The impact of plant cycling is evaluated for near and medium term advanced energy conversion systems in terms of effects on equipment and implications for the choice of materials. A brief outline is given of current problems and their causes in steam and combined cycle gas turbine (CCGT) plants. In contrast to earlier years, it is now quite common for relatively new plants to have to cycle. The causes of this are increased competition in the power supply industry, unforeseen changes in the relative price of fuels, and regulatory changes which no longer have the effect of insulating certain types of energy conversion systems from the need to load follow and two shift. It is therefore vital that the issue of cycling be considered at the plant design stage.In advanced steam plants, where steam inlet temperatures will be well over 600°C, problems will involve the performance of transition joints and austenitic alloys under cycling conditions. The“ R” function is described and tabulated to show the likely susceptibility of a range of ferritic, austenitic and nickel based alloys to thermal shock, caused by quenching of pipework by slugs of condensate. It would seem that even modern high strength austenitics do not have the same capability as the modified 9 and 12 Cr ferritics. There may also be problems with steam turbine materials. The main concern in advanced CCGT plants is the potential for increased thermal fatigue, due to the use of more sophisticated blade cooling techniques. However a potential issue is shortcomings in blade life assessment models as applied to directionally solidified and single crystal materials, as it seems likely that current approaches, using isotropic data, may be giving a severe over estimate.It seems unlikely that coal gasification plant will be able to two shift, although load following will be possible. It is suggested that the critical area will be that of the synthesis gas exchanger where there is potential for corrosion assisted fatigue. This problem is likely to increase if more resistant coatings are used, as these tend to be less ductile than current alloys.Conversely recuperative gas turbines are designed to load follow and two shift and should be able to resist the effects of rapid start ups and shut downs. Modern designs using either primary or secondary surface recuperators are briefly described. The topical issue here is passage collapse in primary surface systems, which is likely to increase under cycling duty.
Read full abstract