The Philippine state has been violating the non-derogable right to equality and non-discrimination of child prisoners, a peremptory principle of international law, on the ground of “sex… social origin, property, birth, or other status” as laid down under Article 2, Article 24, and Article 26 of the Covenant. Virtually all child prisoners come from the poorest of the poor as well. Child prisoners detained by police officers in the company of adult crime suspects include prostituted girls, children hooked on substance abuse, street urchins, child scavengers, and children with mental disabilities.With the conspiratorial acquiescence, tacit consent, and implicit authority of the President and her top officials, and in violation of the principle of equality under Paragraphs 7, 10, and 12 of Committee General Comment 18, police officers commit the crime of jailing the children of the poorest of the poor on account of their being poor, sex (with respect to girls), poor social origins, and lack of property. The President down to the police officers know that these prisoners come from the economically marginalized and politically powerless sectors of society and therefore could not stand up to defend their human rights in the face of such onslaughts from the state. This reveals the discriminatory nature of the crime of jailing children with adult crime suspects, which the President and top officials refuse to officially acknowledge and stop until now, in violation of Articles 2(1), 24, and 26.The Philippine state has been committing a form of unlawful discrimination based on the status of the child prisoners as children of the poorest of the poor, on account of their being poor, their sex (as far as girl prisoners are concerned), and of their tender age which render them defenseless and powerless to rise up in defense of their dignity and human rights in the face of the systematic, organized, and widespread onslaught by law enforcers acting under color of official authority and title from the President who is their commander-in-chief. This violates Article 26 as elucidated in Committee General Comment 28 (Paragraphs 3, 4, and 15).These state functionaries know and/or are in a position to know that these child prisoners are mostly unlettered, economically marginalized, and politically powerless; thus, enabling them to commit this institutionalized discrimination against child prisoners with impunity. The President, et. al., know and/or are in a position to know that these children are incapable of defending and protecting their rights amid the onslaughts from the law enforcers who tacitly and indirectly receive their orders from the Philippine President, who is their Commander-in-Chief.