Comparison of operating room variables, radiation exposure and implant costs for WEB versus stent assisted coiling for treatment of wide neck bifurcation aneurysms.

Abstract

BackgroundThe WEB device offers another option for treating wide neck bifurcation aneurysms (WNBA). The objective was to compare procedure variables, radiation and implant cost between WEB and stent assisted coiling (SAC) for WNBA.MethodsA retrospective comparison of similarly sized WNBA treated with SAC or WEB over 5-years was performed. The operating room (arrival-departure), anesthesia (intubation-extubation), procedure duration (puncture-closure), fluoroscopy time and radiation dose(m-Gy) were recorded from the patients’ charts. Implant cost per case of all implants (stents, coils, WEB) that were opened whether deployed or not was captured including any coils used in the WEB cases. The implant cost represented the true cost incurred by the institution.ResultsThere were 46 WEB and 41 SAC cases with no significant difference in aneurysm size. There were more MCA and ACOMM (p = 0.005) and more ruptured aneurysms (p = 0.02) in the WEB group. Regarding procedure variables (hours:minutes): Operating room time WEB 2:31 (±0:37) versus SAC 3:41 (±0:50) (p < 0.0001); anesthesia duration WEB 2:05 (±0:31) versus SAC 3:13 (±0:51) (p < 0.0001) and procedure duration WEB 1:16 (±0:29) versus SAC 2:09 (±0:46) (p < 0.0001). Regarding radiation: Fluoroscopy time WEB 0:34 (±0:18) versus SAC 1:06 (±0:35) (p < 0.0001) and radiation dose WEB 2392(±1086)m-Gy versus SAC 3442 (±1528)m-Gy (p = 0.0007). The implant cost was $17,028(±$5,527) for the WEB versus $23,813 (±$7,456) for the SAC group (p < 0.0001).ConclusionThe WEB group had significantly shorter operating room, procedure and anesthesia duration compared to the SAC group. The radiation dose and fluoroscopy time was lower for the WEB group. The total implant cost per case was significantly lower for the WEB versus the SAC group.