The NASA-funded Pterodactyl Project seeks to advance the current state of the art for atmospheric entry vehicles by developing novel guidance and control technologies for deployable entry vehicles (DEVs). This paper details the efforts of the Pterodactyl team to develop, implement, and evaluate different control hardware effectors on an asymmetric, mechanically deployed DEV. Multiple control effector designs are developed for a baseline vehicle including propulsive control systems (reaction control systems) and nonpropulsive control systems (aerodynamic control surfaces and internal moving masses). For each control system, state-feedback integral controllers based on linear quadratic regulator optimal control methods are designed to track the guidance commands of either the bank angle or the angle of attack and sideslip angle. Using a lunar return reference mission, a comparative analysis of the performance and maneuverability of the DEV using the different control system configurations is conducted. The aerodynamic control surface design is demonstrated to be the most suitable architecture, primarily due to its ability to achieve acceleration rates that supersede the other designs. Considering performance, maneuverability, and guidance tracking during entry, the aerodynamic control surface design is recommended for this DEV and chosen reference mission.