Abstract. Currently, osteoporosis is one of the most common diseases that significantly reduce the quality of life of patients, leading to their disability and death from related complications. The growing prevalence of osteoporosis in the population over the years, both among people over 60 years of age and among children under 18 years of age, as well as the high prevalence of osteoporotic fractures and their projected increase, requires improvement in the organization of care for patients, which primarily implies timely diagnosis with determination of the risk of low-energy fractures and timely treatment. Purpose: based on an analysis of the literature, to evaluate the current state of the problem and the effectiveness of modern methods for diagnosing osteoporosis. Materials and methods: a search was conducted in the open electronic scientific databases PubMed and the databases of the Russian scientific electronic library eLibrary using keywords and phrases: osteoporosis, osteodensitometry, bone mineral density, osteoporotic fracture. The results were obtained using the equipment of the Center for Collective Use of Scientific Equipment at Derzhavin Tambov State University. Results. The research presents data on risk factors for osteoporosis, possible clinical manifestations and existing methods for diagnosing this disease, indicating the advantages and disadvantages of each of the presented methods. The standard research method, if there is reason to assume a diagnosis, will be osteodensitometry. Ultrasound osteodensitometry serves as an indirect method for assessing bone tissue density. To determine bone mineral density it is recommended to use single energy X-ray absorptiometry (SXA), dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), radiographic absorptiometry (RA) and quantitative computed tomography. The standard radiographic method of radiation visualization of bone structures is the most accessible and widespread in the Russian Federation; however, for the purpose of diagnosing osteoporosis, this technique in most cases is not the method of choice, since radiographs can reveal reliable, but rather late signs of this disease. Conclusion. Each of the diagnostic methods has its own individual advantages, unique to it; to identify this disease in the early stages of its development, there is a need to use several methods for quantitative determination of bone density simultaneously.
Read full abstract