes of different PCI guidance modalities in the era of drug-eluting stent (DES).MethodsA network meta-analysis of 28 randomized trials and 11,860 patients undergoing different modalities-guided PCI in the era of DES was performed. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% credible interval (CrI) were calculated.ResultsIn comparison with CAG, IVUS was associated with a significant reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE, OR: 0.60; 95% CrI: 0.46–0.79), cardiovascular death (OR: 0.46; 95% CrI: 0.20–0.94), target vessel/lesion revascularization (TVR/TLR, OR: 0.55; 95% CrI: 0.41–0.74), and a trend toward decreased risk of stent thrombosis (OR: 0.44; 95% CrI: 0.17 to 1.00). FFR/quantitative flow ratio (QFR) could significantly reduce stroke compared with CAG, IVUS, and OCT/optical frequency domain imaging (OFDI). However, myocardial infarction (MI), all-cause death, stent thrombosis, and any revascularization presented similar risks for different PCI guidance modalities.ConclusionIn the era of DES, IVUS led to lower risks of MACE than CAG, which was mainly due to lower risks of cardiovascular death and TVR/TLR. A trend toward decreased risk of stent thrombosis was also observed with IVUS. Hemodynamic parameter (FFR/QFR)-guided PCI could significantly reduce the stroke risk compared with CAG, IVUS, and OCT/OFDI.Systematic Review Registration[https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/], identifier [CRD42021291442].

The association between SYNTAX score and long-term outcomes in patients with unstable angina pectoris: a single-centre retrospective study

BackgroundThe SYNTAX score affects clinical outcomes in early studies. However, the prognostic value of the SYNTAX Score for long-term outcomes and differences by SYNTAX score risk stratification in long-term prognosis between medical therapy and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with unstable angina pectoris (UAP) are not well known in the era of new generation drug-eluting stents and medication.MethodsIn this single-centre retrospective study, a total of 2364 patients with UAP from January 2014 to June 2017 at Beijing Friendship Hospital were enrolled. The primary endpoint was a composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), including all-cause death, cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction and stroke at least 2 years after discharge.ResultsIn this study, 1695 patients had low SYNTAX scores (leqq 22), 432 patients had medium SYNTAX scores (23–32), 237 patients had high SYNTAX scores (≥ 33), 1018 received medical therapy, and 1346 patients underwent PCI. Long-term MACEs occurred in 95 patients during the 3.38 ± 0.99-year follow-up. Compared to the medical therapy group, the PCI group showed lower MACEs and cardiac death in patients with high SYNTAX scores (7.4% vs. 16.7%, P = 0.048; 3.7% vs. 14.6%, P = 0.004) but no reduction in patients with low and medium SYNTAX scores. Cox multivariate regression analysis showed that advanced age, diabetes mellitus, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), hs-CRP and high SYNTAX score were independent predictors for MACEs in the medical therapy group (P < 0.05), whereas chronic kidney disease (CKD) and LVEF were predictors of MACEs in the PCI group.ConclusionsCompared to medical therapy, PCI could only significantly reduce long-term MACEs and cardiac death for patients with high SYNTAX scores but not for patients with low and medium SYNTAX scores. A high SYNTAX score could predict long-term MACEs for UAP patients in the medical therapy group but not in the PCI group.

Impact of lipoprotein (a) on long-term outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention in the era of new generation drug-eluting stents

BackgroundHigh lipoprotein (a) [Lp (a)] levels are associated with worse long-term outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, there are limited studies investigating association between Lp (a) levels and long-term outcomes in the era of new generation drug-eluting stents (DES). MethodsA total of 495 patients with available data on Lp (a) who underwent PCI for de novo lesions with new generation DES were enrolled between 2013 and 2017. The primary endpoint was the major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), which was defined as a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, clinically driven target lesion revascularization, and revascularization for new lesions during 3 years. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the Lp (a) level: high Lp (a) group (≥30 mg/dL: n = 109) and low Lp (a) group (30 mg/dL>: n = 386). Multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to identify the predictors for 3-year MACE. ResultsThe incidence of 3-year MACE was significantly higher in high Lp (a) group than low Lp (a) group (33.0% vs. 15.9%, p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that Lp (a) level of ≥30 mg/dL was an independent predictor for 3-year MACE (HR 2.01, 95%CI 1.30–3.11, p = 0.002). ConclusionHigh Lp (a) level was associated with worse long-term outcome even in the era of new generation DES.

Clinical effectiveness of thrombus aspiration during percutaneous coronary intervention for stent thrombosis in a contemporary setting

ObjectiveThe impact of adjunctive manual thrombus aspiration (TA) in patients with stent thrombosis (ST) treated with percutaneous intervention has not been evaluated in the current era of potent P2Y12 agents and new-generation drug-eluting stents. We sought to assess the effect of TA using data from a large contemporary registry. MethodsThe study population was derived from the Essex ST Investigation Registry (ESTHIR), which contains all consecutive cases of angiographically determined definite ST undergoing interventional treatment in a tertiary cardiac centre between November 2015 and June 2018. Propensity score matching was performed to match patients who underwent TA (TA group) to those who did not (n-TA group). The study endpoints were final TIMI flow and survival free of cardiovascular death (CD) or target lesion revascularisation (TLR). ResultsA total of 128 ST patients were included in the present analysis. The mean age was 65 ± 11 years, and 84% were male. About 90% of the patients presented with STEMI, and 85% had very late ST. Seventy-two patients (56%) underwent TA. After propensity score matching, 30 patients were included in each study group. A higher rate of final TIMI III flow was observed in the TA group (TA vs n-TA group, 100% vs 83%), but this difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.052). At 1000 days of follow-up, survival free of CD or TLR was not different between the two groups (p = 0.8). ConclusionIn a propensity-matched population of ST patients undergoing PCI in a contemporary setting, TA was not associated with improved final TIMI flow or long-term cardiovascular outcomes.

Efficacy and Safety of Excimer Laser Catheter in Patient with Complex or High Thrombotic Coronary Artery Stenosis

Background: Indications of excimer laser use in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are uncrossable device after coronary guidewire passing and thrombus modification in Acute Coronary Syndrome lesion (ACS). The excimer laser has been used for more than twenty years. However, there are inconsistent data of the efficacy and safety in an excimer laser use over the drug-eluting stent (DES) era. The authors gathered data of patient that underwent PCI using excimer laser in contemporary PCI strategy. Primary outcome was efficacy of the excimer laser defined as technical success excimer laser. Materials and Methods: The present study was a single-center retrospective analysis of 115 lesions from 112 patients over eight years with 1.1% of all PCI used excimer laser-assisted catheter. The patient data were extracted from hospital-based inpatient and outpatient medical records. A technical success excimer laser was defined as the laser catheter could cross the entire length of the stenotic lesion determined by angiographic evidence of tip catheter beyond lesion or mention in the procedural record. Results: The mean patient age was 67.1 years old with 65.2% being male and 45.2% having diabetes. The average left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 51.9%. Chronic total occlusion was 39.1% followed by 33.9% of thrombotic lesion. Intravascular imaging was used in 64.4%. Overall technical success of excimer laser was 74.8% with significantly higher success rate in thrombotic groups at 94.9 versus 64.5% (p&lt;0.001). Overall procedural PCI success was 87.8% and no difference was observed between groups at 94.9% versus 84.2% (p=0.135). The slow flow phenomenon was significantly higher in the thrombotic groups at 17.9% versus 2.6% (p=0.007), whereas coronary perforation, major dissection, and death were not different. The authors found that older age such as 80 years or older and non-thrombotic lesions were significantly associated with technical failure of excimer laser use. Conclusion: Excimer laser had a high success rate in the thrombotic lesion and a fair success rate in non-thrombotic lesions. The PCI procedure success was high in both groups Keywords: Excimer laser; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Uncrossable lesion; Adjunctive lesion modification

β-Blockers Reduced the Target Lesion Revascularization After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using an Everolimus-eluting Stent

The effect of β-adrenergic blockers on everolimus-eluting stent (EES) implantation is unknown. We aimed to investigate how β-blockers affect the outcomes of EES by using the Tokyo-MD PCI registry data and analyse real-world data in this drug-eluting stent era in Japan.We selected 1,899 patients who underwent EES implantation. We compared patients with β-blocker administration versus those without, at follow-up regarding the incidence rate of ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (ID-TLR), all-cause death, cardiac death, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and stent thrombosis (ST).Patients in the β-blocker group had higher coronary risks than those in the non-β-blocker group. Although no significant difference was observed in the five-year incidence of all-cause death, cardiac death, AMI, and ST between the two groups, the incidence of ID-TLR was significantly lower in the β-blocker group (4.5% vs. 6.6%; p=0.04). β-Blocker administration (hazard ratio=0.61; p=0.016) was negatively associated with ID-TLR via multivariate analysis.β-Blocker administration reduced ID-TLR after percutaneous coronary intervention using an EES despite the greater comorbid risks and more severe disease lesions.

Revascularization or Optimal Medical Therapy for Stable Ischemic Heart Disease: A Bayesian Meta-Analysis of Contemporary Trials

BackgroundThe role of revascularization in patients with stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD) has been controversial, more so in the present era of drug-eluting stents. AimsTo examine the absolute risk difference (ARD) between revascularization plus optimal medical therapy (OMT) versus OMT alone among patients with SIHD using Bayesian approach. MethodsPubMed/MEDLINE and Cochrane citation indices were utilized to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) through March 31, 2020. Among trials comparing initial revascularization plus OMT with initial OMT alone, revascularization arm must have comprised >50% of patients receiving either percutaneous or surgical revascularization, and >50% of patients must have received aspirin and statin as OMT in both arms. ResultsSeven RCTs (12,494) were included in the final analysis. The ARD of all-cause mortality for revascularization with respect to OMT was centred at −0.002 (95% CrI: −0.01; 0.01, Tau: 0.01, 67% probability of ARD of revascularization vs. OMT < 0). The ARD for cardiac mortality was centred at −0.0025 (95%CrI: −0.01; 0.01, Tau: 0.01, 77% probability of ARD of revascularization vs. OMT < 0). The ARD for MI was −0.02 (95% CrI: −0.06; 0.00, Tau: 0.02, 97% probability of ARD for revascularization vs. OMT < 0). There was 96% probability of ARD for unstable angina with revascularization vs. OMT < 0, 4.5% probability of ARD for freedom from angina with revascularization vs. OMT < 0, and 6% probability of ARD for stroke with revascularization vs. OMT < 0. ConclusionsBayesian analysis demonstrated minimal probability of difference in all-cause mortality and cardiac mortality in patients with SIHD who underwent revascularization compared with OMT alone. However, revascularization was associated with lower probability of MI, unstable angina, and increased freedom from angina, but a higher risk of stroke compared with OMT alone. PROSPEROThe protocol of this systematic review and meta-analysis was registered in PROSPERO [CRD42020160540].

Outcomes between prediabetes and type 2 diabetes mellitus in older adults with acute myocardial infarction in the era of newer-generation drug-eluting stents: a retrospective observational study

BackgroundThe comparative clinical outcomes between prediabetes and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in older adults with AMI in the era of newer-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) are limited. We investigated the 2-year clinical outcomes of these patients.MethodsA total of 5492 AMI patients aged ≥65 years were classified into three groups according to their glycemic status: normoglycemia (group A: 1193), prediabetes (group B: 1696), and T2DM (group C: 2603). The primary outcome was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction (Re-MI), and any repeat revascularization. The secondary outcome was stent thrombosis (ST).ResultsThe primary and secondary outcomes cumulative incidences were similar between the prediabetes and T2DM groups. In both the prediabetes and T2DM groups, the cumulative incidences of MACE (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 1.373; p = 0.020 and aHR: 1.479; p = 0.002, respectively) and all-cause death or MI (aHR: 1.436; p = 0.022 and aHR: 1.647; p = 0.001, respectively) were significantly higher than those in the normoglycemia group. Additionally, the cumulative incidence of all-cause death in the T2DM group was significantly higher than that in the normoglycemia group (aHR, 1.666; p = 0.003).ConclusionsIn this retrospective study, despite the 2-year clinical outcomes of the patients with prediabetes and T2DM in the older adults were worse than those in the normoglycemia group; they were similar between the prediabetes and T2DM groups. Hence, comparable treatment strategies should be strengthened between prediabetes and T2DM in older adults with AMI.Trial registrationRetrospectively registered.

A Simple Model to Predict Repeat Revascularization After Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease.

Repeat revascularization is still common in the era of drug-eluting stents (DES), especially for non-target lesions. However, few validated models exist to predict the need for revascularization. We aimed to develop and validate an easy-to-use predictive model for repeat revascularization after DES implantation in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD). A total of 1,653 stable CAD patients with angiographic follow-up after DES implantation were consecutively enrolled. Split-sample testing was adopted to develop and validate the model. In the training set, male, diabetes, number of target lesions, occlusion lesion, number of non-target lesions, recurrent angina, suboptimal low density lipoprotein-cholesterol level, and high lipoprotein (a) level were independent predictors of repeat revascularization using logistic regression analyses. The established model (Model 1) yielded a bias-corrected concordance index of 0.700 (95% confidence interval: 0.667 to 0.735), with good calibration. It also performed well in the validation set. Compared with the traditional empirical model only including recurrent angina (Model 2), Model 1 had better discriminative ability and clinical usefulness. In conclusion, we established and validated a simple model including 8 easily accessible variables to predict repeat revascularization after DES implantation in stable CAD patients, contributing to better risk stratification, decision making, and patient consultation.

Abstract 9448: The Effect of Diabetes on Cardiovascular Events After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting versus Drug-Eluting Stents for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis

Background: The optimal method of coronary revascularization for diabetes mellitus (DM) patients with left main coronary artery disease (LMCAD) is controversial in the drug-eluting stent (DES) era. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing DES-based percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for LMCAD in DM patients and tested for potential effect measure modification (EMM) by diabetes on major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). Methods and Results: We included all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing CABG to DES-based PCI including DM patients with LMCAD published up to March 1, 2021. We completed separate random-effects meta-analyses for four RCTs (4,356 patients, mean follow-up of 4.9 years) and six observational studies (9,360 patients, mean follow-up of 5.2 years). DM and non-DM patients were at increased risk of the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, and unplanned revascularization when comparing CABG to DES-based PCI (p-value for interaction = 0.70) (Figure 1, DM =1, Non-DM =0). In observational studies, there was no difference between DES-based PCI and CABG for all-cause mortality in patients with DM (Figure 2). Conclusion: DES-based PCI was associated with an increased risk of MACCE compared to CABG in LMCAD patients irrespectively of DM status. We did not observe significant EMM by DM status. Considering these data, heart teams could consider DM as one of the many components in the clinical decision-making process, but not as a primary deciding factor between DES and CABG for LMCAD.

Mise au point sur l'athérectomie rotationnelle à haute vitesse par Rotablator en 2021 et données du registre France PCI

Developed in the late 1980s, rotational atherectomy has raised a lot of hope for its innovative principle of selective ablation, allowing volume reduction (instead of redistribution) of atherosclerotic plaque, while sparing healthy tissue. Long shunned for its disappointing results on restenosis, the Rotablator finally reasserted itself in the 2000s; era of drug eluting stents and coronary angioplasty boom, thus generating emergence of complex lesions. Indeed, the Rotablator has demonstrated an undeniable benefit in complex (type C) and calcified lesions preparation (before stenting), with a procedural success rate of 95%. Although these lesions only represent a small amount (2-3%) of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), they remain a technical impasse for plain-old balloon angioplasty strategy, making the Rotablator more suitable for these resistant lesions' treatment. Registry data attest the safety of this therapy, with a rate of peri-procedural complications and in-hospital mortality comparable to conventional angioplasty (France PCI register). However, certain specific, rare but serious complications (burr entrapment, broken Rotawire, coronary perforation) justify trained teams, perfect knowledge of the equipment, and strict compliance with good practice guidelines. In 2018, the rise of a new method of atherectomy by intra-vascular lithotripsy (Shockwave) has coincided with Rotablator decreasing activity (this finding being biased by a general decrease in PCI activity due to Covid pandemic). This therapeutic range's enhancement revolutionizes calcified lesions treatment, tending towards precise targeting of each indication, depending in particular on calcium distribution's anatomy in the plaque.

Impact of Intravascular Ultrasound on Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction.

The aim of this study was to examine the impact of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on long-term clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). IVUS-guided PCI has been associated with improved cardiovascular outcomes. However, the beneficial effect of IVUS-guided PCI in patients with AMI in the drug-eluting stent era remains unclear. Patients who underwent PCI with drug-eluting stents were selected from 10,719 patients enrolled in a multicenter AMI registry. The included patients were classified into 2 groups according to the use or nonuse of IVUS. The primary outcome was a composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization, during long-term follow-up. A total of 9,846 patients were treated with IVUS-guided PCI (n=2,032) or angiography-guided PCI (n=7,814). IVUS-guided PCI was associated with reduced MACE (HR: 0.779; 95% CI: 0.689-0.880; P< 0.001). The results were consistent after multivariable regression and propensity score matching. One-year landmark analysis showed a lower risk for MACE within 1 year (HR: 0.766; 95%CI: 0650-0.903; P=0.002) and beyond 1 year (HR: 0.796; 95%CI: 0663-0.956; P=0.014) after index PCI. The use of IVUS was associated with better long-term cardiovascular outcomes. The clinical benefit of IVUS was maintained both within and beyond 1 year after index PCI. The use of IVUS in PCI should be considered forpatients with AMI.