Jacob Selwood, Diversity and Difference in Early Modern London, Farnham & Burlington, VT, Ashgate, 2010, pp. xii + 214, hb. £55.00, ISBN: 978-0- 7546-6375-1This imaginative contribution to the history of early modern London considers an underexplored facet of civic identity: the encounter between London's citizenry and those 'strangers' who comprised a prominent part of London life, a recognisably non-English presence in the metropolis predating our usual narratives of globalisation. Selwood's focus is on the understanding of 'difference' as a category which transcended any single national group, and one which was open to interpretation and negotiation, particularly regarding those whose parents were born overseas. His interest is in 'the daily practice' of 'defining and policing difference' (p. 6), rather than simply its representation. It is a story of strangers lobbying to escape their marginal status and gain a foothold in the civic community, often with the tacit support of the crown, whilst citizens sought to maintain the boundaries of their community.Chapter one sets the stage with an overview of the changing place of strangers over the period as a whole, usefully synthesising a range of secondary literature. Although the statistical picture is frustratingly imprecise, a general trend of falling numbers in the first half of the seventeenth century, followed by new influxes of immigrants in the second, gives some degree of clarity. This chapter also surveys the institutions which aliens had to negotiate in order to gain a place in London society, notably the guilds, both a barrier and an access point, although even guild membership did not entirely negate marginal status or lead to citizen status. In practice, the securest way for an outsider to secure a foothold in urban society was through money or patronage, a situation not so unfamiliar today.The following chapters are more original in terms of research. Chapter two surveys the understandings of difference expressed in Londoners' petitions protesting about the threat of competition from aliens. To members of trading guilds such as the Company of Weavers, aliens were a threat to the integrity of their trade on several levels. Such companies were partly intended to tame the forces of competition within particular trades and thus maintain a degree of equity amongst members: the toleration of rival societies of artisans, unencumbered by regulation and apparently closed to Englishmen, presented an inexcusable source of competition. Because such practices were supposedly passed on to second generation immigrants, they remained for many Londoners a foreign presence within the nation, 'a common weal among themselves' (p. 61). But whereas the company elites favoured integrating the aliens into their own bodies, thus absorbing some of their innovatory practices, the 'commonalty' feared the consequences of this. …