The idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis is a rare and complex disease that usually is treated by urologist, being its most common clinical presentation ‘‘back pain with homolateral hydronephrosis.’’ However, the main therapy is a medical treatment—immunosuppressive and/or antifibrogenic—that must be started as soon as possible; usually, instead, only intervention with decompression of the urinal obstruction is performed, and the necessary pharmacological therapy is often postponed or, in the worst cases, ignored. Moreover, we have recently pointed out that an experienced internist can provide a more accurate and not invasive diagnosis compared to the typical surgical one [1]. We present the case of a patient affected by idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis, hospitalised by the internal medicine staff after the wrong treatment implemented by urologists. A 53-year-old man was admitted to our hospital—in the internal medicine department—after receiving a bilateral nephrostomy 50 days earlier in another hospital. The state of his health was generally good. The urology department where the patient had been previously hospitalised diagnosed a bilateral hydronephrosis caused by suspected idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis. A guided CT-scan biopsy seemed to confirm the diagnostic hypothesis, and the urologist, after an unsuccessful stent decompression, performed a bilateral nephrostomy. The patient did not receive any program of drug therapy. After the patient was admitted to our department, we confirmed the diagnostic hypothesis through data derived from history, symptoms, physical examination, thoracicabdominal NMR and biochemical tests (ANA, antidsDNA, ENA, ANCA, ASMA, serum rheumatoid factor, anti-TPO antibodies, ACE, PPD skin testing), while we did not perform gallium-67 scan and/or PET-scan in order to avoid any delay in the beginning of the medical treatment. Through these tests, we could exclude cancer, autoimmune and granulomatous diseases. The negative results of the acute-phase reactants (i.e. PCR and ESR), although not very specific, indicated a limited activity of the disease. The NMR, in the T2-weighted images (Fig. 1), confirmed this hypothesis and suggested a pattern of disease less responsive to an immunosuppressive approach. However, we decided to start the immunosuppressive drug therapy, prednisone and azathioprine. After 40 days, because the dimensions of the fibrous mass showed no reduction, we transferred the patient to the urology department where he received bilateral intraperitonealisation of ureters and sealing of both nephrostomies. One month later, we started a tamoxifen therapy, and in 3 months we obtained the reduction of more than 50% of the fibrous mass. The idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis [2] is a disease observed and treated by urologists and less frequently by internists, because of its clinical presentation with a monoor bilateral hydronephrosis. However, it is possible to treat the disease with an appropriate and timely pharmacological therapy rather than with an invasive strategy as often performed by urologists. Indeed the diagnostic techniques for imaging, especially NMR and/or gallium scintigraphy and/or PET scan, together with an accurate clinical assessment and some other tests—which can identify neoplasia, auto-immune and granulomatous diseases—allow to obtain a deductive and not invasive diagnosis. Nevertheless, the disease appears more easily curable when the drug therapy is started A. Artom (&) M. Uccelli P. Artom Division of Internal Medicine, Santa Corona Hospital, 17027 Pietra Ligure (SV), Italy e-mail: alberto.artom@ospedalesantacorona.it
Read full abstract