Stable Burst Fractures Research Articles

Treatment of stable burst fracture of the atlas (Jefferson fracture) with rigid cervical collar.

A retrospective review of a clinical series. To evaluate the use of a rigid cervical collar alone as the treatment for stable Jefferson fracture, and to devise an algorithm for treatment of Jefferson fracture with or without an associated cervical injury. The traditional treatment for Jefferson fracture, if there is no indication for surgery, is immobilization by halo vest. Because halo vest placement is associated with intracranial infection and a significant degree of patient discomfort, slightly less rigid forms of external immobilization may be useful for the treatment of stable Jefferson fractures. No standard protocol calling for the use of one form of stabilization device has been reported. The medical records and radiographs of 16 consecutive patients with Jefferson fracture during a 2-year period were reviewed. Each patient underwent a complete cervical radiograph series and a computed tomographic scan. The mean C1 lateral mass displacement was 1.8 mm. Cervical spine radiographs, including lateral flexion-extension views were obtained 10 to 12 weeks after injury before the removal of an external immobilization device. Of these 16 patients, 1 sustained a complete injury, and 7 sustained an incomplete injury. Eight patients were neurologically intact. Twelve patients sustained a stable Jefferson fracture and were treated with a rigid cervical collar (Miami-J collar [Jerome Medical, Moorestown, NJ]) alone from 10 to 12 weeks. The patient sustaining the complete neurologic injury died of multisystem trauma. All 15 live patients showed no instability on their follow-up plain radiographs before the removal of an external stabilization device. Six patients underwent further plain radiographs approximately 1 year after the fracture and similarly demonstrated no instability. Isolated stable burst fracture of the atlas can be treated effectively with a rigid cervical collar alone for 10 to 12 weeks with good neurologic recovery and segmental stability. Unstable Jefferson fractures with concurrent unstable fracture of other cervical vertebrae, especially C2, requires surgical stabilization.

Transpedicular decompression and stabilization of burst fractures of the lumbar spine

Twenty-seven consecutive patients with neurological impairment due to burst fractures of the lumbar spine were operated upon, via the postero-lateral route, over a 38-month-period. Transpedicular fixation devices [posterior segmental fixator (PSF) or variable screw placement system (VSP)] were applied in all cases, in order to achieve short-segment fusion of the fractured spinal segment. Return to useful motor power or neurological normality (median follow-up: 18.7 months) occurred in 22 cases (81% of the whole series), with this outcome resulting in all but one of the cases with preoperative incomplete neurological deficit. Postoperative encroachment of the spinal canal, degree of kyphotic deformity, and reduction of the vertebral height showed statistically significant differences compared with the corresponding preoperative values.

Near-anatomical reduction and stabilization of burst fractures of the lower thoracic or lumbar spine.

Thirty-one consecutive symptomatic patients with burst fractures of the lower thoracic or lumbar spine (T 11-L4) were treated by early surgery in a 36-month period, with near-anatomical reduction being achieved via the postero-lateral route. Fusion and reconstruction of the vertebral body was done by using autologous or processed bovine bone. Correction of the kyphotic deformity was obtained by using distraction rods or transpedicular devices. The post-operative mean degree of kyphosis, percent vertebral height, and percent canal stenosis showed statistically significant differences, compared with the corresponding pre-operative mean values. All but one of the 25 patients with incomplete paraplegia exhibited neurological improvement, with complete recovery occurring in 20 cases (median follow-up: 16 months) irrespective of the location of the lesion at the thoraco-lumbar junction (T 11-L1) or the lower lumbar segment (L2-L4). Out of the 6 patients with pre-operative complete paraplegia, useful motor power returned in one case with a lesion below L1. The results confirm the suitability of the postero-lateral route and are consistent with the assumption that early near-anatomical reduction and stabilization favours maximum neurological recovery in symptomatic patients.