Statement Of Question Research Articles

On the Thomson Effect as Expounded by Prof. Tait

AMONG modern expositions of the subject of thermo-electricity there is none so full, and on the whole so instructive to students, as that contained in Prof. Tait's “Heat.” It is therefore the more important to call attention to what appears to me to be, to say the least, a very questionable statement there made. It refers to the Thomson effect.

Prof. Tait and Mr. H. Spencer

As Mr. Spencer has already got the length of calling some of my statements “fictions, pure and absolute,” it is time that this discussion should cease. But it is necessary that I should at least show my reasons for having made the statements in question. They will be found ample.

IV.—On the Possibility of Changes in the Latitudes of Places on the Earth's Surface; being a Reply to Mr. Hill's Letter

I am grateful to Mr. Hill for noticing my former paper “On Possible Changes of Latitude on the Earth's Surface” in his letter, October, 1878, p. 479. I wish, however, that he had gone into the subject more in detail; in which case I, and perhaps others, would have felt more satisfied with his reply. He epitomizes my appeal to physicists by making me ask, “Assuming that a thin crust surrounds a fluid substratum, could then a deformation shift the crust over the nucleus?” And he replies that, Mr. G. Darwin having proved that the earth is “enormously stiff,” the discussion would be fruitless. But in this statement of my question and reply to it, he has omitted what seems to me the important proviso, based on Hopkins’ reasoning about the mode of cooling, that this fluid substratum is shallow, and encloses a rigid nucleus; and given no reply to my inquiry whether such a supposition might not afford the required rigidity.