Standard Antiplatelet Therapy Research Articles

Impact of Smoking on Long-Term Revascularization Success and Complications in Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Background: Smoking is a major modifiable risk factor in coronary artery disease (CAD) and is associated with adverse outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). PCI, widely utilized for revascularization in multivessel CAD, aims to restore coronary blood flow and reduce ischemic complications. However, smokers face increased risks of restenosis and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) after PCI, highlighting a need for further investigation into these associations. Objective: This study aimed to assess the impact of smoking on revascularization success and complications in patients undergoing multivessel PCI. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary cardiovascular center, evaluating clinical data from patients who underwent PCI from January 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023. Patients aged 18 and older with confirmed multivessel CAD were included. Participants were divided into smokers (N=779) and non-smokers (N=779) based on documented smoking status. All patients underwent PCI with either drug-eluting stents (DES) or drug-eluting balloons (DEB), followed by standard dual antiplatelet therapy. The primary outcome was revascularization success, defined as achieving TIMI grade ≥2. Secondary outcomes included incidences of MACE and restenosis. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS v27, with t-tests and chi-square tests used for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Logistic regression adjusted for confounders. Results: Revascularization success was significantly lower in smokers (69.8%) compared to non-smokers (81.6%) (p < 0.001). Smokers also exhibited higher rates of MACE (15.5%) and restenosis (12.6%) versus 8.4% and 7.3% in non-smokers, respectively (p < 0.001 for both outcomes). Conclusion: Smoking negatively affects revascularization success and increases MACE and restenosis risks in multivessel PCI patients. These findings underscore the importance of tailored therapeutic strategies and smoking cessation efforts to improve PCI outcomes in this high-risk group.

Abbreviated or Standard Antiplatelet Therapy After PCI in Diabetic Patients at High Bleeding Risk

BackgroundAbbreviated antiplatelet therapy (APT) reduces bleeding without increasing ischemic events in largely unselected high bleeding risk (HBR) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with higher ischemic risk, and its impact on the safety and effectiveness of abbreviated APT in HBR PCI patients remains unknown. ObjectivesThis study sought to investigate the comparative effectiveness of abbreviated (1 month) vs standard (≥3 months) APT in HBR patients with and without DM after biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting coronary stent implantation. MethodsThis was a prespecified analysis from the MASTER DAPT (Management of High Bleeding Risk Patients Post Bioresorbable Polymer Coated Stent Implantation With a Abbreviated Versus Prolonged DAPT Regimen) trial, which randomized 4,579 HBR patients (1,538 [34%] with DM) to abbreviated (n = 2,295) or standard (n = 2,284) APT. The coprimary outcomes were net adverse clinical events (NACEs; composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and major bleeding), major adverse cardiac or cerebral events (MACCEs; all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and stroke), and major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding at 11 months. ResultsHBR patients with DM had higher risks of MACCEs (HR: 1.28; 95% CI: 1.00-1.63) and similar net adverse or bleeding events compared with nondiabetic subjects. Abbreviated compared with standard APT was associated with similar NACEs and MACCEs (Pinteraction = 0.47 and 0.59, respectively) and reduced major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (Pinteraction = 0.55) irrespective of diabetes status. ConclusionsMACCE and NACE rates were similar, and bleeding rates were lower with abbreviated APT in patients with or without diabetes. Therefore, diabetes status did not modify the treatment effects of abbreviated vs standard APT in HBR patients after biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting coronary stent implantation. (Management of High Bleeding Risk Patients Post Bioresorbable Polymer Coated Stent Implantation With a Abbreviated Versus Prolonged DAPT Regimen [MASTER DAPT]; NCT03023020)

Cost-effectiveness of Implementing a Genotype-Guided De-Escalation Strategy in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome.

A genotype-guided P2Y12-inhibitor de-escalation strategy, switching acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients without a CYP2C19 loss-of-function allele from ticagrelor or prasugrel to clopidogrel, has shown to reduce bleeding risk without affecting effectivity of therapy by increasing ischemic risk. We estimated the cost-effectiveness of this personalized approach compared to standard dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT; aspirin plus ticagrelor/prasugrel) in the Netherlands. We developed a one-year decision tree based on results of the FORCE-ACS registry, comparing a cohort of ACS patients who underwent genotyping with a cohort of ACS patients treated with standard DAPT. This was followed by a lifelong Markov model to compare lifetime costs, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for a fictional cohort of 1000 patients. The cost-effectiveness analysis was performed from the perspective of the Dutch healthcare system. A genotype-guided de-escalation strategy led to anincrease of 55.30 QALYs and saved €698,286 compared to standard DAPT based on a lifetime horizon. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that the genotype-guided strategy was cost-saving in 93% and increased QALYs in 86% of simulations. The intervention remained cost-effective in the scenario where prices for all P2Y12-inhibitors were equalized. The genotype-guided strategy remained dominant in various other scenario and sensitivity analyses. A genotype-guided de-escalation strategy in patients with ACS was both cost-saving and yielded higher QALYs compared to standard DAPT, highlighting its potential for implementation in clinical practice. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03823547.

Early antiplatelet therapy after intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Early neurological deterioration (END) and recurrence of vessel blockage frequently complicate intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Several studies have indicated the potential effectiveness of the early initiation (within < 24 h) of antiplatelet therapy (APT) after IVT. However, conflicting results have been reported by other studies. We aimed to offer a thorough overview of the current literature through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Our systematic review and meta-analysis were prospectively registered on PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023488173) following the PRISMA guidelines. We systematically searched Web of Science, SCOPUS, PubMed, and Cochrane Library until May 5, 2024. Rayyan. ai facilitated the screening process. The R statistical programming language was used to calculate the odds ratios and conduct a meta-analysis. Our primary outcomes were excellent functional recovery (modified Rankin Scale score 0-1), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and mortality. Eight studies involving 2,134 participants were included in the meta-analysis. Early APT showed statistically significant increased odds of excellent functional recovery (mRS 0-1) compared to the standard APT group (OR, 1.81; [95% CI: 1.10, 2.98], p = 0.02). However, we found no differences between the early and standard APT groups regarding sICH (OR, 1.74; [95% CI: 0.91, 3.33], p = 0.10) and mortality (OR, 0.88; [95% CI: 0.62, 1.24]; p = 0.47). Early APT within 24 h of IVT in stroke patients is safe, with no increase in bleeding risk, and has a positive effect on excellent functional recovery. However, there was a statistically insignificant trend of increased sICH with early APT, and the current evidence is based on highly heterogeneous studies. Further large-scale RCTs are warranted.

The comparison of short-term dual antiplatelet therapy versus standard dual antiplatelet therapy in elderly patients with coronary artery disease who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention

Abstract Introduction Elderly patients are likely to have more underlying risk factors for bleeding and the bleeding risk increases with age although dual anti-platelet therapy (DAPT) is mandatory for patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for prevention of ischemic events. Therefore, elderly patients aged 75 or older are included as minor criteria for high bleeding risk, as defined by the Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk criteria. However, only limited data have been investigated of optimal duration of DAPT for patients aged 75 or older. Purpose The aim of this study is to evaluate optimal DAPT duration for elderly patients aged 75 and older. Methods We selected 1,571 patients aged 75 and older with coronary artery disease (CAD) from the pooled database among the 5 randomized controlled trials related to DAPT duration after PCI. DAPT was consisted of clopidogrel or ticagrelor in addition to aspirin. Short-term DAPT duration was defined as 1 to 3months, and standard DAPT duration was defined as 6 to 12months after PCI. Primary outcomes were net clinical adverse outcomes (NACE), composite of major cardiovascular and cerebrovascular adverse outcomes (MACCE) and TIMI major bleeding at 1 year. The inversed probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis was performed to minimize selection bias effects of pooled database. Results The NACE was not significantly different between the short-term DAPT group (3.9%) and standard DAPT group (7.6%) (HR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.46-1.04; p=0.076) (Figure A). Moreover, MACCE was not different in both groups. However, the significant reduction of bleeding risk was observed in short-term DAPT group (1.4%) than standard DAPT group (3.4%) (hazard ratio (HR): 0.40, 95% confidential interval (CI): 0.19-0.83; p=0.015) (Figure B). These results were consistent after multivariable Cox regression analysis and IPTW analysis. Conclusions Short-term DAPT duration (1 to 3months) was found to be superior to standard DAPT duration (6 to 12months) in terms of bleeding outcomes without the increased ischemic outcomes in patients aged 75 or older with CAD who underwent PCI.

Short vs Standard Duration Dual Antiplatelet Therapy after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with New-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents: A Meta- Analysis

Objective: In patients with coronary artery disease, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is recommended after percutaneous coronaryintervention, but the duration is still debated. This meta-analysis compared short-duration (1 to 3 months) to standard-time (twelve months) double antiplatelet treatment in patients who received coronary intervention with new generation drug eluting Stent.Methodology: To conduct this examination, we methodically looked at PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, Embase, and Web of Sciencedatabases for randomized controlled trials, evaluating varying durations of double antiplatelet treatment following new generation stents implantation from July to September 2023. Seven randomized controlled trials were included with a total of 22,945 patients. The primary efficacy endpoint was the incidence of Major adverse cardiovascular events, such as cardiac mortality, heart attack, stent coagulation, and target vessel revascularization; while the safety endpoint was the incidence major bleeding. Secondary endpoints were major adverse cardiovascular and cerebro-vascular complications, any bleeding, and net adverse cardiovascular incidence for a year after stent implantation.Results: Short-time DAPT was linked to a significantly less incidence of major bleeding (0.8% vs 1.5%), any bleeding (2.5% vs 4.2%)and NACE (2.5% vs 4.2%) compared to standard duration of DAPT. No significant variation was noticed among the two groups regarding major adverse cardiovascular events (4.1% vs. 4.2%) and acute cardiovascular and cerebrovascular incidents (4.7% vs. 4.8%). Short-duration DAPT in patients with acute coronary syndrome was linked with decreased risk of bleeding and net adverse cardiovascular events.Conclusion: Short-duration DAPT significantly lowers bleeding risk and reduces net clinical adverse events without increasing ischemic risk, making it a reasonable choice for people with new-generation drug eluting stents, particularly those with highbleeding risk or recent surgery.

Real-world implementation of a genotype-guided p2y12-inhibitor de-escalation strategy in acute coronary syndrome patients

Abstract Background CYP2C19 genotype-guided de-escalation from ticagrelor or prasugrel to clopidogrel, may optimize the balance between ischemic and bleeding risk in ACS patients. Purpose Compare bleeding and ischemic event rates in genotyped patients versus standard care. Methods Since 2015, ACS patients in the FORCE-ACS registry received standard dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). Since 2021, immediate genotype-guided P2Y12-inhibitor de-escalation was applied, switching non-carriers of the loss-of-function allele CYP2C19*3 or CYP2C19*2 from ticagrelor or prasugrel to clopidogrel, while loss-of-function carriers, carrying at least one loss-of-function allele, remained on ticagrelor or prasugrel. The primary ischemic endpoint, a composite of cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke and the primary bleeding endpoint, BARC 2, 3, or 5 bleeding, were compared between genotyped those on standard DAPT after one year. Results Among 5,321 enrolled ACS patients, 406 underwent genotyping, compared with 4,915 non-genotyped ACS patients on standard DAPT. In the genotyped cohort, 65.3% (n=265) were non-carriers, whereas 34.7% (n=141) were loss-of-function carriers. The primary ischemic endpoint occurred in 5.2% of patients in the genotyped cohort compared to 6.9% in the standard care cohort (adjHR 0.88, 95% CI 0.56–1.38). The rate of the primary bleeding endpoint was lower in the genotyped cohort compared to the standard care cohort (4.7% vs. 9.8%; adjHR 0.50, 95% CI 0.31-0.78). Conclusion These results demonstrate the feasibility of a CYP2C19 genotype-guided P2Y12-inhibitor de-escalation strategy in a real-world ACS population. This strategy reduced bleeding events, while ischemic events were not increased as compared to a standard DAPT regime.Primary ischemic endpointBARC 2, 3 or 5 bleeding

Prevalence and clinical outcomes of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with major trauma

BackgroundThe occurrence and sequelae of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in major trauma patients is underexplored across both trauma and cardiology specialties. Coronary reperfusion greatly reduces the risk of significant morbidity and mortality in AMI. However, in patients presenting with significant injuries, concurrent AMI presents a competing management priority given the increase in risk of bleeding with standard anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy, which may be contraindicated. This study aimed to evaluate the epidemiology and clinical outcomes associated with AMI in a contemporary major trauma cohort. MethodsThis study used data from the Victorian State Trauma Registry (VSTR). All adult patients with major trauma from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2022 were included. Patients that died prior to hospital arrival were excluded. AMI was identified by ICD-10-AM diagnosis codes recorded against the first hospital admission. Clinical outcomes included in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and discharge destination. Results28,928 patients were identified over the 10-year study period. AMI occurred in 401 patients (1.4 %). AMI patients were older, had more comorbidities and were more frequently on anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy. Low impact fall was the most common trauma mechanism in AMI patients. Patients with AMI experienced longer hospital stays (12 [7–20] versus 7 [4–12] days, p < 0.001) and higher rates of in-hospital mortality (adjusted RR 1.45, 95 % CI 1.25–1.65). ConclusionAMI in the setting of major trauma occurs in an older, more comorbid, and vulnerable group of patients. AMI is associated with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality and prolonged hospital stay in the setting of major trauma, underscoring the importance of identifying and treating major trauma associated AMI in a timely and effective manner.

Dynamics of hemostasis system parameters in assessing the risk of complications in the patients with acute myocardial infarction receiving antiplatelet therapy

Background. Current treatment of patients with myocardial infarction is based on the strategy of early invasive coronary intervention in combination with dual antiplatelet therapy - with acetylsalicylic acid and a P2Y12 blocker of platelet adenosine diphosphate receptors. In patients with thrombosis of the infarct-related artery, the phenomenon of “slow/ no reflow” (slowing of blood flow due to distal embolization of the artery), inhibitors of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa platelet receptors are administered as additional disaggregant therapy. In patients undergoing standard antiplatelet therapy in combination with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, there is a risk of hemorrhagic complications, therefore, monitoring of hemostasis parameters is necessary. Currently, there are no standard approaches to monitor the antiplatelet therapy.Objective. To study the dynamics of hemostatic system parameters in patients with acute myocardial infarction during antiplatelet therapy.Material and methods. We assessed platelet aggregation with 10 µmol of adenosine phosphate as an inducer in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with different options of standard antiplatelet therapy in combination with GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors. Group 1 included 20 patients on dual antiplatelet therapy (clopidogrel 75 mg + acetylsalicylic acid 100 mg) + GPIIb/IIIa inhibitor (tirofiban). Group 2 included 15 patients on dual antiplatelet therapy (ticagrelor 180 mg + acetylsalicylic acid 100 mg) + GPIIb/IIIa inhibitor.Results. While on antiplatelet therapy the patients in both groups 1 and 2 demonstrated a decrease in platelet aggregation ability under the impact of adenosine phosphate, relative to the norm: 38 (21;43) % and 14 (11;15) %, respectively, the norm being 79 (73;84) % (p&lt;0.05). Meantime, no thrombotic events in the form of stent thrombosis were noted, which indicated antiplatelet therapy efficacy. In an intragroup comparison, the decrease in the platelet aggregation ability was most pronounced in group 2 (p&lt;0.05). By the 7th day of myocardial infarction, the platelet aggregation had continued to decrease to 26 (17;43) % in group 1, to 10 (7;11) % in group 2. The most pronounced effect of antiplatelet therapy was observed in group 2 (p&lt;0.05), which was manifested by a statistically significant decrease in platelet aggregation ability under the impact of 10 µmol of adenosine phosphate.Conclusions. While studying the hemostasis system changes over time in patients with myocardial infarction receiving antiplatelet therapy, we have found that making the platelet aggregation ability assessment with 10 µmol of adenosine phosphate as an inducer is possible to identify the effect of medications. However, further studies including larger patient groups are needed to determine the target values of platelet aggregation with 10 µmol of adenosine phosphate and assess the therapy efficacy.

Vertebral artery pseudoaneurysm: a rare cause of posterior circulation infarction in a middle-aged man.

Pseudoaneurysm of the vertebral artery is a rare cause of posterior circulation stroke. Treatment for this condition can be achieved through microscopic surgery or endovascular therapy. We report a case of a 36-year-old middle-aged male patient who presented with left limb numbness as the sole complaint. On a magnetic resonance imaging examination, multiple infarcts were observed in the left cerebellar tonsil. A subsequent head and neck computed tomography angiography examination led to the diagnosis of a pseudoaneurysm in the left vertebral artery. Following standard antiplatelet therapy, the patient underwent endovascular intervention. The patient's left limb numbness gradually subsided after surgery. A follow-up angiography performed 1 week after discharge showed no recurrence. These findings suggest that covered stent placement is an effective method of treating pseudoaneurysm of the vertebral artery.

Real-World Implementation of a Genotype-Guided P2Y12 Inhibitor De-Escalation Strategy in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients.

CYP2C19 genotype-guided de-escalation from ticagrelor or prasugrel to clopidogrel may optimize the balance between ischemic and bleeding risk in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This study sought to compare bleeding and ischemic event rates in genotyped patients vs standard care. Since 2015, ACS patients in the multicenter FORCE-ACS (Future Optimal Research and Care Evaluation in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome) registry received standard dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). Since 2021, genotype-guided P2Y12 inhibitor de-escalation was recommended at a single center, switching noncarriers of the loss-of-function allele CYP2C19∗3 or CYP2C19∗2 from ticagrelor or prasugrel to clopidogrel, whereas loss-of-function carriers remained on ticagrelor or prasugrel. The primary ischemic endpoint, a composite of cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, or stroke, and the primary bleeding endpoint, Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 2, 3, or 5 bleeding, were compared between a genotyped cohort and a cohort treated with standard DAPT after 1year. Among 5,321 enrolled ACS patients, 406 underwent genotyping compared with 4,915 nongenotyped ACS patients on standard DAPT. In the genotyped cohort, 65.3% (n=265) were noncarriers, 88.7% (n=235) of whom were switched to clopidogrel. The primary ischemic endpoint occurred in 5.2% (n=21) of patients in the genotyped cohort compared to 6.9% (n=337) in the standard care cohort (adjusted HR: 0.82; 95%CI: 0.53-1.28). The primary bleeding rate was significantly lower in the genotyped cohort compared to the standard care cohort (4.7% vs 9.8%; adjusted HR: 0.47; 95%CI: 0.30-0.76). The implementation of a CYP2C19 genotype-guided P2Y12 inhibitor de-escalation strategy in a real-world ACS population resulted in lower bleeding rates without an increase in ischemic events compared to a standard DAPT regimen.

Initial Experience with the Derivo 2Heal Flow Diverter under Standard or Reduced-Dose Single Antiplatelet Therapy.

Flow diverters with surface modifications or coatings have been recently introduced to clinical practice with the expectation that they can reduce the rate of thromboembolic complications and residual aneurysms. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the utility of the Derivo 2Heal (D2H) device, a new fibrin and heparin-coated flow diverter. Patients treated by a single operator by using the D2H were retrospectively evaluated for demographic data, aneurysm characteristics, procedural variables, and follow-up data. All patients were treated by using a single D2H, monitored by platelet function testing and kept under single antiplatelet therapy with regular or half-dose clopidogrel or prasugrel after the procedure. Twenty patients with 26 aneurysms were treated. Three presented acutely with subarachnoid hemorrhage. Adjunctive devices were used in 6 patients. There were no technical failures and 2 periprocedural self-limited nonthrombotic minor adverse events. During follow-up, 1 of the acutely ruptured aneurysms reruptured, and 1 patient had a visual TIA. All patients were doing well clinically (19 with mRS of 0 and 1 with 1) at the last follow-up after discharge. The rates of total occlusion on very early angiographic (MRA/CTA or DSA, mean: 2.4 months), DSA (mean: 5.8 months), and midterm angiographic (mean: 14.5 months) follow-up for all versus uncoiled aneurysms were 68% versus 70%, 77.8% versus 90.0%, and 91.7% versus 90.1%, respectively. The absence of permanent neurologic deficits in the periprocedural period and favorable occlusion rates in this preliminary study suggest that the novel coating comprising fibrin and heparin may have the potential to increase the safety and efficacy of flow diversion and needs to be further studied by comparing the D2H device with its bare counterpart and other coated or surface-modified flow diverters.

Thromboelastography-Guided Antiplatelet Therapy for Patients with Ischemic Cerebrocardiovascular Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The effectiveness of thromboelastography (TEG)-guided antiplatelet therapy in patients with ischemic cerebrocardiovascular diseases is not well-established. This systematic review evaluates the efficacy and safety of TEG-guided antiplatelet therapy compared to standard treatment in patients with ischemic cerebrocardiovascular diseases. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing TEG-guided antiplatelet therapy with standard therapy in patients suffering from ischemic stroke (IS) or coronary artery disease (CAD) were identified. The primary efficacy measure was a composite of ischemic and hemorrhagic events. Secondary efficacy measures included any ischemic events, while safety was assessed by the occurrence of bleeding events. Ten studies involving 4 RCTs and 6 observational studies with a total of 1,678 patients were included. When considering a composite of ischemic and hemorrhagic events in RCTs, a significant reduction was observed in IS or CAD patients under TEG-guided therapy compared to standard therapy (OR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.27-0.75, p = 0.002). After pooling RCTs and observational studies together, compared to standard antiplatelet therapy, TEG-guided therapy significantly reduced the risk of a composite of ischemic and hemorrhagic events (OR: 0.26, 95% CI: 0.19-0.37; p &lt; 0.00001), ischemic events (OR: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.19-0.41; p &lt; 0.00001), and bleeding events (OR: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.16-0.62; p = 0.0009) in patients with IS or CAD. TEG-guided antiplatelet therapy appears to be both effective and safe for patients with IS or CAD. These findings support the use of TEG testing to tailor antiplatelet therapy in individuals with ischemic cerebrocardiovascular diseases.

Abbreviated Versus Standard Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Times After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With High Bleeding Risk With Acute Coronary Syndrome: Insights From the SWEDEHEART Registry.

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) reduces ischemic events but increases bleeding risk, especially in patients with high bleeding risk (HBR). This study aimed to compare outcomes of abbreviated versus standard DAPT strategies in patients with HBR with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Patients from the SWEDEHEART (Swedish Web-system for Enhancement and Development of Evidence-Based Bare in Heart Disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies) registry with at least 1 HBR criterion who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome were identified and included. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on their planned DAPT time at discharge: 12-month DAPT or an abbreviated DAPT strategy and matched according to their prescribed P2Y12 inhibitor at discharge. The primary outcome assessed was time to net adverse clinical events at 1 year, which encompassed cardiac death, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or clinically significant bleeding. Time to major adverse cardiovascular events and the individual components of net adverse clinical events were considered secondary end points. A total of 4583 patients were included in each group. The most frequently met HBR criteria was age older than 75 years (65.6%) and Predicting Bleeding Complications in Patients Undergoing Stent Implantation and Subsequent Dual Antiplatelet Therapy score ≥25 (44.6%) in the standard DAPT group and oral anticoagulant therapy (79.6%) and age 75 years and older (55.2%) in the abbreviated DAPT group. There was no statistically significant difference in net adverse clinical events (12.9% versus 13.1%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.99 [95% CI, 0.88-1.11], P=0.83), major adverse cardiovascular events (8.6% versus 7.9%; HR, 1.08 [95% CI, 0.94-1.25]), or their components between groups. The results were consistent among all of the investigated subgroups. In patients with HBR undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention due to acute coronary syndrome, abbreviated DAPT was associated with comparable rates of net adverse clinical events and major adverse cardiovascular events to a DAPT duration of 12 months.

Short-term (1-3 months) versus standard (12 months) dual antiplatelet therapy following new-generation drug-eluting stent implantation: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention mainly receive antiplatelet therapy. However, limited data are available regarding the optimal dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) following the implantation of new-generation drug-eluting stent (DES). This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of short-term (1-3 months) DAPT and standard (12 months) DAPT after the implantation of a new-generation of DES. We systematically searched PubMed, The Cochrane Library Database, Embase for trials that compared short-term (1-3 months) and standard DAPT after the implantation of next-generation DES were retrieved from all published studies in English until December 31, 2021. The primary endpoint was major bleeding. The secondary endpoints included all-cause mortality, cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stroke, stent thrombosis, and all bleeding. This study included a total of 7 randomized controlled trials, comprising 28,344 subjects. Regarding primary endpoints, short-term DAPT exhibited a significantly lower incidence of major bleeding compared with standard DAPT [relative risk (RR): 0.66, 95% confidence interval (CI): (0.54, 0.81), P < .0001]. For secondary endpoints, there were significant differences between short-term and standard DAPT in all bleeding [RR: 0.59, 95% CI: (0.50, 0.69), P < .00001]. However, no significant differences were identified in all-cause mortality [RR: 0.96, 95% CI: (0.77, 1.18), P = .27], myocardial infarction [RR: 0.98, 95% CI: (0.82, 1.18), P = .86], cardiac death [RR: 0.83, 95% CI: (0.63, 1.10), P = .20], stroke [RR: 1.08, 95% CI: (0.79, 1.47), P = .63], cerebrovascular [RR: 1.08, 95% CI: (0.79, 1.47), P = .63], and stent thrombosis [RR: 1.13, 95% CI: (0.80, 1.57), P = .49] between the 2 groups. In patients undergoing implantation of a new-generation of DES, short-term (1-3 months) DAPT exhibited no inferiority compared with standard (12 months) DAPT in terms of all-cause mortality, cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and definite or probable stent thrombosis compared with standard (12 months) DAPT. However, short-term DAPT appeared superior to standard DAPT in terms of major bleeding and all bleeding.

P2Y12 monotherapy versus standard dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements None. Introduction Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the recommended therapy for lowering the ischemic risk among patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, the increased incidence of bleeding is a major concern. Monotherapy with a P2Y12 inhibitor after short-term DAPT to reduce adverse cardiovascular events and bleeding rates has not been fully established and remains uncertain. This meta-analysis aims to determine the effectiveness of P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after short-term DAPT in reducing cardiovascular and bleeding events. Methods A comprehensive search of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the use of short-term DAPT followed by P2Y12 monotherapy in patients with ACS who underwent PCI was conducted. Outcome measures for all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and bleeding rates were analyzed using a random-effects model via Review Manager V5.4. Results A total of six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 36,724 subjects were analyzed. There were no significant differences in all-cause mortality (RR 0.89 [95% CI: 0.78-1.02], I² = 0%, p = 0.10) and myocardial infarction (RR 1.00 [95% CI: 0.88-1.14], I² = 0%, p = 0.72) between the P2Y12 inhibitor group and dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) group. There was a lower rate of major bleeding in the P2Y12 group compared to the DAPT group (RR 0.65 [95% CI: 0.49-0.88], I² = 76%, p = 0.002). The major sources of substantial heterogeneity are due to different intervals of de-escalation and baseline risk factors prior to PCI in each study. Conclusion P2Y12 monotherapy has similar rates of all-cause mortality and myocardial infarction. However, early de-escalation leads to a lower incidence of bleeding. P2Y12 monotherapy showed a 35% decreased risk of bleeding compared to the DAPT strategy. This suggests that P2Y12 monotherapy is a preferable antiplatelet strategy in patients undergoing PCI, especially in the high-risk bleeding population.

Current Strategies to Guide the Antiplatelet Therapy in Acute Coronary Syndromes.

The role of antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndromes is a moving target with considerable novelty in the last few years. The pathophysiological basis of the treatment depends on platelet biology and physiology, and the interplay between these aspects and clinical practice must guide the physician in determining the best therapeutic options for patients with acute coronary syndromes. In the present narrative review, we discuss the latest novelties in the antiplatelet therapy of patients with acute coronary syndromes. We start with a description of platelet biology and the role of the main platelet signal pathways involved in platelet aggregation during an acute coronary syndrome. Then, we present the latest evidence on the evaluation of platelet function, focusing on the strengths and weaknesses of each platelet's function test. We continue our review by describing the role of aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitors in the treatment of acute coronary syndromes, critically appraising the available evidence from clinical trials, and providing current international guidelines and recommendations. Finally, we describe alternative therapeutic regimens to standard dual antiplatelet therapy, in particular for patients at high bleeding risk. The aim of our review is to give a comprehensive representation of current data on antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndromes that could be useful both for clinicians and basic science researchers to be up-to-date on this complex topic.

Analysis of the therapeutic effect of aspiration thrombectomy for early carotid stent thrombosis

Objective: To investigate the clinical characteristics and the efficacy of thrombus aspiration in patients with early intrastent thrombosis (EST) following carotid artery stenting (CAS). Methods: This study is a retrospective case series, collecting clinical data of five patients who developed EST after CAS in the Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University from January 2021 to September 2023.All patients were male, with an age of (64.0±11.9) years (range:48 to 77 years), accounting for 2.0% (5/244) of CAS procedures during the same period.Among them, three patients did not receive standard dual antiplatelet therapy before the procedure, and one had an inadequate ADP inhibition rate (45.6%).Four patients received XACT carotid stents, while one received a Wallstent carotid stent.All five patients showed significant residual stenosis ranging from 43% to 55% after CAS.Emergency thrombus aspiration was performed in all cases, and data regarding perioperative conditions, vascular patency, and clinical outcomes were collected. Results: The interval between CAS and the occurrence of EST ranged from 3 hours to 14 days.The main clinical symptoms included sudden onset of consciousness disorders and contralateral limb weakness.None of the patients received preoperative intravenous thrombolysis, and thrombus aspiration was performed during the procedure to restore vascular patency.Four cases underwent balloon angioplasty during the procedure, and two cases utilized overlapping stents.Two patients experienced intraoperative embolization of thrombus to the C2 segment.In one case, the embolized thrombus was retrieved using an intracranial thrombectomy stent, while in another case, it was aspirated using a guiding catheter.Postoperatively, all patients had a thrombolysis in cerebral infarction grade of 3, and symptoms improved in four cases.One patient showed no improvement in symptoms, and MRI revealed extensive new infarction in the right frontal and insular regions, adjacent to the right lateral ventricle.Regular follow-up examinations after discharge did not reveal restenosis or embolism within the stent.The follow-up period ranged from 7.6 to 21.2 months, with modified Rankin scale scores of 0 to 1 point in four cases and 2 points in one case, indicating good recovery in all patients. Conclusions: Acute intrastent thrombosis is a rare complication after carotid artery stenting.The combined use of percutaneous thrombus aspiration and endovascular techniques, such as balloon angioplasty and stent overlapping, can rapidly restore vessel patency with favorable outcomes.However, further large-scale clinical studies are needed to confirm the effectiveness of these treatments for acute intrastent thrombosis.

Geographical Variations in the Effectiveness and Safety of Abbreviated or Standard Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients at High Bleeding Risk

Geographical Variations in the Effectiveness and Safety of Abbreviated or Standard Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients at High Bleeding Risk

Safety and efficacy of factor XIa inhibition with milvexian for secondary stroke prevention (AXIOMATIC-SSP): a phase 2, international, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding trial

People with factor XI deficiency have lower rates of ischaemic stroke than the general population and infrequent spontaneous bleeding, suggesting that factor XI has a more important role in thrombosis than in haemostasis. Milvexian, an oral small-molecule inhibitor of activated factor XI, added to standard antiplatelet therapy, might reduce the risk of non-cardioembolic ischaemic stroke without increasing the risk of bleeding. We aimed to estimate the dose-response of milvexian for recurrent ischaemic cerebral events and major bleeding in patients with recent ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA). AXIOMATIC-SSP was a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding trial done at 367 hospitals in 27 countries. Eligible participants aged 40 years or older, with acute (<48 h) ischaemic stroke or high-risk TIA, were randomly assigned by a web-based interactive response system in a 1:1:1:1:1:2 ratio to receive one of five doses of milvexian (25 mg once daily, 25 mg twice daily, 50 mg twice daily, 100 mg twice daily, or 200 mg twice daily) or matching placebo twice daily for 90 days. All participants received clopidogrel 75 mg daily for the first 21 days and aspirin 100 mg daily for the first 90 days. Investigators, site staff, and participants were masked to treatment assignment. The primary efficacy endpoint was the composite of ischaemic stroke or incident covert brain infarct on MRI at 90 days, assessed in all participants allocated to treatment who completed a follow-up MRI brain scan, and the primary analysis assessed the dose-response relationship with Multiple Comparison Procedure-Modelling (MCP-MOD). The main safety outcome was major bleeding at 90 days, assessed in all participants who received at least one dose of the study drug. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03766581) and the EU Clinical Trials Register (2017-005029-19). Between Jan 27, 2019, and Dec 24, 2021, 2366 participants were randomly allocated to placebo (n=691); milvexian 25 mg once daily (n=328); or twice-daily doses of milvexian 25 mg (n=318), 50 mg (n=328), 100 mg (n=310), or 200 mg (n=351). The median age of participants was 71 (IQR 62-77) years and 859 (36%) were female. At 90 days, the estimates of the percentage of participants with either symptomatic ischaemic stroke or covert brain infarcts were 16·8 (90·2% CI 14·5-19·1) for placebo, 16·7 (14·8-18·6) for 25 mg milvexian once daily, 16·6 (14·8-18·3) for 25 mg twice daily, 15·6 (13·9-17·5) for 50 mg twice daily, 15·4 (13·4-17·6) for 100 mg twice daily, and 15·3 (12·8-19·7) for 200 mg twice daily. No significant dose-response was observed among the five milvexian doses for the primary composite efficacy outcome. Model-based estimates of the relative risk with milvexian compared with placebo were 0·99 (90·2% CI 0·91-1·05) for 25 mg once daily, 0·99 (0·87-1·11) for 25 mg twice daily, 0·93 (0·78-1·11) for 50 mg twice daily, 0·92 (0·75-1·13) for 100 mg twice daily, and 0·91 (0·72-1·26) for 200 mg twice daily. No apparent dose-response was observed for major bleeding (four [1%] of 682 participants with placebo, two [1%] of 325 with milvexian 25 mg once daily, two [1%] of 313 with 25 mg twice daily, five [2%] of 325 with 50 mg twice daily, five [2%] of 306 with 100 mg twice daily, and five [1%] of 344 with 200 mg twice daily). Five treatment-emergent deaths occurred, four of which were considered unrelated to the study drug by the investigator. Factor XIa inhibition with milvexian, added to dual antiplatelet therapy, did not substantially reduce the composite outcome of symptomatic ischaemic stroke or covert brain infarction and did not meaningfully increase the risk of major bleeding. Findings from our study have informed the design of a phase 3 trial of milvexian for the prevention of ischaemic stroke in patients with acute ischaemic stroke or TIA. Bristol Myers Squibb and Janssen Research & Development.