i8o SEER, 85, I, 2007 from Dagestan into Chechnya. Despite such occasional lapses which one must expect of a provincialnationalitiesofficialin today's Russia the essay is clearlyworth reading. To sum up, this wide-ranging volume should be of keen interest to those working on the political dimensions of Russian Orthodoxy and Islam in post-Communist Russia and on their mutual interrelationship. TheHoover Institution J. B. DUNLOP Stanford University Smith, David J. (ed.). TheBaltic Statesand 7Their Region: New Europeor Old? On the Boundary of Two Worlds: Identity, Freedom, and Moral Imagination in the Baltics, 3. Editions Rodopi, Amsterdam and New York, 2005. vi + 322 pp. Notes. Bibliographies. ?67.00, $84.00 (paperback). THE focus of TheBalticStates andT7heir Region: NewEurope orOld? is to define the 'European'identity, to locate the Baltic Sea States within that context and to highlight any contributionsto that definitionstemming from this region. The articlescan be divided into two general groups:those that fulfilthe criteriaby directly engaging the debate and those that fulfil the criteria while only indirectlyengaging the old/new debate. In the firstgroup, ChristopherS. Browningarguesthat the old/new debate is only the most recent in a long line of identitydebateswithin Finland,beginning with the question of their East/West identity and now asking whether their defence allegiances end at the eastern shore of the Atlantic Ocean or extend across (or do neither). Dovile Budryte addresses a similar question about Lithuania, but shows that because of historical support from the US, historical aggression from Russia, and perceived willingness of the current 'old' EU member states to sacrificethe interestsof the Baltic States to better their own relations with Russia, Lithuania suffers from no such internal debates about the direction of their security preferences: trans-Atlantic structuresand relations firstwith European structuresand relations still very important,but definitelysecond. PerttiJoenniemi, in contrast,focuses not on the effects of the US's European 'altercastation' on individual states and on whether the states are new or old states, but on how the US's distinction between old and new has drivennorth-eastEurope to focus more on regional security. Two furtherarticles,written by Marko Lehti and Helen M. Morris, highlight the Baltic States as 'new' Europe states in direct contrastto 'old' states, while focusing primarily on their identity construction. Lehti shows that through interpretationsand revisions of their own history, the Baltic States have constructed their identity as 'European', though this identity is now being challenged by the old/new debate. Morris highlights how states' identities are constructed partially in response to national minorities, but highlights that the 'old' Europe states expect more of the new EU member states regardingminority rights, than they do of themselves. REVIEWS i8i Highlighting the authors who indirectlyengage the old/new debate is the editor, DavidJ. Smith, and Martyn Housden, both of whom show the influence of the Baltic States in constructingthe 'European'identity. They outline how the minority policies of Estonia and Latvia during the interwar period have done a greatdeal to establishthe currentminoritypolicies of some of the states within the wider European context and could be a guiding light for how the EU wants to develop: from an EU of states to an EU of legally independent groups. Leonidas Donskis shows, by looking at Rolandas Paskas's rise and fall from power within Lithuania, that a state's concept of its identity can be a self-fulfillingprophecy. Viatcheslav Morozov and SergeiJakobson-Obolenski both highlight effectively that the identities of the Baltic States and, in the case ofJakobson-Obolenski, Europe have been created in part by identifying characteristics of other regions or states (Russia and, more specifically, Kaliningrad) that do not fit them. Morozov further argues that only by recognizing the similar history will true identity be constructed between Russia, the Baltic States and Europe. Dirk Crols, despite his title, focuses on the argument(sharedwithJakobson-Obolenski)that the EU encouragesstates to develop into single, stable nation-states,which inherently encourages the 'othering', a concept in direct contrast to the inclusion and integration they profess. Paul Holtom, Charles Woolfson and Eero Mikenberg, in contrast, argue that the EU has effectively integrated the Baltic States, but that this integration has brought with it dilemmas such as illegal trade through the Baltic ports...
Read full abstract