ssGBLUP Method Research Articles

Comparison of genomic prediction methods for early growth traits of Inner Mongolia cashmere goats based on multi trait models.

Inner Mongolia cashmere goat is an excellent livestock breed formed through long-term natural selection and artificial breeding, and is currently a world-class dual-purpose breed producing cashmere and meat. Multi trait animal model is considered to significantly improve the accuracy of genetic evaluation in livestock and poultry, enabling indirect selection between traits. In this study, the pedigree, genotype, environment, and phenotypic records of early growth traits of Inner Mongolia cashmere goats were used to build multi trait animal model., Then three methods including ABLUP, GBLUP, and ssGBLUP wereused to estimate the genetic parameters and genomic breeding values of early growth traits (birth weight, weaning weight, average daily weight gain before weaning, and yearling weight). The accuracy and reliability of genomic estimated breeding value are further evaluated using the five fold cross validation method. The results showed that the heritability of birth weight estimated by three methods was 0.13-0.15, the heritability of weaning weight was 0.13-0.20, heritability of daily weight gain before weaning was 0.11-0.14, and the heritability of yearling weight was 0.09-0.14, all of which belonged to moderate to low heritability. There is a strong positive genetic correlation between weaning weight and daily weight gain before weaning, daily weight gain before weaning and yearling weight, with correlation coefficients of 0.77-0.79 and 0.56-0.67, respectively. The same pattern was found in phenotype correlation among traits. The accuracy of the estimated breeding values by ABLUP, GBLUP, and ssGBLUP methods for birth weight is 0.5047, 0.6694, and 0.7156, respectively; the weaning weight is 0.6207, 0.6456, and 0.7254, respectively; the daily weight gain before weaning was 0.6110, 0.6855, and 0.7357 respectively; and the yearling weight was 0.6209, 0.7155, and 0.7756, respectively. In summary, the early growth traits of Inner Mongolia cashmere goats belong to moderate to low heritability, and the speed of genetic improvement is relatively slow. The genetic improvement of other growth traits can be achieved through the selection of weaning weight. The ssGBLUP method has the highest accuracy and reliability in estimating genomic breeding value of early growth traits in Inner Mongolia cashmere goats, and is significantly higher than that from ABLUP method, indicating that it is the best method for genomic breeding of early growth weight in Inner Mongolia cashmere goats.

Accuracy of Genomic prediction for fleece traits in Inner Mongolia Cashmere goats

The fleece traits are important economic traits of goats. With the reduction of sequencing and genotyping cost and the improvement of related technologies, genomic selection for goats has become possible. The research collect pedigree, phenotype and genotype information of 2299 Inner Mongolia Cashmere goats (IMCGs) individuals. We estimate fixed effects, and compare the estimates of variance components, heritability and genomic predictive ability of fleece traits in IMCGs when using the pedigree based Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (ABLUP), Genomic BLUP (GBLUP) or single-step GBLUP (ssGBLUP). The fleece traits considered are cashmere production (CP), cashmere diameter (CD), cashmere length (CL) and fiber length (FL). It was found that year of production, sex, herd and individual ages had highly significant effects on the four fleece traits (P < 0.01). All of these factors should be considered when the genetic parameters of fleece traits in IMCGs are evaluated. The heritabilities of FL, CL, CP and CD with ABLUP, GBLUP and ssGBLUP methods were 0.26 ~ 0.31, 0.05 ~ 0.08, 0.15 ~ 0.20 and 0.22 ~ 0.28, respectively. Therefore, it can be inferred that the genetic progress of CL is relatively slow. The predictive ability of fleece traits in IMCGs with GBLUP (56.18% to 69.06%) and ssGBLUP methods (66.82% to 73.70%) was significantly higher than that of ABLUP (36.73% to 41.25%). For the ssGBLUP method is significantly (29% ~ 33%) higher than that with ABLUP, and which is slightly (4% ~ 14%) higher than that of GBLUP. The ssGBLUP will be as an superiors method for using genomic selection of fleece traits in Inner Mongolia Cashmere goats.

Single-step genomic prediction for body weight and maturity age in Finnish rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)

The use of genomic information has been proven to be a highly effective in predicting genomic breeding values (GEBV) across various species, including aquatic organisms. In the Finnish national rainbow trout breeding programme, the integration of genomic selection holds particular significance for the traits recorded on sibling fish reared in the main commercial sea production environment, given the selection occurs among the breeding candidates reared in the freshwater nucleus. In the programme, family tanks allow to maintain a pedigree for a large number of fish, and genotyping of a portion of the fish accompanied with a single-step genomic evaluation (ssGBLUP) would maintain high selection intensity and simultaneously make use of possibilities of genomic selection. In this study we used three different statistical approaches to quantify the selection accuracy of ssGBLUP evaluation of body weight and maturity age, relative to the evaluation based on the traditional sire-dam-offspring pedigree (PBLUP). The data included 600,409 fish in the pedigree among which 214,410 and 4573 were phenotyped for the reported traits and genotyped, respectively. Firstly, a phenotypic cross validation study showed that ssGBLUP had a slightly better prediction power for body weight and maturity age recorded at the sea, with an average 2.7% relative increase in accuracy compared to PBLUP. Secondly, a linear regression (LR) of GEBVs computed using either full or reduced dataset demonstrated that the ssGBLUP model had a consistently lower bias and dispersion compared to the PBLUP model, underscoring its efficacy in dealing with complex datasets like ours. When considering the reliability of [G]EBV predictions, the use of ssGBLUP model resulted in a significant improvement. There is, on average, a notable 50% relative increase in the reliability of predictions for the sea-recorded traits. Thirdly, the enhancement in reliability was further evidenced by the individual assessment of [G]EBVs computed using the reverse reliability methodology. Notably, genotyped individuals experienced an average increase of 0.27 units in reliability, while ungenotyped individuals experienced a corresponding increase of 0.03 units. The results show that the ssGBLUP method had higher prediction accuracy for both sea and freshwater traits compared to PBLUP. The developed ssGBLUP model will be instrumental in Finland's rainbow trout breeding, facilitating precise and efficient selection of new candidates.

Genomic Selection Using Single-Step Genomic BLUP on the Number of Services per Conception Trait in Thai–Holstein Crossbreeds

Reproductive traits are important traits that directly affect a farmer’s income and are difficult to improve upon using traditional genetic methods. Therefore, there is a need to consider new options for increasing the accuracy of the genetic selection of dairy cows. The objective of this study was to compare the genetic methods of the traditional BLUP and ssGBLUP techniques in terms of the estimated genetic parameters and accuracy of the estimated breeding values. The data comprised 101,331 services per conception (NSPC) records from 54,027 Thai–Holstein crossbred cows, 109,233 pedigree data, and 770 genotyped animals. A Bayesian analysis via threshold Gibbs sampling was used to analyze the estimated variance components and genetic parameters. The results showed that the means of the NSPC data were 2.21, 2.31, and 2.42 for less than 87.5% for Holstein genetics (breed group; BG1), 87.5 to 93.6% for Holstein genetics (BG2), and greater than 93.7% for Holstein genetics (BG3), respectively. The estimated heritability values were 0.038 and 0.051, and the repeatability values were 0.149 and 0.157 for the traditional BLUP and ssGBLUP methods, respectively. The accuracy of the estimated breeding values from the ssGBLUP method was higher than that from the traditional BLUP method, ranging from 6.05 to 17.69%, depending on the dataset, especially in the top 20% of the bull dataset had the highest values. In conclusion, the ssGBLUP method could improve the heritability value and accuracy of the breeding values compared with the traditional BLUP method. Therefore, switching from traditional methods to the ssGBLUP method for the Thai dairy cattle breeding program is a viable option.

Genetic parameters and association between longevity and milk production in buffaloes using the ssGBLUP method

Genetic parameters and association between longevity and milk production in buffaloes using the ssGBLUP method

Single-step genomic evaluation for growth traits in a Mexican Braunvieh cattle population.

The objective was to compare (pedigree-based) BLUP, genomic BLUP (GBLUP), and single-step GBLUP (ssGBLUP) methods for genomic evaluation of growth traits in a Mexican Braunvieh cattle population. Birth (BW), weaning (WW), and yearling weight (YW) data of a Mexican Braunvieh cattle population were analyzed with BLUP, GBLUP, and ssGBLUP methods. These methods are differentiated by the additive genetic relationship matrix included in the model and the animals under evaluation. The predictive ability of the model was evaluated using random partitions of the data in training and testing sets, consistently predicting about 20% of genotyped animals on all occasions. For each partition, the Pearson correlation coefficient between adjusted phenotypes for fixed effects and non-genetic random effects and the estimated breeding values (EBV) were computed. The random contemporary group (CG) effect explained about 50, 45, and 35% of the phenotypic variance in BW, WW, and YW, respectively. For the three methods, the CG effect explained the highest proportion of the phenotypic variances (except for YW-GBLUP). The heritability estimate obtained with GBLUP was the lowest for BW, while the highest heritability was obtained with BLUP. For WW, the highest heritability estimate was obtained with BLUP, the estimates obtained with GBLUP and ssGBLUP were similar. For YW, the heritability estimates obtained with GBLUP and BLUP were similar, and the lowest heritability was obtained with ssGBLUP. Pearson correlation coefficients between adjusted phenotypes for non-genetic effects and EBVs were the highest for BLUP, followed by ssBLUP and GBLUP. The successful implementation of genetic evaluations that include genotyped and non-genotyped animals in our study indicate a promising method for use in genetic improvement programs of Braunvieh cattle. Our findings showed that simultaneous evaluation of genotyped and non-genotyped animals improved prediction accuracy for growth traits even with a limited number of genotyped animals.

Genome-wide association studies uncover genes associated with litter traits in the pig

Litter traits are critical economic variables in the pig industry as they represent a production indicator that can serve to determine sow fertility. In this study, a genome-wide association study on litter traits, including total number born (TNB), number born alive (NBA), litter birth weight (LBW), average birth weight (ABW), and piglet uniformity (PU), was carried out on two pig breeds (Yorkshire and Landrace). A total of 3 637 pigs of both breeds were genotyped using the GeneSeek GGP Porcine 50K SNP BeadChip. A mixed linear model (MLM) and fixed and random model circulating probability unification (FarmCPU) were employed in the genome-wide association studies for litter traits using combined data from the two pig breeds and data from each breed separately. Additionally, the heritability of traits was estimated using three methods—pedigree-based best linear unbiased prediction (PBLUP), genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP), and single-step best linear unbiased prediction (ssGBLUP)—and was found to lie between 0.065 and 0.1289, 0.0478 and 0.0938, 0.0793 and 0.0935, 0.1862 and 0.2163, and 0.0327 and 0.0419 for TNB, NBA, LBW, ABW, and PU, respectively. We also compared the genomic prediction accuracies and unbiasedness for litter traits of the three BLUP models. Our results indicated that the ssGBLUP method provided higher predictive accuracies and more rational unbiasedness compared with the PBLUP and GBLUP methodologies. Furthermore, based on their possible roles, eight candidate genes (INHBA, LEPR, HDHD2, CTNND2, RNF216, HMX1, PAPPA2, and NTN1) were identified as being linked with litter traits. In the middle of the test, these genes were found to be connected with pig metabolism and ovulation rate. Our results provide the insights into the genetic architecture of litter traits in pigs, and the potential single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and candidate genes identified may benefit economic profits in pig-breeding industry and contribute to improve litter traits.

Genetic parameters and accuracy of traditional and genomic breeding values for resistance to infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis in Hereford

The objectives of this research were to estimate genetic parameters using a threshold animal model by traditional (pedigree and phenotype), single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) and Weighted ssGBLUP (WssGBLUP) methods, and assess the relative increase in accuracy with the addition of genomic information on the estimation of breeding values for the incidence of infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis (IBK) in Hereford cattle. The data used in this study were obtained from animals belonging to four farms of Delta G breeders association and genetically evaluated by the Delta G breeding program, born between 2015 and 2017, totaling 293,716 individuals in the pedigree data and 1,579 phenotypes for IBK (1 = absence of disease or 2 = presence of disease). The genotypic data, after quality control, retained 37,505 SNP markers and 1,401 samples. A Bayesian framework and a threshold animal model were used to estimate variance components and to predict breeding values. Animals with genotype and phenotype for the traits studied were divided into 3 groups by random and k-means clustering cross-validation strategies. The estimate of direct heritability for resistance to IBK was 0.12 ± 0.01 and 0.10 ± 0.01 through PBLUP and ssGBLUP methods. The mean realized prediction accuracies based on linear regression statistics were 0.36, 0.65 and 0.70, respectively for PBLUP, ssGBLUP and WssGBLUP; therefore, the use of the genomic relationship matrices was superior to the pedigree-based method. When using the WssGBLUP method, there was an additional increase in prediction accuracy when compared to the ssGBLUP method, which was already substantially better than PBLUP. The prediction of breeding values using genomic information by the single-step methods should result in more accurate selection decisions compared to traditional pedigree evaluations and, consequently, genomic selection can be readily applied with moderately high reliability to help reduce the incidence of IBK in Hereford cattle.

Integrating genomic selection for rapid improvement of milk yield in small-scale dairy farms

The objective was to evaluate the efficiency of single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) compared with conventional BLUP for milk yield in Thai-Holstein dairy cows. Data included 130,195 test-day milk yield records from the first parity of 16,383 cows between 1999 and 2018, divided into 5 data sets according to different regions of Thailand. Genetic analyses were done with the BLUP and ssGBLUP methods using a repeatability test-day model. Fixed effects included farm–calving season combination, breed group–months in milk combination, and age at first calving. Random effects included additive genetic effects, permanent environmental effects, and herd-month-year of test. The heritability values for milk yield between BLUP and ssGBLUP methods did not yield any differences. However, those values among regions differed in accordance with environmental factors, i.e., weather and feed resources, which are apparently different among Thailand regions. The accuracy of the EBV in the ssGBLUP method (0.53–0.65) was greater than that of the BLUP method (0.50–0.60) in all regions, with a difference in accuracy from 3.85 to 8.33%. The EBV using the BLUP and ssGBLUP methods showed similar trends within regions, but those obtained by the ssGBLUP method were greater than those using the BLUP method in all regions. Genomic selection using the ssGBLUP method was accurate and computationally efficient. Considering accuracy and average of EBV, the switch from traditional methods to the ssGBLUP method for the Thai dairy cattle breeding program is a viable option.

Comparison of different response variables in genomic prediction using GBLUP and ssGBLUP methods in Iranian Holstein cattle.

We compared the reliability and bias of genomic evaluation of Holstein bulls for milk, fat, and protein yield with two methods of genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) and single-step GBLUP (ssGBLUP). Four response variables of estimated breeding value (EBV), daughter yield deviation (DYD), de-regressed proofs based on Garrick (DRPGR) and VanRaden (DRPVR) were used as dependent variables. The effects of three weighting methods for diagonal elements of the incidence matrix associated with residuals were also explored. The reliability and the absolute deviation from 1 of the regression coefficient of the response variable on genomic prediction (Dev) using GBLUP and ssGBLUP methods were estimated in the validation population. In the ssGBLUP method, the genomic prediction reliability and Dev from un-weighted DRPGR method for milk yield were 0.44 and 0.002, respectively. In the GBLUP method, the corresponding measurements from un-weighted EBV for fat were 0.52 and 0.008, respectively. Moreover, the un-weighted DRPGR performed well in ssGBLUP with fat yield values for reliability and Dev of 0.49 and 0.001, respectively, compared to equivalent protein yield values of 0.38 and 0.056, respectively. In general, the results from ssGBLUP of the un-weighted DRPGR for milk and fat yield and weighted DRPGR for protein yield outperformed other models. The average reliability of genomic predictions for three traits from ssGBLUP was 0.39 which was 0.98% higher than the average reliability from GBLUP. Likewise, the Dev of genomic predictions was lower in ssGBLUP than GBLUP. The average Dev of predictions for three traits from ssGBLUP and GBLUP were 0.110 and 0.144, respectively. In conclusion, genomic prediction using ssGBLUP outperformed GBLUP both in terms of reliability and bias.

Prediction ability for growth and maternal traits using SNP arrays based on different marker densities in Nellore cattle using the ssGBLUP.

This study aimed to investigate the prediction ability for growth and maternal traits using different low-density customized SNP arrays selected by informativeness and distribution of markers across the genome employing single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP). Phenotypic records for adjusted weight at 210 and 450days of age were utilized. A total of 945 animals were genotyped with high-density chip, and 267 individuals born after 2008 were selected as validation population. We evaluated 11 scenarios using five customized density arrays (40k, 20k, 10k, 5k and 2k) and the HD array was used as desirable scenario. The GEBV predictions and BIF (Beef Improvement Federation) accuracy were obtained with BLUPF90 family programs. Linear regression was used to evaluate the prediction ability, inflation, and bias of GEBV of each customized array. An overestimation of partial GEBVs in contrast with complete GEBVs and increase of BIF accuracy with the density arrays diminished were observed. For all traits, the prediction ability was higher as the array density increased and it was similar with customized arrays higher than 10k SNPs. Level of inflation was lower as the density array increased of and was higher for MW210 effect. The bias was susceptible to overestimation of GEBVs when the density customized arrays decreased. These results revealed that the BIF accuracy is sensible to overestimation using low-density customized arrays while the prediction ability with least 10,000 informative SNPs obtained from the Illumina BovineHD BeadChip shows accurate and less biased predictions. Low-density customized arrays under ssGBLUP method could be feasible and cost-effective in genomic selection.

Determining Heat Stress Effects of Multiple Genetic Traits in Tropical Dairy Cattle Using Single-Step Genomic BLUP.

Heat stress is becoming a significant problem in dairy farming, especially in tropical countries, making accurate genetic selection for heat tolerance a priority. This study investigated the effect of heat stress manifestation on genetics for milk yield, milk quality, and dairy health traits with and without genomic information using single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (ssGBLUP) and BLUP in Thai−Holstein crossbred cows. The dataset contained 104,150 test-day records from the first lactation of 15,380 Thai−Holstein crossbred cows. A multiple-trait random regression test-day model on a temperature−humidity index (THI) function was used to estimate the genetic parameters and genetic values. Heat stress started at a THI of 76, and the heritability estimates ranged from moderate to low. The genetic correlation between those traits and heat stress in both BLUP methods was negative. The accuracy of genomic predictions in the ssGBLUP method was higher than the BLUP method. In conclusion, heat stress negatively impacted milk production, increased the somatic cell score, and disrupted the energy balance. Therefore, in dairy cattle genetic improvement programs, heat tolerance is an important trait. The new genetic evaluation method (ssGBLUP) should replace the traditional method (BLUP) for more accurate genetic selection.

Genomic Selection for Milk Production Traits in Xinjiang Brown Cattle.

Simple SummaryMilk production is an important trait in the breeding and genetic improvement of Xinjiang Brown cattle. To obtain the best strategy for improving the reliability of the breeding value estimation for each trait, we used single-trait and multitrait models based on the A-array pedigree-based best linear unbiased prediction (PBLUP) and H-array single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (ssGBLUP) to perform the genetic evaluation of different strategies using the restricted maximum likelihood (REML) and Bayesian methods. Upon comparison, the ssGBLUP calculation results of the multitrait models obtained using the REML and Bayesian methods were better than those of other strategies. Considering the calculation time, the multitrait model REML method is recommended for ssGBLUP calculation to accurately predict the breeding value of young animals; thus, this strategy should be used for the early breeding selection of Xinjiang Brown cattle.One-step genomic selection is a method for improving the reliability of the breeding value estimation. This study aimed to compare the reliability of pedigree-based best linear unbiased prediction (PBLUP) and single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (ssGBLUP), single-trait and multitrait models, and the restricted maximum likelihood (REML) and Bayesian methods. Data were collected from the production performance records of 2207 Xinjiang Brown cattle in Xinjiang from 1983 to 2018. A cross test was designed to calculate the genetic parameters and reliability of the breeding value of 305 daily milk yield (305 dMY), milk fat yield (MFY), milk protein yield (MPY), and somatic cell score (SCS) of Xinjiang Brown cattle. The heritability of 305 dMY, MFY, MPY, and SCS estimated using the REML and Bayesian multitrait models was approximately 0.39 (0.02), 0.40 (0.03), 0.49 (0.02), and 0.07 (0.02), respectively. The heritability and estimated breeding value (EBV) and the reliability of milk production traits of these cattle calculated based on PBLUP and ssGBLUP using the multitrait model REML and Bayesian methods were higher than those of the single-trait model REML method; the ssGBLUP method was significantly better than the PBLUP method. The reliability of the estimated breeding value can be improved from 0.9% to 3.6%, and the reliability of the genomic estimated breeding value (GEBV) for the genotyped population can reach 83%. Therefore, the genetic evaluation of the multitrait model is better than that of the single-trait model. Thus, genomic selection can be applied to small population varieties such as Xinjiang Brown cattle, in improving the reliability of the genomic estimated breeding value.

SsGBLUP Method Improves the Accuracy of Breeding Value Prediction in Huacaya Alpaca.

Simple SummaryAlpaca breeding takes place in the most entrenched areas of the Andes, where the conditions to implement genetic improvement programs are very difficult. Likewise, taking phenotypic records is limited in its ability to predict genetic merit accurately. For this reason, genomic information is shown as an alternative that helps to predict the genetic values of fiber traits more precisely. This study showed how genomic information increased precision by 2.623% for the fiber diameter, 6.442% for the standard deviation of the fiber diameter, and 1.471% for the percentage of medullation compared to traditional methods for predicting genetic merit, suggesting that adding genomic data in prediction models could be beneficial for alpaca breeding programs in the future.Improving textile characteristics is the main objective of alpaca breeding. A recently developed SNP chip for alpacas could potentially be used to implement genomic selection and accelerate genetic progress. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the increase in prediction accuracy of three important fiber traits: fiber diameter (FD), standard deviation of fiber diameter (SD), and percentage of medullation (PM) in Huacaya alpacas. The data contains a total pedigree of 12,431 animals, 24,169 records for FD and SD, and 8386 records for PM and 60,624 SNP markers for each of the 431 genotyped animals of the Pacomarca Genetic Center. Prediction accuracy of breeding values was compared between a classical BLUP and a single-step Genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP). Deregressed phenotypes were predicted. The accuracies of the genetic and genomic values were calculated using the correlation between the predicted breeding values and the deregressed values of 100 randomly selected animals from the genotyped ones. Fifty replicates were carried out. Accuracies with ssGBLUP improved by 2.623%, 6.442%, and 1.471% on average for FD, SD, and PM, respectively, compared to the BLUP method. The increase in accuracy was relevant, suggesting that adding genomic data could benefit alpaca breeding programs.

Inclusion of genomic information in estimation of genetic parameters for body weights and visual scores in Nelore cattle

ABSTRACT The aim of this study was to evaluate genomic information inclusion in genetic parameter estimation of standardized body weight at birth and at 240, 365, and 450 days of age, and visual scores for body structure, precocity, and body muscularity, measured as yearlings in Nelore cattle. We compared genetic parameters, (co)variance components (estimated from Bayesian inference and Gibbs sampling), breeding value accuracies, genetic trends, and principal component analysis (PCA) obtained through traditional GBLUP and ssGBLUP methods. For all traits [...]

Investigating pig survival in different production phases using genomic models.

Pig survival is an economically important trait with relevant social welfare implications, thus standing out as an important selection criterion for the current pig farming system. We aimed to estimate (co)variance components for survival in different production phases in a crossbred pig population as well as to investigate the benefit of including genomic information through single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (ssGBLUP) on the prediction accuracy of survival traits compared with results from traditional BLUP. Individual survival records on, at most, 64,894 crossbred piglets were evaluated under two multi-trait threshold models. The first model included farrowing, lactation, and combined postweaning survival, whereas the second model included nursery and finishing survival. Direct and maternal breeding values were estimated using BLUP and ssGBLUP methods. Furthermore, prediction accuracy, bias, and dispersion were accessed using the linear regression validation method. Direct heritability estimates for survival in all studied phases were low (from 0.02 to 0.08). Survival in preweaning phases (farrowing and lactation) was controlled by the dam and piglet additive genetic effects, although the maternal side was more important. Postweaning phases (nursery, finishing, and the combination of both) showed the same or higher direct heritabilities compared with preweaning phases. The genetic correlations between survival traits within preweaning and postweaning phases were favorable and strong, but correlations between preweaning and postweaning phases were moderate. The prediction accuracy of survival traits was low, although it increased by including genomic information through ssGBLUP compared with the prediction accuracy from BLUP. Direct and maternal breeding values were similarly accurate with BLUP, but direct breeding values benefited more from genomic information. Overall, a slight increase in bias was observed when genomic information was included, whereas dispersion of breeding values was greatly reduced. Combined postweaning survival presented higher direct heritability than in the preweaning phases and the highest prediction accuracy among all evaluated production phases, therefore standing out as a candidate trait for improving survival. Survival is a complex trait with low heritability; however, important genetic gains can still be obtained, especially under a genomic prediction framework.

Genomic evaluation of Brown Swiss dairy cattle with limited national genotype data and integrated external information

This study demonstrated the feasibility of a genomic evaluation for the dairy cattle population for which the small national training population can be complemented with foreign information from international evaluations. National test-day milk yield data records for the Slovenian Brown Swiss cattle population were analyzed. Genomic evaluation was carried out using the single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction method (ssGBLUP), resulting in genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV). The predominantly female group of genotyped animals, representing the national training population in the single-step genomic evaluation, was further augmented with 7,024 genotypes of foreign progeny-tested sires from an international Brown Swiss InterGenomics genomic evaluation (https://interbull.org/ib/whole_cop). Additionally, the estimated breeding values for the altogether 7,246 genotyped domestic and foreign sires from the 2019 sire multiple across-country evaluation(MACE), were added to the ssGBLUP as external pseudophenotypic information. The ssGBLUP method, with integration of MACE information by avoiding double counting, was then performed, resulting in MACE-enhanced GEBV (GEBVM). The methods were empirically validated with forward prediction. The validation group consisted of 315 domestic males and 1,041 domestic females born after 2012. Increase, inflation, and bias of the GEBV(M) reliability (REL) were assessed for the validation group with a focus on females. All individuals in the validation benefited from genomic evaluations using both methods, but the GEBV(M) REL increased most for the youngest selection candidates. Up to 35 points of GEBV REL could be assigned to national genomic information, and up to 17 points of GEBVM REL could additionally be attributed to the integration of foreign sire genomic and MACE information. Results indicated that the combined foreign progeny-tested sire genomic and external MACE information can be used in the single-step genomic evaluation as an equivalent replacement for domestic phenotypic information. Thus, an equal or slightly higher genomic breeding value REL was obtained sooner than the pedigree-based breeding value REL for the female selection candidates. When the abundant foreign progeny-tested sire genomic and MACE information was used to complement available national genomic and phenotypic information in single-step genomic evaluation, the genomic breeding value REL for young-female selection candidates increased approximately 10 points. Use of international information provides the possibility to upgrade small national training populations and obtain satisfying reliability of genomic breeding values even for the youngest female selection candidates, which will help to increase selection efficiency in the future.

Improving the accuracy of genomic evaluation for linear body measurement traits using single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction in Hanwoo beef cattle

BackgroundRecently, there has been a growing interest in the genetic improvement of body measurement traits in farm animals. They are widely used as predictors of performance, longevity, and production traits, and it is worthwhile to investigate the prediction accuracies of genomic selection for these traits. In genomic prediction, the single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (ssGBLUP) method allows the inclusion of information from genotyped and non-genotyped relatives in the analysis. Hence, we aimed to compare the prediction accuracy obtained from a pedigree-based BLUP only on genotyped animals (PBLUP-G), a traditional pedigree-based BLUP (PBLUP), a genomic BLUP (GBLUP), and a single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) method for the following 10 body measurement traits at yearling age of Hanwoo cattle: body height (BH), body length (BL), chest depth (CD), chest girth (CG), chest width (CW), hip height (HH), hip width (HW), rump length (RL), rump width (RW), and thurl width (TW). The data set comprised 13,067 phenotypic records for body measurement traits and 1523 genotyped animals with 34,460 single-nucleotide polymorphisms. The accuracy for each trait and model was estimated only for genotyped animals using five-fold cross-validations.ResultsThe accuracies ranged from 0.02 to 0.19, 0.22 to 0.42, 0.21 to 0.44, and from 0.36 to 0.55 as assessed using the PBLUP-G, PBLUP, GBLUP, and ssGBLUP methods, respectively. The average predictive accuracies across traits were 0.13 for PBLUP-G, 0.34 for PBLUP, 0.33 for GBLUP, and 0.45 for ssGBLUP methods. Our results demonstrated that averaged across all traits, ssGBLUP outperformed PBLUP and GBLUP by 33 and 43%, respectively, in terms of prediction accuracy. Moreover, the least root of mean square error was obtained by ssGBLUP method.ConclusionsOur findings suggest that considering the ssGBLUP model may be a promising way to ensure acceptable accuracy of predictions for body measurement traits, especially for improving the prediction accuracy of selection candidates in ongoing Hanwoo breeding programs.

17 Investigating pig survival in different productive stages using genomic models

Abstract Pig survival is an economically important trait with animal welfare implications. Although survival is highly affected by the environment, previous studies reported genetic variability of this trait, indicating the opportunity for improvement through selection. Genomic information is currently included in the major commercial pig breeding programs, which can be incorporated by single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP). The objectives of this study were to: 1) estimate (co)variance components for farrowing, lactation, nursery, and finishing survival; and 2) compare the individual breeding value accuracies obtained using traditional pedigree-based BLUP (BLUP) and ssGBLUP methods. Individual survival records were collected for a crossbred pig population, and two-trait threshold models, which included maternal effects, were used for (co)variance components estimation. Direct and maternal breeding values were estimated using BLUP and ssGBLUP methods, and individual accuracies were obtained based on posterior standard deviation. Heritabilities for the four survival phases were low, ranging from 0.04 to 0.12. Pre-weaning survival was controlled by dam and piglet additive gene effects. The additive direct and maternal components were equally important at farrowing, whereas the piglet’s own genetic merit was the most expressive during lactation. Common environment estimates were higher than maternal genetic effects, indicating early life experiences related to the sow, but independent of the maternal genetic component. Nursery and finishing survival showed the same or higher heritabilities compared to pre-weaning stages. The genetic correlation between the pre-weaning phases was high (0.68), whereas the correlation between the post-weaning measurements was moderate (0.42). The incorporation of genomic information through ssGBLUP increased the individual accuracy, on average, from 0.36 to 0.41 for direct and from 0.29 to 0.37 for maternal effects compared to BLUP. Although the heritabilities for survival in different productive stages are low, genetic gains can be obtained, given that breeding values benefit from the inclusion of genomic information.

9 A comparison of different genomic prediction methods in the Canadian Landrace swine population

Abstract Increasing the accuracy of breeding value prediction can lead to more profitability through accelerating genetic progress for economic traits. The objective of this study was to assess the predictive abilities and unbiasedness of best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) and popular genomic prediction methods of BayesC, BayesC(π = 0.99), genomic BLUP (GBLUP), and single-step GBLUP (ssGBLUP). Genotypic information (50K and 60K) of 4,890 performance tested Landrace pigs before February 2019 and 471 validation Landrace pigs that both had phenotypic information on backfat thickness (BFT), average daily gain (ADG), and loin muscle depth (LMD) from two Canadian pig breeding companies (AlphaGene and Alliance Genetics Canada) were used. The de-regressed breeding values (DEBV) were employed in GBLUP and Bayesian methods. A total number of 48,580 single nucleotide polymorphisms remained after quality control and imputation steps. The prediction accuracies were calculated using the correlation between predicted breeding values before performance test and DEBVs after performance test. All employed genomic prediction methods showed higher prediction accuracies for BFT (50.80–52.68%), ADG (26.61–34.47%), and LMD (18.25–25.08%) compared to BLUP method (BFT = 28.54%, ADG = 16.41%, LMD = 17.15%). The highest prediction accuracies for BFT and ADG were obtained using ssGBLUP method, and for LMD it was obtained using BayesC(π = 0.99). The BayesC(π = 0.99) showed also the lowest prediction biases across the studied traits (+0.05 for BFT, 0.00 for AGD, and -0.10 for LMD). In conclusion, our results revealed the superiority of ssGBLUP (for BFT and ADG) and BayesC(π = 0.99) (for LMD) over other tested methods in this study. However, the prediction accuracies from the tested genomic prediction methods were not significantly different from each other. Thus, employing these methods can be helpful for accelerating the genetic improvement of BFT, ADG, and LMD in the moderate population size of Canadian Landrace.