Sentinel Lymph Node Status Research Articles

Sentinel lymph node status affects long-term survival in patients with intermediate-thickness melanoma

Sentinel lymph node status affects long-term survival in patients with intermediate-thickness melanoma

Lymphatic transit rate as a predictive parameter for nodal metastasis in primary limb malignant melanoma

BackgroundThe status of sentinel lymph node (SLN) is one of the most predictive prognostic factors in patients with clinically localized malignant melanomas (MMs). However, since the positive SLN metastatic rate is as low as 20%, it is desirable to minimize SLN biopsy performance with imaging. By dynamic lymphoscintigraphy, we have proposed the lymphatic transit rate (LTR), the value that the distance between the primary lesion and SLN is divided by scintigraphic saturation time. LTR represents the scintigraphic saturation velocity and can be used for evaluation of metastasis of skin cancers. MethodsDynamic lymphoscintigraphy data from 36 lymph nodes in 36 patients with primary MM on the limb were analyzed. The initial sites of the MMs were the lower limb in 24 patients and the upper limb in 12 patients. Histopathologically, nodal metastasis was found in 10 patients. ResultsIn the lower limb MM, the mean LTRs were 3.49 cm/min in histologically non-metastatic SLNs and 4.49 cm/min in histologically metastatic SLNs (P = 0.0056). In the upper limb MM, the mean LTRs were 2.59 cm/min in non-metastatic SLNs and 3.94 cm/min in metastatic SLNs (P = 0.0162). Thus, significantly higher LTRs were obtained in the metastatic SLNs. All SLNs with LTR < 4.0 cm/min in the lower limb MM and those with LTR < 3.0 cm/min in the upper limb MM were non-metastatic. ConclusionLTR is a useful predictive indicator for nodal metastasis and SLN biopsy performance in MMs.

Neurotropic melanoma: an analysis of the clinicopathological features, management strategies and survival outcomes for 671 patients treated at a tertiary referral center

Neurotropic cutaneous melanoma is a rare melanoma subtype that invades nerves and is often associated with desmoplastic melanoma. Limited data suggest that it has a greater propensity to recur locally, but it is unknown whether its behavior differs from that of other melanoma subtypes, including desmoplastic melanoma. We investigated clinicopathological predictors of outcome in a cohort of 671 patients with neurotropic melanoma to develop evidence-based management recommendations. Patients with primary neurotropic melanoma diagnosed from 1985 to 2013 were identified from the Melanoma Institute Australia database, along with a control cohort of 718 non-neurotropic melanoma patients. Features predictive of sentinel lymph node status, recurrence, melanoma-specific survival and response to adjuvant radiotherapy were sought. Neither local recurrence (hazard ratio: 1.28 (0.73–2.25) P=0.39) nor melanoma-specific survival (hazard ratio: 0.79 (0.55–1.15) P=0.22) were significantly affected by the presence of neurotropism on multivariate analysis. However, there was a markedly reduced likelihood of sentinel node positivity (hazard ratio: 0.61 (0.41–0.89) P=0.01) in neurotropic melanoma patients. Surgical margins ≥8mm halved the recurrence risk compared with <2 mm margins (hazard ratio: 0.46 (0.31–0.68) P<0.001). Additionally, in neurotropic melanoma patients with <8 mm margins, adjuvant radiotherapy halved the recurrence risk (hazard ratio: 0.48 (0.27–0.87) P=0.02). This, the largest study of neurotropic melanoma reported to date, has demonstrated that the presence of neurotropism does not alter the risk of melanoma recurrence or survival but does reduce the likelihood of sentinel node positivity. For successful treatment of neurotropic melanoma, adequate excision margins are of paramount importance. However, when adequate margins cannot be achieved, adjuvant radiotherapy reduces the risk of recurrence.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in Merkel cell carcinoma: The Mayo Clinic experience of 150 patients

BackgroundMerkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare cutaneous malignancy of neuroendocrine origin with a high propensity for lymph node metastasis. Sentinel lymph node (SLN) status is important for accurate staging; however, the optimal treatment following SLN biopsy, regardless of nodal status, remains unclear. Methods150 patients with MCC who underwent SLN biopsy from 1995 to 2011 at 3 Mayo Clinic sites were reviewed. ResultsOf 150 patients with MCC who underwent SLN biopsy, 39 (26%) were positive and 111 (74%) were negative. There was no significant difference between the sex, age, tumor location, or size of primary in the positive and negative SLN groups. While there was no difference in the cumulative incidence of any regional recurrence between SLN groups, the rate of in-transit recurrences was significantly higher in patients with a positive SLN (p = 0.022). The disease-specific survival for MCC was 97.0%, 82.4%, and 82.4% at 1, 3, and 5 years with a positive SLN and 99.0%, 94.9%, and 86.8% with a negative SLN (p = 0.31). Among those alive at last follow up, the median follow up was 3.8 years (IQR, 2.1–8.4) and 2.9 years (IQR, 1.8–6.1) for positive and negative SLN cohorts respectively. ConclusionsOccult nodal metastasis is common in MCC(26%). No tumor or patient characteristics were identified to predict SLN positivity. Patients with a positive SLN have a higher risk of in-transit recurrence and may benefit from adjuvant radiation with inclusion of the in-transit field in amenable cases. When patients with a positive SLN receive additional treatment to the at-risk nodal basin, both OS and DSS are similar to patients with a negative SLN.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy status is not the most powerful predictor of prognosis in cutaneous melanoma.

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) status has been advocated in several recently published articles as the single most valuable prognostic marker for melanoma, and of greater prognostic importance than more established parameters such as Breslow thickness. A careful examination of the evidence for these claims, however, indicates that they are not substantiated by the available data, are somewhat misleading and suggest misinterpretation of the statistical analysis of the papers to which they refer. We will examine the basis for these claims and show why they are invalid.

Sentinel Lymph Node Status is a Main Prognostic Parameter Needful for the Correct Staging of Patients with Melanoma Thicker than 4 mm: Single-Institution Experience and Literature Meta-Analysis

ABSTRACTPurpose of the study: The usefulness of sentinel lymph node biopsy in thick melanomas is debated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the possible prognostic significance of sentinel lymph node biopsy in T4 melanoma patients and to verify whether this was a homogeneous group of patients with similar poor behavior.Materials and Methods: A retrospective observational study was performed. Data were extracted from the Tuscan Regional Referral Center database. The outcome of sentinel lymph node-negative and sentinel lymph node-positive T4 melanomas were compared. A systematic review of published series on this issue and a meta-analysis were performed.Results: Among 125 T4 melanoma patients, 53 patients (42.4%) were sentinel lymph node-positive and 72 (57.6%) patients were sentinel lymph node-negative. The 5-year and the 10-year melanoma specific survival were 81.9% and 72.3% for sentinel lymph node-negative patients and 42.4% and 17.9% (P < 0.001) for sentinel lymph node-positive patients. A positive sentinel lymph node showed an HR of 3.08. The meta-analysis confirmed that there was a significantly greater risk of death for patients with thick melanoma and positive sentinel lymph node (RR 1.75).Conclusions: The results of the study point out that the sentinel lymph node biopsy is required for the correct staging of patients with melanoma thicker than 4 mm and that the status of sentinel lymph node is a significant predictor of melanoma specific survival. This knowledge allows early surgical and adjuvant treatment as well as appropriate trial enrollment and tailored follow-up.

Predictive clinicopathological characteristics affecting sentinel lymph node metastasis in early breast cancer patients

Background: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is one of the standard procedures for breast cancer patients without clinically detected axillary lymph nodes. However, 60–78% of patients suffered from unnecessary invasive axilla surgery. Our objective is to investigate predictive clinicopathological factors affecting sentinel lymph node (SLN) status in early breast cancer patients. Methods: There were 324 patients who were diagnosed as invasive breast cancer and took SLNB in Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH). They were categorized into the two groups according to axillary lymph node status, and their clinicopathological characteristics were compared by univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results: Univariate analysis showed that tumor size, pT stage, lympho-vascular invasion (LVI), estrogen (ER) status, hormone receptor (HR) status, and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) were associated with SLN metastasis. However, pT stage, histological grade and TNBC were independent predictive factors for SLN involvement by multivariate logistic regression analysis. Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that pT stage and histological grade provided positive, and TNBC provided negative prediction about SLN metastasis in early stage breast cancer patients with clinically negative axillary lymph nodes.

A unique gene expression signature is significantly differentially expressed in tumor-positive or tumor-negative sentinel lymph nodes in patients with melanoma.

The purpose of this study was to learn whether molecular characterization through gene expression profiling of node-positive and node-negative sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in patients with clinical stage I and II melanoma may improve the understanding of mechanisms of metastasis and identify gene signatures for SLNs/SLNs that correlate with diagnosis or clinical outcome. Gene expression profiling was performed on SLN biopsies of 48 (24 SLN and 24 SLN) patients (T3a/b-T4a/b) who underwent staging of SLNs using transcriptome profiling analysis on 5 μm sections of fresh SLNs. U133A 2.0 Affymetrix gene chips were used. Significance analysis of microarrays was used to test the association between gene expression level and SLN status. Genes with fold change more than 1.5 and q value less than 0.05 were considered differentially expressed. Pathway analysis was performed using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis. The Benjamini and Hochberg method was used to adjust for multiple testing in pathway analysis. We identified 89 probe sets that were significantly differentially expressed (1.5-27-fold; q<0.05). Upon performing the pathway analysis, it was found that 25 genes were common among the most significant and biologically relevant canonical pathways. The molecules and pathways that achieved differential expression of highest statistical significance were notably related to melanoma and its microenvironment and to signaling pathways implicated in immunosuppression and development of cancer. A 25-gene signature is significantly differentially expressed between SLN and SLN and is related to melanoma oncogenesis and immunosuppression. The identified expression profile provides a signature of melanoma nodal involvement. These findings warrant further investigation into the mechanisms of metastasis, melanoma metastasis diagnosis, and prediction of outcome.

Predictive clinicopathological characteristics affecting sentinel lymph node metastasis in early breast cancer patients

Background: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is one of the standard procedures for breast cancer patients without clinically detected axillary lymph nodes. However, 60–78% of patients suffered from unnecessary invasive axilla surgery. Our objective is to investigate predictive clinicopathological factors affecting sentinel lymph node (SLN) status in early breast cancer patients.

A new molecular-based lymph node staging classification determines the prognosis of breast cancer patients

Background:The one-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) assay is a novel molecular method that can detect metastasis in a whole lymph node based on cytokeratin 19 mRNA copy number. This cohort study aimed to establish an OSNA-based nodal staging (pN(mol)) classification for breast cancer.Methods:The cohort consisted of 1039 breast cancer patients who underwent sentinel node (SN) biopsy using the OSNA assay. Cutoff value of the SN tumour burden stratifying distant disease-free survival (DDFS) was determined, and predictive factors for DDFS and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were investigated. pN(mol) classification of the SN status was defined as: pN0(mol)(sn), SN negative; pN1mi(mol)(sn), SN positive and tumour burden <cutoff-value; and pN1(mol)(sn), tumour burden ⩾cutoff-value. Median follow-up time; 68.3 months.Results:Cutoff value of the SN tumour burden was 2810 copies per μl. Of the 1039 patients, 798, 95, and 146 had pN0(mol)(sn), pN1mi(mol)(sn), and pN1(mol)(sn) status, respectively. Five-year DDFS and BCSS rates were lower for pN1(mol)(sn) patients than for pN1mi(mol)(sn) patients (87.7% vs 98.8%, P=0.001 and 93.1% vs 98.8%, P=0.044, respectively). Multivariate analyses revealed the pN(mol) classification was most significant predictor for DDFS and BCSS.Conclusions:The molecular-based pN classification determines the prognosis of breast cancer patients and could guide therapeutic decision making.

Understanding the influence of patient demographics on disease severity, treatment strategy, and survival outcomes in merkel cell carcinoma: a surveillance, epidemiology, and end-results study.

ObjectiveTo identify trends in patient presentation and outcomes data that may guide the development of clinical algorithms on Merkel Cell Carcinoma (MCC).MethodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study searching in the National Cancer Institute's SEER registry for documented MCC cases from 1986-2013. No exclusion criteria were applied. We hereby identified 7,831 original MCC entries. Demographics, staging, and socioeconomic characteristics were identified and treatment modality likelihoods and survival data were calculated via logistic regression and Kaplan-Meier statistical modeling.ResultsConcerning tumor localization, 44.5% (n= 3,485) were located on the head and neck, and 47.8% were located on the trunk and extremities (n= 3,742). Male and younger patients are more likely to receive radiation than surgery with no differences seen among patient race. Caucasians and “Other” races both showed higher overall survival than African American patients. States with higher median household income levels demonstrated survival advantage. Income quartiles yielded no differences in surgical or radiotherapy interventions. Moreover, patients who forego radiotherapy had a poorer overall survival.LimitationsGeneralizability of SEER data, potential intrinsic coding inconsistencies, and limited information on patient comorbidities, sentinel lymph node and surgical margin status are major limitations. There is no information regarding medical intervention such as systemic chemotherapy or immunotherapy. Recoding efforts are inconclusive regarding variables such as tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, mutations, or immunosuppression status, which are well-documented for other cancers within the database.ConclusionMCC lesions of the head and neck region, lower income quartiles, and African American race are associated with higher mortality. MCC patients have a median household income that is significantly higher than national values with no significant difference in subsequent treatment modalities (surgery or radiotherapy) based on socioeconomic markers. A lack of radiotherapy is associated with higher mortality.

Is mitotic rate still useful in the management of patients with thin melanoma?

T1 melanoma substaging was recently modified by the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC). Although sentinel lymph node (SLN) positivity is the most important prognostic factor in melanoma, there is a lack of consensus on whether SLN biopsy should be performed in patients with thin melanoma (≤1 mm). The main aim of this study was to investigate predictors of SLN positivity in patients with thin melanoma, with a special emphasis on mitotic rate. A secondary aim was to evaluate survival in this group of patients. Retrospective multicenter observational study with analysis of age, sex, tumour location, thickness, mitotic rate, regression and microscopic satellites. Predictive factors were identified using a classification and regression tree (CART) approach. Melanoma-specific survival according to SLN status was estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves. We analysed 203 patients with a melanoma ≤1 mm. Using the new AJCC staging criteria, the CART algorithm identified a 7.5% likelihood of SLN positivity in T1a patients. In the case of T1b melanoma, there was a 14.3% likelihood of SLN positivity in patients with a mitotic rate >1 mitosis/mm2 and a 3.2% likelihood in those with ≤1 mitoses/mm2 . None of the patients with T1b disease who had ≤1 mitoses/mm2 and regression had SLN positivity. In T1b patients, 5-year melanoma-specific survival was 98.7% in the SLN-negative group and 75% in the SLN-positive group (P = 0.05). When stratified by mitotic rate, survival was 100% for patients with a mitotic rate of ≤1 mitoses/mm2 and 91.4% for those with >1 mitosis/mm2 (P = 0.022). There were no deaths in the T1a subgroup. Sentinel lymph node metastasis was less common in patients with T1b melanoma who had a mitotic rate of ≤1 mitoses/mm2 . Performance of SLN biopsy should be carefully considered in this subgroup of patients, particularly considering the good prognosis.

Prognostic significance of BRAF and NRAS mutations in melanoma: a German study from routine care

BackgroundHotspot mutations of the oncogenes BRAF and NRAS are the most common genetic alterations in cutaneous melanoma. Specific inhibitors of BRAF and MEK have shown significant survival benefits in large phase III trials. However, the prognostic significance of BRAF and NRAS mutations outside of clinical trials remains unclear.MethodsThe mutational status of BRAF (exon 15) and NRAS (exon 2 and 3) was determined in melanoma samples of 217 patients with pyrosequencing and Sanger sequencing. The genotypes were correlated with clinical outcomes and pathologic features of the primary tumors. Time to disease progression was calculated with the cumulative incidence function. Survival analyses were performed with Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Relative survival was calculated with the Ederer-II method. Treatment with BRAF and MEK inhibitors and immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) was allowed.ResultsMutations in BRAF and NRAS were identified in 40.1 and 24.4% of cases, respectively. Concurrent mutations in both genes were detected in further 2.3%. The remaining 33.2% were wild type for the investigated exons (WT). BRAF mutations were significantly associated with younger age at first diagnosis (p < 0.001) and truncal localization of the culprit primary (p = 0.002). The nodular subtype was most common in the NRAS cohort. In addition, NRAS-mutant melanoma patients showed a higher frequency of nodal relapse (p = 0.013) and development of metastatic disease (p = 0.021). The time to loco-regional nodal relapse was shortest in NRAS-mutant melanoma (p = 0.002). Presence of NRAS mutation was an independent risk factor for disease progression in multivariate analysis (HR 2.01; 95% CI 1.02 – 3.98). BRAF-mutant melanoma patients showed a tendency for better overall and relative survival. Genotype was not a consistent risk factor in multivariate analysis. Instead, positive sentinel lymph node status (HR 2.65; 95% CI 1.15 – 6.10) and treatment with ICB in stage IV disease (HR 0.17; 95% CI 0.06–0.48) were significant multivariate risk factors.ConclusionsNRAS-mutant tumors tended to behave more aggressively particularly in early stages of the disease in this high-risk melanoma population. Treatment with immune checkpoint blockade improved survival in stage IV disease in a real-world setting.

Factors Influencing Disease Progression in Patients with Head and Neck Melanoma.

Histological parameters as well as the status of sentinel lymph node are known to be strong prognostic factors in patients with melanoma. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed 1,384 patients who were diagnosed with head and neck melanoma between 1976 and 2010 regarding prognostic factors [tumor thickness, level of invasion, sentinel lymph node (SLN) status, ulceration, histological subtype, localization, and gender], overall survival, and disease-free survival. Patients who developed metastases had a significantly thicker tumor than patients without metastases. Additionally, a thicker tumor was often associated with a higher level of invasion (Clark level). There was no overall survival benefit in patients who underwent SLN dissection when compared to patients who did not (p=0.07). Compared to SLN-negative patients, patients with SLN involvement had a significantly shorter disease-free period (p<0.001) and shorter overall survival time (p<0.001). In summary, tumor thickness is the most important prognostic factor. SLN dissection does not affect the overall survival of patients with melanoma. However, a positive SLN is a marker for a worse outcome in these patients.

Novel rapid-immunohistochemistry using an alternating current electric field for intraoperative diagnosis of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer

Axillary lymph node status and pathological diagnosis of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) is a prognostic factor that influences management of postoperative therapy. Recent reports indicate that one-step nucleic acid amplification and hematoxylin and eosin (HE)-stained frozen sections are effective for intraoperative diagnosis of SLNs. In the present study, we report a rapid-immunohistochemical staining (R-IHC) method that enables intraoperative detection of SLN metastases within 16 min using an anti-cytokeratin antibody. This is the first report on SLN diagnosis using R-IHC in patients with breast cancer. We prospectively examined 160 dissected SLNs from 108 breast cancer patients who underwent surgery at our institute. The dissected SLNs were sectioned and conventionally stained with HE or immunohistochemically labeled with anti-cytokeratin antibody using R-IHC procedures. Intraoperative R-IHC analyses were completed within 16 min, after which diagnoses were made by two pathologists. The total time required for intraoperative diagnosis was about 20 min. In this study series, R-IHC detected four metastatic SLNs that were undetected using conventional HE staining (4/20, 20.0%). Compared with subsequent permanent diagnosis, R-IHC offered 95.2% sensitivity and 100% specificity. These findings indicate R-IHC is a clinically applicable technique that enables precise and quick intraoperative detection of micro- and macrometastasis in breast cancer.

Molecular analysis of sentinel lymph node in colon carcinomas by one-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) reduces time to adjuvant chemotherapy interval

BackgroundThe interval between surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) is a predictive factor of survival in high-risk colon cancer (CC). This study aimed to evaluate the impact of intraoperative sentinel lymph node (SLN) analysis using the one-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) technique on the time interval between surgery and AC. MethodsWe performed a prospective study analyzing 56 consecutive patients who had surgery for CC between July 2012 and October 2014, including 20 patients needing AC. SLN status was determined intraoperatively in 17 patients in the OSNA group; when positive, a portacath (PAC) was placed during the procedure for upcoming AC. In the remaining patients, we proceeded without SLN status determination and the PAC was installed after definitive histopathological analysis of the specimen if needed. ResultsThere was no difference between the groups regarding cancer staging, duration of hospitalization (7.5days in the OSNA group and 10days in the control group, p=0.43) and major complications (20% vs 30% respectively, p=0.55). The time interval between surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy was significantly shorter in the OSNA group at 35 (±8) days vs 67 (±36) days (p=0.021). ConclusionSLN status determination by the OSNA technique is safe, feasible and could significantly reduce time between surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy in a pilot study.

Gene-signature based prediction of relapse-free survival in melanoma patients with known sentinel lymph node status.

e21037 Background: Staging of cutaneous melanoma (CM), as defined by the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC), includes determination of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) status as a major prognostic factor. We have previously identified and validated a gene expression risk score (GRS) in primary CM and adjacent stroma, consisting of 7 protective genes and 1 risk-associated gene, which predicts patient survival, independently of AJCC stage. This external validation study evaluated single and combined performance of GRS and SLN in predicting relapse-free survival (RFS). Methods: The study cohort included 203 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) -primary CMs (AJCC stages IA-IIIC, n=31 RFS events). Tissue samples and clinical data were provided by two centers, and gene expression was determined externally using real-time RT-PCR (double-blind study). External prospective data analysis followed a pre-specified protocol. Results: Integration Discrimination Improvement (IDI) analysis demonstrated non-inferiority of GRS vs. SLN status in predicting RFS (IDI estimate=-0.8%, p=0.040). In univariate Cox regression analysis, GRS and SLN status predicted RFS (GRS: p=0.011, HR=2.44 [1.2-4.95]; SLN: p=0.038, HR=2.12 [1.03-4.38]). Multivariate Cox regression demonstrated independent contribution of prognostic information by both parameters (GRS: p=0.015, HR=2.40 [1.18-4.89]; SLN: p=0.046, HR=2.11 [1.02-4.37]. IDI analysis demonstrated that combining GRS and SLN status improved prognostic performance, as compared to SLN status alone (IDI estimate=3.2%, p=0.044). When complementing SLN status with GRS (SLN positive or high GRS), sensitivity of relapse detection increased from 38.7% for SLN alone to 67.7%. Conclusions: GRS is a non-invasive predictor of RFS, complementary to SLN analysis. Combining GRS and SLN status significantly improves accuracy of melanoma prognosis and, therefore, may guide follow-up care as well as treatment decisions regarding new adjuvant therapies, e.g. of SLN positive patients with high GRS. [Table: see text]

Performance of a 31-gene expression profile (GEP) test for metastatic risk prediction in cutaneous melanomas (CM) of the head and neck.

9576 Background: Accurate prognostication of distant metastatic risk using sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy for CM can be challenging in melanomas of the head and neck due to a higher false negative rate compared to other anatomical areas. A GEP signature that predicts metastatic risk based on primary tumor biology, providing a binary outcome of Class 1 (low risk of metastasis) or Class 2 (high risk), was previously described. The prognostic capabilities of the GEP independently and in combination with SLN status in a cohort of patients with primary head and neck CM are assessed here. Methods: All samples and clinical data were collected under an IRB-approved multicenter protocol. qPCR analysis was used to assess expression of the gene signature (Class 1 vs. Class 2). Distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and melanoma-specific survival (MSS) were assessed. Results: 157 subjects with primary CMs in the head and neck region were identified. 110 of 157 subjects had a SLN biopsy performed. Median age was 65 years (range 25-89) and median Breslow depth was 1.6 mm (range 0.2-15.0 mm). In 71 SLN-negative patients, 18 of 27 (67%) distant metastatic events were GEP Class 2. Overall, 73% (47 of 64) distant metastases, and 88% (22 of 25) deaths due to CM were called Class 2. By comparison, sensitivities for DMFS and MSS were 41% (26 of 64) and 52% (13 of 25), respectively, using SLN biopsy alone, and increased to 80% (51 of 64) and 88% (22 of 25), respectively, when combining the SLN status and GEP class. Kaplan-Meier 5-year DMFS and MSS rates based on SLN status alone or in combination with GEP are shown in the table. Conclusions: These data support the ability of the GEP test to accurately identify low- and high-risk cases of head and neck melanoma. The results strongly support the role of GEP testing to enhance current staging by better predicting the risk of distant metastasis and death for patients with melanoma in an anatomic region that is associated with a higher SLN biopsy false negative rate. [Table: see text]

Head and neck desmoplastic melanoma: Utility of sentinel node biopsy

PurposeThe utility of sentinel lymph node biopsy in desmoplastic melanoma has been questioned due to multiple reports of a low rate of occult nodal metastasis in this variant of melanoma. We describe a single institution experience with management of desmoplastic melanoma of the head and neck and discuss the utility of sentinel lymph node biopsy. Materials and methodsA retrospective review was performed of 49 patients with desmoplastic melanoma of the head and neck at a tertiary care center from 1994 to 2014. ResultsSentinel lymph node biopsy was performed in 15 patients. Only 1 (6.7%) of these patients was found to have a positive sentinel node. Of the 46 patients without evidence of neck disease at presentation, 3 (6.5%) were found to have occult nodal disease or developed neck recurrences. When looking at the entire cohort, there were a total of 16 recurrences in 14 patients (28.6%). The majority (85.7%) of recurrences were either local or distant metastasis with only 2 (14.3%) recurrences being in regional lymph node basins. The overall rates of local, regional, and distant recurrences were 14.2%, 4.1%, and 10.2% respectively. The mixed pathologic subtype was not associated with a higher rate of nodal metastasis. ConclusionsDesmoplastic melanoma has a low rate of occult nodal metastasis and a high propensity to recur locally or as a distant metastasis, regardless of regional node status. Our experience combined with the uncertain impact that sentinel node status has on survival raises the question of the utility of routine sentinel node biopsy in this specific variant of melanoma.

Clinical significance of MSKCC nomogram on guiding the application of touch imprint cytology and frozen section in intraoperative assessment of breast sentinel lymph nodes.

The widely practiced intra-operative methods for rapid evaluation and detection of sentinel lymph node (SLN) status include frozen section (FS) and touch imprint cytology (TIC). This study optimized the use of TIC and FS in the intra-operative detection of breast SLNs based on the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) nomogram. Three hundred forty-two SLNs were removed from 79 patients. SLN metastatic probability was assessed by the MSKCC nomogram. The SLNs underwent intra-operative TIC and FS, as well as routine post-operative paraffin sections (RPSs). The relationships between TIC, FS, and SLN metastatic probability were analyzed. Overall, TIC was more sensitive than FS (92.31% vs. 76.92%), while TIC specificity was inferior to FS specificity (84.85% vs. 100%). In addition, the best cut-off value for TIC based on the MSKCC nomogram was inferior to the best FS cut-off value (22.5% vs. 34.5%). All patients with a MSKCC value <22.5% in the present study were negative based on FS and RPS, while the true-negative and false-positive rates for TIC were 92.5% and 7.5%, respectively. Thus, early breast cancer patients, based on a MSKCC value <22.5%, can safely avoid FS, but should have TIC performed intra-operatively. Patients with a MSKCC value >22.5% should have TIC and FS to determine the size of metastases, whether or not to proceed with axillary lymph node dissection, and to avoid easily missed metastases.