In Belgium, legal aid was and still is mainly the responsibility of the legal profession. It is up to this group to provide legal advice and to represent citizens seeking justice before the court. History has shown that advocates regard themselves as the experts in this particular line of jurisdiction, citing their law degrees combined with a vocational training and the disciplinary rules installed by the Bars as evidence of their suitability. For decades the legal profession would not tolerate any interference in their practices, nor in the organisation of the means of access to justice by the poor. They regarded themselves as the only professional group equipped to handle the legal problems of the poorest rung in society. Such a belief was perhaps understandable in the nineteenth century when social problems were solved by charity. At that time, citizens were favoured by legal aid. There were no formal rights and the organisation of legal aid differed from local bar to local bar. After two world wars, politicians directed liberal society towards a social democracy and as the social security system expanded, more people became entitled to enjoy the advantages of the system. Social problems could be solved by the social security system. Legal problems, often connected with social problems, remained the jurisdiction of the legal profession and the latter did not want to change the manner in which access to justice was organised. No attempts were made by the legal profession to channel legal aid into welfare state provisions. In spite of the attempts made by progressive lawyers and advocates to change the legal aid system, most notably in the 1970s, and in spite of public approval for these efforts, politicians were not willing to alter the system. It is only in the last decade that some changes have been made. In 1993 the Belgian constitution recognised legal aid as a fundamental right and in 1998 an act on legal aid was promulgated. Since the implementation in 2000 of the 1998 Legal Aid Act, people on lower incomes have been entitled to an advocate free of charge. This is a formal right and legal criteria are based on equal eligibility (merits and means tests). This change should have been regarded as a mere formal update of a legal aid system that should in fact have existed for many years. The legal aid act INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE LEGAL PROFESSION, VOL. 13, NO. 1, MARCH 2006