You have accessJournal of UrologyBenign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Surgical Therapy and New Technology (II)1 Apr 20132007 BIPOLAR PLASMA VAPORIZATION VERSUS STANDARD TUR IN CASES OF SECONDARY BLADDER NECK SCLEROSIS – A PROSPECTIVE, MEDIUM TERM, RANDOMIZED COMPARISON Bogdan Geavlete, Cristian Moldoveanu, Catalin Iacoboaie, Florin Stanescu, and Petrisor Geavlete Bogdan GeavleteBogdan Geavlete Bucharest, Romania More articles by this author , Cristian MoldoveanuCristian Moldoveanu Bucharest, Romania More articles by this author , Catalin IacoboaieCatalin Iacoboaie Bucharest, Romania More articles by this author , Florin StanescuFlorin Stanescu Bucharest, Romania More articles by this author , and Petrisor GeavletePetrisor Geavlete Bucharest, Romania More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.2426AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES This prospective, randomized, medium term trial aimed to assess the efficiency, safety and postoperative results of the bipolar plasma vaporization (BPV) by comparison to monopolar transurethral resection (TUR) in cases of secondary bladder neck sclerosis (BNS). METHODS A total of 70 patients with BNS secondary to TURP (46 cases), open prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH - 18 cases) and radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer (6 cases) were enrolled in the trial. The inclusion criteria consisted of maximum flow rate (Qmax) below10 mL/s and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) over 19. All patients were evaluated preoperatively as well as at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 18 months after surgery by IPSS, quality of life score (QoL), Qmax and post-voiding residual urinary volume (PVR). RESULTS The mean operation time (10.3 versus 14.9 minutes), catheterization period (0.75 versus 2.1 days) and hospital stay (1.1 versus 3.2 days) were significantly reduced in the BPV series. During the immediate postoperative follow-up, the re-catheterization for acute urinary retention only occurred in the TUR group (5.7%). The medium term re-treatment requirements due to BNS recurrence were lower in the BPV study arm (2.8% versus 8.5%). At the 1, 3, 6, 12 and 18 month's assessment, statistically similar parameters were found concerning the IPSS and QoL symptom scores, Qmax and PVR values specific for the two therapeutic alternatives. CONCLUSIONS BPV constitutes a valuable endoscopic treatment approach for secondary BNS patients. The method emphasized superior efficacy, a satisfactory safety profile and similar medium term follow-up features when compared to standard TUR. Results BPV TUR p value IPSS 1 month 3.8 4.0 0.766 3 months 3.6 3.9 0.629 6 months 3.5 3.6 0.892 12 months 3.3 3.5 0.714 18 months 3.4 3.3 0.881 Qol 1 month 1.4 1.5 0.939 3 months 1.2 1.4 0.525 6 months 1.1 1.2 0.962 12 months 1.1 1.1 0.696 18 months 1.2 1.1 0.179 Qmax (mL/s) 1 month 23.0 23.3 0.880 3 months 23.2 23.6 0.817 6 months 23.5 23.8 0.868 12 months 23.9 24.2 0.852 18 months 23.8 24.0 0.922 PVR (mL) 1 month 31 28 0.460 3 months 24 23 0.733 6 months 22 21 0.694 12 months 19 18 0.699 18 months 21 17 0.133 © 2013 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 189Issue 4SApril 2013Page: e824 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2013 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Bogdan Geavlete Bucharest, Romania More articles by this author Cristian Moldoveanu Bucharest, Romania More articles by this author Catalin Iacoboaie Bucharest, Romania More articles by this author Florin Stanescu Bucharest, Romania More articles by this author Petrisor Geavlete Bucharest, Romania More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract