Stent-assisted Coiling Group Research Articles

Flow diverters versus stent-assisted coiling in unruptured intracranial vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms.

Flow diverters (FDs) have been used in unruptured intracranial vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms (IVADAs) with seemingly more favorable outcomes compared with stent-assisted coiling (SAC). However, the benefits of FDs over SAC in unruptured IVADAs need further evaluation. This was a propensity score-matched, retrospective cohort study. Consecutive patients with unruptured IVADAs treated with FDs or SAC at the authors' hospital between January 2016 and December 2020 were reviewed. Propensity score matching at 1:1 was based on age, significant stenosis adjacent to aneurysmal dilatation, maximum diameter, and posterior inferior cerebellar artery involvement. Periprocedural cerebrovascular complications and angiographic and clinical outcomes were compared between the two matched groups. A total of 124 unruptured IVADAs in 123 patients (median age 53 [interquartile range 47-59] years; 101 men) were included. The FD and SAC groups included 65 and 59 IVADAs, respectively. Propensity score matching resulted in 47 matched pairs. The rates of immediate complete occlusion were significantly lower in the matched FD group than in the matched SAC group (6.4% vs 68.1%, p < 0.001). The rates of periprocedural cerebrovascular complications were comparable between the two matched groups (6.4% vs 6.4%, p > 0.99). At last follow-up, the rates of complete occlusion (89.4% vs 80.9%, p = 0.39) and favorable clinical outcomes (100.0% vs 97.9%, p > 0.99) were comparable, whereas the rate of recanalization was significantly lower in the matched FD group than in the matched SAC group (0.0% vs 12.8%, p = 0.03). Although the difference between the rates of in-stent stenosis was not statistically significant (17.0% vs 6.4%, p = 0.18), the difference in the effect measures was considerable. In unruptured IVADAs and compared with SAC, FDs provide comparable rates of periprocedural cerebrovascular complications, favorable clinical outcomes, and follow-up complete occlusion, lower rates of immediate complete occlusion and follow-up recanalization, and likely higher rates of in-stent stenosis.

Safety and effectiveness of stent-assisted coiling with adjunctive techniques in ruptured acute aneurysms: a propensity score-matched cohort study.

The use of stent-assisted coiling (SAC) in acute subarachnoid hemorrhage cases is associated with higher incidence rates of bleeding and ischemic complications. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the SAC technique in the treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms (RIAs). A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with RIAs treated with SAC or coiling alone (CA). Univariate analysis compared clinical information between the two groups. Propensity score matching was used to select patients for comparison and analyze surgical complications, prognosis, and imaging outcomes in both groups. A total of 394 aneurysms were included, and 272 aneurysms remained after application of propensity score matching, with an equal distribution of 136 cases in both the SAC and CA groups. There was no statistically significant difference in the immediate postoperative outcomes between the two groups (63.2% of SAC patients achieved class 1 on the Raymond-Roy occlusion classification scale vs 58.8% of CA patients, difference [95% CI] 4.4% [-0.076 to 0.163]; 33.1% achieved class 2 vs 38.2%, 5.1% [-0.065 to 0.170]; 3.7% achieved class 3 vs 2.9%, 0.8% [-0.047 to 0.062], p = 0.506). At the 1-year follow-up, the SAC group exhibited higher rates of complete occlusion (59.5% vs 42.4%, 17.1% [0.040-0.294]) and stability (24.0% vs 19.2%, 4.8% [-0.061 to 0.156]), while experiencing lower rates of improvement (12.4% vs 22.4%, 10.0% [0.001-0.201]) and recanalization (4.1% vs 16.0%, 11.9% [0.036-0.120]), with statistically significant differences in these outcomes (p < 0.001). No significant disparities were observed in clinical outcomes in terms of modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores at discharge (76.5% vs 77.2% had mRS score 0-2, 0.7% [-0.098 to 0.113]; 23.5% vs 22.8% had mRS score 3-6, 0.7% [-0.098 to 0.113], p = 0.886) and 1-year follow-up (90.8% vs 92.2% had mRS score 0-2, 1.4% [-0.063 to 0.091]; 9.2% vs 7.8% had mRS score 3-6, 1.4% [-0.063 to 0.091], p = 0.683). Intraoperative rupture occurred more frequently in the SAC group compared with the CA group, although the difference was not statistically significant (5.1% vs 2.9%, 2.2% [-0.035 to 0.081], p = 0.356). The SAC group demonstrated a higher incidence of intraoperative thrombosis, but the difference was not statistically significant (8.1% vs 2.9%, 5.2% [-0.010 to 0.117], p = 0.063). Postoperative thrombosis in the SAC group was 3 times higher, but this difference was not statistically significant (6.6% vs 2.2%, 4.4% [-0.013, 0.106], p = 0.076). The surgery-related mortality rates did not differ significantly between the two groups (4.4% vs 5.9%, 1.5% [-0.048 to 0.077], p = 0.583). Although stent treatment for RIA results in some incidents of complications, it is safe and effective. Besides, the SAC group showed better vascular imaging results compared with the CA group.

A single-center comparative study with large sample size on stent-assisted coiling versus coiling alone for the ruptured anterior communicating artery aneurysms: Analysis of safety, efficacy, and prognosis based on propensity score matching.

To compare the safety, efficacy, and prognosis of stent-assisted coiling (SAC) versus coiling alone (CA) in the treatment of ruptured anterior communicating artery aneurysms (ACoAAs). The clinical and follow-up data of ruptured ACoAAs treated with endovascular treatment in our center from January 2011 to January 2021 were retrospectively collected. Patients were divided into an SAC group and a CA group based on whether stents were used, after which the two groups were matched for propensity scores. The general clinical data, embolization effect, perioperative complications, clinical, and follow-up results after matching were compared. A total of 354 patients were enrolled, of whom 147 patients (41.5%) received SAC and the rest received CA. Comparison baseline of two groups showed that patients with a larger diameter, wide neck, irregular morphology, and anterior direction were more likely to receive SAC. After propensity score matching, 113 patients were included in each group. Immediately postoperative angiography results showed that the complete embolization rate of patients in the SAC group was significantly lower than that in the CA group (62.8% vs. 76.1%, p = 0.03). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the incidence of perioperative complications, mortality, poor prognosis at discharge or follow-up, mid-term complete occlusion rate and recurrence rate. The stent-assisted treatment of ruptured ACoAAs did not increase the risk of perioperative complications or the probability of poor prognosis, indicating that SAC treatment of ruptured ACoAAs is safe and feasible and has a reliable mid-term cure rate.

Stent-assisted coiling vs. coiling alone of ruptured tiny intracranial aneurysms: A contemporary cohort study in a high-volume center.

This study aims to compare the safety and efficacy of stent-assisted coiling (SAC) with those of coiling alone (CA) for the treatment of ruptured tiny intracranial aneurysms. We enrolled 245 patients with ruptured tiny intracranial aneurysms treated with coil embolization. Patients were grouped into SAC and CA groups. Baseline characteristics, periprocedural complications, clinical outcomes, and angiographic results were compared between the two groups. In addition, a subgroup analysis was conducted in the SAC group, and patients were regrouped into low-profile visualized intraluminal support (LVIS) and laser-cut groups to compare the perioperative procedure-related complications and clinical and angiographic follow-up outcomes. All baseline characteristics were equivalent between the two groups except for aneurysm size and dome-to-neck aspect ratio. The rates of overall procedure-related complications, intraprocedural rupture, postoperative early rebleeding, intraprocedural thrombosis, postprocedural thrombosis, and procedure-related mortality were comparable between the two groups (P = 0.105, 0.145, 0.308, 1.000, 1.000, 0.160, respectively). Nevertheless, the rate of hemorrhagic complication in the SAC group was significantly higher (P = 0.023). The angiographic follow-up outcomes showed that the SAC group had a higher complete occlusion rate and lower recurrence rate (88.2 vs. 67.1%, 5.4 vs. 15.2%, P = 0.001). The clinical outcomes at discharge and follow-up between the two groups demonstrated no significant differences (P = 0.192 and P = 0.085, respectively). For subgroup analysis, LVIS stents were associated with a significantly higher rate of complete occlusion (P = 0.014) and a lower rate of intraprocedural rupture (p = 0.021). Moreover, multivariate analysis showed that there were no predictors for the overall, hemorrhagic, and ischemic procedure-related complications, while Raymond class was an independent predictor of retreatment (OR = 3.508, 95% CI 1.168-11.603; P = 0.029). Stent-assisted coiling may increase the incidence of hemorrhagic events with favorable angiographic results and comparable clinical outcomes compared with stand-alone coiling. Nevertheless, LVIS stent could improve the safety compared with lazer-cut stent. Simultaneously, considering the better long-term effect, LVIS stent-assisted coiling may be a preferable choice for ruptured tiny intracranial aneurysms.

Comparative effectiveness of stent-assisted coiling and Woven EndoBridge embolization for the treatment of unruptured wide-neck bifurcation intracranial aneurysms.

Woven EndoBridge (WEB) intrasaccular flow disruptors and stent-assisted coiling (SAC) are viable endovascular treatment options for wide-neck bifurcation intracranial aneurysms (WNBAs). Data directly comparing these two treatment options are limited. The authors aimed to compare radiographic occlusion rates and complication profiles between patients who received WEB and those who received SAC for WNBAs. Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained cerebrovascular procedural database was performed at a single academic medical center between 2017 and 2021. Patients were included if they underwent WEB embolization or SAC of an unruptured WNBA. SAC patients were propensity matched to WEB-embolized patients on the basis of aneurysm morphology. Complete and adequate (complete occlusion or residual neck remnant) occlusion rates at last angiographic follow-up, as well as periprocedural complications, were compared between the two groups. A cost comparison was performed for a typical 5-mm WNBA treated with WEB versus SAC by using manufacturer-suggested retail prices. Thirty-five WEB and 70 SAC patients were included. Aneurysm width, neck size, and dome-to-neck ratio were comparable between groups. Follow-up duration was significantly longer in the SAC group (median [interquartile range] 545 [202-834] days vs 228 [177-494] days, p < 0.001, Mann-Whitney U-test). Complete (66% of WEB patients vs 69% of SAC patients) and adequate (94% WEB vs 91% SAC) occlusion rates were similar between groups at the last available angiographic follow-up (p = 0.744, chi-square test). Complete occlusion rates were comparable on Cox regression analysis after correction for follow-up duration (hazard ratio 1.5, 95% CI 0.8-3.1). Average time to residual aneurysm or neck formation was not statistically different between treatment groups (613 days for SAC patients vs 347 days for WEB patients, p = 0.225, log-rank test). Periprocedural complications trended higher in the SAC group (0% WEB vs 9% SAC, p = 0.175, Fisher exact test), although this finding was not significant. The equipment costs for a typical SAC case were estimated at $18,950, whereas the costs for a typical WEB device case were estimated at $18,630. Midterm complete and adequate occlusion rates were similar between patients treated with WEB and those treated with SAC. Given these comparable outcomes, there may be equipoise in treatment options for WNBAs.

Stent‐Assisted Coiling Versus Balloon‐Assisted Coiling for the Treatment of Ruptured Wide‐Necked Aneurysms: A 2‐Center Experience

Background Balloon‐assisted coiling (BAC) and stent‐assisted coiling (SAC) have been established as feasible approaches to manage ruptured wide‐necked intracranial aneurysms. Antiplatelet medications used with SAC theoretically increase risk of thrombotic and hemorrhagic complications. This study aims to evaluate safety and efficacy of SAC versus BAC for acutely ruptured wide‐necked intracranial aneurysms. Methods We performed a 2‐center retrospective observational study of consecutive patients treated with SAC or BAC for ruptured wide‐necked intracranial aneurysms from 2015 to 2020. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, and aneurysm characteristics were collected. Primary and secondary efficacy outcomes were radiographic aneurysm occlusion at follow‐up and functional status at 3 months. Safety outcomes included periprocedural hemorrhagic/ischemic complications and symptomatic ventriculostomy tract and cerebrospinal shunt hemorrhage rates. Univariable and multivariable analyses with multiple imputations to account for follow‐up loss were performed. Results A total of 112 and 109 patients underwent SAC and BAC, respectively. Median cohort age was 56 years, and 72% were female. Baseline characteristics were similar. Hydrocephalus rate was higher in the SAC group (78% versus 64%; P =0.02). Median aneurysm size was 5.1 mm. Anterior circulation aneurysms were most common (81%). Aneurysm and neck size were different, more aneurysms measuring &lt;7 mm (80% versus 67%; P =0.02) and larger neck size aneurysms (3.7 versus 3.2 mm; P =0.02) were treated with SAC. At first follow‐up, SAC showed higher rates of complete occlusion (61% versus 45%; P =0.02) before and after adjusting for confounders. Functional outcome was not different in the multivariable models after adjustment. Coil herniation was higher in the BAC group (8% versus 2%; P =0.03). Thromboembolic, hemorrhagic, and ventriculostomy complications were not different. The use of acute antithrombotic therapy was not associated with symptomatic ventriculostomy tract hemorrhage. Conclusion Our findings suggest that SAC may be as safe as BAC for the acute management of ruptured wide‐necked intracranial aneurysms without significant risk of ischemic and hemorrhagic complications.

Flow Diversion vs. Stent-Assisted Coiling in the Treatment of Intradural Large Vertebrobasilar Artery Aneurysms.

ObjectiveTo compare the safety, angiographic, and long-term clinical outcomes of intradural large vertebrobasilar artery (VBA) aneurysms following flow diversion (FD) or conventional stent-assisted coiling (SAC).MethodsWe performed a retrospective study of 66 consecutive patients with intradural large VBA aneurysms between 2014 and 2021 who underwent FD or SAC. Patients' characteristics, postprocedural complications, and clinical and angiographic outcome details were reviewed.ResultsA total of 66 intradural large VBA aneurysms were included, including 42 (63.6%), which were treated with SAC (SAC group) and 24 (36.4%), which were treated with FD (FD group). Clinical follow-up was obtained at the median of 24.0 [interquartile range (IQR) 12.0–45.0] months, with 34 (81.0%) patients achieved the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ≤ 2 in the SAC group and 21 (87.5%) patients in the FD group. Thirteen (19.7%) patients experienced neurological complications, of which 9 (13.6%) patients first occurred during the periprocedural phase and 4 (6.1%) patients first occurred during follow-up. The overall complication rate and periprocedural complication rate were both higher in the SAC group, but did not reach statistical significance (23.8 vs. 12.5%, P = 0.430; 16.7 vs. 8.3%, P = 0.564). The mortality rates were similar between the groups (11.9 vs. 12.5%). Angiographic follow-up was available for 46 patients at the median of 7 (IQR 6–14) months, with a numerically higher complete occlusion rate in the SAC group (82.1 vs. 55.6%, P = 0.051) and similar adequate aneurysm occlusion rates between the groups (85.7 vs. 83.3%, P = 1.000). In the multivariate analysis, ischemic onset (P = 0.019), unilateral vertebral artery sacrifice (P = 0.008), and older age (≥60 years) (P = 0.031) were significantly associated with complications.ConclusionThere was a trend toward lower complication rate and lower complete occlusion rate for intradural large VBA aneurysms following FD as compared to SAC. FD and SAC have comparable mortality rates and favorable outcomes. Ischemic onset, unilateral vertebral artery sacrifice, and older age could increase the risk of complications.

Modified balloon-assisted coiling instead of acute stenting in the treatment of ruptured wide necked intracranial aneurysms.

The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and efficiency of the modified balloon assisted coiling (mBAC) technique in endovascular treatment (EVT) of ruptured wide-necked aneurysms (WNAs) to avoid stent placement in the acute phase of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). The local neurointerventional radiology database was retrospectively reviewed to identify patients who underwent EVT due to ruptured WNAs by the authors. According to the EVT technique performed, the study sample was divided into 3 groups: conventional BAC, stent assisted coiling (SAC), and mBAC. The patient demographics, aneurysm features, technical and clinical complications, aneurysm occlusion grades, morbidity, and mortality rates were comparatively analyzed. This study involved a total of 113 patients who had ruptured WNAs. The mBAC technique was performed on 26 aneurysms (23 saccular and 3 fusiform) in 26 patients to avoid acute phase stenting. The mean continuous balloon inflation time was 7.1 ± 2.12 min. The initial and follow-up angiographic and clinical outcomes were better in the mBAC group than in the SAC group (p < 0.05). The mBAC technique offers a prolonged, continuous balloon inflation time during the whole coiling process in the treatment of ruptured WNAs. The mBAC technique has the potential to obviate the need for SAC in patients who are candidates for stenting during the acute phase of SAH, and it might be considered a safe and effective endovascular approach with low complication rates and good angiographic and clinical outcomes.

Longitudinal Cost Profiles of Pipeline Embolization Device Versus Stent-Assisted Coiling in Propensity-Matched Unruptured Small Anterior Circulation Aneurysms.

The cost profiles of stent-assisted coiling (SAC) vs Pipeline embolization device (PED) in small unruptured anterior circulation aneurysms have not been studied. To compare the 2 modalities cost profiles in a propensity-matched cohort controlling for potential technical complexity confounders including size and location. Patients treated with either SAC or PED at our institution were identified. Following propensity-score algorithm, 46 patients, 23 in each group were matched. The procedural and follow-up costs in each group were analyzed and compared. Median maximal aneurysm size in the SAC and PED cohort were 5.3vs 5.1mm, respectively. Costs of access guide materials were significantly higher in the SAC group (P <.01). The average implant cost was not significantly different between the SAC and PED cohorts (${\$}$13973.2 ± ${\$}$2886.2vs ${\$}$14,760.7 ± ${\$}$3782.1, respectively; P=.43). Similarly, total procedural costs were not different (${\$}$18341.5 ± 4104vs ${\$}$17484.3±2914.1, respectively, P=.42). Although there were significantly more total follow-ups (P=.02) and longer follow-up duration (P=.01) in SAC cohort, no significant difference in follow-up costs between the 2 groups was identified (${\$}$20557 ± ${\$}$9247vs ${\$}$18958 ± ${\$}$9171.9, P=.56). Overall cost was similar between the SAC (${\$}$38898.9 ± ${\$}$9645.5) and PED groups (${\$}$36442.4 ± ${\$}$9076) (P=.38). In small unruptured anterior circulation aneurysms (excluding anterior communicating artery aneurysms) matched for technical complexity confounders, SAC and PED offer an overall equivalent economic cost profile. Postprocedural noninvasive imaging was more frequent in the SAC group. However, follow-up costs and total costs were not significantly different.

Treatment Outcomes of Stent-Assisted Coil Embolization for Ruptured Vertebral Artery Dissecting Aneurysms: The Preservation of Branches May Improve the Prognosis.

Subarachnoid hemorrhage due to ruptured vertebral artery dissecting aneurysm (rVADA) is associated with a high frequency of acute rebleeding and requires early treatment following onset. Parent artery occlusion (PAO) or stent-assisted coiling (SAC) embolization is selected as a treatment option according to the individual patient condition. This report is a retrospective examination evaluating the treatment outcomes for rVADA. The subjects were 20 rVADA patients (16 men and 4 women) who underwent endovascular treatment at our institution. The mean patient age was 52.9 years. Ten patients each were allocated to the PAO group and SAC group. We evaluated and compared the following parameters: presence of hemorrhagic complications, presence of ischemic complications, requirement of retreatment, and Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) after 90 days. The reasons for selecting SAC were contralateral occlusion or a small diameter in three patients, the posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) involvement in three patients, perforating artery from dissected lesion in five patients, and anterior spinal artery in one patient. There was no rebleeding in any patient. Symptomatic ischemic complications were observed in four patients in the PAO group and in one in the SAC group. Hyper-intense lesions in the brainstem on MRI DWI were noted in five patients in PAO group and in one in the SAC group. Retreatment was required for three patients in the PAO group and for four in the SAC group. Favorable outcomes (GOS 4, 5) after 90 days were observed for three patients in the PAO group and for eight patients in the SAC group (p = 0.0257). SAC that can preserve branches is a useful treatment option for rVADA. Further studies on a greater number of subjects are required to establish the optimal dose of antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants, and for stent selection.

The safety and outcomes of acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysms with incomplete occlusion after coiling: a case-control study

BackgroundIncomplete aneurysmal occlusion is a common feature of immediate posttreatment angiography. The safety and outcomes of acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysms (RIAs) with incomplete occlusion after stent-assisted coiling (SAC) and no-stent coiling (NSC) have not been well clarified. Progressive occlusion of stents can promote the complete occlusion of intracranial aneurysms (IAs), but it remains to be determined if progressive occlusion in acutely RIAs with incomplete occlusion after coiling may be enhanced by protective stenting. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and outcomes of those aneurysms after SAC and NSC; And to discover whether the stents can promote progressive aneurysm occlusion in such lesions or not.MethodsWe reviewed 199 patients with acutely RIAs underwent endovascular coiling and developed incomplete occlusion in the past seven years. The patients’ clinical and imaging information were recorded and analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the association of recurrence rate with potential risk factors.ResultsSAC group had wider aneurysms neck (3.471 mm vs 2.830 mm, P = 0.009) and smaller dome-to-neck ratio (1.536 vs 2.111, P = 0.001) than in NSC group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in total procedure-related complications rate (31.7% vs 23.5%, P = 0.195), procedure-related mortality (6.9% vs 2.0%, P = 0.170) and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 6-month follow-up (P > 0.05). However, SAC group had significantly higher ischemic complications rate (21.8% vs 8.2%, P = 0.007) and complete occlusion rate (65.6% vs 48.3%, P = 0.020), and lower recurrence rate (15.6% vs 28.1%, P = 0.042) than NSC group based on 6-month follow-up angiograms. Additionally, Multivariable analysis showed NSC was an independent risk factor for aneurysm recurrence (Odds Ratio [OR]: 4.061; P = 0.018).ConclusionsAcutely RIAs with incomplete occlusion after SAC is associated with higher complications rate and mortality, but has an acceptable safety profile and similar clinical outcome compared to NSC, as well as gives patients superior angiography outcome by progressive occlusion of stents.

Comparison of operating room variables, radiation exposure and implant costs for WEB versus stent assisted coiling for treatment of wide neck bifurcation aneurysms.

BackgroundThe WEB device offers another option for treating wide neck bifurcation aneurysms (WNBA). The objective was to compare procedure variables, radiation and implant cost between WEB and stent assisted coiling (SAC) for WNBA.MethodsA retrospective comparison of similarly sized WNBA treated with SAC or WEB over 5-years was performed. The operating room (arrival-departure), anesthesia (intubation-extubation), procedure duration (puncture-closure), fluoroscopy time and radiation dose(m-Gy) were recorded from the patients’ charts. Implant cost per case of all implants (stents, coils, WEB) that were opened whether deployed or not was captured including any coils used in the WEB cases. The implant cost represented the true cost incurred by the institution.ResultsThere were 46 WEB and 41 SAC cases with no significant difference in aneurysm size. There were more MCA and ACOMM (p = 0.005) and more ruptured aneurysms (p = 0.02) in the WEB group. Regarding procedure variables (hours:minutes): Operating room time WEB 2:31 (±0:37) versus SAC 3:41 (±0:50) (p < 0.0001); anesthesia duration WEB 2:05 (±0:31) versus SAC 3:13 (±0:51) (p < 0.0001) and procedure duration WEB 1:16 (±0:29) versus SAC 2:09 (±0:46) (p < 0.0001). Regarding radiation: Fluoroscopy time WEB 0:34 (±0:18) versus SAC 1:06 (±0:35) (p < 0.0001) and radiation dose WEB 2392(±1086)m-Gy versus SAC 3442 (±1528)m-Gy (p = 0.0007). The implant cost was $17,028(±$5,527) for the WEB versus $23,813 (±$7,456) for the SAC group (p < 0.0001).ConclusionThe WEB group had significantly shorter operating room, procedure and anesthesia duration compared to the SAC group. The radiation dose and fluoroscopy time was lower for the WEB group. The total implant cost per case was significantly lower for the WEB versus the SAC group.

Pipeline Embolization Device Versus Stent-Assisted Coiling for Intracranial Aneurysm Treatment: A Retrospective Propensity Score-Matched Study.

Pipeline embolization device (PED; Medtronic) and stent-assisted coiling (SAC) are established modalities for treatment of intracranial aneurysms. To comparatively assess the efficacy of these techniques. We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with aneurysms treated at our institution with either PED from 2013 to 2017 or SAC from 2009 to 2015. All large (>10 mm), ruptured, fusiform, anterior communicating artery, posterior circulation aneurysms, and patients with no available follow-up imaging were eliminated before running the propensity score matching (PSM). Patients were matched using nearest neighbor controlling for: age, gender, smoking, exact location, maximal diameter, and presence of multiple aneurysms. Total hospital costs for equipment and implants were calculated from procedure product and hospital billing records, and compared between the propensity-matched pairs. Out of 165 patients harboring 202 aneurysms; 170 (84.2%) were treated with the PED, and 32 (15.8%) were treated using SAC. PSM resulted in 23 matched pairs; with significantly longer follow up in the SAC group (mean 29.8 vs 14.1 mo; P=.0002). Complete occlusion rates were not different (82.6 vs 87%; P=.68), with no difference between the groups for modified Rankin Scale on last clinical follow-up, procedural complications or retreatment rates. Average total costs calculated from the hospital records, including equipment and implants, were not different between propensity-score matched pairs (P=.48). PED placement and SAC offer equally efficacious occlusion rates, functional outcomes, procedural complication rates, and cost profiles for small unruptured anterior circulation saccular aneurysms which do not involve the anterior communicating artery.

Reconstructive treatment of symptomatic vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms with Willis covered stent: Initial experience

BackgroundSymptomatic vertebral artery dissecting aneurysm (VADA) is a challenging disease with controversy on treatment strategy due to anatomic configuration and their nature. Moreover, the outcomes of reconstructive treatment have not been well established. ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of reconstructive endovascular treatment (EVT) for symptomatic VADAs with Willis covered stent. MethodsWe evaluated retrospectively 13 patients with symptomatic VADAs who treated with Willis covered stent, compared with stent-assisted coiling (SAC) on the characteristics, posttreatment course, angiographic and clinical follow-up outcomes at an average of 14.4 months (range, 3–48 months). ResultsA total of 33 patients with symptomatic VADAs were reviewed, 23 of these patients with ruptured VADAs. The technical successful rate is 100% respectively in Willis covered stent (Group A) and SAC (Group B, n ​= ​20). The initial complete occlusion rate was significant higher in group A (100%) than group B (30%) (p ​< ​0.01). Major procedure-related complications were not significant different in the two groups. Serial follow-up angiograms revealed 5 recurrent VADAs in group B and no recurrence in group A (p ​> ​0.05). No obvious in-stent stenosis and no re-hemorrhage and delayed ischemic symptoms during the follow-up period. The final angiograms of all survived patients demonstrated the complete occlusion rate was higher in group A (100%) than group B (80%), but no significant statistical difference (p ​> ​0.05). Clinical outcomes were favorable in 31 (93.9%), severe disability occurred in one in group B, and only one death in group A. The final clinical outcomes were also not significant difference in the two groups (p ​> ​0.05). ConclusionsOur initial result demonstrated reconstructive EVT with Willis covered stent provides a viable approach for selected symptomatic VADAs involving the intracranial and extracranial segments, which is similar to favorable results with SAC. However, an expanded clinical experiences and larger cohort studies are needed.

Stent assisted coiling versus non-stent coiling for the management of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: A outcome comparison study

Objective To compare the safety and efficiency of stent assisted coiling (SAC) with non-SAC for the management of ruptured intracranial aneurysms. Methods A total of 1 217 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms who underwent endovascular treatment at Neurointervention Department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 2011 to January 2018 were retrospectively enrolled. Patients were categorized into SAC (n=631) and non-SAC (n=586) groups. We retrospectively analyzed the immediate postoperative occlusion degree and that at follow-up (based on Raymond scale) as well as perioperative complication rate in the two groups. The difference was considered as significant with P<0.05. Results In SAC group, the Raymond grades were grade Ⅰ in 65.0% (n=410), grade II in 29.9% (n=189) and grade Ⅲ in 5.0% (n=32), while those in non-SAC group were grade Ⅰ in 51.4% (n=301), grade Ⅱ in 36.0% (n=211) and grade Ⅲ in 12.6% (n=74), and the inter-group difference was significant (P 0.05). At 12 months post operation, DSA was performed in 227 cases of SAC group and 102 cases of non-SAC group. In SAC group, the Raymond grades were grade Ⅰ in 71.8% (n=163), grade Ⅱ in 22.9% (n=52) and grade Ⅲ in 5.3% (n=12), while those in non-SAC group were grade Ⅰ in 53.9 % (n=55), grade Ⅱ in 34.3% (n=35) and grade Ⅲ in 11.8% (n=12). The recurrence rate was 11.9% (n=27) in SAC group and 38.2% (n=39) in non-SAC group. Those inter-group differences were significant (P<0.01). Conclusions Compared with non-SAC, SAC is associated with higher occlusion rate, lower recurrence rate, lower rebleeding rate and relatively higher rate of ischemic event. However, mortality and disability rate between two groups do not seem to differ. Key words: Aneurysm, ruptured; Embolization, therapeutic; Stents; Treatment outcome; Coils

Exploring the Feasibility of Pipeline Embolization Device Compared With Stent-Assisted Coiling to Treat Non-saccular, Unruptured, Intradural Vertebral Artery Aneurysms.

Object: The pipeline embolization device (PED) has been used to treat non-saccular, unruptured, intradural vertebral artery aneurysms at some institutions. However, there is an absence of large controlled studies validating the feasibility of this treatment. This study aimed to explore the therapeutic feasibility of PED by comparing PED treatment with controlled stent-assisted coiling (SAC).Materials and Methods: Thirty-two PED procedures were matched in a 1:2 manner with 64 SAC procedures based on patient age, sex, aneurysm size, and aneurysm location. Technical factors, procedural complications, angiographic results, and clinical outcomes were analyzed and compared.Results: There was no statistically significant difference in technical factors and procedural complications between the two groups (PED vs. SAC, 9.4 vs. 4.7%, P = 0.397). In multivariate analysis, smoking and therapeutic modality were identified as independent predictors of occlusion. Smoking was a risk factor for aneurysm obliteration [hazard ratio (HR) 0.53; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.31–0.89; P = 0.018]. Aneurysms treated with PED were more likely to achieve obliteration over time compared with aneurysms treated with SAC (HR 2.97; 95% CI, 1.79–4.93; P < 0.001). The rate of favorable clinical outcomes (modified Rankin Scale (mRS), 0–2) was similar between the two groups (PED vs. SAC, 100 vs. 96.9%, P = 0.551). In the SAC group, one patient had neurological deficit with an mRS of four at the latest follow-up. There was no mortality in either group.Conclusions: The PED and SAC groups showed similar technical factors, procedural complications, angiographic results, and favorable clinical outcomes. Aneurysms treated with PED were more prone to obliteration over time than aneurysms treated with SAC. These outcomes suggest, based on short-term follow-up, PED is a safe and feasible strategy for the treatment of non-saccular, unruptured, intradural vertebral artery aneurysms.

WEB embolization versus stent-assisted coiling: comparison of complication rates and angiographic outcomes

BackgroundIntrasaccular flow disruption represents a new paradigm in endovascular treatment of wide-necked bifurcation aneurysms.ObjectiveTo perform a matched case–control study comparing complications and angiographic outcome using the Woven Endobridge (WEB) device...

Treatment of Small and Tiny Aneurysms Before and After Flow Diversion Era: A Single Center Experience of 409 Aneurysms

To explore whether we should use the Pipeline embolization device (PED) as the primary treatment modality for small and tiny aneurysms at anterior circulation. This retrospective study included 409 cases of small and tiny aneurysms, including aneurysms treated by the PED (n= 77), coiling (n= 51), and stent-assisted coiling (SAC) (n= 281). We also made a comparison regarding the safety and efficacy among these treatment modalities. A total of 55 patients with 77 small aneurysms were treated with PEDs. Technical success was achieved in 98.4% of procedures. The complete occlusion rate was 75.9% (44/58). Both the morbidity and mortality rates were 1.8%. Comparing the 3 treatment modalities, the technical event rate tended to be the highest in the PED group (4.8% vs. 2.0% and 1.1%; PED vs. Coil vs. SAC; P= 0.100), and the use of a PED neither significantly shortened the procedure duration (127.2 ± 62.8 vs. 115 ± 37.1 and 112.8 ± 40.6 minutes, P= 0.322) nor lowered the complication rate (11.1% vs. 9.8% and 6.1%; P= 0.281). SAC had the highest occlusion rate (75.9% vs. 75.8% and 94.0%; P < 0.001) and lowest morbidity rate (0.8% vs. 4.2% and 1.8%; SAC vs. Coil vs. PED; P= 0.099). Ipsilateral multiple aneurysms were more frequently seen in the PED group (33.8% vs. 3.9% and 3.2%; P < 0.001). Procedure duration tended to be lower in the PED group versus the SAC group (122.7 ± 57.4 vs. 157.5± 22.2 minutes; P= 0.060). For these aneurysms, the PED group had the highest occlusion rate (80.0% vs. 50.0% and 66.7%; P= 0.516). The PED is an alternative treatment for small and tiny aneurysms. However, SAC remains the safest and most efficient treatment modality. The PED should be reserved for ipsilateral multiple aneurysms.

323 Comparison Between Balloon-Assisted and Stent-Assisted Technique for Treatment of Unruptured Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysms

Abstract INTRODUCTION Balloon and stent are representative of assistant devices for wide-neck aneurysm coiling. To date, there were no studies comparing balloon-assisted (BAC) and stent-assisted coiling (SAC) for the treatment of internal carotid artery unruptured aneurysms (ICA-UA). METHODS We sought to characteristics of patients and aneurysms, and clinical and angiographic prognosis between groups. Total number of ICA-UA was 227 in 190 patients. Two groups were separted into BAC group (141 ICA-UA in 120 patients) and SAC group (86 ICA-UA in 70 patients). RESULTS &gt;In SAC, aneurysm size and neck diameter tended to be larger than in BAC, but aneurysm volume and packed density of coil were not different between groups. Immediate angiographic occlusion grade was better for BAC than for SAC. Periprocedural thromboembolic events were more frequent during SAC (11.6%) than BAC (2.4%) per aneurysm, but hemorrhagic events were the opposite (2.4% for BAC and none for SAC per aneurysm) (P &lt; 0.05). At discharge, treatment-related morbi-mortality rates were 1.6% for BAC and 1.4% per patient for SAC. At clinical follow-up (BAC, 118 patients [98.3%] for a mean of 48.4 months; SAC, 69 patients [98.6%], for a mean of 37.4 months), 1 additional treatment-related infarction occurred during SAC, resulting in a modified Rankin scale score of 4. Thus, overall treatment-related morbidity-mortality rates were 1.7% in BAC and 2.9% in SAC. At imaging follow-up (BAC, 135 aneurysms [95.7%] for 28.3 months; SAC, 81 aneurysms [94.1%] for 23.9 months), BAC and SAC showed stable or improved occlusion in 94.1% and 95.0%, minor recurrence in 4.4% and 2.5%, and major recurrence in 1.5% and 2.5%, respectively. CONCLUSION Both BAC and SAC were safe and effective techniques for ICA-UA. There were no differences in morbidity, mortality and recurrence rates between groups, despite their opposite trends.

Innovations in Endovascular Treatment Strategies for Large Carotid Cavernous Aneurysms—The Safety and Efficacy of a Flow Diverter

The efficacy for the treatment of large carotid cavernous aneurysms (CCAs) was compared between conventional endovascular treatments, stent-assisted coiling (SAC), parent artery occlusion (PAO), and the flow diverter (FD). Between January 2001 and December 2015, 49 patients with large, broad-necked, unruptured CCA underwent endovascular treatment at our institution. We performed PAO in 22 patients, SAC in 18 patients, and FD in 9 patients. Safety and efficacy were assessed in all patients by periodic clinical and radiological examinations during a 6-month follow-up. All 22 aneurysms treated with PAO disappeared immediately after treatment, but in the SAC-treated group, complete occlusion was obtained in only 5 of the 18 patients. All aneurysms in the FD group resulted in body filling. Perioperative ipsilateral temporary ischemic events occurred in 6 cases (PAO 4, SAC 2, FD 0). Delayed deterioration or new onset of cranial nerve symptoms was observed in 10 cases (PAO 3, SAC 3, FD 4), almost all of which recovered within 3 months. During the 6-month follow-up, all aneurysms treated with PAO showed a decrease in size without recanalization. In the SAC group, 12 aneurysms showed neck remnants, and marked recanalization occurred in 4 cases. Six of the 9 aneurysms in the FD group were completely occluded. The FD provided excellent final results despite transient worsening of symptoms. Although further long-term follow-up is essential, from a cost-effective and time-saving viewpoint, FD is a relatively safe and reliable method for the treatment of large CCAs.