remarkable buzz. Young entrepreneurs in Santiago—a city that until recently was not considered a major entrepreneurship hub, often recognize the program’s name. Start-Up Chile has become the central convening force for a national entrepreneurial movement: although its collaborative office space is in the nation’s capital, its ripple effects are felt throughout the country, where entrepreneurs and local leaders have begun organizing meet-up events and conferences to promote discussions around innovation. The program has received even more attention internationally: plaudits have come from sources as wide-ranging as technology bloggers, start-up hacker societies, the Kauffman Foundation, and The Economist. In Chile, excitement around the program may stem mainly from the community and university events, new opportunities for aspiring entrepreneurs, and the program’s inspiring messaging, which conveys a vision for the country’s cultural transformation. The excitement abroad comes from less Chile-centric aspects of the program. For earlystage, location-independent foreign entrepreneurs—thus far, applying from over 70 countries globally—Start-Up Chile seems to be a proposition that cannot lose. Selected applicants receive an almost instantly deployed one-year working visa without having to work for another company, US$40,000 without having to give up an equity stake in their company, and a welcoming community of fellow founders from all around the world—and many more benefits. For proponents of entrepreneurship and innovation in the academic and foundation worlds, Start-Up Chile offers not only a new model to boost regional entrepreneurship but also the potential for a global movement of interconnected start-up networks. For Chileans, foreign applicant entrepreneurs, and hopeful influencers of policy alike, the project’s early successes seem to predict future ones. However, it is important to discern Ted Gonder