St Mark's Incontinence Score Research Articles

Body image and pelvic floor dysfunction in pregnancy and postpartum: A prospective one-year follow-up cohort study.

To determine the prevalence of pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) among pregnant women, their clustering and their association with body image disturbance (BID) up to 1 year postpartum. Monocentric prospective cohort study. University Hospitals Leuven. Pregnant women attending for pregnancy care, first assessed prior to 14 weeks of gestation and agreeing to follow-up until 1 year postpartum. Standardised questionnaires reporting on PFD and BID at 12-14 and 28-32 weeks of gestation, and again at 6-8 weeks and 1 year postpartum. We calculated the prevalence of PFD, how the cases clustered and how the cases correlated with BID using a linear mixed-model analysis. A minimum of 174 women with complete follow-up were required. The questionnaires used were the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF), St. Mark's Incontinence Score (SMIS), Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms (PAC-SYM), Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory (POPDI), Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire IUGA Revised (PISQ-IR) and the Body Image Disturbance Questionnaire (BIDQ). Out of 208 women, 92.8% reported one or multiple symptoms of PFD at 28-32 weeks of gestation, dropping to 73.6% by 1 year postpartum. The most common symptoms were constipation (65.3% at 28-32 weeks of gestation and 42.8% at 1 year postpartum) and urinary incontinence (56.8% at 28-32 weeks of gestation and 35.1% at 1 year postpartum). After correcting for body mass index, parity and mode of delivery, the severity of BID was associated with the ICIQ-UI SF score (β = 0.016, range 0.007-0.024), the PAC-SYM score (β = 0.006, range 0.002-0.011) and the POPDI score (β = 0.009, range 0.005-0.012), but not with the SMIS score (β = 0.015, range -0.001 to 0.031) or the PISQ-IR score, in sexually active women. Urinary incontinence, constipation and symptoms of prolapse have a measurable impact on BID.

Modified delayed coloanal anastomosis following TME for mid and low rectal cancer: 19 consecutive patients from a single center.

Surgery and management of rectal cancer have made significant progress in recent decades. However, there is still no coloanal anastomosis technique that offers a good compromise between functionality and low morbidity. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficiency of the modified delayed coloanal anastomosis (mDCA). In this retrospective study, we analyzed the morbi-mortality as well as functional outcomes of 19 patients treated with mDCA, out of 73 colorectal cancer patients treated at our institution from September 2021 to June 2023. The inclusion criteria were cancer of the mid and low rectum (tumor less than 10cm from the anal verge). Morbidity represented by complications of Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher was estimated at 5.2%. Only one patient experienced an asymptomatic anastomotic leak (AL) grade A. Ischemia of the colonic stump occurred in one patient, taken back to the OR on the 5th postoperative day. No stump retraction was noted. Anastomotic stenosis appeared in one patient (5.2%) during the 90-day postoperative period, and was treated by instrumental dilation. Perioperative mortality was nil. The mean St Marks incontinence score at 90days was 13.2 points. At the 3-month follow-up, 15 patients (78.9%) had major low anterior resection syndrome (LARS), three (15.7%) had minor LARS, and one patient (5.2%) had no LARS. None of the patients had a diversion loop ileostomy. The mDCA, by decreasing the rate of AL, without the need for diversion ileostomy, might be an interesting alternative to the conventional immediate coloanal anastomosis (ICA), for restoring the GI tract after proctectomy for cancer.

Efficacy of Traditional Acupuncture Compared to Biofeedback Therapy in Fecal Incontinence: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Fecal incontinence has a devastating impact on quality of life and imposes a substantial socioeconomic burden. Best medical therapy, including biofeedback therapy, improves mild symptoms with minimal impact on moderate to severe symptoms. Surgical management for incontinence carries a degree of morbidity, resulting in low uptake and acceptability. Although acupuncture is common practice in Singapore for numerous medical conditions, its role in fecal incontinence is relatively novel. In our local context, however, acupuncture is accessible, inexpensive, and potentially well accepted as a treatment strategy. To determine the effectiveness of traditional Chinese medicine acupuncture, compared to biofeedback therapy, in the treatment of fecal incontinence. The secondary aim is to investigate the differences in quality of life after treatment. Randomized controlled trial. Prospective, single-institution study. Patients with 2 or more episodes of fecal incontinence per week or St. Mark's incontinence score of 5 or higher were recruited. Patients were randomly assigned into biofeedback therapy, which included 3 sessions over 10 weeks, or 30 sessions of acupuncture over 10 weeks. Incontinence episodes, St. Mark's score, and fecal incontinence quality-of-life scale. Eighty-five patients were randomly assigned to biofeedback therapy (n = 46) or acupuncture (n = 39). Demographics and baseline clinical characteristics were not different ( p > 0.05). Overall median incontinence episodes were reduced in both, with the acupuncture arm reporting significantly fewer episodes at week 15 ( p < 0.001). Acupuncture also improved quality of life, with improvement in lifestyle, coping, depression, and embarrassment at week 15 ( p < 0.05). Although the St. Mark's score was significantly reduced in both arms at week 15 ( p < 0.001), the acupuncture arm's score was significantly lower ( p = 0.002). Longer follow-up is required. Acupuncture is clinically effective and improves the quality of life in patients with fecal incontinence. See Video Abstract . Clinicaltrials.gov : NCT04276350. ANTECEDENTES:La incontinencia fecal tiene un impacto devastador en la calidad de vida e impone una carga socioeconómica sustancial. La mejor terapia médica, incluida la terapia de biorretroalimentación, mejora los síntomas leves, con un impacto mínimo sobre los síntomas moderados a graves. El tratamiento quirúrgico de la incontinencia conlleva un grado de morbilidad que resulta en una baja aceptación y aceptabilidad. Si bien la acupuntura es una práctica común en Singapur para numerosas afecciones médicas, su papel en la incontinencia fecal es relativamente novedoso. Sin embargo, en nuestro contexto local, la acupuntura es accesible, económica y potencialmente bien aceptada como estrategia de tratamiento.OBJETIVO:Determinar la efectividad de la acupuntura de la Medicina Tradicional China, en comparación con la terapia de biorretroalimentación en el tratamiento de la incontinencia fecal. El objetivo secundario es investigar las diferencias en la calidad de vida después del tratamiento.DISEÑO:Ensayo controlado aleatorio.AJUSTE:Estudio prospectivo de una sola institución.PACIENTES:Se reclutaron pacientes con >2 episodios de incontinencia fecal/semana o una puntuación de incontinencia de St. Mark's >5. Los pacientes fueron asignados aleatoriamente a una terapia de biorretroalimentación que incluyó 3 sesiones durante 10 semanas o 30 sesiones de acupuntura durante 10 semanas.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Episodios de incontinencia, puntuación de St. Mark's y escala de calidad de vida de incontinencia fecal.RESULTADOS:Ochenta y cinco pacientes fueron asignados aleatoriamente a terapia de biorretroalimentación (n = 46) o acupuntura (n = 39). Las características demográficas y clínicas iniciales no fueron diferentes ( p > 0,05). La mediana general de episodios de incontinencia se redujo en ambos, y el grupo de acupuntura informó significativamente menos en la semana 15 ( p <0,001). La acupuntura también mejoró la calidad de vida, con mejoras en el estilo de vida, el afrontamiento, la depresión y la vergüenza en la semana 15 ( p <0,05). Mientras que la puntuación de St Mark se redujo significativamente en ambos brazos en la semana 15 ( p < 0,001), la puntuación del brazo de acupuntura fue significativamente menor (p = 0,002).LIMITACIONES:Se requiere un seguimiento más prolongado.CONCLUSIONES:La acupuntura es clínicamente efectiva y mejora la calidad de vida en pacientes con incontinencia fecal. (Traducción-Dr Yolanda Colorado ).

Patient Satisfaction With Long-term Sacral Neuromodulation for Fecal Incontinence: Experience From a Single Tertiary Center.

Sacral neuromodulation is an effective treatment for fecal incontinence in the long term. Efficacy is typically assessed using bowel diary, symptom severity, and quality-of-life questionnaires, and "success" is defined as more than 50% improvement in these measures. However, patient satisfaction may be a more meaningful and individualized measure of treatment efficacy. To assess patient-reported satisfaction with long-term sacral neuromodulation and compare it to the frequently applied efficacy measures. An observational study of a prospectively maintained database. A single tertiary pelvic floor referral unit. Data from 70 patients (68 women, median age 69 [60-74] years) were available. The median time since implantation was 11 (9-14) years. Nineteen patients reported inactive neuromodulation devices. Bowel diaries, the Manchester Health Questionnaire, and the St. Mark's Incontinence Score were recorded at baseline, after percutaneous nerve evaluation, and at the last follow-up. Patient-reported satisfaction, using a 0% to 100% visual analog scale, with treatment since implantation (overall) and in the 2 weeks preceding completion of the last outcome measures (current) were also assessed. Satisfaction was significantly higher in those with active sacral neuromodulation devices (75% vs 20%, p < 0.001) at follow-up. No significant relationships exist between symptom improvement using conventional measures and patient-reported satisfaction. Current satisfaction was not associated with changes in bowel diary data after percutaneous nerve evaluation. Despite improvements in the St. Mark's Incontinence Score and Manchester Health Questionnaire below the 50% improvement threshold used to define "success," patients reported high (80%) satisfaction. Retrospective design with gaps in the available data. High patient satisfaction with sacral neuromodulation can be achieved; however, the response to percutaneous nerve evaluation may not predict treatment satisfaction in the long term. The change in questionnaire results, which measure the use of compensatory behaviors and quality-of-life impact, may better correspond to treatment satisfaction. ANTECEDENTES:La neuromodulación sacra es un tratamiento eficaz para la incontinencia fecal a largo plazo. La eficacia suele evaluarse mediante cuestionarios sobre la frecuencia diaria intestinal, la gravedad de los síntomas o la calidad de vida, y el "éxito" se define como una mejoría >50% en estas medidas. Sin embargo, la satisfacción del paciente puede ser una medida más significativa e individualizada de la eficacia del tratamiento.OBJETIVO:Evaluar la satisfacción a largo plazo de los pacientes con la neuromodulación sacra y compararla con las medidas de eficacia aplicadas con frecuencia.DISEÑO:Estudio observacional de una base de datos mantenida prospectivamente.LUGAR:Unidad terciaria única de referencia de suelo pélvico.PACIENTES:Se dispuso de datos de 70 pacientes (68 mujeres, mediana de edad 69 [60-74]). La mediana de tiempo transcurrido desde la implantación fue de 11 (9-14) años. Diecinueve pacientes informaron de dispositivos de neuromodulación inactivos.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VALORACIÓN:Diarios intestinales, el Cuestionario de Salud de Manchester y la Puntuación de Incontinencia de St Marks registrados al inicio, tras la evaluación percutánea del nervio y en el último seguimiento. Los pacientes informaron de su satisfacción, utilizando una escala analógica visual de 0%-100%, con el tratamiento desde la implantación (global) y en las dos semanas anteriores a la realización de las últimas medidas de resultado (actual).RESULTADOS:La satisfacción fue significativamente mayor en los pacientes con dispositivos de neuromodulación sacra activos (75% frente a 20%, p < 0,001) durante el seguimiento. No existen relaciones significativas entre la mejoría de los síntomas mediante medidas convencionales y la satisfacción comunicada por el paciente. La satisfacción actual no se asoció con los cambios en los datos de la frecuencia diaria intestinal tras la evaluación percutánea de los nervios. A pesar de que las mejoras en la puntuación de incontinencia de St Mark y el Cuestionario de Salud de Manchester se situaron por debajo del umbral de mejora del 50% utilizado para definir el "éxito", los pacientes declararon un alto grado de satisfacción (80%).LIMITACIONES:Retrospectivo con lagunas en los datos disponibles.CONCLUSIONES:Puede lograrse una alta satisfacción de los pacientes con la neuromodulación sacra; sin embargo, la respuesta a la evaluación percutánea del nervio puede no predecir la satisfacción con el tratamiento a largo plazo. El cambio en los resultados del cuestionario, que mide el uso de conductas compensatorias y el impacto en la calidad de vida, puede corresponder mejor a la satisfacción con el tratamiento. (Traducción-Dr. Ingrid Melo ).

Is percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) effective for fecal incontinence (FI) in adults compared with sham electrical stimulation? A meta-analysis.

Sacral nerve neuromodulation (SNM) has been considered the optimal second-line treatment for fecal incontinence (FI). However, SNM involves high cost and requires highly skilled operators. Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) has emerged as an alternative treatment modality for FI, yielding varying clinical outcomes. We conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of PTNS compared to sham electrical stimulation for FI. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies from May12, 2012 to May12, 2022. Four randomized controlled studies were included in this review, involving a total of 439 adult patients with FI (300 in the PTNS group and 194 in the sham electrical stimulation group). Our meta-analysis revealed that PTNS demonstrated superior efficacy in reducing weekly episodes of FI compared to the control groups (MD - 1.6, 95%CI - 2.94 to - 0.26, p = 0.02, I2 = 30%). Furthermore, a greater proportion of patients in the PTNS group reported more than a 50% reduction in FI episodes per week (RR 0.73, 95%CI 0.57-0.94, p = 0.02, I2 = 6%). However, no significant differences were observed in any domains of the FI Quality of Life (QoL) and St Mark's incontinence scores (MD -2.41, 95%CI -5.1 to 0.27, p = 0.08, I2 = 67%). Importantly, no severe adverse events related to PTNS were reported in any of the participants. Our meta-analysis revealed that PTNS was more effective than sham stimulation in reducing FI episodes and led to a higher proportion of patients reporting more than a 50% reduction in weekly FI episodes.

Are we using best practice to guide laxative use in post-partum patients with obstetric anal sphincter injuries – A retrospective review

ObjectiveObstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) is the leading cause of anal incontinence (AI) in young women. Laxatives are recommended to enhance recovery, however there are no consistent guidelines to guide best practice on the type, frequency, and dose of laxative should be used. This study aimed to evaluate the current use of laxatives following repair of OASIs, and to determine any association with AI.Study designA retrospective cohort study of 356 women who sustained OASIs between January 2016 and June 2020, at a single tertiary centre in Adelaide. Data regarding the type, dose and frequency of laxatives prescribed was extracted from each patient. The degree of OASIs was determined by clinical examination and endoanal ultrasound, and AI was measured by the St Marks incontinence score. ResultsMultiple combinations and classes of laxatives were prescribed including bulking agent (Metamucil and Fybogel), emollients (Coloxyl), and osmotic laxatives (lactulose and Movicol). Bulking agents were prescribed for 245 women (68.8%), which is contrary to the current recommendations based on two previous randomised controlled trials. AI reported by 51 (14.3%) women. There were no statistical differences between AI and laxative type, dose, or frequency. ConclusionConsiderable variation existed in laxatives prescription. Bulking agents was not associated with higher rates of AI. Further research is required to improve post-partum care in women following repair of OASIs.

Prospective cohort study of high-volume transanal irrigation in patients with constipation and/or faecal incontinence.

The aim of this work was to determine the clinical efficacy of high-volume transanal irrigation (TAI) in patients with constipation and/or faecal incontinence using validated symptom and quality of life questionnaires. This was a prospective cohort study of 114 consecutive patients with constipation and/or faecal incontinence (Rome IV defined) who started TAI. A comprehensive questionnaire was completed at baseline and 4, 12, 26 and 52 weeks' follow-up. The primary objective was significant symptom reduction [≥30%; Cleveland Clinic Constipation Score (CCCS) and St Marks Incontinence Score (SMIS)] in those who continued TAI at 52 weeks. Secondary objectives were (1) continuation rates of TAI, (2) effect on quality of life (QoL) and (3) identification of predictors for continuation. A total of 59 (51.8%) patients with constipation, 26 (22.8%) with faecal incontinence and 29 (25.4%) with coexistent symptoms were included. At 52 weeks, 41 (36.0%) patients continued TAI, 63 (55.2%) stopped and 10 (8.8%) patients were lost to follow-up. In those who continued TAI at 52 weeks (n = 41), no reduction of constipation symptoms was observed. Median Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life scores decreased on most domains, indicating QoL improvement. Reduction of faecal incontinence occurred in 5/9 (55.6%) patients with faecal incontinence and in 3/10 (30.0%) patients with coexistent symptoms. The median SMIS per-individual decreased in patients with coexistent symptoms (2; interquartile range 0-4; p = 0.023). Median Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life scores increased in most domains, indicating improved QoL. No clinical characteristics predicted continuation. One-third (n = 41) of patients continued TAI at 52 weeks. In those who continued TAI at 52 weeks, symptoms of faecal incontinence (SMIS) were reduced but not constipation (CCCS). QoL related to both constipation and faecal incontinence improved. No clinical characteristics predicted continuation.

Correlation of anorectal symptoms and endoanal ultrasound findings after obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS).

Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) predispose to development of anorectal symptoms that affect women's quality of life. A retrospective cohort study was conducted for all women with singleton vaginal deliveries who had a primary OASIS repair and attended the Postpartum Perineal Clinic between July 1st 2017 and December 31st 2020. This study was approved by the Research Ethics Board. The purpose of this study was (1) to determine correlation between endoanal ultrasound (EAUS) findings and anorectal symptoms quantified by the St. Mark's Incontinence Score (SMIS), (2) to determine the incidence of residual anal sphincter defects, and (3) to determine the rate of clinical overdiagnosis of OASIS. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to assess correlation between anorectal symptoms and EAUS findings. A total of 247 participants with clinical diagnosis of OASIS met the inclusion criteria. A 3rd-degree tear was identified in 126 (51.0%) and 4th-degree tear was identified in 30 (12.1%) participants. In participants with sonographic evidence of OASIS, there was a statistically significant weak positive correlation between the size of residual defect and SMIS for both external anal sphincter (EAS) (r= .3723, p<.0001) and internal anal sphincter (IAS) (r= .3122, p=.0180). Residual defect in the anorectal sphincter of greater than 1 hour (>30°) in width was present in 64.3% participants with 3rd-degree tear and 86.7% participants with 4th-degree tear. The rate of overdiagnosis was 36.8%. The size of residual defect of EAS and IAS has a weak positive correlation with anorectal symptoms, emphasizing the importance of EAUS for counselling regarding mode of subsequent delivery.

Long-term outcomes of total colectomy for severe constipation.

Surgery for constipation is usually reserved for patients with severe and refractory symptoms because of concerns about perioperative morbidity and unpredictable functional outcomes. The aim of this paper is to identify the long-term outcomes of patients who have undergone total colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis for severe constipation. Patients who had undergone a total colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis for severe constipation were identified from a prospectively maintained database and sent a postal survey assessing functional symptoms, patient satisfaction and the impact of symptoms on quality of life. Information regarding the surgery, perioperative complications and hospitalizations were also collected. Functional outcomes of the surgery were evaluated with the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index, St Marks incontinence score, Wexner continence score, obstructed defaecation syndrome score and Cleveland Clinic constipation score. Seventy-one questionnaires were posted and 32 (45%) patients responded. The mean time since surgery was 15.3 years (range 2.9-30.4 years) Most patients were happy with the surgery. Ongoing symptoms were common, the most frequent of these were abdominal pain, experienced by 23 patients (71.9%), and faecal incontinence, experienced by 17 patients (53%). Fourteen patients (43.8%) required subsequent hospital admission due to bowel obstruction and eight patients (25%%) had subsequent surgery for adhesions. There was an association between patient quality of life and subsequent surgeries. Most patients were happy and viewed their life as improved following total colectomy for severe constipation. This is despite a high rate of ongoing functional symptoms.

Assessing Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries: A Comparison of Exoanal and Endoanal Ultrasound.

To explore the differences in assessing obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASI) between transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) and endoanal ultrasound (EAUS) and test relationships between ultrasound findings and anal incontinence (AI) symptoms. A group of 196 women with a history of vaginal delivery was recruited. OASI was detected in a set of 5 slices by EAUS and 8 slices by TPUS. OASI grading was performed on TPUS rules and EAUS rules. A "significant sphincter defect" was diagnosed by TPUS and EAUS using "2/3 rules." Symptoms of AI were determined using the St Mark's Incontinence Score (SMIS). Ultrasound findings were compared between the two methods and correlated with symptoms. Of 196 women, 29 (14.8%) suffered from AI with a mean SMIS of 12.1 ± 4.5, and 70 (35.7%) women with a mean age of 57 years had suspected OASI on imaging. Twenty-one (10.7%) "significant defects" were diagnosed by TPUS and 24 (12.2%) by EAUS. OASI Grades on TPUS had good agreement with EAUS rules (k=0.70, P < .001). Logistic regression analysis showed that OASI Grade on imaging and "significant sphincter defects" seen on both forms of imaging were associated with AI symptoms. The odds ratio was 46 and 38 for "significant defects" on TPUS and EAUS, and 14 and 7 for OASI 3b+ on TPUS and EAUS in predicting AI, respectively. "Significant defects" diagnosed by EAUS or TPUS and OASI Grade 3b+ predict AI symptoms. The diagnostic performance of endoanal and exoanal ultrasound (EAUS and TPUS) appear to be very similar.

Impact of parity and delivery mode on pelvic floor function in young women: a 3D ultrasound evaluation.

The objectives were to evaluate clinical and anatomical parameters assessed by three-dimensional pelvic floor ultrasound (3D ultrasound) in parous and nulliparous women of childbearing age and to assess underreported symptoms of sexual dysfunction (SD), urinary incontinence (UI) and flatus incontinence (FI). Women without complaints of pelvic floor dysfunction, aged 20-50 years, were eligible for this prospective cross-sectional study. They completed the King's Health Questionnaire, Female Sexual Function Index and St Mark's Incontinence Score adapted for this study. Next, a physical examination and 3D ultrasound were performed. The scores obtained in the questionnaires were compared with the 3D ultrasound data. In total, 326 women were invited to participate. Of these, 203 women met the inclusion criteria, and their cases were classified as nulliparity (NU, 59), vaginal delivery (VD, 80), forceps delivery (FD, 18) and caesarean section (CS, 48). These groups were homogeneous regarding age (p=0.096), parity (p=0.051) and body mass index (p=0.06). The hiatal dimension (HD; p=0.003) and transverse diameter (TD) (p=0.001) were significantly different among the groups. Compared with the NU and CS groups, the VD and FD groups had an increased HD and TD. The frequencies of underreported symptoms identified by questionnaires were as follows: SD (46.3%), UI (35%) and FI (28%). After VD and FD, women were more likely to present UI (p<0.001), FI (p<0.001) and SD (p=0.002) than the women with NU and those who had undergone a CS. UI was related to a greater HD (p=0.002) and anteroposterior diameter (p=0.022), FI was associated with a thinner left pubovisceral muscle (p=0.013), and SD was related to a greater HD (p=0.026). Three-dimensional ultrasound can identify mild morphological changes in young women with apparently normal physical examinations, mainly after VD and FD. In such individuals, these findings are associated with higher incidences of underreported sexual, urinary and anal symptoms.

The long-term prevalence of anal incontinence in women with and without obstetric anal sphincter injuries

Introduction:Anal incontinence (AI) is a distressing and common condition for women. Women who sustain obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASI) have been reported to have a higher prevalence of long-term AI than those who do not. However, the data is wide ranging, inconsistent and seldom comparative, with rates quoted varying between 13.1% and 74%. Methods:139 women who sustained OASI at their first delivery and 44 women who did not (controls) were contacted at 6 weeks and then a mean of 8 years following their first delivery. They were asked to complete a questionnaire including the St Mark’s Incontinence Score (SMIS) to assess the prevalence and severity of anal incontinence. Results:There was a high prevalence of anal incontinence (SMIS ≥1) in both women with OASI (62%) and controls (59%) (NS). The prevalence of severe AI (SMIS ≥ 6) was 27% in the OASI group and 18% in controls (NS). Higher grade tears and operative delivery were associated with higher rates of severe AI. In women with OASI, the mode of subsequent delivery did not impact the prevalence of AI. Conclusion:Women with OASI have a similar prevalence of long-term AI compared with women who do not sustain OASI. Some degree of AI is common 8 years post-partum, with our study demonstrating a high prevalence of 59% in controls. Brief summary:Women with and without OASI were contacted 5–15 years post-partum, and there was no difference in the rates of anal incontinence between the two groups.

The role of anal manometry in the follow-up of women with obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASI).

Mode of birth (MOB) following OASI is determined by choice, symptoms and anorectal study results in asymptomatic women. Endoanal ultrasound (EAUS) is the gold-standard imaging modality. EAUS use in MOB counselling is supported by strong evidence. Less is understood about how anal manometry (AM) influences MOB counselling. A retrospective observational study was conducted from 2007 to 2020. Women underwent symptom assessment using validated ePAQ and St Mark's incontinence score (SMIS). Anorectal studies using EAUS and AM were performed. The case group was the normal ultrasound group and the control group was the abnormal ultrasound group. Both groups were compared with normal and abnormal AM result groups. A total of 1348 women were included over 13 years. Among these, 454 women were symptomatic, 894 were asymptomatic; 274 (31%) asymptomatic women had isolated abnormal AM results, 313 (35%) had two abnormal anorectal results and 221 (24.7%) had normal anorectal results. Eighty-six asymptomatic women (10.4%) had isolated abnormal EAUS results, 138 (30.4%) symptomatic women had isolated abnormal AM, 221 (48.7%) had two abnormal anorectal results and 57 (12.6%) had normal anorectal results. Thirty-eight symptomatic women (8.4%) had an isolated abnormal EAUS result. AM identifies more women with sphincter function impairment than EAUS alone. Without AM, almost one third of asymptomatic women would not have been identified and could have been inadequately counselled. Performing AM and EAUS together captured most women with compromised anal sphincter function. We conclude that AM should be performed in all women with OASI alongside EAUS to enable accurate MOB counselling.

Mode of delivery following obstetric anal sphincter injury: a 7-year retrospective review and follow-up cohort survey.

Limited evidence exists regarding long-term outcomes following birth after prior obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI). This article set out to describe outcomes following birth after OASI by reviewing the grades of tear, endoanal ultrasound (EAUS) findings, subsequent delivery outcomes and long-term symptoms. This study was conducted in two parts. The first involved a retrospective review of all OASI at a tertiary hospital in Australia over 7 years (2013-2019 inclusive) where the patient underwent a subsequent delivery. Following this, a retrospective cohort survey of this group was performed. There were 27,284 vaginal births and 828 OASIs (3.03%); 247 (29.8%) had at least one subsequent birth by January 2021. Vaginal delivery occurred in 68%; recurrence of OASI was 5.4%. There were 90 responses (36.4%) to the follow-up survey. EAUS had been performed in 87.5%; none demonstrated a defect. Vaginal birth was the preferred mode for 77.8%; this occurred in 64%. The majority had high levels of satisfaction, this related to communication rather than the mode of delivery itself. Ongoing faecal or flatal incontinence was reported by 12%. There was no statistically significant difference in St Mark's incontinence scores between modes of birth. In our unit most women who sustain OASI will have a subsequent vaginal delivery in future pregnancies. The majority remain asymptomatic at long-term follow-up with no statistically significant difference in incontinence scores regardless of mode of delivery. The rate of recurrent OASI was 5.4%.

An evaluation of the long-term effectiveness of Gatekeeper™ intersphincteric implants for passive faecal incontinence

BackgroundImplantation of Gatekeeper™ prostheses presents an option for the treatment of passive faecal incontinence (FI). Whilst preliminary results are encouraging, long-term data regarding its sustained benefit are limited. The aim of this study was to assess and evaluate the long-term clinical function and quality of life of patients with passive faecal incontinence who were treated with Gatekeeper™ prostheses.MethodsThis was a single centre, single surgeon retrospective study of prospectively collected clinical data in patients with FI treated between June 2012 and May 2019. Patients with passive FI with symptoms refractory to conservative treatment and endoanal ultrasonography showing intact or disrupted internal anal sphincter were included. Formal clinical and quality of life assessments were carried out using the St. Mark’s Incontinence Score (SMIS) and Faecal Incontinence Quality of Life (FIQoL) questionnaires at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and then annually. Endoanal ultrasonography was performed both before and after surgery.ResultsForty patients (14 males, 26 females) with a median age of 62.5 (range 33–80) years were treated with the Gatekeeper™ implant. The majority of patients (87.5%) received six implants. There were no peri or post-operative complications. Prosthesis migration was observed in 12.5% patients. The median follow-up duration was 5 years (interquartile range (IQR) 3.25–6.00 years). A sustained improvement in median SMIS and FIQoL scores from baseline to follow-up was noted. Significant differences were observed between the median baseline SMIS score and last follow-up score of 16.00 (IQR 15.00–16.75) to 7.00 (IQR 5.00–8.00) respectively (p < 0.001), a 56.25% decrease. The overall median FIQoL score showed a significant improvement from 7.95 (IQR 7.13–9.48) to 13.15 (IQR 12.00–13.98) (p < 0.001) a 65.40% increase.ConclusionsGatekeeper™ implantation is a safe approach to treating passive FI and is minimally invasive, reproducible and has minimal complications. Long-term sustained clinical improvement is achievable beyond 5 years. Careful patient selection is paramount, as is consistency of technique and follow-up protocol.

Stepped-wedge randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy in adults with chronic constipation

BackgroundThe effectiveness of laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy (LVMR) in patients with defecatory disorders secondary to internal rectal prolapse is poorly evidenced. A UK-based multicenter randomized controlled trial was designed to determine the clinical efficacy of LVMR compared to controls at medium-term follow-up.MethodsThe randomized controlled trial was conducted from March 1, 2015 TO January 31, 2019. A stepped-wedge RCT design permitted observer-masked data comparisons between patients awaiting LVMR (controls) with those who had undergone surgery. Adult participants with radiologically confirmed IRP refractory to conservative treatment were randomized to three arms with different delays before surgery. Efficacy outcome data were collected at equally stepped time points (12, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 72 weeks). Clinical efficacy of LVMR compared to controls was defined as ≥ 1.0-point reduction in Patient Assessment of Constipation-Quality of Life and/or Symptoms (PAC-QOL and/or PAC-SYM) scores at 24 weeks. Secondary outcome measures included 14-day diary data, the Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7), the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), St Marks incontinence score, the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12), the chronic constipation Behavioral Response to Illness Questionnaire (CC-BRQ), and the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ).ResultsOf a calculated sample size of 114, only 28 patients (100% female) were randomized from 6 institutions (due mainly to national pause on mesh-related surgery). Nine were assigned to the T0 arm, 10 to T12, and 9 to T24. There were no substantial differences in baseline characteristics between the three arms. Compared to baseline, significant reduction (improvement) in PAC-QOL and PAC-SYM scores were observed at 24 weeks post-surgery (– 1.09 [95% CI – 1.76, – 0.41], p = 0.0019, and – 0.92 [– 1.52, – 0.32], p = 0.0029, respectively) in the 19 patients available for analysis (9 were excluded for dropout [n = 2] or missing primary outcome [n = 7]). There was a clinically significant long-term reduction in PAC-QOL scores (− 1.38 [− 2.94, 0.19], p = 0.0840 at 72 weeks). Statistically significant improvements in PAC-SYM scores persisted to 72 weeks (− 1.51 [− 2.87, − 0.16], p = 0.0289). Compared to baseline, no differences were found in secondary outcomes, except for significant improvements at 24 and 48 weeks on CC-BRQ avoidance behavior (− 14.3 [95% CI − 23.3, − 5.4], and − 0.92 [− 1.52, − 0.32], respectively), CC-BRQ safety behavior (− 13.7 [95% CI − 20.5, − 7.0], and − 13.0 [− 19.8, − 6.1], respectively), and BIPQ negative perceptions (− 16.3 [95% CI − 23.5, − 9.0], and − 10.5 [− 17.9, − 3.2], respectively).ConclusionsWith the caveat of under-powering due to poor recruitment, the study presents the first randomized trial evidence of short-term benefit of LVMR for internal rectal prolapse.Trial registrationISRCTN Registry (ISRCTN11747152).

A prospective trial of the THD SphinKeeper® for faecal incontinence.

THD SphinKeeper® is an emerging surgical technique for faecal incontinence (FI). The safety, indications and efficacy of the procedure are still being investigated. The aim of this study is to present the first experience of SphinKeeper® in Australia. This was a prospective single-centre observational study of patients undergoing SphinKeeper® implantation between February 2018 and September 2019. Baseline demographics, intraoperative and postoperative complications, Cleveland Clinic Faecal Incontinence Score, St Mark's Incontinence Score, Faecal Incontinence Quality of Life score (FIQOL), anorectal manometry and endo-anal ultrasound were assessed preoperatively and 3 and 12months after implantation. Thirteen patients (2 male, 11 female) underwent implantation during the study period. Anal sphincter defects were present in 13 (76.9%) patients [external anal sphincter (EAS) defect, 2 (15.4%); internal anal sphincter (IAS) defect 4 (30.8%); EAS+IAS defect, 4 (30.8%)]. Median follow-up was 32months (range 18-37months). There were four complications: one intraoperative (rectal perforation) and three postoperative (one implant extrusion, two implants that required removal due to malposition). At 12months, an average of 9/10 implants remained ideally placed in each patient. THD SphinKeeper® insertion was associated with an improvement in coping/behaviour as measured using FIQOL (p=0.047). However, the procedure did not improve FI scores or anorectal manometry parameters. In this study, SphinKeeper® marginally improved symptoms of FI but there was no significant impact on anorectal manometric measurements. Larger-scale studies are needed to determine the patient cohort most likely to benefit from this procedure.

Under-classified obstetric anal sphincter injuries

Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIs) that are missed at delivery can have long-term consequences. OASIs that are under-classified at delivery are likely to be inadequately repaired, resulting in a persistent anal sphincter defect. We aimed to identify women who have persistent defects on endoanal ultrasound, inconsistent with the original diagnosis, and compare the effect on St Mark's incontinence scores (SMIS). We also aimed to look for changes in numbers of under-classification over time. Records of women attending a perineal clinic who had endoanal ultrasound from 2012 to 2020 were reviewed. Women who had a modified Starck score implying a defect greater than the classification [indicated by the depth of external anal sphincter or internal anal sphincter (IAS) defect] at delivery were identified. A total of 1056 women with a diagnosis of 3a or 3b tears were included. Of these, 120 (11.36%) were found to have a defect greater than the original diagnosis and therefore were incorrectly classified at delivery. Women who had a 3b tear diagnosed at delivery, but had an IAS defect, had a significantly higher SMIS (p< 0.01). When comparing two 4-year periods, there was a significant improvement in the diagnosis of IAS tears. Some women with OASIs that have under-classified OASIs are associated with worse anorectal symptoms. This is likely because of an incomplete repair. Some improvement in diagnosis of IAS tears has been noted. We propose improved training in OASIs can help reduce the number of incorrectly classified tears and improve repair.

P474 Prevalence of fecal incontinence and clinical characteristics of IBD patients in remission and treated with biologics – experience from a tertiary referral center

Abstract Background Fecal incontinence (FI) is a debilitating disorder highly prevalent in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients with reports in literature ranging from 20–80%. There is limited data on FI prevalence in IBD patients who are in remission, treated with biologics and their clinical characteristics. Methods In this cross-sectional observational study we have included IBD patients in remission, treated with biologics. Demographics and medical data were collected from electronic medical charts while patients were screened for FI using the St. Mark’s incontinence score (SMIS). Significant FI was characterized as SMIS ³6. Descriptive statistical analysis was used. Results We included 57 patients (24 female/33 male) in clinical remission treated with biologics, median age 41 years (18–70), 23 patients had ulcerative colitis (UC) and 34 had Crohn’s disease (CD). Median disease duration was 8 years (1–31). Significant FI was identified in 41 patient (71.9%) out of which 87.8% were in biochemical and 34.1% in endoscopical remission. FI was more prevalent among CD patients (76.4%) compared to UC (65.2%), but the difference did not reach statistical significance. FI was not significantly correlated to gender, type or number of biologics but there was significant positive correlation with disease duration (r=0.3139; p&amp;lt;0.05), especially for patients with disease duration longer than 5 years who had significantly higher mean SMIS score (9.1±4.6 vs 5.2±2.6; t-2.86; p&amp;lt;0.05). Furthermore, patients older than 50 years of age also had significantly higher average SMIS scores compared to younger patients (10.6±4.6 vs 7.6±4.3;t-2.09;p&amp;lt;0.05) Conclusion FI is highly prevalent in IBD patients treated with biologics, even in those who have reached endoscopical remission. Clinicians should be aware of this disorder and use available screening tools especially in older patients with longer disease duration in order to further improve quality of life of these patients.

Which factors are associated with anal incontinence after obstetric anal sphincter injury?

Obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) is an important factor in the etiology of anal incontinence. This study aimed to evaluate whether anal sphincter defects, levator avulsion or levator ballooning after OASI are associated with severity of anal incontinence. Furthermore, we evaluated whether factors such as constipation and altered stool consistency are associated with symptoms of incontinence after OASI. In this multicenter prospective observational cohort study, women with OASI were invited to participate at least 3 months after primary repair. All women completed validated questionnaires, including St Mark's incontinence score, Bristol stool scale (BSS) and Cleveland clinic constipation score (CCCS), and underwent four-dimensional (4D) transperineal ultrasound for assessment of the levator ani muscle and anal sphincter. In total, 220 women were included. Median follow-up was 4 months (range, 3-98 months). Univariate linear regression analysis showed an association of St Mark's incontinence score with a residual defect of the external anal sphincter (EAS) (β, 1.55 (95% CI, 0.04-3.07); P = 0.045), higher parity (β, 0.85 (95% CI, 0.02-1.67); P = 0.046), BSS (β, 1.28 (95% CI, 0.67-1.89); P < 0.001) and CCCS (β, 0.36 (95% CI, 0.18-0.54); P < 0.001). However, multivariate linear regression found an association of St Mark's incontinence score only with BSS (β, 1.50 (95% CI, 0.90-2.11); P < 0.001) and CCCS (β, 0.46 (95% CI, 0.29-0.63); P < 0.001). Residual defects of the EAS, detected on 4D transperineal ultrasound, are associated with severity of anal incontinence symptoms measured using St Mark's incontinence score 4 months after OASI repair. Furthermore, clinical factors such as constipation and altered stool consistency appear to influence this association and may therefore play a more important role in clinical management. © 2020 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.