Standard Anterior Portals Research Articles

Clinical Outcomes Following Treatment of Ramp Lesion during Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis)

Abstract Background Ramp lesion is defined as a vertical longitudinal detatchment of PHMM due to meniscocapsular ligament tears that is not greater than 2 cm in medio-lateral length resulting in separation of meniscocapsular or meniscotibial ligament. Aim of the Work The study aims to perform a systemic review and meta analysis concerning outcomes of ramp lesion repair during ACL reconstruction. Methodology Systematic review and Meta-analysis on Patients with ramp lesion undergoing ACL reconstruction and ramp lesion treatment with total of 387 studies matched our search terms. After exclusion of duplicates, 37 studies were initially included based on their Abstract. 27 studies were finally included. The average MINORS score of all non-randomised studies was 8.7/16 for non- comparative studies and 16.9/24 for comparative studies, respectively. Results Our results suggest that medial meniscus repair associated with ACL reconstruction may restore meniscal function by adjusting the anteroposterior length of the torn medial meniscus. Our data demonstrate that more than 75% of medial meniscal tears in the ACL-deficient knee occur in the peripheral posterior horn. If we assume that the anatomy as described by Hughston and Eilers is correct, then care should be taken when addressing these tears, because a strong repair is needed to preserve the stability of the knee. Conclusion MRI demonstrated moderate sensitivity and excellent specificity in the diagnosis of ramp lesion in patients with ACL tear. According to the current systematic review, ramp lesions are common in ACL-deficient knees and are often missed through standard anterior portals. Exploration of the meniscocapsular complex via an additional posteromedial portal is recommended, if MRI suggests a lesion in this area or if instability is present at probing. If the posteromedial view still does not reveal any lesion despite significant instability, soft-tissue debridement might uncover hidden lesions (meniscotibial ligament disruptions). Ramp lesion repair leads to a significant improvement of subjective knee scores, regardless of the specific fixation technique. For stable ramp lesions, trephination and abrasion might be equivalent to ramp lesion repair in terms of postoperative stability.

Arthroscopic Trans-septal Portal of the Knee With Direct Visualization and No Need for Posterolateral Portal Creation

Arthroscopic visualization and access of the posterior knee are limited when using standard anterior and posterior portals. The creation of a trans-septal portal allows for complete access to the posterior compartment as arthroscopic instruments are able to be passed back and forth between the posteromedial and posterolateral compartments. Due to the close proximity of the popliteal artery and its branches, precise portal placement and safe orientation of arthroscopic instruments are critical to avoid iatrogenic injury. The conventional technique of trans-septal portal creation, involving a posterolateral portal, can be difficult in some cases. To overcome these obstacles, a posteromedial technique of trans-septal portal creation is presented. By using the medial parapatellar portal as the viewing portal, our technique allows for direct visualization of the posterior septum on each step of creation of the trans-septal portal, eliminating the need for “blind” maneuvers. What is more, no posterolateral portal is needed, decreasing the risk of potential complications. Using the posterior cruciate ligament fibers as a main landmark for trans-septal portal placement, preservation of the posterior part of the septum is achieved. This ensures optimal safe-margin distance away from the popliteal neurovascular bundle and making the technique safe and reproducible.

PREVALENCE OF RAMP LESION IN ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT INJURIES INCREASES WITH DELAYS

AbstractIntroductionThe medial meniscus is crescent shaped and it is wider posteriorly than anteriorly. It covers up to 60 % of the articular surface of medial tibial condyle and helps with the loading distribution in the medial compartment. Meniscal lesions occur in association with ACL tears in 60 % of the time. The posterior aspect of the menisco-capsular junction is known as the meniscal rampzone. If not addressed during surgery, it could lead to unfavourable results.ObjectiveIncidence of ramp lesion following ACL injuries.MethodsObservational study of 100 patients at EL Hadara Main University Hospital who underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. MRI and arthroscopic diagnosis was done to detect Ramp lesions associated with ACL ruptures in November 2017 till November 2019.ResultsIncidence was 9%. Duration of injury and increased medial meniscal slope were associated with increased incidence of ramp lesion. MRI signs were present in 79% of cases without Ramp lesion, 100% in Cases with ramp lesion. Mode of Injury and presence of locking or giving way symptoms were not associated with increased incidence.ConclusionThe ramp lesion at the posterior aspect of the meniscus is difficult to visualize from standard anterior portals and is, therefore, frequently missed and can be underestimated. Also, there are no specific MRI signs of this lesion. The overall incidence of ramp lesions in 100 cases that had undergone ACL reconstruction in our study was 9 %. It was found also that the longer the duration from injury, the more likely ramp lesion would occur.Declaration of Interest(b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project.

Arthroscopic Superior Capsular Reconstruction

Background: Limited options exist for young patients with massive, irreparable rotator cuff tears. While several treatment options exist, superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) was developed to restore glenohumeral joint stability by preventing superior humeral head migration during glenohumeral motion. Indications: Arthroscopic SCR is indicated in young patients with a massive, irreparable rotator cuff tear. Patients require a functioning deltoid muscle with minimal to no glenohumeral joint arthritis. In addition, patients should have Hamada grade 2 or less and should have an intact or repairable subscapularis tendon. Technique Description: The patient is positioned in the beach chair position. Standard anterior, posterior, and mid-lateral portals are established. An accessory posterior-superior lateral portal is used for visualization. Three 3.0 mm knotless anchors are placed in the glenoid through lateral percutaneous incisions. Two 4.75 mm anchors are placed adjacent to the humeral articular cartilage for medial row fixation. The graft dimensions are measured using the distance between the anchors. The graft is prepared using a gown card as a template with 5 mm added to the medial, posterior, and anterior graft dimensions, and 10 mm added to the lateral dimension. Sutures are passed through the graft in an inverted horizontal mattress for the glenoid anchors to diminish friction and allow appropriate suture passage through the knotless mechanism of the anchor. The graft is then shuttled into the joint through a lateral PassPort button cannula. Two lateral row anchors are used to secure the lateral graft on the humerus. Native rotator cuff tissue is repaired to the graft using sutures from the medial row anchors as well as free SutureTape. Results: Outcomes following SCR have demonstrated improvements in clinical outcomes and shoulder range of motion. Similar outcomes have been identified between the use of allograft and autograft. Patients generally are able to return to light recreational activities and work. Discussion/Conclusion: Arthroscopic SCR yields favorable results in the setting of a massive, irreparable rotator cuff tear. Meticulous surgical technique is needed to avoid intraoperative surgical complications. The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Arthroscopic Double-Row Rotator Cuff Repair With Box Configuration

Background: Arthroscopic transosseous-equivalent (TOE) techniques may offer additional advantages, including a more efficient surgery with a self-reinforcing construct with equivalent clinical results to medial knotted TOE repair for rotator cuff tears (RCTs). Indications: An arthroscopic knotless double-row (DR) rotator cuff repair (RCR) using FiberTak RC anchors for medial row fixation with box configuration may be an appropriate construct for operatively indicated small-to-moderate full-thickness RCTs. Technique: Our modified technique uses TOE repair principles to address RCTs too small for traditional 4.75-mm anchors using medial row fixation and too large to apply a single medial to lateral anchor repair. The patient is placed in a beach chair position. In addition to standard anterior and posterior portals, a lower lateral working portal and a higher posterolateral viewing portal are made. Subsequent to supraspinatus footprint visualization/preparation, two 2.6-mm FiberTak RC anchors each loaded with 1 LabralTape and 1 FiberWire are placed medially. The 4 sets of sutures for one anchor are placed through the rotator cuff tendon together in 1 spot and the process is repeated for the second anchor. One FiberWire from each anchor is then tied extracorporeally and then a double pulley technique is used to compress the medial aspect of the repair at the footprint in a box configuration. Finally, 1 limb of LabralTape from each of the medial anchors along with the corresponding FiberWire is secured through 2 lateral-row 4.75-mm anchors anteriorly and posteriorly to restore the lateral footprint and secure the rotator cuff in TOE box configuration. This modified technique can provide anatomical compression of the rotator cuff tendon at the footprint with additional medial compression achieved by the box configuration while taking advantage of knotless fixation. Results: Postoperatively, a sling is worn for 4 weeks, passive range of motion (ROM) is initiated at 2 weeks, active ROM is begun at 6 weeks, and strengthening at 3 months. Patients may return to full unrestricted activities around 5 to 6 months. Discussion/Conclusion: A modified arthroscopic DR RCR with box configuration is an excellent treatment option for patients with small-to-moderate full-thickness RCT who fail conservative treatment. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Arthroscopic Repair of a “Floating” Posterior Inferior Glenohumeral Ligament

Background: Combined posterior glenoid labrum lesions with posterior humeral avulsion of the glenohumeral ligament, also known as the “floating” posterior inferior glenohumeral ligament (PIGL), occur infrequently. These combined lesions are frequently missed on magnetic resonance imaging in the workup of posterior shoulder instability. Correct identification of the “floating” PIGL lesion allows for appropriate preoperative planning and treatment to decrease the risk of recurrent posterior shoulder instability. Indications: A “floating” PIGL lesion is a cause of posterior shoulder instability and demonstrates increased translation when compared with isolated labral lesions. Surgical repair of an acute “floating” PIGL lesion with concomitant superior labral tear is described. Technique Description: The patient is placed in the lateral decubitus position. Standard posterior and anterior portals are created. In this case, a superior labral tear with anterior labral tear extension was also identified and repaired. The posterior labrum was repaired prior to the posterior humeral avulsion of the glenohumeral ligament (HAGL). The torn posterior labrum is mobilized and glenoid bony bed prepared. Short, 2.9-mm biocomposite knotless suture anchors loaded with suture tape are used for labral fixation. A 70° arthroscope is used to visualize the posterior HAGL from the anterior cannula and an additional posterior inferior portal established. The footprint of PIGL on the humerus is identified, debrided, and two 3.0-mm anchors loaded with suture placed. The sutures are passed through the capsule and PIGL and tied in a mattress pattern external to the capsule and ligament. The posterior portals are closed with nonabsorbable suture. Results: While few outcomes are described in the literature for the “floating” PIGL, the literature suggests good outcomes following surgical repair. Conclusion: The “floating” PIGL lesion is a rare cause of posterior shoulder instability. It is important to perform a thorough evaluation for concomitant pathology in patients with posterior shoulder instability as multiple structures can be injured. Arthroscopic repair of the posterior labrum and posterior humeral avulsion of the glenohumeral ligament can be performed to restore posterior stability to the shoulder in the setting of a “floating” PIGL.

Short-Term Outcomes After Treatment of Isolated Hidden Meniscal Ramp Lesions.

Background:Ramp lesions are encountered in 16% to 24% of all anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures. However, isolated ramp lesions without a ruptured ACL have also been reported.Purpose:To evaluate outcomes after type 3 hidden ramp lesions without ACL rupture were treated with all-inside sutures passed through the standard anterior portal.Study Design:Case series, Level of evidence, 4.Methods:Included were 41 patients (26 female; 63.4%) with isolated type 3 ramp lesions who underwent surgery between January 2017 and January 2019. Patients with concomitant lateral meniscal injuries and revision meniscal surgeries were excluded. We retrospectively recorded patient age, sex, and body mass index (BMI), as well as follow-up periods, comorbidities, and postoperative and early midterm complications. The Lysholm, visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores were compared preoperatively to final follow-up. In addition, patients were classified as having either a sedentary or active lifestyle according to Sedentary Behavior Research Network (SBRN) criteria. The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to evaluate the normality of the data, and the Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare preoperative and postoperative outcome scores. The Spearman test was employed to evaluate the correlation between patient variables.Results:The mean follow-up period was at 37.6 (range, 25-49) months. A total of 17 patients (41.46%) had a sedentary lifestyle based on SBRN criteria. All scores improved significantly from preoperatively to final follow-up (VAS, from 8.43 ± 1.53 to 2.34 ± 2.9; Lysholm, from 47.73 ± 17.02 to 85.37 ± 14.01; and IKDC, from 27.12 ± 14.81 to 85.32 ± 8.78; P < .001 for all). Although no significant relationship was established between patient activity level and postoperative Lysholm and IKDC scores, an inverse correlation was observed between BMI and Lysholm (r =–0.9906) and BMI and IKDC (r =–0.9402).Conclusion:Satisfactory postoperative clinical results were obtained in patients with type 3 ramp lesions not accompanied by ACL rupture who were treated with all-inside suturing through standard anterior portals.

Arthroscopic Distal Tibial Allograft for Posterior Glenoid Reconstruction

Background: Posterior glenoid bone loss occurs in more than two-thirds of patients with posterior glenohumeral instability, with 14% to 22% having greater than subcritical bone loss (13.5%), a marker for potential need for bony augmentation versus soft tissue-only procedures. Several techniques are described to augment either the version or volume of the glenoid surface including osteotomies, autograft transfers, and allograft tibia transfers. Indications: Arthroscopic-assisted allograft distal tibia bone block augmentation to the posterior glenoid is indicated for revision posterior instability procedures with posterior bone loss and in primary cases of posterior instability with critical bone loss. Technique Description: Arthroscopic posterior glenoid reconstruction with allograft distal tibia and posterior labral repair in the lateral position is presented. This technique uses standard instrument sets and requires no patient repositioning. The preplanned tibial bone block is prepared on a back table either prior to, or concurrently with, arthroscopic procedure. After creation of high posterior portal and standard anterior portal, a sucker-shaver and burr are used to create a perpendicular edge for apposition of the allograft tibia. The bone block is introduced through a longitudinal incision and underdelivered to the prepared surface under the liberated labrum. The articular surface of the graft and glenoid are aligned and cannulated screws are used to compress the bone block against the native glenoid. The posterior labral tissue is then mobilized over the graft and repaired to the native glenoid. Results: Arthroscopic distal tibial allograft augmentation for posterior bone loss restored stability and function in a small cohort of patients. Patients reported improved stability in the immediate postoperative course, with restoration of motion by 2 months. Push-ups, pull-ups, and return to full active duty without restrictions is allowed at 6 months postoperatively. Imaging at 3 months postoperatively has shown excellent graft healing. Discussion: The benefits of allograft tibia augmentation for posterior instability with glenoid bone loss include an anatomic joint surface restoration including articular cartilage, lack of donor site morbidity, and a minimally invasive approach. When performed arthroscopically, this technique permits concurrent posterior labral repair and anatomic reconstruction.

CHALLENGES IN SMALL KNEE ARTHROSCOPY: A QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE PEDIATRIC CADAVERIC EXPERIENCE

Background:Arthroscopy may be utilized for treatment of septic arthritis of the pediatric knee, with success reported in ages from 3 months to 12 years. There is limited data on the ability to arthroscopically assess articular structures and ensure adequate evaluation without arthrotomy.Hypothesis/Purpose:The purpose of this study is: (1) utilize arthroscopy in small cadaveric knees to improve qualitative and quantitative knowledge of pediatric articular structures and (2) to obtain pilot data for common procedures performed in pediatric patientsMethods:Five small pediatric cadaveric specimens (1-4 years) underwent arthroscopy (2.7 mm Stryker arthroscope). Medial and lateral compartments were assessed for meniscus size/mobility/height, compartmental joint space, ACL insertion, patellar chondral height and length, and position of the medial patellofemoral ligament were recorded. Utilizing standard anterior medial and lateral portals, the ability to visualize the structures of the posteromedial and posterolateral compartments was recorded. Procedures pertinent to immature ACL reconstruction and meniscal repair (unstable discoid) were critically evaluated to provide source data for future work.Results:Prior to arthroscopy, all specimens underwent volume-assessed knee insufflation (average 11.4 cc normal saline). Arthroscopic visualization of the menisco-capsular attachment was possible posteromedially in 4/6, and posterolaterally in 5/6 knees. Qualitative arthroscopic relationships were similar to adult references; including patellar-trochlear articulation and lateral meniscal positional relationship to the ACL insertion (see Figure 1). The ACL center was within 2 mm of the posterior aspect of the anterior horn of the lateral meniscus in all specimens. The average height of the medial compartment space under valgus load was 1.5 mm (1 – 2 mm), and lateral space under varus was 2.2 mm (2-3 mm); further emphasizing the need for small joint instruments. The width of the medial and lateral menisci are noted in Table 1. All-inside meniscal devices designed for skeletally mature specimens should be used with caution (Figure 1). Traditionally described inside-out technique for immature ACL reconstruction with an iliotibial band demonstrated significant proximity of the passing device to the neurovascular bundle (Figure 1).Conclusion:The entirety of the small knee is assessable via standard diagnostic arthroscopy, when a 2.7mm arthroscope is utilized. These findings suggest that intra-articular pathology can be reliably identified utilizing this surgical technique. However, the ability to work on the infant meniscus and cartilage with standard arthroscopic instruments is likely limited given the constraints of joint height.Table 1.Meniscal width of the medial and lateral meniscus as measure by a microprobe. Figure 1.Arthroscopic and gross images of an infant cadaveric knee 11 year old). (A) ACL insertion into the tibia. Note the relationship of the anterior horn of the lateral meniscus to the ACL Insertion. (B) The patellocrochiear articulation with a well formed troctilea, (C) Medial patellofemoral ligament as it inserts onto the patella. Marking in the ligament 1') indicates centroid of the ligament based on superficial anatomy. (D) Pilot study of placement of an all-inside meniscal repair device (Stryker AIR) The size of implant is 70% of the height of the lateral meniscus, .1E) Image of a dissected popliteal fossa of a small knee. Curved clamp )black arrow) was placed as if to facilitate passage of the !Thin a extra-articular ACL reconstruction with the dicta:fiat hand. Note the proximity to the posterior neurovascular structures (Yellow = artery; blue = nerve).

Arthroscopic Standard Anterior and Posteromedial Portal Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Remnant Preservation : 2-Year Follow-up

BACKGROUND: Grade 3 posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injury needs surgical intervention, but there is no consensus on the optimal technique in PCL reconstruction. The old technique always removes the remnant for good visualization of tunnel replacement. Recently, many studies proposed the concept of preservation of PCL remnant with achieve good visualization.&#x0D; AIM: The aim of the study is to evaluate PCL reconstruction with remnant preservation using the standard anterior and posteromedial portal at 2-year follow-up.&#x0D; METHODS: We conducted a cohort retrospective study between January 2013 and December 2015. In this study, 25 patients underwent PCL reconstruction using the standard anterior and posteromedial portal with remnant preservation. We used quadrupled hamstring autograft. The patients were assessed using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm Knee Score, Modified Cincinnati Score, and knee society score (KSS) at pre-operative and 2-year post-operative. Range of motion (ROM) and complications were evaluated postoperatively.&#x0D; RESULTS: The mean diameter of the quadruple hamstring graft was 8 mm. Clinical outcomes enhanced significantly (p &lt; 0.05). The average of Lysholm activity scale improved from 65.12 ± 10.48 to 94.96 ± 4.80. The IKDC score improved from 60.50 ± 15.10 to 95.60 ± 3.44. Modified Cincinnati score improved from 62. 28 ± 13.6 to 96.04 ± 1.62. The KSS also improved from 60.12 ± 18.01 to 94.88 ± 6.36. Twenty-two patients had 0–135° full ROM and three patients had 0–110° ROM. Two patients had surgical site infection but recovered with local debridement.&#x0D; CONCLUSION: PCL reconstruction using the standard anterior and posteromedial portal with remnant preservation at 2-year follow-up resulted in satisfactory clinical and functional outcomes.

Anatomic Evaluation of the Interportal Capsulotomy Made with the Modified Anterior Portal versus Standard Anterior Portal: Comparable Utility with Decreased Capsule Morbidity.

PurposeTo identify potential differences in interportal capsulotomy size and cross-sectional area (CSA) using the anterolateral portal (ALP) and either the: (i) standard anterior portal (SAP) or (ii) modified anterior portal (MAP).Materials and MethodsTen cadaveric hemi pelvis specimens were included. A standard arthroscopic ALP was created. Hips were randomized to SAP (n=5) or MAP (n=5) groups. The spinal needle was placed at the center of the anterior triangle or directly adjacent to the ALP in the SAP and MAP groups, respectively. A capsulotomy was created by inserting the knife through the SAP or MAP. The length and width of each capsulotomy was measured using digital calipers under direct visualization. The CSA and length of the capsulotomy as a percentage of total iliofemoral ligament (IFL) side-to-side width were calculated.ResultsThere were no differences in mean cadaveric age, weight or IFL dimensions between the groups. Capsulotomy CSA was significantly larger in the SAP group compared with the MAP group (SAP 2.16±0.64 cm2 vs. MAP 0.65±0.17 cm2, P=0.008). Capsulotomy length as a percentage of total IFL width was significantly longer in the SAP group compared with the MAP group (SAP 74.2±14.1% vs. MAP 32.4±3.7%, P=0.008).ConclusionThe CSA of the capsulotomy and the percentage of the total IFL width disrupted are significantly smaller when the interportal capsulotomy is performed between the ALP and MAP portals, compared to the one created between the ALP and SAP. Surgeons should be aware of this fact when performing hip arthroscopy.

Different Techniques for the Management of Meniscal Ramp Lesions Using Standard Anterior Portals

There is strong association between meniscal lesions and anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Recently, light was shown on a new entity: ramp lesions. The incidence of these lesions and their management is still unclear. Although some believe that some lesions, when stable, can be managed conservatively, most surgeons repair ramp tears. Accessibility of these tears is challenging; they are best accessed through posterior portals, which is time-consuming and poses potential risk to vital structures. Our technique allows access to and management of ramp lesions through safe standard anterior portals. Ramp lesions are searched for as a routine step during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by advancing the scope through the intercondylar notch just beside the medial femoral condyle. If a lesion is found, it is repaired; only very stable small tears are treated with needling to refresh the edges and induce a healing response. A simple suture, horizontal mattress suture, or a circumferential stitch is used.

Arthroscopic Standard Anterior and Posteromedial Portal Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Remnant Preservation: 2-Year Follow-up

Background: Grade 3 Posterior Cruciate Ligament (PCL) injury needs surgical intervention, but there is no consensus on the optimal technique in PCL reconstruction. The old technique always removes the remnant for good visualization of tunnel replacement. Recently, many studies proposed the concept of the preservation of PCL remnant with achieving good visualization. The aim of the study is to evaluate PCL reconstruction with remnant preservation using the standard anterior and posteromedial portal at 2-years follow-up. Methods: We conducted a cohort retrospective study between January 2013 to December 2015. In this study, 25 patients underwent PCL reconstruction using standard anterior and posteromedial portal with remnant preservation. We used quadrupled hamstring autograft. The patients were assessed using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm knee score, Modified Cincinnati Score, and Knee Society Score (KSS) at pre-operative and 2-years post-operative. Range of Motion (ROM) and complication were evaluated post-operatively. Results: The mean diameter of the quadruple hamstring graft was 8 mm. Clinical outcomes enhanced significantly (p&lt;0.05). The average Lysholm activity scale improved from 65.12 ± 10.48 to 94.96 ± 4.80. The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score improved from 60.50 ± 15.10 to 95.60 ± 3.44. The Modified Cincinnati Score improved from 62. 28 ± 13.6 to 96,04 ± 1.62. The KSS also improved from 60.12 ± 18.01 to 94.88 ± 6.36. 22 patients had 0-135° full ROM and 3 patients had 0-110° ROM. Two patients had surgical site infection but recovered with local debridement. Conclusion: PCL reconstruction using standard anterior and posteromedial portal with remnant preservation at 2 years follow up resulted in satisfactory clinical and functional outcomes.

Ramp lesions are frequently missed in ACL-deficient knees and should be repaired in case of instability

PurposeThe aim of the current study was (1) to provide an overview of common definitions and classification systems of ramp lesions (RL) and (2) to systematically review the available literature with regard to the diagnosis and treatment of RLs in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient knees.MethodsFollowing the PRISMA guidelines, MEDLINE and Scopus were searched for articles (1) reporting on acute or chronic ACL injuries, (2) with concomitant medial meniscus injury, (3) located at the posterior meniscocapsular attachment site (and red–red zone). Ex vivo studies, reviews and technical notes were excluded.ResultsTwenty-seven studies were included based on the criteria mentioned above. RLs are common in ACL-deficient knees with a prevalence ranging from 9 to 24%. RLs should especially be suspected in younger patients, patients with an increased meniscal slope and in patients with prolonged time from injury to surgery. The sensitivity of MRI for the detection of RLs ranges from 48 to 86% at a specificity of 79–99%. For arthroscopy, RLs are easily missed through standard anterior portals (sensitivity 0–38%). RL repair leads to a significant improvement of subjective knee scores, regardless of the specific fixation technique. For stable RLs, the literature suggests equivalent postoperative stability for trephination and abrasion compared to surgical RL repair.ConclusionRamp lesions are frequently missed in ACL-deficient knees on standard arthroscopy with anterior portals only. If a RL is suspected, exploration via an additional posteromedial portal is indicated. In case of instability, RL repair should be performed.Level of evidenceIV.

Arthroscopic Anatomy of the posterolateral structures of the knee

Objectives The purpose of this study was to describe an arthroscopic surgical approach to identify and expose the popliteus tendon (PT), posterior fibular head, Fibular collateral ligament (FCL), popliteal fibular ligament (PFL), biceps femoris tendon, and the peroneal nerve. Methods 10 fresh human cadaveric knees were examined arthroscopically using standard anterior and posterior portals. The use of a transeptal approach with both posteromedial and posterolateral portals was required using a standard 30 degrees arthroscope. Optimal portal placement and specific technique and sequence for appropriate visualization of the PLC structures were tested and documented. Results In all specimens, all the PLC structures that we attempted to identify were successfully visualized. These included the PT, posterior fibular head, the FCL, the PFL, biceps femoris tendon, peroneal nerve, PT and FCL femoral attachments. Conclusion This study demonstrated that the identification and exposure of the PLC structures using an all arthroscopic approach can be successfully performed with precise portal placement. This technique may serve as a basis for arthroscopic treatment of PLC injuries.

2-3 Year Retrospective Audit of Arthroscopic ‘Internal Brace’ For Chronic ATFL Injury

Category: Arthroscopy Introduction/Purpose: The aim of this audit is to present the surgical technique and medium term outcomes (2-3 years) of arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior talo-fibular ligament (ATFL) using the Arthrex InternalBraceTM system. Acute lateral ligament injuries of the ankle respond well to early functional rehabilitation with physiotherapy and can have excellent results. For patients who develop chronic lateral ligament, the morbidity can be significant. Multiple surgical techniques for repair or reconstruction of the anterior talo-fibular ligament (ATFL) have been described. Protracted immobilization is often required in the post-op protocol. Short term outcomes (six months), for arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior talo-fibular ligament (ATFL) using the Arthrex InternalBraceTM system, have previously been presented. The majority of patients reported good or excellent recovery. Methods: A similar cohort of patients to the short term (six months group) were identified. Adults aged between 18 and 65, average age 42. Exhausted conservative treatment. Clinical assessment and MRI scan confirmed torn/stretched/abnormal ATFL and no other significant pathology. Surgery was performed by a single surgeon Pre-operative questionnaire was completed on the day of surgery. (AOFAS, MOXFQ, EDQ-5, Visual Analogue Score) Surgery was performed as Day case with General anaesthetic and popliteal block. Antibiotics were given at induction. Anterior ankle arthroscopy performed through 2 standard anterior portals. +ve drive through confirmed. Arthroscopic stabilisation with Arthrex InternalBraceTM System:- 3.5 mm BioComposite SwiveLock with FiberTape placed into fibula with the distal end of FiberTape passed through 4.75 mm BioComposite SwiveLock / FibreTape (InternalBraceTM) placed into the talar neck. Post-op mobilisation in a moonboot for 7-10 days. Commence physiotherapy at 10 days. Biomechanical podiatric assessment at 6 weeks. Called for FU assessment at 2 years. Results: In the short term FU group, the majority of patient (13 of 17) reported that they were satisfied or very satisfied with the results of there surgery, with 10 of 16 stating that the surgery gave good, very good or excellent pain relief. The majority of patients (12 of 16) would definitely have the surgery again. Review at two years of clinical notes for patients who previously had surgery for ATFL injury with InternalBraceTM. Patients with other pathologies were excluded. This gave a similar cohort to the six month review patients. All patients were contacted for FU by an ESP Podiatrist and invited to come for clinical review. Only 3 patients reported on-going issues with pain, 1 of which requires revision surgery. Conclusion: Arthroscopic ATFL repair using an InteralBraceTM allows early post-operative rehabilitation with accelerated fully weight bearing rehabilitation. This audit would suggest that the short-term positive results are maintained into the medium term at 2-3 years. The long term outcome is currently not known due to this being a relatively new procedure. This method of ATFL repair could have great potential for elite athletes but also for ‘every day’ patients who still desire to have a rapid return to normal function.

Arthroscopic Repair of an Isolated Subscapularis Tendon Rupture in an Adolescent Patient

Arthroscopic repair of an isolated subscapularis tendon rupture has been previously described in the adult population; however, the technique has yet to be described in a pediatric patient. In this Technical Note, we describe an arthroscopic repair of an isolated subscapularis tendon rupture with concomitant mini-open suprapectoral biceps tenodesis in an adolescent patient. Standard anterior and posterior portals are established with an accessory portal in the anterosuperior angle of the acromion. A 0-PDS suture is used to pass strands of suture tape through the inferolateral and superolateral aspects of the subscapularis tendon. Suture tape is passed through a suture anchor and the accessory portal and is fixated at the junction of the inferior one-third and superior two-thirds of the subscapularis tendon footprint and at the junction of the superior one-third and inferior two-thirds of the subscapularis tendon footprint. Following subscapularis tendon fixation, biceps tenodesis is performed through either a mini-open subpectoral or arthroscopic suprapectoral approach. This described technique allows for full visualization of the subscapularis tendon and lesser tuberosity. Additionally, this technique allows for accurate placement of suture anchors to maximize footprint coverage and appropriate graft tensioning.

Arthroscopic Repair of Type II SLAP Tears Using Suture Anchor Technique

Arthroscopic SLAP tear repair has become an increasingly used treatment for patients presenting with symptomatic SLAP tears after failed nonoperative management. Debridement, SLAP repair, and open or arthroscopic biceps tenodesis or tenotomy have been used for the treatment of SLAP tears. Various techniques for repair have been described, and furthermore, there is a high incidence of concomitant pathology of the shoulder. Repair remains an excellent option in isolated SLAP tears amenable to repair, with excellent outcomes in well-indicated patients. We present a method for repairing a SLAP tear using standard suture anchor fixation, anterior and posterior portals, and an accessory portal of Wilmington. Adequate labral repair can be achieved with this technique in patients with no concomitant biceps pathology. This report highlights this technique for SLAP repair in patients with isolated symptomatic SLAP tears that have failed conservative management.

Anterior and Posterior Ankle Impingement by One-Step Arthroscopic Treatment: 10years Follow-up Prospective Study by Standard Anterior and Double Postero-Medial Portals

Simultaneous anterior and posterior ankle impingement is preferably treated by 2steps surgery. Aiming to avoid postponing further surgery in prone position, authors focused a procedure which addresses posterior ankle disorders through 2postero-medial portals, after anterior arthroscopic step without changing patient's assessment. They present this 10years follow-up prospective study. In period January 2001-January 2015 78 ankle affected with both side pathology, were submitted to arthroscopic treatment by standard anterior portals and double postero-medial approach, maintaining supine position and addressing simultaneously one-step surgery anteriorly and posteriorly. Reproducing same posterior portals of prone procedure, peroneal approach is rotated 90°medially lying 5cm superiorly to medial one along Achilles' tendon. FHL tendon landmark prevents damage to posterior tibial bundle. Patients were evaluated with pre-op and post-op x-ray scan and AOFAS scale. At final survey 71patients have been evaluated, being 7 lost. Wilcoxon test was utilized to compare score values reported at admission time, after 12months and after 10years. AOFAS scale, steady improved from preoperative mean 38.73(range21-51) to 1year postoperative=89.87 and to further 95.4 at 10years. The preop vs/postop 12months was p-value=0.00051 and postop 12months vs/10years p-value was =0.03628. Big improvement was reported in study group at 10years follow-up compared to control group (the former p-value=0.0004883, the lesser p-value=0.0009766, inferior to threshold p=0.05). None patient reported any complication, any problem to posterior tibial nerve territory or to medial talus skin sensitivity. Varicose veins caused in 3patients posterior ankle swelling and oedema for 3weeks. Four patients have been submitted to new surgical procedure for same disorder. In open surgery as in arthroscopic procedure, supine assessment made impossible to reach both the joint spaces without intra-operative patient's repositioning. Maintaining supine assessment during arthroscopy, this technique allowed to reach disorders in posterior ankle compartment after anterior treatment by standard portals. Absence of neurovascular lesions confirmed safety and reproducibility of this procedure providing anatomical landmarks respect.

Endoscopy of the Posterior Aspect of the Ankle

Posterior and anterior arthroscopy of the ankle and hindfoot may have to be undertaken at the same surgical sitting. Standard arthroscopic practice does not allow to approach both compartments without changing the position of the patient. In the supine position, most intra-articular structures of posterior portion of the ankle joint can be accessed from anterior portals with judicious traction, but visualization of posterior extra-articular compartment and hindfoot are not possible. To avoid repositioning of the patient, we have developed a procedure that allows access to the posterior compartment of the ankle with the patient supine. We describe a 2 posteromedial ankle portals procedure, which allows to reach both the posterior side of the ankle joint and the hindfoot extra-articular compartments keeping the patient supine throughout the procedure. After treatment of anterior compartment disorders using standard anterior portals, 2 posteromedial entry portals permit to visualize and treat pathologies of the posterior ankle and of the hindfoot, without prolonging surgery.