The purpose of this paper is to exemplify an ideological articulation between a movement constructing a place and neo-liberalism and to relate it with perspective of new Right, hegemonic ideology in contemporary politics. Neo-liberalism promotes globalization and extends logic of market to social. The approach of this paper is discourse analysis, referring to problematic of critical geopolitics, centered on political geography since early 1990s. Its major agenda is to clarify connections between geographical representations and power in politics.The subject of analysis is discourse of Lega Nord (Northern League), which is one of major political parties in Italy. Its fundamental claim is to bring autonomy to regions in northern Italy. In 1996, Lega began to represent almost whole of northern as Padania and to seek secession from Italy.In context of rise of this movement, there was a process of transformation from Welfare State to neo-liberal state in Italy. While mechanism of political representation was brought down in early 1990s due to corruption in traditional popular parties, an economic crisis, changing subjectivities and so on, already in 1980s small firms of Post-Fordist mode of production, a so-called third Italy, in northern and central had developed rapidly. The Lega succeeded in representing such small firms especially in a rural and local area near Alps, as so-called Pedemontania. In 1996, also being affected by external constraint of Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) of Europe, reforms of Italian Welfare State, for example, federal reforms, deregulation, and fiscal reforms, were important and pressing problems.In this context, geopolitics of Lega Nord is to change meaning of northern from Italy to namely to Europe. First, as a populist party, Lega Nord represents excluded from political decisions by political class and bureaucratic elites, against (welfare) state. It then proposes that all political-economic difficulty in derives from southern Italy. Therefore, it argues that North should secede from South, and that only North should enter EMU. Second, Lega defines what place Padania is. Padania articulates chiefly three elements: North, localism, and Europe. The Lega describes new history and geography of Padania. According to Lega, the people of Padania, who respect laws, moral norms, and value of work, constitute local and autonomic communities.Such a Padania in 1996 was a neo-liberal place. It was place for economic activities and social integration of neo-liberalism that took no account of political. After however, Lega Nord increasingly became more conservative and more xenophobic, focusing on theme of immigration outside EU. As a far right party, it began to take a strong attitude towards globalization and EU, claiming that cultural differences must be protected. Thus, Padania had become a closed place. Consequently, popularity of Lega declined sharply in some elections, even in its strongholds. Such a process of shifting position exemplifies that articulation, a characteristic of new Right, between neo-liberalism and neo-conservatives, is unstable and contradictory.
Read full abstract