ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Research Articles

Association of ticagrelor vs clopidogrel with net adverse clinical events in STEMI patients with mild thrombocytopenia

Abstract Backgrounds Current guidelines advocate for aspirin plus ticagrelor as the preferred dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, there is a lack of consensus or guidelines to direct clinicians on managing STEMI patients with mild thrombocytopenia, defined as a platelet count of 100~150×109/L. Purpose This study aims to investigate the association between ticagrelor and clopidogrel with ischemic and hemorrhagic events in STEMI patients with a platelet count of 100~150×109/L. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted using Health and Medical Big Data Super Platform from January 2010 to June 2023.The study included STEMI-patients with a platelet count of 100~150×109/L who received DAPT consisting of aspirin and a P2Y12 receptor antagonist (either clopidogrel or ticagrelor) All STEMI patients with a platelet count of 100~150×109/L were included in the analysis with a follow-up of at least one year. The inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) approach based on propensity score was utilized to balance observed confounders between treatments. The primary endpoint was net adverse events (NACE) at 1 year, including ischemic events (recurrent myocardial infarction or ischemic stroke), Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) classification ≥ 3, and cardiac death. Secondary outcomes were cardiac death, recurrent myocardial infarction, and ischaemic stroke. Results The study cohort consisted 2941 participants with median age of 69 years, and 21.0% were female. Following adjustment using the inverse probability of treatment weighting, ticagrelor and clopidogrel demonstrated similar NACE (aHR, 0.86; 95%CI, 0.60-1.23). Cardiac death (aHR, 0.69; 95%CI, 0.36-1.31), recurrent myocardial infarction (aHR, 0.94; 95%CI, 0.50-1.78), and ischaemic stroke (aHR, 0.62; 95%CI, 0.34-1.14) did not significantly differ between the two groups. Conclusion In routine clinical practice, among STEMI patients with a platelet count of 100~150×109/L ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel, was not associated with a significant difference in the risk of NACE at 1 year. Further research is warranted to assess whether ticagrelor is more effective than clopidogrel in this particular patient population.

Malondialdehyde-specific natural IgM inhibit toll-like receptor 4 and peptidyl-arginine deiminase 4-dependent NETosis triggered by coronary extracellular vesicles of myocardial infarction patients

Abstract Background Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) are critical mediators of thromboinflammation during acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, triggers and signalling pathways of NETosis in AMI remain incompletely understood. Levels of extracellular vesicles (EV) carrying oxidation-specific epitopes (OSE) originating from lipid peroxidation are increased at the culprit site in AMI. Importantly, natural IgM antibodies with specificity for OSE, such as malondialdehyde (MDA), have been shown to modulate functional effects of EV, and are associated with reduced cardiovascular risk. Purpose We investigated the stimulatory capacity of EV on neutrophil effector functions and specifically targeted key mediators of NET formation using pharmacological inhibitors and atheroprotective natural IgM to inhibit this process. Methods Patients were included after diagnosis of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and blood was aspirated from the culprit site and peripheral arterial site (n=28) during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). Myocardial function was documented by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging 4±2 days and 195±15 days after pPCI. EV were isolated from cell culture supernatants and culprit site plasma for neutrophil stimulation in vitro. Pharmacological inhibitors were used to map NET signalling pathways of EV. Isolated EV were used for neutrophil stimulation in a murine injection model in the presence of the MDA-specific IgM LR04 or an isotype control. NET formation and other neutrophil functions were assessed by flow cytometry, ELISA and fluorescence microscopy. Results Levels of NET surrogate markers and CD45+ MDA+ EV were higher at the culprit site than in the peripheral circulation. EV generated by LPS-activated THP-1 monocytic cells induced in vitro NET formation, release of neutrophil elastase and IL-8, and degranulation of MPO and NGAL in primary human neutrophils, but not reactive oxygen species. Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) and peptidyl-arginine deiminase 4 (PAD4) were identified as key mediators of NET formation induced by in vitro-generated EV and EV isolated from the culprit site of AMI patients. Functionally, the MDA-specific monoclonal IgM antibody LR04, but not an isotype control, inhibited the ability of patient-derived and in vitro-generated EV to trigger release of NETs in primary human neutrophils and in mice. Titres of MDA-specific IgM antibodies were inversely associated with the NET marker citH3 in blood of AMI patients. Finally, we found that the concentration of CD45+ MDA+ EV per protective MDA-specific IgM at the culprit site showed an inverse association with left ventricular ejection fraction 72 hours and 6 months after AMI. Conclusions We show that EV can trigger several neutrophil effector functions. EV-induced NET formation is TLR4- and PAD4-dependent and can be inhibited by OSE-specific natural IgM potentially influencing cardiovascular outcomes after an acute event.

Trends in major cardiac events after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention from 2003 to 2017: the western Denmark heart registry

Abstract Background In Denmark, primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been the national reperfusion strategy since 2003. We recently reported a gradual decline in 1-year mortality in patients treated with pPCI-treated STEMI from 2003 to 2017. To elucidate potential causes of this observation, we examined temporal trends in the 1-year risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Purpose To examine trends in 1-year risks of MACE following STEMI treated with pPCI from 2003 to 2017. Methods Using the Western Denmark Heart Registry, we identified STEMI patients undergoing first-time pPCI from 2003 to 2017 and divided the patients into four time periods. The main outcome was 1-year risk of MACE, defined as recurrent myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, or cardiovascular death. Cause-specific adjusted hazard ratios (HR) were used to assess temporal trends using the first period (2003-2006) as reference. Further, temporal trends were compared to an age-, sex-, and calendar-year matched general population. Results From 2003 to 2017, 18,540 pPCI-treated STEMI patients were identified (median [Q1-Q3] age, 64 [55-74] years); 13,639 men [74%]). Trends in 1-year risk of MACE showed a gradual reduction over time from 13.0% in 2003-2006, 11.8% in 2007-2010, 9.7% in 2011-2014, to 8.7% in 2015-2017 (Figure). The adjusted relative risk reduction was 33% when comparing 2015-2017 with 2003-2006 (adjusted HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.58-0.76). Comparable relative risk reductions were observed for all three individual components of MACE of 33-35%. Compared to the matched general population, the 1-year risk difference in MACE decreased from 11% in 2003-2006 to 7% in 2015-2017. Conclusions In a high-income European country with a fully implemented pPCI strategy, 1-year risk of MACE declined by approximately one-third after first-time STEMI between 2003 to 2017. This MACE reduction was substantially larger than observed in the matched general population, i.e., confirming an important reduction in the excess risk associated with STEMI.

Efficacy of combination therapy with statin and ezetimibe versus high dose statin monotherapy in secondary prevention in high-risk patients

Abstract Background Secondary prevention in patients with acute coronary syndrome focuses on lowering low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol below 55 mg/dL. In all statin-naïve patients at high risk (LDL-cholesterol target <55 mg/dL), initiation of high-intensity statin monotherapy is recommended by ESC guidelines. Nonetheless, at one month, a significant proportion of patients do not reach their LDL-cholesterol target. Purpose The aim of this study was to compare lipid-lowering therapy with statin monotherapy versus statin with ezetimibe in secondary prevention in patients at high risk. Methods The current prospective study included 264 consecutive patients admitted with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention. None of the patients had taken lipid-lowering drugs in the previous 12 months. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups: Group 1 - rosuvastatin 40 mg (n= 144) and Group 2 - rosuvastatin 40 mg and ezetimibe 10 mg (n= 120). All patients' lipid profiles were assessed upon admission and after one month of lipid-lowering treatment. Results At baseline, no patient had LDL cholesterol level lower than 55 mg/dL. There was no significant difference in lipid profile at baseline between the two groups (all p > 0.05). No differences were observed between the two groups in terms of baseline LDL-cholesterol deviation from the target (103.4% versus 99.70%; p= 0.66). As expected, the combination therapy reduced LDL-cholesterol at one month significantly higher compared to high-dose statin monotherapy (-59.65% versus -37.54%; p< 0.0001). After one month of treatment, only 47.92% of patients in Group 1 reached the LDL-cholesterol target (<55 mg/dL) compared to 90.00% of the patients in Group 2 (p<0.0001; R.R.= 0.53). Conclusion(s) Our findings show that statin and ezetimibe combination therapy is more effective in reduction in LDL-cholesterol levels and reaching targets compared to statin monotherapy alone. In statin-naïve patients at high risk, early initiation of the statin and ezetimibe combination instead of statin monotherapy should be taken into account in secondary prevention, for an earlier reach of the LDL-cholesterol target and to reduce the overall cardiovascular risk.

Classification of 90-day mortality risk among patients with cardiogenic shock requiring advanced mechanical circulatory support

Abstract Background The SCAI shock classification aims to provide a simple and practical stratification of the severity of patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) and to immediately offer them crucial treatments such as mechanical circulatory support (MCS). Additionally, the IABP shock II risk score is designed to predict 30-day mortality in patients with CS following acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and the SAVE score can also predict in-hospital mortality for patients after veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO) insertion due to refractory CS. However, previous studies on SCAI staging in patients with MCS have been inconsistent, and the association with prognosis remains unclear. Purpose The aim of this study is to investigate the correlation between the SCAI shock stage and prognosis in ACS patients requiring advanced MCS, and to compare it with other prognostic scores. Methods From January 2012 to July 2023, 137 ACS patients with advanced MCS (excluding IABP) were evaluated. Upon ICU admission, patients were categorized into SCAI stages B to E. The IABP shock II score and the SAVE score were also calculated to serve as prognostic tools. The type of MCS was categorized as Impella, VA-ECMO with IABP, and ECPELLA (VA-ECMO with Impella). We compared the 90-day survival rates with the SCAI shock stage and other prognostic tools. Result The distribution for SCAI classifications stage B to E was 13 (10%), 38 (28%), 21 (15%), and 65 (47%), respectively. There were no significant differences among the groups regarding age, gender, comorbidities, the ratio of ST-elevation myocardial infarction, door-to-balloon time, and onset-to-reperfusion time. In SCAI Stage E, a significantly higher proportion of patients (86%) underwent extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation, exhibiting elevated lactate and peak CK-MB levels, along with higher IABP Shock II and lower SAVE scores, compared to other stages. A Kaplan-Meier analysis of 90-day mortality, based on the SCAI, the IABP Shock II, the SAVE categories, and the type of MCS, demonstrated that outcomes deteriorated as the stage advanced across all classifications. In the univariate Cox regression analysis for 90-day mortality, significant differences in outcomes were observed across the four classifications. However, in the multivariate Cox regression analysis that incorporated all four classifications, only the type of MCS (Impella vs. ECMO with IABP; hazard ratio [HR] 0.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16 - 0.78, p = 0.012) and the SCAI classification (stage E vs. stage C; HR 3.03; 95% CI, 1.51 - 6.08, p = 0.002) demonstrated a significant association with 90-day mortality. Conclusion The SCAI shock stage upon ICU admission suggests the potential for convenient prediction of mid-term outcomes in ACS patients who received advanced MCS.

Mechanical wave velocities in acute myocardial infarction: an exploratory study using three-dimensional high frame rate echocardiography

Abstract Background Evaluation of cardiac function is crucial for management of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Recently, high frame rate (HFR) echocardiography has enabled identification of fast-propagating mechanical waves (MW) within the myocardium. These waves have the potential to offer unique insights into myocardial tissue properties, including edema and fibrosis. However, the potential of 3D HFR echocardiography to accurately quantify MW velocities and thereby assess myocardial stiffness in AMI patients remains unexplored. Purpose To assess the feasibility of a novel method for estimating MW velocities using 3D HFR echocardiography in patients with AMI compared to healthy controls. Methods Twenty patients with first time ST-elevation myocardial infarction were included within 48 hours after reperfusion therapy. We used a commercially available ultrasound scanner to acquire conventional 3D high-quality (~20 frames per second) acquisitions and subsequent 3D HFR recordings (~820 frames per second). The high-quality recording was used to extract a myocardial mask to define the region of interest in the HFR acquisition to detect the atrial kick wave and generate a comprehensive 3D map of MW propagation and velocities. We compared MW velocities between these patients and twenty age- and sex-matched healthy controls. Results MW velocities were successfully measured in 93% of participants (17 patients and 20 controls). Global MW velocities were significantly higher in AMI patients compared to healthy controls (2.1±0.6m/s vs. 1.5±0.2m/s, p<0.001). Territorial values, corresponding to the theoretical perfusion area of the three main coronary arteries, were significantly higher in infarct-related territories in patients when compared to same territories in controls for all coronary territories: Right coronary artery: 1.9±0.7 m/s vs. 1.4±0.3m/s, p<0.05; Circumflex artery: 3.1±1.5m/s vs. 1.7±0.4m/s, p<0.01; and Left anterior descending artery: 1.8±0.5m/s vs. 1.4±0.2m/s, p<0.01. Conclusions Estimation of MW velocities using a novel 3D HFR echocardiography method was feasible in most patients with AMI and all healthy controls. MW velocities were higher in patients compared to healthy controls and infarcted compared to non-infarcted coronary territories. These findings confirm the potential of non-invasive myocardial tissue characterization by MW imaging.Boxplot of MW velocities3D HFR MW visualisation

Cangrelor use in ticagrelor-loaded ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients with high residual platelet reactivity: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract Background Despite the use of potent P2Y12 inhibitor, many patients still present with high platelet reactivity (HPR) at the time of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). HPR is associated with impaired myocardial reperfusion and the subsequent poor outcome. Purpose We sought to determine the impact of Cangrelor -a rapid and potent intravenous P2Y12 inhibitor- on myocardial reperfusion in patients with HPR admitted for primary PCI in a randomized trial. Methods Patients pre-treated with ticagrelor and aspirin with residual HPR (baseline platelet reactivity unit (PRU) > 208) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive cangrelor (experimental group) or not (control group) just before PCI. The primary endpoint was optimal myocardial reperfusion defined as a final myocardial blush grade (MBG) 3 assessed by an independent core laboratory. Results After screening of 128 patients, a total of 60 patients were with HPR were enrolled and randomized. The ticagrelor loading dose to PRU measurement times were 83 ± 32 and 90 ± 47 minutes in the experimental and control groups, respectively. Baseline PRU were 245 ± 30 and 252 ± 35 in the experimental and standard group, respectively. A final MBG 3 was observed in 21/30 (55%) and 17/30 (45%) the experimental and standard groups (p=0.29). A final TIMI flow grade 3 was observed in 30/30 (100%) and 27/30 (90%) the experimental and standard groups (p=0.24). Peak troponin levels after PCI were 51381 ± 50047 and 51078 ± 63960 ng/L (p=0.98) in the experimental and standard group, respectively. At the end of the PCI, control PRU were 36 ± 57 and 198 ± 107 (p<0.0001) in the experimental and standard group, respectively. One patient of the experimental group presented an in-hospital major bleeding (BARC 3). Conclusion In ticagrelor-loaded STEMI patients with residual HPR at the time of PCI, cangrelor use was associated with a more effective platelet inhibition but failed to significantly improve the rates of optimal final myocardial blush grades.

Inhibition of fractalkine signalling in patients with acute myocardial infarction - First results from the FRACTAL trial

Abstract Background We have previously demonstrated a strong association between expression of the fractalkine receptor CX3CR1 on lymphocytes and microvascular obstruction (MVO) in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) for ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Our pre-clinical studies also found an improvement in infarct size, inflammation and intramyocardial haemorrhage (IMH) when rats were pre-treated with the fractalkine inhibitor KAND567. Purpose FRACTAL (FRACTalkine inhibition in Acute myocardial infarction) study was a phase IIa, pilot, randomized, 2-arm parallel group, placebo-controlled, double blinded, multi-centre trial. Its primary aim was to assess the safety and tolerability of intravenous and oral administration of the fractalkine inhibitor KAND567 as well as reducing signs of reperfusion injury in STEMI patients undergoing PPCI. Methods Patients with a new diagnosis of anterior STEMI, who had index chest pain within 5 hours and angiographic occlusion of the LAD, were randomised on a 1:1 basis to receive either KAND567 or placebo over a period of 72 hours. All patients then underwent a baseline MRI scan at 3 days with a follow-up scan at 3 months, paralleled by longitudinal deep immuno­phenotyping over 9 time points. Results A total of 71 patients were enrolled into the study with 64 (90.1%) being male patients. The mean age of patients was 59.2 years. 37 patients received KAND567, whilst 34 received placebo over 72-hour period. Throughout the 3-month follow-up period, 23 (62%) patients from the KAND567 arm as compared to 24 (71%) patients in the placebo arm had reported adverse events. There was no statistical difference in serious adverse events (SAEs) between both arms with 9 documented in the placebo arm and 12 in the KAND567 arm. Safety bloods also demonstrated no significant differences between the two groups across all time points. There was a higher incidence of left ventricular (LV) thrombus in the placebo arm as compared to the KAND567 arm (17.6% vs. 2.7%; p=0.049). Additionally, the study also demonstrated a lower occurrence of IMH in the KAND567 arm compared to the placebo arm (35.5% vs. 55.2%; p=0.19). Deep immunephenotyping suggested clear target engagement in the KAND567 arm in natural killer cells as well as in cytotoxic T-lymphocytes. Conclusion This first in-man study demonstrates that inhibition of the fractalkine pathway in STEMI patients appears safe and well-tolerated, while demonstrating a promising potential in preventing LV thrombus and IMH. The results suggest a new mechanism and class of drug to target reperfusion injury, clearly warranting a larger phase III study.LV thrombus and IMH

Evaluation of Pharmaco-invasive PCI in Terms of in Hospital Clinical Outcome of Acute Anterior ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Compared to Primary PCI

Background: The strategic reperfusion early after Myocardial Infarction trial and the French Registry of Acute Anterior ST segment elevation MI suggested that pharmaco-invasive strategy compares favorably with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). Objectives: To evaluate in hospital clinical outcome of patients with acute anterior ST segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing Primary PCI and pharmaco-invasive PCI. Methods: This cross sectional study was conducted in United Hospital, Dhaka. A total of 120 patients were studied. These patients were categorized into two groups. Those with acute anterior ST segment elevation MI who underwent primary PCI was denoted as group A (n= 55) and those with acute anterior ST segment elevation thrombolysed by streptokinase followed by PCI confined to pharmaco-invasive PCI was denoted as group B (n=65). Results: Acute LVF was more in pharmaco-invasive group than in primary PCI group and was statistically significant (p= 0.032). 02 patients (3.6%) died in primary PCI group: one of which was due to ventricular fibrillation followed by asystole 3 hours after procedure and the other died due to cardiac arrest 10 hours after the procedure. No major bleeding incidence was found in both groups. Conclusion: Acute anterior ST segment elevation myocardial infarction patients receiving pharmaco-invasive treatment compared with the Primary PCI had higher incidence of acute LVF and no significant discrepancy was observed regarding bleeding events, death, stent thrombosis, arrythymia, heart block and cardiac arrest. J Shaheed Suhrawardy Med Coll 2023; 15(1): 34-38

Incidence and risk factors for cardiac rupture after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in contemporary era: findings from the improving care for cardiovascular disease in China-Acute Coronary Syndrome project.

Cardiac rupture (CR) is fatal mechanical complication of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We systematically analyzed the clinical features of STEMI patients with CR, as well as predictors and treatments associated with risk of CR in contemporary era. In this nationwide database, 49,284 patients admitted within 48 h after STEMI were enrolled, and were stratified according to CR status. We analyzed patients' clinical characteristics, case fatality rate, and independent correlates of CR. A total of 188 (0.38%) patients had CR, of which 42.6% died during hospitalization. Older age, female gender, higher heart rate, history of diabetes, and worse cardiac function were risk factors of CR in patients with STEMI, while a previous history of myocardial infarction was associated with a reduced risk of CR. CR patients were less likely to undergo primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). After adjustment, primary PCI was associated with 56% decreased risk of CR (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.29-0.67). This result was consistent in the propensity-score matching analysis and inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis. CR was associated with high in-hospital mortality among STEMI patients. Multiple factors were associated with CR occurrence, primary PCI was associated with lower risk of CR, indicating that early intervention targeting the risk factors and implementation of primary PCI may improve its prognosis. Clinical trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov; Number: NCT02306616; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Long-term outcomes and operators' experience in primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is typically performed by experienced operators. Therefore, the safety of pPCI for STEMI performed by less experienced operators with the support of experienced operators remains unknown. We aimed to investigate the long-term outcomes of pPCI for STEMI performed by less experienced operators with the support of experienced operators. In total, 775 STEMI patients were enrolled and divided into groups according to operator experience in PCI: less experienced (n = 384) and experienced (n = 391) operator groups. Experienced operators were defined as those who had performed > 50 elective PCI procedures per year as the first operator or instructional assistant, whereas less experienced operators were defined as others. When less experienced operators performed the pPCI, experienced operators supported them. The primary endpoint was any cardiovascular event, defined as a composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and unplanned hospitalization for heart failure. In the propensity score-matched analysis, 324 patients were included in each group. The cumulative incidence of the primary endpoint over a median of 5years in the less experienced operator group was similar to that in the experienced operator group (15% vs. 18%, P = 0.209). In the multivariate Cox proportional hazards model, there was no excess risk for patients operated upon by less experienced operators for the primary endpoint (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.58-1.25; P = 0.417). pPCI for STEMI by less experienced operators did not increase the risk of in-hospital mortality or 5-year long-term cardiovascular events if supported by experienced operators.

Microaxial Flow Pump Use and Renal Outcomes in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock - a Secondary Analysis of the DanGer Shock Trial.

In the Danish-German Cardiogenic Shock (DanGer Shock) trial, use of a microaxial flow pump (mAFP) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)-related CS led to lower all-cause mortality but higher rates of renal replacement therapy (RRT). In this prespecified analysis, rates and predictors of acute kidney injury (AKI) and RRT were assessed. In this international, randomized, open label, multicenter trial, 355 adult patients with STEMI-CS were randomized to mAFP (N=179) or standard care alone (N=176). AKI was defined according to Risk, Injury, and Failure, sustained Loss and End-stage kidney disease (RIFLE) criteria and assessed using logistic regression models. Use of RRT was assessed accounting for the competing risk of death using Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard models. AKI (RIFLE≥1) was recorded in 110 patients (61%) in mAFP group and 79 (45%) in control group (p<0.01); RRT was used in 75 (42%) and 47 (27%) patients, respectively (p<0.01). About 2/3 of the RRTs were initiated within the first 24h from admission (n=48 (64%) in mAFP group, n=31 (66%) in control group). Occurrence of AKI and RRT were associated with higher 180-day mortality in both study arms. At 180 days, all patients alive were free of RRT. mAFP use was associated with higher rates of RRT, even when accounting for competing risk of death (subdistribution hazard: 1.67 [1.18-2.35]). This association was largely consistent among prespecified subgroups. Allocation to mAFP was associated with lower 180-day mortality irrespective of AKI or RRT (p=0.8 for interaction). Relevant predictors of AKI in both groups comprised reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, baseline kidney function, shock severity, bleeding events, and positive fluid balance. In addition, predictors of AKI specific to mAFP were suction events, higher pump speed, and longer duration of support. Shock severity, allocation to mAFP, and device-related complications were associated with an increased risk of AKI. AKI was generally associated with higher mortality, but the allocation to mAFP consistently led to lower mortality rates at 180 days irrespective of the occurrence of AKI with or without RRT initiation.

Mitral annular plane systolic excursion by cardiac MRI versus Global longitudinal strain analysis by speckle tracking echocardiography for prognostic assessment in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients

Mitral annular plane systolic excursion by cardiac MRI versus Global longitudinal strain analysis by speckle tracking echocardiography for prognostic assessment in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients

Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Multivessel Disease: Complete versus Culprit-only Revascularization

Objective: To compare the clinical outcomes of complete revascularization and culprit-only revascularization in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) who presented with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) at Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar. Methodology: A prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted, enrolling 400 patients with multivessel CAD. Patients were randomly assigned to either the complete revascularization group (n=200) or the culprit-only revascularization group (n=200). The primary outcomes assessed included cardiovascular death, reinfarction, and the need for repeat revascularization over a six-month follow-up period. Statistical analysis was performed using chi-square tests and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Results: Complete revascularization significantly reduced the rates of major adverse cardiovascular events compared to culprit-only revascularization. Cardiovascular death was lower in the complete revascularization group (4% vs 9%, p = 0.02), as was reinfarction (5% vs 11%, p = 0.01), and repeat revascularization (7% vs 15%, p = 0.004). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a significant improvement in event-free survival in the complete revascularization group. Conclusion: Complete revascularization significantly improves clinical outcomes in patients with multivessel CAD presenting with STEMI, reducing cardiovascular death, reinfarction, and repeat revascularization. This study supports complete revascularization as a preferred treatment strategy in such patients to improve long-term outcomes. Keywords: coronary artery disease, STEMI, complete revascularization, culprit-only PCI, cardiovascular outcomes

Reassess Hospital Costs and Mortality Between Myocardial Infarction With and Without ST-Segment Elevation in a Modern Context.

Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) may have higher hospitalization costs and poorer prognosis than non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). A single-center retrospective study was conducted on 758 STEMI patients and 386 NSTEMI patients from January 1, 2020 to May 30, 2023 aimed to investigate the differences in cost and mortality. STEMI patients had higher maximal troponin I (15,222.5 (27.18, 40,000.00) vs. 2731.5 (10.73, 27,857.25), p < 0.001) and lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (56% (53%, 59%) vs. 57% (55%, 59%), p < 0.001) compared to NSTEMI patients. The clinical symptoms were mainly persistent or interrupted chest pain/distress in either STEMI or NSTEMI patients. STEMI patients had a significantly higher risk of combined hypotension than NSTEMI patients (8.97% vs. 3.89%, p = 0.002), and IABP was much more frequently used in the STEMI group with a statistical difference (2.90% vs. 0.52%, p = 0.015). STEMI patients have statistically higher hospitalization costs (RMB, ¥) (31,667 (25,337.79, 39,790) vs. 30,506.91 (21,405.96, 40,233.75), p = 0.006) and longer hospitalization days (10 (8, 11) vs. 9 (8, 11), p = 0.001) compared to NSTEMI patients. Although in-hospital mortality was higher in STEMI patients, the difference was not statistically significant (3.56% vs. 2.07%, p = 0.167). Multivariable logistic regression was performed and found that systolic blood pressure and NT-proBNP were risk factors for patient death (OR ≥ 1). STEMI patients are more likely comorbid cardiogenic shock, heart failure complications with higher hospitalization costs and longer hospitalization days. And relatively more use of acute mechanical circulatory support devices such as IABP. ChiCTR2300077885.

In-Depth Review of the Influence of Renal Insuficiency on Major Adverse Cardiovascular Event (MACE) and Mortality in Patients with Acute St-Segment Elevation Myocardial In- farction (STEMI)

The widespread implementation of invasive procedures such as coronary angiography and primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) into the routine management of patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in the last 10 years has led to a significant improvement in patient prognosis. At the same time, this also raises new problems and questions, mostly related to the fact that there are many elderly patients and/or patients with comorbidities who need to undergo this invasive procedure. One of the most important comorbidities is renal insufficiency. STEMI patients with renal insufficiency typically present with more extensive atherosclerotic lesions, including diffuse coronary calcification, which poses a challenge to the interventional cardiologist due to a higher risk of periprocedural complications, higher risk of restenosis, major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) , and patient mortality. This review discusses in depth the influence of renal insufficiency on MACE and mortality in STEMI patients. Keywords: renal insufficiency, STEMI, MACE, mortality.

Pharmacotherapy of acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction and the pharmacist's role, part 2: Complications, postrevascularization care, and quality improvement.

In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time. Key pharmacotherapeutic modalities and considerations for the patient with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) across the later phases of inpatient care are reviewed. Published descriptions and validation of clinical pharmacist roles specific to the acute management of STEMI are limited. This high-risk period from presentation through revascularization, stabilization, and hospital discharge involves complex pharmacotherapeutic decision points, many operational medication needs, and multiple layers of quality oversight. A companion article reviewed STEMI pharmacotherapy from emergency department presentation through revascularization. Herein we complete the pharmacotherapy review for the STEMI patient across the inpatient phases of care, including the management of peri-infarction complications with vasoactive and antiarrhythmic agents, considerations for postrevascularization antithrombotics, and assessments of supportive therapies and secondary prevention. Key guideline recommendations and literature developments are summarized from the clinical pharmacist's perspective alongside suggested pharmacist roles and responsibilities. Considerations for successful hospital discharge after STEMI and pharmacist involvement in associated institutional quality improvement efforts are also provided. We aim to support inpatient pharmacy departments in advancing clinical services for this critical patient population and call for further research delineating pharmacists' impact on patient and institutional STEMI outcomes.

Pharmacotherapy of acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction and the pharmacist's role, part 1: Patient presentation through revascularization.

In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time. Key pharmacotherapeutic modalities and considerations for the patient with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) across the critical initial phases of care are reviewed. Despite established value in the emergency department (ED), cardiac care, and intensive care settings, there is currently little published literature describing or supporting clinical pharmacist roles in the acute management of STEMI. The high-risk period from hospital presentation through revascularization and stabilization involves complex pharmacotherapeutic decision points, many operational medication needs, and multiple layers of quality oversight. While rife with opportunities for pharmacists to optimize care, this timeframe appears inconsistently targeted by clinical pharmacy services, which may halt after ED evaluation and then resume upon postcatheterization cardiac unit admission. Herein we review the key pharmacotherapeutic modalities and considerations for the patient with STEMI across the critical initial phases of care. These include supportive therapies prior to revascularization, the host of antithrombotics involved in revascularization by percutaneous coronary intervention and/or fibrinolysis, and other periprocedural medications. Important practice guidelines and clinical resources are summarized from the clinical pharmacist perspective, and roles and responsibilities of the responding pharmacist are suggested. A companion article will extend the review to periprocedural adverse event management, key early decision-making regarding long-term risk reduction, and pharmacist involvement in institutional quality improvement efforts. We aim to support inpatient pharmacy departments in advancing clinical services for this critical patient population, and we call for further research delineating pharmacist impact on patient and institutional STEMI outcomes. Patients presenting with STEMI rapidly traverse multiple phases of care and receive a host of antithrombotic and supportive medications during acute management, presenting many important pharmacotherapeutic decision points and roles for pharmacists.

Outcomes of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Patients with Adrenal Insufficiency

Abstract Background Patients with adrenal insufficiency (AI) have both increased risk of cardiovascular disease and adverse outcomes with many medical emergencies. However, limited data exist specifically regarding ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in the context of AI. Methods Admissions for STEMI were identified in the 2016-2019 National Inpatient Sample. In-hospital outcomes were compared between patients with and without AI. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) intervention, acute kidney injury (AKI), vasopressor use, mechanical circulatory support (MCS), mechanical ventilation, ventricular tachycardia (VT), hospital length of stay (LOS), and total charges. Multivariable regression models were used to adjust for potential confounders. Results Among 690,430 STEMI hospitalizations, 1,382 (0.2%) had a diagnosis of AI. AI was associated with higher odds of in-hospital mortality (adjusted OR [aOR] 1.51, 95% CI 1.03-2.2), lower odds of PCI (aOR 0.73, 95% CI 0.55-0.98), higher odds of CABG (aOR 2.8, 95% CI 1.89-4.2) and, AKI (aOR 2.38, 95% CI 1.72–3.3), VT (aOR 1.55, 95% CI 1.1-2.2), need for vasopressors (aOR 2.34, 95% CI 1.33-4.1), mechanical ventilation (aOR 2.11, 95% CI 1.54-2.89) and MCS (aOR 2.18, 95% CI 1.57–3.03). Patients with AI also had a longer LOS (10 days vs. 4.2 days, p&amp;lt;0.001) and higher charges ($258,475 vs. $115,505, p&amp;lt;0.001). Conclusion Patients with AI admitted for STEMI had higher in-hospital mortality, non-fatal adverse outcomes, and resource utilization compared to patients without AI.

ACE Inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers for the Primary and Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Outcomes: Recommendations from the 2024 Egyptian Cardiology Expert Consensus in Collaboration with the CVREP Foundation.

The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) plays a pivotal role in regulating blood pressure (BP), with dysregulation of RAAS resulting in hypertension and potentially heart failure (HF), myocardial infarction (MI), cardio-renal syndrome, and stroke. RAAS inhibitors, such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEis) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), have advantages beyond BP control. However, differences between these two drug classes need to be considered when choosing a therapy for preventing cardiovascular events. A panel of 36 Egyptian cardiologists developed consensus statements on RAAS inhibitors for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular outcomes and stroke, using a modified three-step Delphi process. The consensus statements highlight the importance of effective BP control and the role of RAAS blockade for prevention and management of various cardiovascular diseases. ACEis and ARBs differ in their mode of action and, thus, clinical effects. On the basis of available evidence, the consensus group recommended the following: ACEis should be considered as first choice (in preference to ARBs) to reduce the risk of MI, for primary prevention of HF, and for secondary prevention of stroke. ACEis and ARBs show equivalent efficacy for the primary prevention of stroke. Evidence also favors the preferential use of ACEis in patients with type 2 diabetes, for BP control, for the primary prevention of diabetic kidney disease, and to reduce the risk of major cardiovascular and renal outcomes. Treatment with an ACEi should be started within 24 h of ST segment elevation MI (and continued long term) in patients with HF, left ventricular systolic dysfunction, and/or diabetes. Angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs) are the first choice for patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction, with ACEis being the second choice in this group. ARBs are indicated as alternatives in patients who cannot tolerate ACEis. ACEis may be associated with cough development, but the incidence tends to be overestimated, and the risk can be reduced by use of a lipophilic ACEi or combining the ACEi with a calcium channel blocker. RAAS blockade is an essential component of hypertension therapy; however, the protective effects provided by ACEis are superior to those of ARBs. Therefore, an ACEi is indicated in almost all cases, unless not tolerated.