Pectus excavatum is a common chest wall deformity, occurring in approximately one in every 1000 children [1]. The congenital deformity is characterized by a concave, funnel-shaped chest, which is usually mild at birth, but becoming more severe with growth, particularly during teenage years. Although the most common indication for repair is cosmetic, the majority of patients with severe deformity will suffer from shortness of breath, tachycardia, palpitations and chest discomfort [2]. Cardiac compression/displacement and atelectasis have been demonstrated on CT scanning [3]. Association between thoracic skeletal abnormalities and mitral valve prolapse syndrome (MVPS) is reported [4]. Other reports have highlighted the association between MVPS, cardiac arrhythmias [5] and sudden death [6]. Traditional correction of pectus excavatum is a long procedure, involving resection of bone and cartilage. More recently, a technique of minimally invasive repair has been developed by Donald Nuss [3]. A strong convex steel bar (Fig. 1) spanning the width of the anterior chest wall (Fig. 2) is inserted laterally and fed under the sternum through small bilateral incisions. The bar is inserted at a level corresponding with the maximal sternal depression, usually the 6 /8th intercostals space and secured at its lateral ends by suturing to chest wall muscle. The bar is removed after 2 years when permanent chest wall remodelling has occurred. Excellent long-term results have been achieved with a low complication rate [2,3,7]. Serious complications including cardiac perforation, bilateral empyema, bacterial pericarditis, staphylococcal septicaemia and thoracic outlet syndrome have, however, been reported [8]. We would like to raise some issues concerning cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in this group of patients. The likelihood of these patients requiring CPR, although small, may be greater than in the general population as a consequence of a primary dysrrhythmia or complication of surgery. Correct placement of defibrillation paddles is important to optimize the chances of successful defibrillation and minimize defibrillation energy requirements. The current International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) guidelines recommend either an anterior-lateral (one electrode just to the right of the upper sternal border below the clavicle; the other to the left of the nipple with the center of the electrode in the mid-axillary line) or anterior /posterior (one paddle over the left precordium; the other in a right infrascapular position) positioning of the defibrillation paddles [9]. Clinically, the anteriorlateral position provides easier access for defibrillation paddles and is the more commonly used position at cardiac arrests. This anterior-lateral position may not be appropriate in patients who have undergone this procedure. The ends of the metal Nuss bar would be positioned close to anterior-laterally placed defibrillator paddles, longitudinal to any current flow, and are likely to present a path of low resistance along which current will flow preferentially. This will result in diversion of current away from the myocardium and decrease the chance of successful defibrillation. Although the current pathway traverses the Nuss bar when paddles are placed in the anterior /posterior position, a posteriorly placed pad will force current to traverse the chest, although actual current distribution is likely to be affected by the Nuss bar. Because the bar is transverse to the direction of current flow, is likely to have much less adverse effect on current pathways. We concur with the manufacturer’s recommendations that defibrillation should be carried out with the defibrillation paddles placed in an anterior /posterior position. Posterior paddle placement, as described for defibrillation in the prone position [10], may also be suitable. * Tel.: /44-2380-796720; fax: /44-2380-794348. E-mail address: ppicton@surfree.co.uk (P. Picton). Resuscitation 57 (2003) 309 /310
Read full abstract