Standard Oncology Care Research Articles

The Impact of Age in the Treatment of Non-comorbid Patients with Rectal Cancer: Survival Outcomes from the National Cancer Database.

Multimodal therapy has improved survival outcomes for rectal cancer (RC) significantly with an exemption for older patients. We sought to assess whether older non-comorbid patients receive substandard oncological treatment for localized RC referring to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines and whether it affects survival outcomes. This is a retrospective study using patient data from the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) for histologically confirmed RC from 2002 to 2014. Non-comorbid patients between ≥50 and ≤85years and defined treatment for localized RC were included and assigned to a younger (<75years) and an older group (≥75years). Treatment approaches and their impact on relative survival (RS) were analyzed using loess regression models and compared between both groups. Furthermore, mediation analysis was performed to measure the independent relative effect on age and other variables on RS. Data were assessed using the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist. Of 59,769 included patients, 48,389 (81.0%) were assigned to the younger group (<75years). Oncologic resection was performed in 79.6% of the younger patients compared to 67.2% of the older patients (p < 0.001). Chemotherapy (74.3% vs. 56.1%) and radiotherapy (72.0% vs. 58.1%) were provided less often in older patients, respectively (p < 0.001). Increasing age was associated with enhanced 30- and 90-day mortality with 0.6% and 1.1% in the younger and 2.0% and 4.1% in the elderly group (p < 0.001) and worse RS rates [multivariable adjusted HR: 1.93 (95% CI 1.87-2.00), p < 0.001]. Adherence to standard oncological therapy resulted in a significant increase in 5-year RS (multivariable adjusted HR: 0.80 (95% CI 0.74-0.86), p < 0.001). Mediation analysis revealed that RS was mainly affected by age itself (84%) rather than the choice of therapy. The likelihood to receive substandard oncological therapy increases in the older population and negatively affects RS. Since age itself has a major impact on RS, better patient selection should be performed to identify those that are potentially eligible for standard oncological care regardless of their age.

Virtual reality in chemotherapy support for the treatment of physical functions, fear, and quality of life in pediatric cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Appropriately selected complementary therapies, such as virtual reality (VR) and active video games (AVG), provide support to young patients during the process of cancer treatment. Therefore, this systematic review with meta-analysis aimed to analyze the effects of VR and AVG on fear, physical functions, and quality of life. A systematic search was performed independently in Scopus, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library electronic databases for relevant randomized controlled and crossover studies. From a total of 5,963 records, 11 met the inclusion criteria. After full-text screening two publications were excluded, yet six studies were included in the quantitative analysis because three studies had a large discrepancy in their measured outcomes. For methodological quality assessments, the RoB2 software program was used, while RevMan 5.4.1 was used for statistical analysis and meta-analysis. Standard Mean Difference (SMD) outcome measures were used for the analysis. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic with a cut-off value of 50% considering intervention and outcome measures. Our systematic review includes six randomized controlled studies and three randomized crossover studies. The participants represented both sexes and were children and adolescents (<18 years old) with a diagnosis of cancer. The analysis of the results allows for a careful conclusion that VR has the potential to become an accessory tool in rehabilitation and oncologic treatment. All of the included studies noted a significant advantage of this intervention. VR has the potential to be an effective and important tool in the oncologic treatment of children. VR immerses the patient, and as a result, produces a distraction that effectively reduces pain associated with standard oncologic care procedures in children. However, this systematic review and meta-analysis highlights the need for more research into the use of VR as support for pediatric oncologic care. PROSPERO database (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=319000), CRD42022319000.

Association of palliative care management and survival after chemotherapy discontinuation in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A retrospective single-centre observational study

BackgroundPalliative care (PC) is integrated into standard oncology care. However, its clinical impact at the end of life remains unclear in pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA). We aimed to describe the end-of-life care pathway and to assess whether PC referral influences survival after chemotherapy discontinuation (CD) among advanced PA patients. MethodsThis retrospective single-centre observational study was conducted among deceased patients with advanced PA who had received chemotherapy between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2021. Baseline characteristics, the timing of PC referral and events after CD were collected. The primary outcome was time from CD to death. ResultsAmong the 148 included patients, 53.4% (n = 79) received PC, mostly late after the CD (n = 133, 89.9%), 16.9% (n = 25) received chemotherapy in the last 14 days of life and 75.6% died at the hospital. None received PC in the 8 weeks following the diagnosis. PC referral significantly increased PC department admissions (p < 0.001) and decreased medical unit admissions (p < 0.001). The median survival after the CD was 35 days (IQR: 19–64.5). PC referral was associated with increased survival after CD (HR: 0.65 [0.47–0.90], p = 0.010, Cox) and after adjusting (HR: 0.65 [0.42–0.99], p = 0.045, Cox). ConclusionThe study suggests that PC may be associated with longer survival after CD in advanced PA patients. However, PC is underused, and patients are referred late in their care pathway.

Feasibility of an embedded palliative care clinic model for patients with an advanced thoracic malignancy

PurposeEarly palliative care (PC) with standard oncology care has demonstrated improved patient outcomes, but multiple care delivery models are utilized. This study prospectively evaluated the feasibility of an embedded PC clinic model and collected patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and caregiver needs.MethodsIn this observational study of embedded outpatient PC for patients with advanced thoracic malignancies treated at The Ohio State University Thoracic Oncology clinic, patients received same-day coordinated oncology and palliative care visits at one clinic location. PC encounters included comprehensive symptom assessment and management, advanced care planning, and goals of care discussion. Multiple study assessments were utilized. We describe the feasibility of evaluating PROs and caregiver needs in an embedded PC model.ResultsForty patients and 28 caregivers were enrolled. PROs were collected at baseline and follow-up visits. Over a 12-month follow-up, 36 patients discontinued study participation due to hospice enrollment, death, study withdrawal, or COVID restrictions. At baseline, 32 patients (80%) rated distress as moderate-severe with clinically significant depression (44%) and anxiety (36%). Survey completion rates significantly decreased over time: 3 months (24 eligible, 66% completed), 6 months (17 eligible; 41% completed), 9 months (9 eligible; 44% completed), and 12 months (4 eligible; 50% completed).ConclusionWe found that an embedded PC clinic was feasible, although there were challenges encountered in longitudinal collection of PROs due to high study attrition. Ongoing assessment and expansion of this embedded PC model will continue to identify strengths and challenges to improve patient and caregiver outcomes.

Integration of palliative care in the management of oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Oral Squamous cell Cancers (OSCC) is strongly associated with tobacco consumption. We here in present a case study of a OSCC patient who refused standard oncological care (SOC), to highlight the importance of integrating palliative care (PC) for improved patient outcomes. A 61 years male patient, with history of chewing tobacco for more than 20 years and diagnosed to have OSCC for 1.5 years presented with severe anaemia and a cauliflower-like growth (12 x 10 cm) in the left oral cavity and cheek with greenish-yellow discharge. Pus culture was positive for K. pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa. Patient is also a known hypertensive for 15 years and a diabetic for 7 years on allopathic treatment. However, the patient refused SOC for oral cancer and relied on siddha treatment. Packed cell transfusions were given to correct anaemia and the blood glucose levels was kept under control. Frequent wound debridement, oral care, antibiotics, balanced-diet and hydration improved wound-bed granulation. Patient and family members were counselled and explained in detail on the need for SOC by sharing previous OSCC patients' care and outcomes at our centre. Patient gained trust and courage and agreed for chemotherapy, which reduced the disease burden and improved the quality of life (QoL) considerably. Therefore, PC integration at an early stage of treatment is imperative as it reduced (i) the burden of secondary infection, (ii) pain and distress, and (iii) improved the QoL.

Early integration of palliative care in cervical cancer: Experiences from a pilot study.

Palliative care (PC) has been classically synonymous with end-of-life care offered to patients with advanced incurable cancers with an aim to improve their quality-of-life (QoL). However, there is growing evidence to suggest that early integration of PC (EIPC) along with cancer-directed management improves patient-reported outcomes. In this study, we aim to evaluate the impact of EIPC on QoL of cervical cancer patients treated with curative intent. Patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (stage IB2 to IIIB) having eastern cooperative oncology group (ECOG) performance score 0-2 were randomized into EIPC arm and standard of care arm of concurrent chemoradiation by a computer-generated table of random numbers. QoL was assessed by functional assessment of cancer therapy - general (FACT-G) questionnaire twice in both arms. The first assessment was done prior to starting treatment and second assessment at three months after treatment completion. The mean scores on physical, mental, emotional, social, and functional well-being subscales of FACT-G scale were calculated in both arms, and Wilcoxon test was used to evaluate differences in QoL scores within and in between the arms. This trial was registered with Clinical Trials Registry of India (CTRI) vide CTRI/2017/05/008704. Fifty patients were enrolled in each arm. However, only 42 and 45 patients in EPIC and standard oncological care arm were evaluated in the final analysis. Comparing QoL scores between the two time points in each arm, the mean pre-treatment scores in EIPC arm was significantly higher than post-treatment scores in the domains of physical and emotional well-being, whereas social and functional well-being scores improved significantly after treatment as compared with that as baseline. However, when compared between two arms, the difference of mean scores pre- and post-treatment were almost similar for physical and functional well-being but statistically significant differences were found only in social and emotional well-being scales. Our study is a feasibility study done in an attempt to test the validity of EIPC in cervical cancers. The results are inspiring to conduct robust studies in the future to explore this new domain of integration of palliative services in curable cancers.

Symptom Burden and Shared Care Planning in an Oncology Nurse-Led Primary Palliative Care Intervention (CONNECT) for Patients with Advanced Cancer.

Purpose: Primary palliative care (PPC) interventions are needed to address unmet symptom needs within standard oncology care. We designed an oncology nurse-led PPC intervention using shared care planning to facilitate patient engagement. This analysis examines the prevalence and severity of symptoms reported by patients and how symptoms were addressed on shared care plans (SCPs). Methods: Secondary analysis of a cluster randomized PPC intervention trial. Adult patients with metastatic solid tumors whose oncologist "would not be surprised if the patient died within a year" were included. Twenty-three oncology nurses received PPC training and conducted up to three monthly visits with patients. Symptom prevalence and severity were assessed before each visit using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS). Nurses collaboratively developed treatment strategies with patients, targeting the most bothersome symptoms for improvement. Results: Among 571 nurse-led PPC visits with 235 patients, the most prevalent and severe symptoms were tiredness (reported at 86% of visits; ESAS ≥4 in 55% of visits), low sense of wellbeing (78%; ESAS ≥4 in 38%), and poor appetite (69%; ESAS ≥4 in 42%). Moderately severe symptoms were addressed on SCPs ranging from 4% (drowsiness) to 35% (tiredness) of the time. Symptom management plans developed by PPC-trained oncology nurses primarily focused on nonpharmaceutical interventions (70%) compared with pharmaceutical interventions (30%). Conclusion: The symptoms that patients report most frequently and as most severe on SCPs were addressed less frequently than expected. Further research is needed to understand how PPC interventions can be designed to more effectively target and improve bothersome symptoms for patients with advanced cancer. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02712229.

The Advisory Board on Cancer, Infertility and Pregnancy: a virtual on-demand multidisciplinary tumour board.

Multidisciplinary consultations are part of standard oncological care. These consultations ensure that patients’ cases are discussed by all involved specialists and that a consensus is reached on the most appropriate treatment course.1 The multidisciplinary consultation model is adequate for most patients with cancer, but teams might have insufficient expertise for people with rare cancers or conditions. Cancer during pregnancy is an example of such a rare condition, for which the traditional single-centre multidisciplinary team might not have the expertise to provide a recommendation.

Évaluation des pratiques dans un centre de lutte contre le cancer concernant l’utilisation des traitements systémiques en fin de vie chez les patients atteints d’un cancer métastatique

Appropriate use of palliative systemic treatments near end-of-life is crucial to reduce aggressiveness of cancer care. The study's objective is to evaluate cancer quality-of-care near end-of-life in our cancer institute. From a retrospective cohort, we included all adults with metastatic solid cancers who died in 2019. The use of palliative systemic treatments close to death was measured from quality-of-care indicators described by Earle and al. The integration of supportive care into standard oncology care was also evaluated. All the information were collected from electronic records. Of the 452 patients, 6.2% received systemic treatment in the last 14 days of life and 8.4% started a new systemic treatment in the last 30 days of life. Eighty six percent met a supportive care physician. This intervention was significantly less frequent in the TS≤14 group than in the TS>30 group (71.4 % vs 89.5 % p=0.021). The main reasons for first contact were pain (35 %), early palliative care (29 %) and then exclusive palliative care (17.5 %). Our institute offers a good quality of end-of-life care for patients with metastatic solid cancers. However, improvements should be done regarding prognostic estimation and integration of palliative care.

Replicated Adsorption Technique used to Resolve ALX148 Interference in the Immunohematology Reference Laboratory

Abstract Introduction/Objective Increased expression of CD47 by cancer cells inhibits macrophages' phagocytic activity through CD47-SIRPα interactions, allowing evasion of the innate immune system. Several drugs on the market have been developed to target this interaction, including monoclonal therapeutics and fusion proteins. ALX148 is a genetically engineered SIRPα fusion protein with an inactivated Fc portion. CD47 is expressed highly on red blood cells (RBC), resulting in strong interference in pre-transfusion compatibility testing of patients receiving ALX148. Consequently, trial patients are at increased risk of transfusion-related adverse events or delay of needed transfusion. Few resolutions of ALX148 interference to assess underlying alloantibody development have been reported. One such examiniation demonstrated x6 linear papain-treated RBC adsorptions removed ALX148 interference. This study aimed to replicate these findings. Methods/Case Report Three patients receiving combination ALX148 (dose 6.57-20mg/mL) and Azacitidine therapy with broad-reactive RBC antibody reactivity were selected. High volume alloadsorptions (8:1 RBC:plasma) were performed with papain-treated rr (ccdee) RBCs. Adsorptions were incubated at 37C for 10 minutes. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) was utilized in test tube indirect antiglobulin testing (IAT). Results (if a Case Study enter NA) Initial reactivity strength was 3-4+ at PEG-IAT and saline-IAT with a three-cell screening RBC reagent. Alloadsorbed plasma was non-reactive at IAT with a three-cell screening RBC reagent enhanced by PEG. Drug interference was removed following three times high volume papain-treated alloadsorption. Conclusion Cancer immunotherapies have transformed the standard of care in oncology. Despite the evident clinical success, the medical laboratory has been challenged with adapting to cancer drug therapies capable of causing interference in routine laboratory testing. Clinical trials of ALX148 are associated with interference in pre-transfusion compatibility testing. The use of extended phenotype matching for RBC transfusion can be utilized but incurs additional time and resources. These results suggest high volume linear papain RBC alloadsorptions may be incorporated into antibody resolution for patients receiving ALX148.

Perceptions of Death Among Patients with Advanced Cancer Receiving Early Palliative Care and Their Caregivers: Results from a Mixed-Method Analysis.

Oncologists are often concerned that talking about death with patients may hinder their relationship. However, the views of death held by patients have not been thoroughly investigated. This study aimed to describe the perception of death among patients with advanced cancer receiving early palliative care (EPC) and their caregivers. Qualitative and quantitative analyses were performed on 2 databases: (a) transcripts of open-ended questionnaires administered to 130 cancer patients receiving EPC with a mean age of 68.4 years and to 115 primary caregivers of patients on EPC with a mean age of 56.8; (b) texts collected from an Italian forum, containing instances of web-mediated interactions between patients and their caregivers. Quantitative analysis shows that: (a) patients and caregivers are not afraid of speaking about death; (b) patients and caregivers on EPC use the word "death" significantly more than patients on standard oncology care (SOC) and their caregivers (P < .0001). For both participants on EPC and SOC, the adjectives and verbs associated with the word "death" have positive connotations; however, these associations are significantly more frequent for participants on EPC (verbs, Ps < .0001; adjectives, Ps < .003). Qualitative analysis reveals that these positive connotations refer to an actual, positive experience of the end of life in the EPC group and a wish or a negated event in the SOC group. EPC interventions, along with proper physician-patient communication, may be associated with an increased acceptance of death in patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers.

Intérêts de l’intégration précoce de soins palliatifs aux soins oncologiques : une revue rapide des écrits

With the number of cancer diagnoses and cancer-related deaths on the rise, palliative care is becoming a more important consideration for helping to improve the quality of life of patients and families and the support they receive during their healthcare journey. Accordingly, the early integration of palliative care into standard oncology care would appear to be an underutilized and novel approach that could be used to address the specific needs of palliative oncology patients. Oncology nurses play a central role in this process, delivering care throughout the health continuum, including palliative care. The purpose of this rapid review is to outline the benefits of early palliative care interventions and describe their characteristics. A literature search on CINAHL and PubMed returned five randomized trials conducted between 2010 and 2018. An analysis of these papers showed that the majority of the selected studies concluded that the early integration of palliative care into standard oncology care, which includes such treatments as chemotherapy and radiation therapy, can lead to improvements in quality of life, symptoms of anxiety and depression, and overall survival rate. Keywords: palliative care, early palliative care, intervention, cancer, oncology

Smoking cessation at diagnosis and cancer survival: systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Stopping smoking can considerably cut one's risk of developing cancer compared to continued smoking (i.e. up to 50% after 5 years for esophageal cancer and after 10 years for lung cancer). Much less is known about whether quitting smoking may bring a survival advantage to people who are active smokers at the time of cancer diagnosis. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the studies that examined the prognostic effect of quitting smoking at or around diagnosis among cancer patients. We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for articles published until 30th March 2022 that reported the impact of quitting smoking at or around diagnosis on cancer patients’ survival (any type). Separately for each cancer site, study-specific data were pooled into summary relative risk (SRR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) using random effect meta-analysis models, investigating sources of heterogeneity and bias. Forty-three articles were included, including 20 for lung cancer (LC), 16 for head and neck cancer (HNC), and less than 10 for bladder, breast, gastrointestinal tract, and other sites. Quitting smoking at or around diagnosis was associated with longer overall survival (SRR 0.71, 95% CI 0.64-0.80) in LC patients (consistently for non-small cell and small cell LC) as well as HNC patients (SRR 0.80, 95% CI 0.70-0.91). No significant publication bias was found. For the other body sites, the studies were limited in number, which prevented meta-analyses, but results were generally consistent with a beneficial effect of smoking cessation on survival. Quitting smoking at or around diagnosis is associated with a significantly improved overall survival of smokers diagnosed with LC and HNC and shows beneficial effects in patients with other cancers. Physicians should offer smoking cessation counselling to smokers who start diagnostic workup for suspected cancer, and smoking cessation strategies should arguably become part of standard multidisciplinary oncological care. Key messages • Smoking cessation at or around diagnosis is associated with a significantly improved overall survival of smokers diagnosed with different types of cancer. • Smoking cessation strategies (and counselling) should become part of standard multidisciplinary oncological care.

Building the plane while it’s flying: implementation lessons from integrating a co-located exercise clinic into oncology care

BackgroundDespite its therapeutic role during cancer treatment, exercise is not routinely integrated into care and implementation efforts are largely absent from the literature. The aim of this study was to evaluate a strategy to integrate the workflow of a co-located exercise clinic into routine care within a private oncology setting in two clinics in the metropolitan region of Western Australia.MethodsThis prospective evaluation utilised a mixed methods approach to summarise lessons learned during the implementation of an integrated exercise workflow and supporting implementation plan. Data collection was informed by the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) framework. Reports detailing utilisation of the exercise service and its referral pathways, as well as patient surveys and meeting minutes documenting the implementation process informed the evaluation.ResultsThe co-located exercise service achieved integration into routine care within the clinical oncology setting. Patient utilisation was near capacity (reach) and 100% of clinicians referred to the service during the 13-month evaluation period (adoption). Moreover, ongoing adaptations were made to improve the program (implementation) and workflows were integrated into standard operating practices at the clinic (maintenance). The workflow performed as intended for ~70% of exercise participants (effectiveness); however, gaps were identified in utilisation of the workflow by both patients and clinicians.ConclusionIntegration of exercise into standard oncology care is possible, but it requires the ongoing commitment of multiple stakeholders across an organisation. The integrated workflow and supporting implementation plan greatly improved utilisation of the co-located exercise service, demonstrating the importance of targeted implementation planning. However, challenges regarding workflow fidelity within and across sites limited its success highlighting the complexities inherent in integrating exercise into clinical oncology care in a real-world setting.

PEARL: A randomised phase 3 trial of palliative care early in advanced lung cancers (ALTG/TOGA 13/008).

12020 Background: Early referral to palliative care was associated with improved health-related quality of life (HRQL) and overall survival (OS) in a US phase 3 trial in lung cancer patients (pts). International studies in mixed cancer types have reported conflicting results. PEARL aimed to determine whether early referral to palliative care would improve HRQL, OS, and resource use in Australian pts with recently diagnosed, advanced thoracic cancers. Methods: Eligible participants (pts) in this unblinded, multi-centre, randomised, phase 3 trial had advanced thoracic cancers diagnosed within 60 days, and the ability to complete patient-rated outcome measures (PROMS). Pts were randomly allocated to early referral to palliative care (ER) or referral at clinician’s discretion (DR). All pts received standard oncological care. PROMS were completed at baseline, every 3-4 weeks for 6 months, then 6-8 weekly. The primary objective was to determine the frequency of sustained, substantial improvements in HRQL, defined as a 5-point improvement in the FACT-L Trial Outcome Index (TOI) maintained for at least 2 consecutive assessments. Secondary outcomes included OS, documentation of advanced care plan (ACP), PROM scores at 12 weeks, anxiety/depression (PROMIS-ED), lung cancer symptoms (FACT-L), global HRQL (ICECAP-SCM), carer-satisfaction and burden, and understanding of illness and prognosis. The accrual target of 200 gave 80% power (alpha 0.05) to detect an absolute improvement of 20% in the proportion of pts achieving the primary endpoint. Results: 113 pts and 78 carers were recruited when the trial closed for slow accrual. Pt characteristics were well balanced: 88 (75%) had NSCLC, 18 (16%) small cell and 7 (6%) mesothelioma. Median age was 69 (IQR 62-74), 63 (56%) were male; systemic anti-cancer therapy ongoing or planned in 88 (78%). Median follow-up was 30 months. First consultations with a palliative care specialist within 60 days of diagnosis occurred in more pts assigned ER vs DR (57% vs 3.5%). Sustained substantial improvements in FACT-L TOI were reported by similar numbers of pts assigned ER vs DR: 33% vs 32%, p = 0.9. OS was similar among those assigned ER versus DR (median 12 vs 18.4 months, p = 0.11). A similar % had a written advanced care plan at death: 15/40 (39%) vs 15/33 (47%). We found no important differences between arms in global HRQL (ICECAP-SCM), depression/anxiety (PROMIS-ED), lung cancer symptoms (FACT-L), carer satisfaction (FAMCARE-2), carer burden (CRA), or understanding of illness by carers or pts. Conclusions: Early referral to palliative care, compared with discretionary referral, did not improve important outcomes for Australian thoracic cancer pts or carers. Our findings suggest that the palliative care needs of such pts were addressed equally well by delayed referral when clinically indicated, resulting in reduced burden for resource-limited specialist palliative services. Clinical trial information: ACTRN12617000166370.

Effects of early palliative care on patients with incurable cancer: A meta‐analysis and systematic review

This meta-analysis aims to compare the effects of early palliative care on patients with incurable cancer with those of standard oncologic care or on-demand palliative care. Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) were searched for relevant randomised controlled trials. We also screened reference lists of included studies for additional qualified studies. We used Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool to evaluate quality of included studies. DerSimonian and Laird's random effects meta-analysis was used to synthesise the effects. Sixteen in 1376 studies were included. The pooled data suggested that patients receiving early palliative care had better quality of life (SMD = 0.737, 95% CI: 0.240-1.234), fewer symptoms (SMD = 0.304, 95% CI: 0.097-0.510), better mood (SMD = -0.443, 95% CI: -0.605 to -0.282), better survival (hazard ratio [HR] of death: HR = 1.521, 95% CI: 1.521-1.923; 1-year overall survival probability: HR = 1.238, 95% CI: 1.031-1.486) and higher probability of dying at home (HR = 1.153, 95% CI: 1.027-1.295) than patients in the control group. And there is no difference between resource use. Early palliative care improves lives of patients with incurable cancer, but the evidence level is low because of high heterogeneity of quality of life and small numbers of included studies for other results.

Improving Patients' Life Quality after Radiotherapy Treatment by Predicting Late Toxicities.

Simple SummaryOver 50% of patients with cancer will receive radiotherapy treatment. Five to ten percent of patients who received radiotherapy will develop side effects. Identifying these patients before treatment start would allow for treatment modification to minimize these effects and improve the life quality of these patients. Our team developed a test, which allows predicting these secondary effects before starting the treatment. This will help in proposing personalized treatments to improve the outcome. This review presents how this test is performed, its results, as well as its modification in order to be used in hospitals.Personalized treatment and precision medicine have become the new standard of care in oncology and radiotherapy. Because treatment outcomes have considerably improved over the last few years, permanent side-effects are becoming an increasingly significant issue for cancer survivors. Five to ten percent of patients will develop severe late toxicity after radiotherapy. Identifying these patients before treatment start would allow for treatment adaptation to minimize definitive side effects that could impair their long-term quality of life. Over the last decades, several tests and biomarkers have been developed to identify these patients. However, out of these, only the Radiation-Induced Lymphocyte Apoptosis (RILA) assay has been prospectively validated in multi-center cohorts. This test, based on a simple blood draught, has been shown to be correlated with late radiation-induced toxicity in breast, prostate, cervical and head and neck cancer. It could therefore greatly improve decision making in precision radiation oncology. This literature review summarizes the development and bases of this assay, as well as its clinical results and compares its results to the other available assays.

Supportive oncology care at home interventions: protocols for clinical trials to shift the paradigm of care for patients with cancer

BackgroundPatients with cancer often endure substantial symptoms and treatment toxicities leading to high healthcare utilization, including hospitalizations and emergency department visits, throughout the continuum of their illness. Innovative oncology care models are needed to improve patient outcomes and reduce their healthcare utilization. Using a novel hospital at home care platform, we developed a Supportive Oncology Care at Home intervention to address the needs of patients with cancer.MethodsWe are conducting three trials to delineate the role of Supportive Oncology Care at Home for patients with cancer. The Supportive Oncology Care at Home intervention includes: (1) a hospital at home care model for symptom assessment and management; (2) remote monitoring of daily patient-reported symptoms, vital signs, and body weight; and (3) structured communication with the oncology team. Our first study is a randomized controlled trial to test the efficacy of Supportive Oncology Care at Home versus standard oncology care for improving healthcare utilization, cancer treatment interruptions, and patient-reported outcomes in patients with cancer receiving definitive treatment of their cancer. Participants include adult patients with gastrointestinal and head and neck cancer, as well as lymphoma, receiving definitive treatment (e.g., treatment with curative intent). The second study is a single-arm trial assessing the feasibility and acceptability of the Supportive Oncology Care at Home intervention for hospitalized patients with advanced cancer. Eligible participants include adult patients with incurable cancer who are admitted with an unplanned hospitalization. The third study is a single-arm trial assessing the feasibility and acceptability of the Supportive Oncology Care at Home intervention to enhance the end-of-life care for patients with advanced hematologic malignancies. Eligible participants include adult patients with relapsed or refractory hematologic malignancy receiving palliative therapy or supportive care alone.DiscussionThese studies are approved by the Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center Institutional Review Board and are being conducted in accordance with the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials statement for non-pharmacological trials. This work has the potential to transform the paradigm of care for patients with cancer by providing them with the necessary support at home to improve their health outcomes and care delivery.Trial registrationsNCT04544046, NCT04637035, NCT04690205.

Integrating Medical Genetics Into Precision Oncology Practice in the Veterans Health Administration: The Time Is Now.

Increased access and utilization of tumor profiling of cancers in our veteran population uncovered a modest number of potentially pathogenic germline variants (PPGVs) that require genetics referral for follow-up evaluation and germline sequencing. Challenges identified specific to the veteran population include paucity of genetics providers, either at a veteran's VA facility or nearby non-VA facilities. We sought to investigate the number of veterans who would benefit from having such resources at both local and national levels. Annotated clinical reports of mutations identified by tumor-only profiling and medical records of veterans with solid tumors at the Veterans Administration Ann Arbor Healthcare System (VA AAHS) between 2015 and 2020 were reviewed. PPGVs were identified according to society recommendations (such as ESMO and American Board of Medical Genetics and Genomics), expert review, and/or previously published criteria. After the analysis of our local VA population, these same criteria were then applied to veterans in the National Precision Oncology Program (NPOP). Two hundred eight veterans underwent tumor profiling at the VA AAHS over the defined time period. This included 20 different primary tumor sites with over half (n = 130) being advanced cancer at diagnosis. Of these, 18 veterans (8.5%) had mutations suggestive of a PPGV. Applying these criteria to the larger NPOP database (n = 20,014), a similar percentage (6%) of PPGVs were identified. These results indicate a PPGV frequency (6%-9% of veterans) consistent with the prevalence of inherited cancer predisposition syndromes in the general population, underscoring the need for medical genetics as part of standard oncologic care for veterans. We explore current and future care delivery models to optimize incorporation of medical genetics and genetic counseling to best serve veterans needing such services.

Patient & Caregiver Experiences: Qualitative Study Comparison Before and After Implementation of Early Palliative Care for Advanced Colorectal Cancer.

The Palliative Care Early and Systematic (PaCES) program implemented an early palliative care pathway for advanced colorectal cancer patients in January 2019, to increase specialist palliative care consultation and palliative homecare referrals more than three months before death. This study aimed to understand the experience of patients with advanced colorectal cancer and family caregivers who received early palliative care supports from a specialist palliative care nurse and compared those experiences with participants who experienced standard oncology care prior to implementation of early palliative care. This was a qualitative and patient-oriented study. We conducted semi-structured telephone interviews with two cohorts of patients with advanced colorectal cancer before and after implementation of an early palliative care pathway. We conducted a thematic analysis of the transcripts guided by a Person-Centred Care Framework. Seven patients living with advanced colorectal cancer and five family caregivers who received early palliative care supports expressed that visits from their early palliative care nurse was helpful, improved their understanding of palliative care, and improved their care. Four main themes shaped their experience of early palliative care: care coordination, perception of palliative care & advance care planning, coping with advanced cancer, and patient and family engagement. These findings were compared with experiences of 15 patients and seven caregivers prior to pathway implementation. An early palliative care pathway can improve advanced cancer care, and improve understanding and acceptance of early palliative care. This work was conducted in the context of colorectal cancer but may have relevance for the care of other advanced cancers.