Standard Systemic Therapy Research Articles

Protocol summary of a randomized phase III study: comparing systemic therapy with and without debulking surgery (primary tumour resection) for clinical stage IVA (cT1-2bN0-1M1a) non-small cell lung cancer with radiologically undetermined pleural dissemination JCOG2103 (DEBULK-LUNG).

In patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who present with radiologically undetermined malignant pleural dissemination or incidental surgical diagnosis of the same, surgery is generally not the preferred option; systemic therapy is favoured. However, there is no consensus on incorporating primary site resection into the treatment plan. Retrospective analyses hint at potential benefits of combining systemic therapy with primary site resection, but prospective studies have yet to confirm these findings. Consequently, we have planned a multicentre, open-label, randomized controlled phase III trial to assess the efficacy of adding primary site resection to standard systemic therapy for stage IVA (cT1-2bN0-1M1a) NSCLC patients with radiologically undetermined pleural dissemination. The primary endpoint is overall survival. We aim to enroll 170 patients from 71 institutions over 5 years. This trial is registered at the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT) under study number jRCTs031220666.

Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma with Enteric Differentiation without TTF-1 Expression Is a Very Rare Subtype with Limited Treatment Options and Poor Prognosis

Plain Language SummaryPulmonary adenocarcinoma with enteric differentiation (PAED) without expression of thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1) is an extremely rare and hard-to-treat variant of lung cancer. We collected clinicopathological data of 121 Caucasian patients with pulmonary adenocarcinoma without TTF-1 expression, their systemic therapy options, and the efficacy of their systemic treatment including 79 cases without a PAED and 42 cases with a PAED, compared these subgroups, and investigated patients’ response to chemotherapy and immunotherapy as first-line treatment. A comparison of clinicopathological data of TTF-1-negative PAED and non-PAED patients revealed a significantly lower frequency of high programmed death receptor ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in PAED resulting in the lack of single-agent immunotherapy (p = 0.032) in this subgroup. Frequencies of an activating Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) gene mutation were high in both groups (46.7% and 50.0%), but a G12C gene mutation was seldomly noted (in 6.7% and 18.5% of patients with evaluable data). Median overall survival (OS) was poor in both groups (10 and 12 months). The majority of PAED patients received platinum-based and taxane-containing chemotherapy or chemo-/immunotherapy with an objective response rate of 31.6% and a disease control rate of 57.9%. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and OS of PAED patients with systemic therapy were very poor (3.9 months and 5.9 months). Caucasian patients with a TTF-1-negative PAED have a poor prognosis with reduced response rates to standard first-line systemic therapy and short survival times (PFS and OS).

Efficacy and safety of nivolumab monotherapy in patients with unresectable clear cell sarcoma and alveolar soft part sarcoma (OSCAR Trial/NCCH1510).

Clear cell sarcoma (CCS) and alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS) are rare, and standard systemic therapy is not established except for sunitinib in ASPS. It is known that CCS and ASPS have a common biological feature of melanoma and Xp11.2/TFE3 translocation renal cell carcinoma, and immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are effective in these tumors. The authors conducted a phase 2 trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nivolumab for CCS and ASPS. The number of patients expected to be enrolled was 15-25 and was determined based on the Bayesian design. The primary end point was the confirmed objective response rate (ORR) according to the central review and the secondary end points included ORR, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. A total of 26 patients (CCS, 12; ASPS, 14) were enrolled. Efficacy and safety were analyzed on 25 and 26 patients, respectively. The minimum number of responses required for a positive conclusion regarding the efficacy was four. However, only one patient (4.0%) with ASPS had a partial response. Complete response, stable disease, progression disease, and not evaluable were 0%, 60%, 32%, and 4.0%, respectively. Adverse events of grade 3 or 4 occurred in 57.7% (15 of 26). The median PFS was 4.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.7-8.6 months) and the median OS was 15.8 months (95% CI, 8.2-not reached). The primary end point of the ORR was not met for CCS and ASPS on the central review. Further studies are needed to evaluate ICIs in patients with ASPS.

Evaluation and Management of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Multidisciplinary Indian Consensus Statements from a Delphi Panel

Background India, like many parts of Asia, likely faces a high burden of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), though large-scale data on etiology, presentation, and outcomes are lacking. There appears to be a predominance of unresectable, advanced-stage HCC at presentation in India with variable level of expertise in India to manage these scenarios. This publication summarizes the latest evidence with cognizance of the unique challenges faced in India by treating clinicians. Methods A multidisciplinary panel of medical oncologists, gastroenterologists, hepatologists, interventional radiologists, and hepatobiliary surgical oncologists held a meeting in June 2022 and reviewed the evidence available for management of HCC. The meeting concentrated on the recognition and management of HCC not amenable to surgical approaches in the Indian context. A literature review of these aspects of management was conducted and consensus statements with level of evidence and grades of recommendation were prepared by individual specialists in each field. Statements were evaluated by the modified Delphi method. Key Content and Findings The panel comprising 22 experts formulated 40 consensus statements with regard to defining unresectable HCC, optimization of underlying conditions prior to management, rationale use of various liver-directed therapies (LDTs) in unresectable HCC, and systemic therapeutic options in this group of patients. Conclusion Our consensus statements offer practical, yet evidence-based management guidelines for treating unresectable HCC in the Indian context. There is an emphasis on the crucial need for combining available approaches for LDT, even if less well studied though possibly effective, with standard systemic therapy.

Study Protocol of a Randomized, Two-Arm, Phase I/II Trial Investigating the Feasibility, Safety, and Efficacy of Local Treatment with US-Guided High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound in Combination with Palliative Chemotherapy in Inoperable Pancreatic Cancer.

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PaC) still has a dismal prognosis, and despite medical advances, a bleak 5-year survival rate of only 8%, largely due to late diagnosis and limited curative surgical options for most patients. Frontline palliative treatment shows some survival advantages. However, the high disease mortality is accompanied by high morbidity including cancer-related pain and additional symptoms, which strongly impair patients' quality of life (QOL). At present, there is no established strategy for local therapy for PaC primarily aiming to manage local tumor growth and alleviate associated symptoms, particularly pain. In recent years, non-invasive high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) has shown promising results in reducing cancer pain and tumor mass, improving patients' QOL with few side effects. This is the first randomized controlled trial worldwide including 40 patients with inoperable pancreatic adenocarcinoma randomized into two groups: group A undergoing standard chemotherapy; and group B undergoing standard chemotherapy plus local HIFU treatment. This study aims to establish a robust evidence base by examining the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of US-guided HIFU in combination with standard palliative systemic therapy for unresectable PaC. Primary endpoint assessments will focus on parameters including safety issues (phase I), and local response rates (phase II).

TRLS-09. CONNECT1903: A PILOT AND SURGICAL STUDY OF LAROTRECTINIB FOR TREATMENT OF CHILDREN WITH NEWLY DIAGNOSED HGG WITH NTRK FUSION (NCT04655404)

Abstract BACKGROUND Recurrent fusions in neurotrophic tropomyosin-receptor kinase genes NTRK 1-3 are found in variety of cancers, including pediatric HGG: DIPG (~4%) and non-brainstem HGG (~10%). For non-brainstem HGG seen in children <3 years of age, approximately 40% harbor NTRK alterations. NTRK fusions provide a promising target for gliomas and to that end, Larotrectinib, a globally approved, highly potent, small molecule inhibitor of TRKA/B/C, has previously been investigated and has shown tolerability and efficacy in children with recurrent solid tumors. Compassionate use in a case of infantile GBM showed proof-of-concept with blood-brain penetrance and efficacy. Further evidence of efficacy in two earlier clinical trials has also been previously demonstrated in children with recurrent TRK-fusion primary intracranial tumors (NCT02637687, NCT02576431). METHODS This international trial conducted through the CONNECT consortium, supported in part by Bayer, investigates larotrectinib monotherapy; its feasibility and tolerability in combination with standard systemic chemotherapy (Baby POG or HIT-SKK) or radiation therapy whereby treatment plan determination is response-based. Objectives include: to assess disease control rate (CR, CCR, PR and SD) after two cycles of larotrectinib monotherapy (28-day cycles); to assess feasibility and to describe toxicities of larotrectinib in combination with standard chemotherapy; to assess objective response rate (CR and PR); to assess OS and PFS as compared to historical data from Baby POG, HIT-SKK and radiotherapy. A phase 0 surgical cohort will be explored whereby patients who are planned to undergo a definitive resection will receive pre-surgery larotrectinib, and target inhibition, intratumoral and plasma pharmacokinetics will be investigated. Radiographic responses will also be quantitated. This trial is currently open to accrual at ten CONNECT sites across North America and Australia and has enrolled five patients to date. Sites in UK, Germany and Netherlands are pending activation. A total of 15 patients are anticipated to be enrolled and evaluable.

Primary outcome analysis of the ORCHESTRA trial: A randomized phase III trial of additional tumor debulking to first-line palliative systemic therapy for patients with multiorgan metastatic colorectal cancer.

LBA3502 Background: The phase-3, investigator-initiated, ORCHESTRA trial (NCT01792934) was conducted to prospectively evaluate overall survival (OS) benefit from tumor debulking in addition to standard palliative systemic therapy in patients with multiorgan metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Local therapy of metastases is increasingly discussed as part of the treatment plan for patients with multiorgan mCRC in analogy to selected patients with oligometastatic disease for whom this is standard of care. Treatment decisions are made on a daily base in multidisciplinary teams (MDT) worldwide, but evidence of superiority for additional local therapy over systemic therapy alone based on a head-to-head comparison is lacking. Methods: Between May 2013 and May 2023, 454 patients were enrolled in 28 hospitals. Patients with multiorgan mCRC as described in Table, were eligible if at least 80% tumor debulking was deemed feasible by resection, radiotherapy and/or thermal ablative therapy at the start of first-line palliative systemic therapy according to the MDT. Upon clinical benefit after 3 or 4 cycles of respectively capecitabine or 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin and oxaliplatin ± bevacizumab, 382 patients were randomized 1:1 to continuation with systemic therapy alone in the standard arm or to tumor debulking followed by restart of the systemic therapy in the experimental arm. The primary endpoint was OS, from the date of inclusion to the date of death. Secondary endpoints included progression free survival (PFS) and treatment related adverse events. OS and PFS were analyzed by means of multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis where the variables used in the randomization process were included as covariates. Results: 382 patients were randomized to either receive standard palliative systemic therapy in the standard arm (N=192) or to receive additional tumor debulking to palliative systemic therapy in the experimental arm (N=190). Baseline characteristics of patients were in standard arm versus (vs) experimental arm: median age 64 vs 64 years, male 69% vs 67%, >2 organs involved 38% vs 40%, baseline LDH >250 U/L 17% vs 16%, baseline CEA >200 ng/ml 5% vs 8%. At data cut-off on April 4th, 2024, a total of 153 OS events were observed in the standard arm and 155 OS events in the experimental arm. Median follow up was 32.3 months. Median OS in the standard arm was 27.5 months versus 30.0 months in the experimental arm (adjusted HR 0.88 [95% CI 0.70-1.10] p=0.225). Median PFS in the standard arm was 10.4 months versus 10.5 months in the experimental arm (adjusted HR 0.83 [95% CI 0.67-1.02], p=0.076). Details on local treatment modalities being applied, including rate of successful radical debulking and related adverse events, will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: Additional tumor debulking to standard first-line palliative systemic therapy failed to improve overall survival for patients with multiorgan metastatic colorectal cancer. The increasing use of local therapies for patients with mCRC needs further consideration. Clinical trial information: NCT01792934 . [Table: see text]

Abstract B026: Screening non-small cell lung cancer patient-derived organoids with epigenetic probes reveals PRMT5 as an oncogenic target

Abstract Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality. Detection of drug actionable genetic alterations has made the standard systemic therapy to a more personalized one including targeted therapy and immune checkpoint blockade. Despite the initial response, majority of patients develop resistance to treatment. Therefore, understanding the mechanisms of resistance as well as discovering novel cancer targets is necessary. Resistance to therapies can be associated with an existing clone of tumor cells with genetic alteration, or the emergence of cells with epigenetic changes overcoming the treatment-induced stress. Therefore, investigating the epigenetic aberrations that occur in tumor cells may reveal novel targetable markers that can be of great clinical significance. Methods: Organoid models established from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patient surgical resections and pleural effusion were dissociated into single cells and plated in matrigel-coated 384-well plate. A panel of 32 NSCLC organoid models were treated with a library of 41 epigenetic probes (1uM) and a DMSO control over a period of 8 days. Cell titre glo assay was performed to measure cell survival. Results: Arginine methyl transferase protein 5 (PRMT5) inhibited the cell growth of large proportion of the NSCLC organoid models. LLY-283 showed the most significant effect, with 50% of all organoid models (16/32) treated with LLY283 showing ≥50% reduction in cell viability. Further testing with multiple concentrations of several PRMT5 inhibitors revealed models with differential responses to PRMT5 inhibition. To investigate the differential gene expression changes induced by PRMT5 inhibition, we performed RNA-sequencing on three PRMT5 inhibitor sensitive and three resistant organoid models. Ongoing analyses aim at identifying differentially expressed genes in sensitive and resistant models in response to PRMT5 inhibition, and pathway enrichment analysis to determine the differential mechanisms of response to PRMT5 inhibition. Conclusion: Epigenetic drug screening on a large cohort of NSCLC organoid models reveals PRMT5 as potential novel therapeutic target in NSCLC. Further correlative analysis with transcriptomic changes induced by the PRMT5 inhibitors may reveal biomarkers of response. Citation Format: Khadija Jafarova, Quan Li, Nikolina Radulovich, Geoffrey Liu, Ming S Tsao. Screening non-small cell lung cancer patient-derived organoids with epigenetic probes reveals PRMT5 as an oncogenic target [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Expanding and Translating Cancer Synthetic Vulnerabilities; 2024 Jun 10-13; Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2024;23(6 Suppl):Abstract nr B026.

Veterans Affairs seamless phase II/III randomized trial of standard systemic therapy with or without PET-directed local therapy for oligometastatic prostate cancer (VA STARPORT).

TPS5120 Background: The concept of metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) using radiation or surgery for oligometastatic (OM) prostate cancer (pCa) has evolved from an anecdotal hypothesis to a promising approach that may optimally balance toxicity and oncologic efficacy. Recently, there have been multiple smaller phase II randomized trials that have shown a signal of efficacy for MDT in OM pCa. Most studies have compared MDT to observation alone as the control arm, included only recurrent OM patients, and included up to 3-5 sites of metastasis. It is in this context, that the VA STARPORT trial was initiated in 2021 to definitively determine the role of MDT in Veterans with oligorecurrent pCa in 1-5 sites. Yet, the diagnosis and management of metastatic pCa have since evolved. The SABR-COMET-10 trial recently completed enrollment and compares systemic therapy alone or with MDT in patients with 1-10 metastases from various histologies. While pCa PET/CT imaging was only available for Veterans with biochemical recurrence in 2021, PSMA PET/CT now allows for the improved diagnosis of OM in Veterans with de novo pCa—a growing cohort of patients without a clear standard of care. Therefore, to maximize the impact and generalizability of the trial, VA STARPORT has been amended to allow for de novoOM and 1-10 metastases. The primary goal of VA STARPORT is to determine if adding PET-directed local therapy (PDLT) to standard systemic therapy (SST) improves disease control compared to SST alone in Veterans with recurrent and de novooligometastatic pCa. Methods: VA STARPORT is a phase II/III randomized trial open at 18 VA medical centers comparing SST alone (Arm 1) or with PDLT (Arm 2) in Veterans with OM pCa. Key eligibility criteria include recurrent or de novohormone-sensitive metastatic pCa and 1-10 metastatic lesions on any FDA-approved pCa PET/CT. The primary endpoint is castration-resistant prostate cancer-free survival (CRPC-free survival). Secondary endpoints include radiographic PFS, clinical PFS, freedom from index lesion progression, toxicity, quality of life, and prostate cancer-specific and overall survival. SST is delivered using any NCCN guideline-concordant regimen in both arms. PDLT can be either radiation or surgery to all sites of cancer. Regarding local therapy, de novo patients in Arm 1 receive prostate-directed RT, and in Arm 2 receive PDLT to all metastases and the prostate. For recurrent patients in Arm 1 there is no local therapy, while in Arm 2 patients receive PDLT. All participants undergo somatic tumor sequencing using the VA National Precision Oncology Program. Assuming a hazard ratio of 0.60 for SST + PDLT vs SST, two-sided alpha = 0.05 and 90% power, a total of 464 participants will be randomized to generate 166 CRPC-free survival events by the end of the active study phase. Recruitment is ongoing and 150 patients have been enrolled. Clinical trial information: NCT04787744 .

Anti-TNFR2 monoclonal antibody LBL-019 in patients with advanced malignant tumors: A phase I, first-in-human, open-label, multicenter, dose escalation Study.

e14580 Background: LBL-019 is a humanized monoclonal IgG1 antibody against TNF receptor 2 (TNFR2). It specifically binds to TNFR2 with high affinity, co-stimulates TNFR2 in Fc crosslinking-dependent manner, results in activation of NF-κB signaling and T cell activation and expansion, promoting antitumor immunity. Here we report the preliminary safety and efficacy of LBL-019 in patients with advanced malignant tumors. Methods: This is a phase Ⅰ, open-label, multicenter, dose-escalation study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and PK of LBL-019 in patients with advanced solid tumors that progressed after standard systemic therapy. The dose escalation phase consists of 7 dose cohorts of LBL-019 at 0.2, 0.8, 3, 10, 15, 20, and 30 mg/kg (iv Q2W), using accelerated titration design (first dose) followed by 3+3 design. The primary endpoints were tolerability and safety. The second objectives were pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary efficacy (per RECIST 1.1). Results: As of January 02, 2024, 26 patients [17 (65.4%) male, median age 57 years (range:27, 72), 22 (84.6%) ECOG score of 1] were treated in phase Ⅰ. Tumor types include 7 (26.9%) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), 4 (15.4%) melanoma, and 15 (57.7%) other tumors. 19 (73%) previously received anti-PD(L)-1 treatment. During the study, no DLT was observed, and the MTD was not reached. The median follow-up was 12.2 months (95%CI: 7.5, 15.9). 19 patients (73.1%) experienced TRAEs of all grades, with 2 (7.7%) having grade ≥3 TRAEs. The most common TRAEs (≥10%) included lipase increased (19.2%), anaemia (19.2%), aspartate aminotransferase increased (15.4%), pruritus (11.5%), rash (11.5%). Treatment interruption and permanent discontinuation due to TEAEs occurred in 12 (46.2%) and 1 (3.8%) patient, respectively. Thirteen patients (50.0%) experienced SAEs, and one of SAE was related to treatment. Out of 23 who underwent efficacy evaluation, 1 patient with HCC achieved PR, and 7 patients achieved SD. The patient with PR and 6 patients with SD received prior immunotherapy, the ORR and DCR were 4.3% and 34.8%, respectively. The DoR in the patient with PR has exceeded 10 months. Conclusions: LBL-019 is well tolerable and has demonstrated preliminary efficacy in patients with advanced malignant tumors. Clinical trial information: NCT05223231 .

First-in-human study of ZG0895, a TLR8 selective agonist, as monotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumors.

e15103 Background: ZG0895 is a potent and novel Toll-like receptor (TLR) agonist that shows a highly selective activation of TLR8. It inhibits tumor growth by launching TLR8 downstream signal cascades, thus activating both innate and adaptive immune systems. We report preliminary results from a phase I, first-in-human, dose escalation study evaluating the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and antitumor activity of ZG0895 in patients with advanced solid tumors. Methods: Eligible patients previously treated with or intolerant to available standard systemic therapy(ies), received subcutaneous (s.c.) injection of ZG0895 weekly. If tolerated during the first treatment cycle (21 days per cycle), patients would continue weekly s.c. administrations of ZG0895 until disease progression, loss of clinical benefit, or development of unacceptable toxicity. Dose escalation scheme for ZG0895 was planned with eight dose levels (0.06, 0.18, 0.37, 0.75, 1.50, 2.25, 3.00, 3.75 mg/m2) according to an accelerated titration in the first two dose levels and the standard “3+3” design in the rest dose levels. Primary end points are the safety, tolerability, and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of ZG0895. Secondary endpoints include overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and progression free survival (PFS) per the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1, as well as pharmacokinetics. Results: At data cut-off (December 25, 2023), 7 patients (5 males and 2 females), with the median age of 59 (range: 38-74) years old, received weekly s.c. injections of ZG0895 at the dose levels from 0.06 mg/m2 to 0.75 mg/m2 and completed the DLT observation period. Of the 7 patients, 4 (57.1%) received at least 3 lines of prior antineoplastic therapies, and 3 (42.9%) had exposed to PD-(L)1 inhibitors previously. No dose limiting toxicity events were reported. Five patients (71.4%) experienced grade 1 or 2 treatment-related adverse event (TRAE), and the most frequent events were injection site pain, hypertriglyceridaemia and proteinuria. None of patients experienced ≥grade 3 TRAE. Two patients experienced SAEs (intestinal obstruction and tumour haemorrhage), and both events were not related to ZG0895. The Cmax and AUC increased from 0.06 to 0.18 mg/m2 approximately in dose proportion. Conclusions: During the first 4 dose groups, ZG0895 was well tolerated in patients with advanced solid tumors. Phase I dose escalation of ZG0895 are underway in higher doses. Clinical trial information: NCT05877664 .

Prospective evaluation of the breast microbiome and tumor microenvironment-related biomarkers of response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy in triple negative breast cancer.

TPS615 Background: Predictive biomarkers of response to combination chemotherapy and immune-checkpoint inhibitors are urgently needed to tailor treatment recommendations for patients with early-stage triple negative breast cancer (eTNBC). Our group has demonstrated that tumour-associated microbiota in primary breast tumours represent promising and novel candidate biomarkers for patients with breast cancer. We aim to prospectively interrogate the breast cancer microbiome and tumour microenvironment (TME) of eTNBC treated with neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy, and correlate with clinical outcome. Methods: Trial design: This prospective translational biomarker study is enrolling patients with eTNBC suitable for standard neoadjuvant systemic therapy followed by definitive surgery. The primary objective is to evaluate the change in breast cancer microbiome composition pre- and post-therapy. Secondary objectives include correlation of the breast microbiome with pathologic complete response (pCR) and survival outcomes, tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), PDL-1 and immune subset analysis, extracellular vesicles analysis and analysis of gut microbiome. Tumor tissue samples will be collected at baseline (mandatory research biopsy) and at the time of surgery. Microbiome evaluation will be conducted using metagenomic sequencing to assess changes in the relative abundance of microbial taxa. Blood and stool samples will be collected and analysed at baseline, on-treatment, at the time of surgery and post-operatively for secondary endpoints. Statistical analysis: Hierarchical clustering of samples based on relative abundance of the operational taxonomic units (OTUs) with sample composition at family and genus level will be performed. Alpha Diversity (Shannon Diversity Index) and Beta Diversity (Jaccard Similarity Index) will be analysed. Principal component analysis (PCA) and Random Forest analysis will be performed for classification and clustering analysis. Comparison of taxa or functions between clinical cohorts will be performed (two tailed Z test) and corrected using the false discovery rate to determine Q-values. Thirty patients will be recruited over 18-24 months. Current status: This University College Cork sponsored trial received ethics approval from the CREC in January 2024 and recruitment is ongoing. Those interested can contact uccctg@ucc.ie. This trial will provide a deeper insight into the potential role of the local breast microbiome as a predictive biomarker for response to neoadjuvant therapy in patients with eTNBC. The results will guide further studies exploring optimal immunomodulatory combinations for the treatment of TNBC and may provide evidence regarding future therapeutic targeting of the breast cancer microbiome.

A first-in-human phase 1 trial of T cell membrane-anchored tumor targeted IL12 (ATTIL12) -T cell therapy in advanced/metastatic soft tissue and bone sarcoma.

TPS11586 Background: Interleukin-12 (IL12) is a cytokine that induces antitumor immune response and immune memory by activation of NK cells, induction of IFNg, and maturation of DC cells in the tumor microenvironment (TME). However, prior clinical experience with IL12 has been limited by toxicities including cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and hepatotoxicity. We developed a novel tumor-targeted IL12 gene (ttIL12) that encodes the p35 and p40 VNTANST fusion subunits that targets cell surface vimentin (CSV). Vimentin is expressed intracellularly in many normal and neoplastic mesenchymal cells but our group discovered that intracellular vimentin is often flipped to the cell surface (referred to as CSV) across multiple tumor types.2 Preclinical studies demonstrated efficacy and induction of long-term memory of ttIL12 against metastatic osteosarcoma with reduced toxicity in immune competent models.3 However, ttIL12 had limited efficacy in treating large volume tumors and did not completely eliminate toxic peripheral cytokines. To address this, our team generated a membrane anchored ttIL12 to arm T cells known as attIL12-T cell therapy. We hypothesize attIL12 will minimize toxic cytokines in peripheral tissues but promote induction of INFg/TNFa in the TME to decrease the toxicity and boost efficacy. Methods: This is a phase 1 trial of attIL12-T cells in patients (pts) with locally advanced or metastatic soft tissue or bone sarcomas to assess safety, maximal tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Pts in part A (dose finding) will be enrolled using a Bayesian optimal interval (BOIN) design in up to 6 dose levels. Part B (dose expansion) will evaluate preliminary efficacy in 10 additional pts with osteosarcoma treated at the RP2D. Treatment:Pts will undergo leukapheresis to collect peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) for generation of attIl12-T cells. Bridging therapy is permitted but not required. Pts will receive cyclophosphamide (Cy) IV prior to planned T cell administration. attIL12 T cells will be administered at the specified dose level IV in a single infusion (dose level 1 and 2) or 2 serial doses (dose level 3-6) on day 0 and day 14. Pts will be monitored for toxicity and response evaluation. Pts will also undergo pre-treatment/on-treatment tumor biopsies for translational and correlative analysis. Eligibility:Pts must be ≥ 12 years of age, have a confirmed diagnosis of locally advanced or metastatic sarcoma, evaluable disease, received at least 1 prior line of standard systemic therapy, ECOG PS 0-1, and adequate organ function to tolerate immune-effector cell therapy. Pts with known sensitivity to Cy, active/prior autoimmune disease, uncontrolled CNS disease, or other uncontrolled comorbidities that pose potential safety risk will be excluded. Enrollment to cohort 1 began in Dec 2023. Clinical trial information: NCT05621668 .

ATHENA: A phase 1/2 study of AZD5851, a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy directed against GPC3 in adult patients with advanced/recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

TPS2675 Background: Checkpoint inhibitor therapy is the standard first-line treatment for advanced/recurrent HCC, but there is a significant unmet therapeutic need for patients (pts) who progress after first-line treatment. Adoptive cellular immunotherapy may provide a novel treatment option. Glypican-3 (GPC3), a heparan sulfate proteoglycan, is overexpressed by tumor cells in HCC and virtually absent in healthy tissues, making it an ideal target for CAR-T therapy. AZD5851 is an autologous CAR-T product that expresses a CAR specific for GPC3 and a dominant negative (dn)TGFβRII as an armoring strategy. Expression of dnTGFβRII can block TGFβ signaling, protecting CAR T-cells from the immunosuppressive effects of this cytokine. Early clinical data with C-CAR031, a CAR-T product with the same GPC3-specific CAR and dnTGFβRII-armoring transgene as AZD5851, showed promising tolerability and antitumor activity in pts with HCC [1]. ATHENA (NCT06084884) is a first-in-human, single-arm, open-label, multicenter phase 1/2 study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and antitumor activity of AZD5851 in pts with GPC3+ advanced/recurrent HCC, for whom ≥1 prior line of standard therapy failed or was not tolerable. Methods: Eligible pts are aged ≥18 years with histologically confirmed advanced/recurrent or metastatic and/or unresectable HCC, GPC3+ tumor sample as determined by immunohistochemistry, ≥1 prior line of standard systemic therapy, ≥1 measurable lesion per RECIST 1.1, Child-Pugh A, ECOG PS 0/1, and adequate organ and bone marrow function. Approximately 24 pts will be enrolled in Part A (Phase I, dose escalation) and 50 in Part B (Phase II dose expansion). Pts will undergo apheresis to collect peripheral blood mononuclear cells for AZD5851 production, after which they may receive approved bridging therapy for disease control. Upon successful generation of AZD5851 product, pts will undergo lymphodepletion before receiving a single dose of IV AZD5851. Subsequent follow-up is divided into 3 stages: Stage 1, active follow-up of all pts through 6 months post AZD5851 infusion; Stage 2, further evaluation of pts who have not progressed or started a new anticancer regimen during Stage 1; Stage 3, long-term follow-up for all pts who have received AZD5851. The primary endpoints are to assess the safety/tolerability of AZD5851 (both study parts), and to determine the recommended dose(s) of AZD5851 for expansion and phase 2 trials (Part A). Secondary endpoints include efficacy (objective response rate, best overall response, duration of response, disease control rate, durable response rate, time to response, progression-free survival, and overall survival) and pharmacokinetics. Exploratory endpoints include pharmacodynamic biomarkers and immunogenicity. Enrollment began Nov 2023. 1. Zhang et al. AACR 2023. Abstract CT097. Clinical trial information: NCT06084884 .

A phase 1 trial in progress for in situ immunomodulation with CDX-301, radiation therapy, poly-ICLC, and CDX-1140 in patients with unresectable and metastatic solid tumors.

TPS2697 Background: The prognosis for patients with unresectable and metastatic solid tumors that progress on standard of care therapy remains poor due to limited treatment options. Compelling evidence suggests that the induction and activation of tumor-residing conventional type-1 dendritic cells (cDC1) is critical to elicit anti-tumor immunity. Recently, we have demonstrated that a combinatorial regimen comprised of in situ delivery of Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 ligand (Flt3L), radiation therapy (9Gy), and dual TLR3/CD40 stimulation 1) mobilizes cDC1 to the tumor microenvironment; 2) induces maturation of cDC1; 3) facilitates trafficking of cDC1 carrying tumor antigens to tumor-draining lymph nodes; 4) elicits de novo adaptive T cell immunity; 5) triggers regression of primary tumors, as well as non-irradiated distant tumors; and 6) develops tumor-specific systemic immunological memory using multiple syngeneic orthotopic murine models (1-4). Based on results from preclinical studies, we have initiated a phase 1 study as below. Methods: This is a phase 1 study of in situ immunomodulation with CDX-301 (Flt3L), radiation therapy, CDX-1140 and Poly-ICLC (dual CD40/TLR3 stimulation) in patients with unresectable and metastatic solid tumors. Eligibility for this study includes patients ≥ 18 yrs who have clinically or pathologically confirmed diagnosis of unresectable and metastatic melanoma, cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, Merkel cell carcinoma, high-grade bone and soft tissue sarcoma or HER2/neu (-) breast cancer with no curative treatment options, and progressed on at least one line of standard systemic therapy. The unresectable disease to be irradiated and injected with medications must be located in breast, dermal, subcutaneous, or soft tissue, or lymph nodes with the longest axis of the tumor 2-7 cm, and should be considered safe for injection by the investigator. The metastatic disease must be measurable per irRECIST criteria. Patients will be treated with daily intratumoral injection of CDX-301 for 5 days (Day 1-5), radiation therapy (9Gy, Day 8) followed by administration of CDX-1140 and Poly-ICLC (Day 9). Up to 4 cycles of this combination therapy can be given every 3 weeks. The primary endpoints are safety/tolerability and to evaluate the MTD of for injection (intratumoral in the cohort A and intratumoral and intravenous in the cohort B) of CDX-1140. A standard 3+3 design, allowing for dose de-escalation, will be used within each cohort. Secondary endpoints are to evaluate immune signatures in blood and the tumor. This phase 1 trial opened to enrollment at the University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center in January 2023 (recruitment is currently 4 on February 6, 2024). 1. Nature Communications 2020. 2. J. Immunology 2021. 3. Cancer Research 2021. 4. Scientific Reports 2022. Clinical trial information: NCT04616248 .

A phase II exploratory trial of adebrelimab in combination with chemotherapy and concurrent radiotherapy as a first-line treatment for oligo-metastatic extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer.

TPS8131 Background: Oligometastasis of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) is an intermediate state between local and extensive metastasis, characterized by reduced metastatic potential and a limited number of metastatic sites, which makes local treatment of each lesion possible. Multiple clinical studies have shown that adding local therapy to standard systemic therapy can improve the prognosis of patients with oligometastatic disease. The PD-L1 inhibitor adebrelimab combined with chemotherapy has become one of the standard regimens for first-line treatment of ES-SCLC. Based on these, we hypothesize that in patients with oligometastatic ES-SCLC at risk of early progression, the early addition of chest radiotherapy and stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) for metastatic lesions to first-line treatment with adebrelimab combined with chemotherapy may be expected to achieve local control, thereby improving survival benefits. Methods: This is a prospective, single-arm, multicenter, phase II exploratory trial. Patients will be eligible if they are 18 to 75 years of age; have histopathologically or cytologically confirmed ES-SCLC with the number of metastatic lesions of ≤ 5 and organ metastasis of ≤ 3 (i.e. oligometastases); have an ECOG PS of 0-1; and have no previous systemic treatment. The treatment period in this trial is subdivided into induction therapy, concurrent chemoradiotherapy, and consolidation and maintenance therapy. In the induction setting, patients will receive two 3-week cycles of adebrelimab (20 mg/kg on day 1), carboplatin (AUC of 5 mg/mL per min on day 1)/cisplatin (75 mg/m2 on day 1), and etoposide (100 mg/m2 on days 1-3). Patients who achieve partial response or stable disease after induction therapy will then receive concurrent chemoradiotherapy, of which chemotherapy regimen is the same as the induction setting. Radical IMRT radiotherapy (2.5-3 Gy/f, total dose 45-55 Gy) will be performed for the primary tumor in the chest and lymph node region, and SBRT radiotherapy will be given to metastatic lesions. Prophylactic cranial irradiation is optional. After the end of chemoradiotherapy, patients will receive 1-2 cycles of consolidation treatment with the same regimen as induction treatment, followed by adebrelimab monotherapy (20 mg/kg on day 1, q3w) as maintenance treatment until disease progression, intolerance toxicity, or up to 2 years of adebrelimab. The total cycle number of chemotherapy is 4-6. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary endpoints are objective response rate, duration of response, overall survival (OS), 6-month and 1-year PFS rates, 1-year and 2-year OS rates, and safety. The trial is under recruitment, and a total of 62 patients are planned to be enrolled. Clinical trial information: NCT06177925 .

Chemotherapy in pediatric low-grade gliomas (PLGG).

Pediatric low-grade gliomas (PLGG) are commonly treated with a combination of surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. Recent trends prioritize reducing long-term morbidities, particularly in younger patients. While historically chemotherapy was reserved for cases progressing after radiotherapy, evolving recommendations now advocate for its early use, particularly in younger age groups. The carboplatin and vincristine (CV) combination stands as a standard systemic therapy for PLGG, varying in dosage and administration between North America and Europe. Clinical trials have shown promising response rates, albeit with varying toxicity profiles. Vinblastine has emerged as another effective regimen with minimal toxicity. TPCV, a regimen combining thioguanine, procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine, was compared to CV in a Children's Oncology Group trial, showing comparable outcomes, but more toxicity. Vinorelbine, temozolomide, and metronomic chemotherapy have also been explored, with varied success rates and toxicity profiles. Around 40-50% of PLGG patients require subsequent chemotherapy lines. Studies have shown varied efficacy in subsequent lines, with NF1 patients generally exhibiting better outcomes. The identification of molecular drivers like BRAF mutations has led to targeted therapies' development, showing promise in specific molecular subgroups. Trials comparing targeted therapy to conventional chemotherapy aim to delineate optimal treatment strategies based on molecular profiles. The landscape of chemotherapy in PLGG is evolving, with a growing focus on molecular subtyping and targeted therapies. Understanding the role of chemotherapy in conjunction with novel treatments is crucial for optimizing outcomes in pediatric patients with low-grade gliomas.

Ruxolitinib in steroid-refractory acute graft-vs-host disease: Japanese subgroup analysis of the randomized REACH2 trial

Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD) is a major complication after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in Japan and other countries. Nearly one-third of patients do not respond to standard systemic steroid therapy and no standard second-line treatment has been established in Japan. We report efficacy and safety findings of ruxolitinib versus best available therapy (BAT) from a subgroup analysis of the international, phase 3 REACH2 study in Japanese patients with steroid-refractory aGvHD. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) at day 28. Overall, 9 patients received ruxolitinib and 21 received BAT. The ORR at day 28 (88.9% vs 52.4%) and durable ORR at day 56 (66.7% vs 28.6%) were higher with ruxolitinib versus BAT. The estimated cumulative incidence of loss of response at 6 months was 12.5% with ruxolitinib and 18.2% with BAT. The median failure-free survival was longer with ruxolitinib versus BAT (2.73 vs 1.25 months). The most common adverse events up to day 28 in the ruxolitinib and BAT groups were anemia (55.6% vs 19.0%) and thrombocytopenia (44.4% vs 4.8%, respectively). Ruxolitinib showed better efficacy outcomes and a consistent safety profile compared with BAT in the Japanese subgroup, and the findings were consistent with overall study results.

Efficacy of anti-PD-1 monotherapy for recurrent or metastatic olfactory neuroblastoma

BackgroundOlfactory neuroblastoma (ONB) is a rare malignant tumor of the head and neck. Due to its rarity, standard systemic therapy for this condition has yet to be established. In particular, the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for the recurrent or metastatic (R/M) ONB population remains unclear.MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated 11 patients with R/M ONB who received any systemic chemotherapy at two Japanese institutions (National Cancer Center Hospital East and Kyushu Medical Center) between January 2002 and March 2022 and analyzed outcomes by use of anti-PD-1 antibody (nivolumab or pembrolizumab) monotherapy.ResultsOf the 11 patients, 6 received ICI (ICI-containing treatment group) and the remaining 5 were treated with systemic therapy but not including ICI (ICI-non-containing treatment group). Overall survival (OS) was significantly longer in the ICI-containing group (median OS: not reached vs. 6.4 months, log-rank p-value: 0.035). The fraction of ICI systemic therapy in the entire treatment period of this group reached 85.9%. Four patients (66.7%) in the ICI-containing treatment group experienced immune-related adverse events (irAE), with grades of 1/2. No irAE of grade 3 or more was seen, and no patient required interruption or discontinuation of treatment due to toxicity.ConclusionICI monotherapy appears to be effective and to contribute to prolonged survival in R/M ONB.

Retrospective evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of UVB-311 in atopic dermatitis

BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis is a widespread skin disease based on immune and genetic mechanisms of chronic inflammation formation. The disease most often develops in early childhood, has a frequent recurrent course, age-related clinical features. In this regard, the disease is characterized by a wide variety of treatment methods, the effectiveness of which varies and is a highly debated topic at the present time. AIM: to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of standard local and systemic therapy of atopic dermatitis in combination with UVB 311 nm. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 100 case histories of patients with atopic dermatitis of varying severity who were in the clinic of skin and venereal diseases in the period from 2022 to 2023 were analyzed. Of these, 50 patients received combined systemic and topical therapy with UVB 311 nm (the first group), and 50 patients received only standard topical and systemic therapy (the second group). Systemic and topical therapy of atopic dermatitis included, according to clinical recommendations, corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, antihistamines. RESULTS: As a result of combined therapy with UVB 311 nm, patients showed a decrease in the SCORAD index by 1.7 times after 1 month of therapy, by 8 times after 2 months, and by 30 times after 6 months. In the second group, the SCORAD index decreased 1.2 times after 1 month from the start of therapy (p=0.0004), 3 times after 2 months (p=0.0001), 20 times after 6 months (p=0.003). Side effects in the first group were detected only in 5 (10%) patients: 2 (4%) patients had skin burning, 2 (4%) had skin itching, 1 (2%) patient had photodermatitis in the form of erythema of the skin. These adverse reactions were of a short-term nature and quickly passed if the recommendations were followed without canceling the procedures. CONCLUSION: UVB 311 nm therapy for atopic dermatitis has a higher therapeutic effect, is well tolerated, has minimal early side effects, and leads to clinical remission faster than standard systemic and local therapy.