The present paper is a sequel to those already presented by the author to the Royal Society, in which he had instituted a comparison of the observations of the refractive indices for the standard rays of light in various media, with the results calculated from theoretical formulæ, deduced from the most improved views of the undulatory hypothesis ; the cases discussed including the greatest range of data as yet furnished by experiment. The comparison exhibited an accordance sufficient to warrant the conclusion that the theory affords a very satisfactory approximation, at least, to the expression and explanation of the actual law of nature. In order, however to remove any possible discrepancy which may still exist, or hereafter be found to obtain, the author considers that farther examination is requisite of the principles on which any extension or modification of the theory might be pursued; and such is the object of the investigation undertaken in the present paper. The phenomena of interference, on which the undulatory theory was originally based by Dr. Young, obliged us to adopt some idea of an alternating motion, as well as a motion of translation, in our conception of light; and this, with all the accessions it has received, especially from the investigation of Fresnel, has, at the present day, been connected by the labours of M. Cauchy and others, with general dynamical principles, which regulate the propagation of vibratory motions through an elastic medium. From such dynamical principles there have been deduced certain differential equations of motion, the integration of which gives the well-known expression for a wave, involving the relation between the velocity and the wave length which explains the dispersion. The direct and complete integration of these forms, effected by M. Cauchy, and simplified by Mr Tovey and M. Kelland, involves certain conditions; namely, the evanescence of certain terms, the interpretation of which implies peculiar views of the constitution of the ether. Mr. Tovey shows that without these conditions, a certain form of the wave-function is a particular solution of the equations ; and this form is precisely that expressing elliptically polarized light. If the absence of the condition in question be essential to the case of elliptically and circularly polarized light, it follows that all the preceding investigations, which depend on the fulfilment of those conditions, are applicable only to unpolarized and plane-polarized light, and consequently the general integration is limited in a most material part of its application; a defect which is only remedied by the supplementary investigation of Mr. Tovey, in which, for this case, a particular solution is assigned. It seemed, then, necessary to show explicitly that the non-fulfilment of the conditions, that is, the non-evanescence of the terms in question, is essential for elliptically polarized light, as their evanescence is for common light, and thus to exhibit distinctly the relation between the cases of elliptically polarized, of plane-polarized, and unpolarized light; and, again, to remove, if possible, the obscurity and discrepancy of opinion in which the physical interpretation of those conditions, with regard to the supposed constitution of the ethereal medium, appeared to be involved.
Read full abstract