The yielding capacity of the potato depends largely on the quality of the seed. The quality is determined by a number of factors such as absence of pathogens (viruses, fungi, bacteria, nematodes), physiological stage of development, place of origin, authenticity and purity of variety. In addition size-grading and the prevalence of defects, such as malformed or damaged tubers, may affect yielding capacity. Not all the factors mentioned are of equal importance. Since freedom from pathogens counts very much in quality assessment of seed, methods and difficulties in determination of the presence of pathogens will be discussed extensively; whereas size-grading and defects in tubers, caused by handling, effect of cold or frost, green tubers, and necrotic spots caused by spraying herbicides will be excluded from discussion. Neither will the ways of sampling be discussed. One should keep in mind, however, that sample size is determined by the criteria which the seed material must fulfil. For instance, if one diseased tuber is found in a sample of 6600 or 600 tubers there is a 95 probability that the batch of potatoes will not contain more than 0.1 ~ or 1 diseased tubers, respectively. It is clear that samples of a few hundred tubers/ha are too small to give reliable information on the real level of infection. In practice, however, checking of large samples of potato tubers is very difficult. A survey is given of methods of disease assessment in the field during growing season and after lifting. Only the most important diseases are treated. Some remarks are made on the effect of physiological stage of development and of place of origin of seed on yield. Methods to check authenticity are mentioned briefly. Finally, it is pointed out which methods should be developed and improved (see Conclusions). For requirements of the officially recognized grades (basic and certified)of seed in the European Economic Community, see Jacobsen (1973). Before discussing methods of assessment of diseases caused by pathogens it must be pointed out that such assessment has to reckon with: I. The danger of transmission of the disease by the seed tubers to the next crop. 2. The influence of the pathogens on the keeping quality of the seed tubers. The greater the danger of transmission or (and) the influence on keeping quality, the more important the assessment. The danger of transmission is great if the disease is only or mainly tuber-borne as with most virus and several bacterial and fungal diseases. This danger may still be of importance if
Read full abstract