SRIF Receptor Subtypes Research Articles

Src Homology-2-Containing Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase-1 Restrains Cell Proliferation in Human Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma

Medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) is a rare tumor originating from thyroid parafollicular C cells, where, in the inherited form, constitutive activation of the RET protooncogene is responsible for unrestrained cell proliferation. We previously demonstrated that somatostatin (SRIF) reduces cell growth in the human MTC cell line TT, which expresses all SRIF receptor (SSTR) subtypes and responds differently to selective SSTR agonists. The antiproliferative mechanism of SRIF and its analogs in MTC is still unclear. Src homology-2-containing protein tyrosine phosphatase-1 (SHP-1), a cytoplasmic protein tyrosine phosphatase (PTP), is activated by somatotropin release-inhibiting factor and reduces mutated RET autophosphorylation in a heterologous system. In this study, we explore the role of PTP activation, in particular of SHP-1, in TT cells, where RET is constitutively activated. In TT cells, SRIF stimulated the PTP activity of SHP-1, which was associated with proliferation inhibition and with reduction in the MAPK pathway activation. Blockade of PTP activity with sodium orthovanadate induced cell proliferation and MAPK phosphorylation and blunted the inhibitory effects of SRIF. Moreover, SHP-1 associates with SSTR2 depending on its activation. By using a MAPK kinase inhibitor, we demonstrated that TT cell growth depends on MAPK pathway activation. Furthermore, in TT cells overexpressing SHP-1, cell proliferation and MAPK signaling were strongly down-regulated, whereas in TT cells transfected with a dominant negative form of SHP-1, cell proliferation and MAPK signaling were markedly induced. Our data demonstrate that SRIF inhibitory effects on TT cell proliferation are mediated, at least in part, by SHP-1, which acts through a MAPK-dependent mechanism.

Protective effects of insulin‐like growth factor‐I on the somatostatinergic system in the temporal cortex of β‐amyloid‐treated rats

Insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) has protective effects against beta-amyloid (Abeta)-induced neuronal cell death. Because alterations of the somatostatinergic system have been described in Alzheimer's disease, we investigated the effects of the Abeta peptide and the possible protective role of IGF-I on the somatostatinergic system of the rat temporal cortex and on cell death and phosphorylated (p)-Akt levels in this area. Abeta25-35 was administered intracerebroventricularly to male rats via an osmotic minipump over 14 days (300 pmol/day). Another group received a subcutaneous IGF-I infusion (50 microg/kg/day), concomitant with Abeta25-35 administration, whereas a third group received IGF-I alone. Abeta25-35 significantly decreased the somatostatin (SRIF)-like immunoreactive content and the SRIF receptor density, as a result of a decrease in the levels of the SRIF receptor subtype 2. The inhibitory effect of SRIF on adenylyl cyclase activity was significantly lower after Abeta25-35 infusion, whereas the levels of the inhibitory G protein subunit Gialpha1, Gialpha2 or Gialpha3 were unaltered. Cell death was increased and p-Akt levels decreased in Abeta25-35-treated animals. IGF-I administration increased immunoreactive IGF-I levels in the temporal cortex and restored all parameters affected by Abeta25-35 to baseline values. These findings suggest that IGF-I prevents the deleterious effect of Abeta25-35 on the somatostatinergic system.

The Role of Somatostatin Analogs in Cushing's Disease

Somatostatin (SRIF) has been proposed to be of therapeutic interest in the medical treatment of Cushing's disease. While in vitro data demonstrate the presence of SRIF-receptor subtype (sst) expression in corticotroph adenomas, the current clinically available SRIF-analog Octreotide, predominantly targeting sst(2), is ineffective in lowering ACTH levels in Cushing's disease and only appears to inhibit the release of ACTH in Nelson's syndrome. In the present review, current knowledge on the physiological role of SRIF in the regulation of ACTH secretion by the anterior pituitary gland, as well as by corticotroph tumor cells is summarized. In addition, the role of glucocorticoids in regulating sst-mediated inhibition of ACTH release by corticotroph adenoma cells is discussed. Recently, it was reported that the novel multiligand SRIF-analog SOM230 might have the potential to be of therapeutic interest for Cushing's disease. On the basis of the potent suppressive effects on ACTH release by SRIF-analogs with high binding affinity to sst(5) and the observation that sst(5) expression and action is relatively resistant to glucocorticoid treatment, including the recent observation that sst(5) is the predominant sst expressed in human corticotroph adenomas, it is hypothesized that sst(5) may be a new therapeutic target for the control of ACTH and cortisol hypersecretion in patients with pituitary dependent Cushing's disease.

Evidence for differential effects of selective somatostatin receptor subtype agonists on alpha-subunit and chromogranin a secretion and on cell viability in human nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas in vitro.

Somatostatin (SRIF) analogs interacting with SRIF receptor (SSTR) subtypes SSTR2 and SSTR5 reduce hormone secretion of pituitary adenomas, but their antiproliferative effects are still controversial. We investigated the in vitro effects of SRIF and SSTR-selective agonists interacting with SSTR1 (BIM-23926), SSTR2 (BIM-23120), SSTR5 (BIM-23206), or both SSTR2 and SSTR5 (BIM-23244) on alpha-subunit and chromogranin A secretion and on cell viability of 12 nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas (NFA) expressing SSTR1, SSTR2, and SSTR5, as assessed by RT-PCR. Treatment with SRIF or BIM-23206 did not modify alpha-subunit and chromogranin A secretion, which was significantly inhibited by BIM-23926, BIM-23120, and BIM-23244. SRIF and BIM-23120 did not influence cell viability, which was significantly promoted by BIM-23206 and BIM-23244 and reduced by treatment with BIM-23926. These results demonstrate that, in the selected NFA, the SSTR1-selective agonist inhibits secretory activity and cell viability, the SSTR2-selective agonist inhibits secretion but not cell viability, and the SSTR5-selective agonist does not influence secretion but promotes cell viability. These data can explain the lack of inhibitory effects of currently used SRIF analogs and suggest that drugs acting potently and preferentially on SSTR1 might be useful for medical treatment of NFA.

Delineating somatostatin's neuronal actions.

Somatostatin (somatotropin release inhibitory factor; SRIF) initiates its biological activity by interacting with a family of highly homologous integral membrane receptors (sst(1) -sst(5)). SRIF neuronal actions regulate protein phosphorylation levels, control second messenger production and modulate neuronal membrane potential. Recently, our understanding of SRIF neurobiology has been driven by new pharmacological and molecular biological tools. SRIF receptor subtype specific antibodies have identified a distinctive, yet overlapping, expression pattern for this receptor family, with multiple subtypes co-localizing in the central and peripheral nervous system. This complex expression profile has confounded efforts to establish each receptor's role in the nervous system in part by the possible homo- and heteroligomerization of the receptor proteins. However, the recent discovery of SRIF receptor subtype selective ligands, supplemented by in vitro and in vivo models with inactivated SRIF receptor genes, now provides opportunities to clearly delineate each receptor's neuronal role. The convergence of these pharmacologic, immunologic and molecular biologic approaches extend our understanding of SRIF neurobiology while promising new therapeutic avenues for SRIF research.

Homologous and heterologous in vitro regulation of pig pituitary somatostatin receptor subtypes, sst1, sst2 and sst5 mRNA.

Somatostatin (SRIF) is commonly regarded as an inhibitor of GH release in rodents and humans. However, in pigs, SRIF can stimulate the release of GH at low (picomolar) doses, while inhibiting GHRH-stimulated GH release at high (nanomolar) doses in primary pituitary cell cultures. One possible mechanism by which pig cells respond differently to the actions of SRIF is by differential expression and regulation of SRIF receptor subtypes. As no information is available on the homologous regulation of SRIF receptors in pigs, we examined the acute (4 h) in vitro effects of SRIF on mRNA levels of SRIF receptors sst1, sst2 and sst5 by multiplex RT-PCR. These particular sst subtypes were selected because all three have been implicated in the inhibitory effects of SRIF on GH release in both rodents and humans. At a high dose (10(-7) M), SRIF stimulated the expression of sst1, sst2 and sst5 in pig pituitary cell cultures. At a low dose (10(-13) M), SRIF markedly increased sst1, without affecting sst2 or sst5. Given that our laboratory has shown SRIF at high and low doses stimulates cAMP production in a subpopulation of pig somatotropes, we sought to determine if this signaling pathway may be responsible for the stimulatory effect of SRIF on its own receptor expression. The receptor-independent cAMP activator forskolin elevated sst1 and sst2 mRNA levels but did not affect sst5 expression, suggesting the stimulatory actions of high- and low-dose SRIF on sst1 and high-dose SRIF on sst2 mRNA levels can be mediated by activation of cAMP, whereas the stimulatory effect of high-dose SRIF on sst5 mRNA is elicited by a cAMP-independent pathway. Interestingly, both GHRH (10(-8) M) and ghrelin (10(-6) M), which release GH in pig pituitary cell cultures via cAMP-dependent mechanisms, decreased sst5 without altering sst1 or sst2 mRNA levels. Since the actions of GHRH and ghrelin on sst expression markedly contrasted with that observed for SRIF and forskolin these results clearly indicate GHRH and ghrelin are regulating sst5 mRNA levels by a cAMP-independent signaling pathway. Taken together, our results demonstrate that expression of pig SRIF receptors is under a complex, receptor subtype-selective regulation, wherein the concerted actions of key regulators of somatotrope function would play divergent and dose-dependent effects.

Differential desensitization of somatostatin receptor subtypes in atT-20 cells.

Nonpeptidyl agonists for the somatostatin (SRIF) receptor family have been developed. We have studied the desensitization effects for two of these agonists upon SRIF receptor function in AtT-20 cells, a neuroendocrine tumor cell, which endogenously expresses two distinct SRIF receptor, subtypes. We observe that SRIF and the nonpeptidyl, subtype selective agonists, differentially regulate SRIF receptor subtypes in the AtT-20 cell.

Somatostatin (SRIF) receptor subtype 2 and 5 gene expression in growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas: the relationship with endogenous srif activity and response to octreotide.

To investigate the potential pathophysiologic role of human SRIF receptor gene expression in GH-secreting adenomas in acromegalic patients, we studied the relationship between the SRIF receptor gene expression, endogenous SRIF activity and exogenous response to octreotide in 16 acromagalic patients. Hypothalamic somatostatinergic activity (HSA) was assessed by glucose-induced suppression of TRH-stimulated TSH secretion. As an indicator of somatotrope sensitivity to HSA, glucose-induced suppression of TRH-stimulated GH secretion was determined. For the acute octreotide response, a 100 microg bolus of octreotide was injected intravenously and GH was measured hourly for 6 hr. Pituitary tumor SRIF receptor subtype 2 and 5 (sst2 and sst5) mRNA levels were measured by real-time RT-PCR. Gsp oncogene was also detected by direct PCR sequencing. Sst2 and sst5 mRNA levels were detected in all tumors. Sst2 mRNA levels positively correlated with that of sst5. Sst2 and sst5 mRNA levels did not show any correlation with basal GH values (nadir or peak). Expression of sst2, but not sst5, showed a positive correlation with the GH response to HSA, while the octreotide response positively correlated with the sum of sst2 and sst5 mRNA levels. Individuals with gsp-positive tumors were more responsive to octreotide than those with gsp-negative tumors but sst2 and sst5 mRNA levels did not differ between these two groups. These results suggest common transcriptional and/or post-transcriptonal regulatory mechanisms for these SRIF receptor subtypes within GH-secreting pituitary adenomas. The functional observations suggest that the degree (or level) of sst2 and sst5 expression is critical for the ultimate GH response of somatotropinomas to endogenous SRIF tone and exogenous SRIF analogue therapy. However, sst2 and sst5 mRNA levels are not the only factors mediating the response to SRIF.

The effects of GH-releasing hormone/somatostatin on the 5'-promoter activity of the GH gene in vitro.

The two hypothalamic hormones, GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) and somatostatin (SRIF), are known to regulate GH secretion. However, the effects of these hormones on GH gene expression are not completely clear, partly because of the lack of appropriate host cells maintaining the original characteristics of the somatotroph. Since MtT/S, a pure somatotroph cell line, has become available, the effects of GHRH and SRIF on GH gene transcription have been studied using a subclone of MtT/S (MtT/SGL), in which the GH gene 5'-promoter-luciferase fusion gene was stably incorporated. The expression of GHRH receptor and SRIF receptor subtypes was also studied by RT-PCR. The results showed that MtT/SGL cells intrinsically expressed the functional GHRH receptor and all of the SRIF receptor subtypes. The expression of GHRH receptor was markedly enhanced by glucocorticoid pretreatment and, in the presence of corticosterone and 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine, GHRH (at or above 100 pM) stimulated GH gene 5'-promoter activity in a dose-dependent manner. On the other hand, SRIF (100 nM) significantly antagonized the effect of GHRH, which was completely reversed by pretreatment with pertussis toxin (50 ng/ml). Taken together, the present data indicated that both GHRH and SRIF are involved in the transcriptional regulation of the GH gene, and that the effect of SRIF is mediated through pertussis toxin-sensitive G protein. The MtT/SGL cell line is a good in vitro model for studying the molecular mechanisms of GH gene transcription by GHRH and/or SRIF.

Novel sst(4)-selective somatostatin (SRIF) agonists. 1. Lead identification using a betide scan.

Hypothesizing that structural constraints in somatostatin (SRIF) analogues may result in receptor selectivity, and aiming to characterize the bioactive conformation of somatostatin at each of its five receptors, we carried out an N(beta)-methylated aminoglycine (Agl) scan of the octapeptide H-c[Cys(3)-Phe(6)-Phe(7)-dTrp(8)-Lys(9)-Thr(10)-Phe(11)-Cys(14)]-OH (SRIF numbering) (ODT-8) that is potent at all SRIF receptor subtypes (sst's) but sst(1). We found that H-c[Cys-LAgl(N(beta)Me,benzoyl)-Phe-DTrp-Lys-Thr-Phe-Cys]-OH (4), H-c[Cys-Phe-LAgl(N(beta)Me,benzoyl)-Trp-Lys-Thr-Phe-Cys]-OH (6), H-c[Cys-Phe-LAgl(N(beta)Me,benzoyl)-dTrp-Lys-Thr-Phe-Cys]-OH (8), and H-c[DCys-Phe-LAgl(N(beta)Me,benzoyl)-DTrp-Lys-Thr-Phe-Cys]-OH (10) had high affinity (IC(50) = 14.3, 5.4, 5.2, and 3.4 nM, respectively) and selectivity for sst(4) (>50-fold over the other receptors). The l-configuration at positions 7 and 8 (l(7), l(8)) yields greater sst(4) selectivity than the l(7), d(8) configuration (6 versus 8). Peptides with the d(7), l(8) (7) and d(7), d(8) (9) configurations are significantly less potent at all receptors. H-c[Cys-Phe-Phe-DTrp-LAgl(betaAla)-Thr-Phe-Cys]-OH (16), H-c[Cys-Phe-Phe-DTrp-DAgl(betaAla)-Thr-Phe-Cys]-OH (17), and their N(beta)Me derivatives at position 9 (18, 19) were essentially inactive. Potent but less sst(4)-selective were members of the Agl-scan at positions 10, H-c[Cys-Phe-Phe-dTrp-Lys-lAgl(N(beta)Me,HO-Ac)-Phe-Cys]-OH (20, IC(50) = 6.5 nM), and 11, H-c[Cys-Phe-Phe-DTrp-Lys-Thr-LAgl(N(beta)Me,benzoyl)-Cys]-OH (22, IC(50) = 6.9 nM), while the d-configuration at positions 10 (21) and 11 (23) led to reduced affinity. One of our best analogues, 8, is an agonist when tested for its ability to inhibit forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation in sst(4)-transfected CCL39 cells (EC(50) = 1.01 nM). All Agl-containing analogues were first synthesized using unresolved Fmoc-Agl(N(beta)Me,Boc)-OH, and the diastereomers were separated using HPLC. Chiral assignment at the Agl-containing residue was subsequently done using enzymatic degradation and by de novo synthesis in the cases of H-c[Cys-Phe-DAgl(N(beta)Me,benzoyl)-DTrp-Lys-Thr-Phe-Cys]-OH (9) and H-c[DCys-Phe-DAgl(N(beta)Me,benzoyl)-DTrp-Lys-Thr-Phe-Cys]-OH (11), starting with the papain-resolved Fmoc-DAgl(Boc). These results suggested that the orientation of side chains at position 6, 7, or 11 with respect to the side chains of residues 8 and 9 may be independently responsible for sst(4) selectivity.

Somatostatin receptor subtype 1 selective activation in human growth hormone (GH)- and prolactin (PRL)-secreting pituitary adenomas: effects on cell viability, GH, and PRL secretion.

Somatostatin (SRIF) analogs interacting with SRIF receptor subtype (SSTR) 2 and SSTR5 are known to reduce secretion in GH-secreting pituitary adenomas. We investigated the effects of SRIF and a SSTR1 selective agonist, BIM-23926, on GH and prolactin (PRL) secretion and cell viability in primary cultures deriving from 15 GH- and PRL-secreting adenomas expressing SSTR1. Quantitative RT-PCR showed SSTR1 mRNA mean levels of 6 +/- 2.2 x 10(4) molecules/ microg reverse-transcribed total RNA. SSTR2 and SSTR5 were frequently expressed (93.3%), on the contrary of SSTR3 (53.3%) and SSTR4 (6.7%). GH secretion was significantly reduced by SRIF and BIM-23926 (45 +/- 8.6% and 32 +/- 18.1% inhibition, respectively) as well as PRL secretion (16.1 +/- 4% and 19.7 +/- 3.5% inhibition, respectively). After treatment with SRIF and BIM-23926, cell viability was significantly reduced by 17.5 +/- 5% and 20 +/- 3.9%, respectively. SSTR1 mRNA levels correlated with the degree of GH and PRL secretion inhibition. These results demonstrate that SSTR1 selective activation inhibits hormone secretion and cell viability in GH- and PRL-secreting adenomas in vitro and suggest that SRIF analogs with affinity for SSTR1 may be useful to control hormone hypersecretion and reduce neoplastic growth of pituitary adenomas.

Somatostatin binds to murine macrophages through two distinct subsets of receptors

Somatostatin (SRIF) exerts anti-inflammatory effects, in part by deactivating monocytes/macrophages. Thus, the objective of this study was to characterize specific receptors for SRIF on these cells. Macrophages isolated from mouse peritoneal cells bound [ 125I]Tyr 0, d-Trp 8 SRIF 14 specifically. Scatchard analysis of saturation binding data revealed two classes of binding sites with an affinity of 0.44±0.13 and 2.58±0.56 nM, respectively. By sensitive and specific RT-PCR, the mRNAs for the five SRIF receptors (SSTR1 to SSTR5) could be detected. Evidence for the involvement of SSTR1 and SSTR2 in the binding of SRIF to the high and low affinity sites, respectively, was obtained by the demonstration that (1) only SSTR1 and SSTR2 subtype-specific agonists were active in competing for [ 125I]Tyr 0, d-Trp 8 SRIF 14 binding to high and low affinity sites, respectively, and (2) [ 125I]Tyr 0, d-Trp 8 SRIF 14 bound to high but not low affinity sites on macrophages isolated from SSTR2 knock-out mice. In conclusion, we have identified and characterized two different SRIF receptor subtypes in murine macrophages.

Recent advances in the development of nonpeptide somatostatin receptor ligands.

Somatostatin (SRIF) is a cyclic peptide that occurs in two biologically active forms, SRIF-14 and SRIF-28. These peptides inhibit the secretion of many other peptides, including insulin and glucagon, function as neurotransmitters or neuromodulators, and exhibit potent antiproliferative activity. Recent research has led to the development of nonpeptide SRIF ligands with high affinity and selectivity at all SRIF receptor subtypes. Additionally, the newly discovered sst(2)and sst(3) antagonists will greatly facilitate our understanding of these receptors. These novel nonpeptide SRIF agonists and antagonists may have therapeutic potential in a variety of disease states.

SOM230: a new somatostatin peptidomimetic with potent inhibitory effects on the growth hormone/insulin-like growth factor-I axis in rats, primates, and dogs.

The goal of this project was to find a somatostatin (SRIF) analog with superior therapeutic potential. Receptor binding studies of new SRIF analogs were used to reveal SRIF substructures that interact with individual human SRIF receptor subtypes (sst1-sst5). Incorporation of these substructures into a stable cyclohexapeptide template led to SOM230, which binds with nanomolar affinity to sst1, sst2, sst3, and sst5. In rats, the inhibitory effect of SOM230 on GH was similar to SMS 201-995 (octreotide) at 1 h, but was 4-fold more potent at 6 h post injection, indicating increased metabolic stability. Treatment of rats with SOM230, at 1 and 10 micro g/kg.h, decreased IGF-I plasma levels, on d 2, by 68% and 90% (P < 0.01); whereas, under SMS 201-995 treatment, plasma IGF-I levels decreased by 28% and 49%, respectively. After a 2-wk infusion of rats, the suppression of IGF-I levels by SOM230 was still pronounced, whereas the response to SMS 201-995 was largely lost. This enhanced effect of SOM230 on IGF-I plasma levels was confirmed in an 8-wk study where both analogs were infused at 50 micro g/kg/h in rats. In rhesus monkey, SOM230 and SMS 201-995 treatment resulted in GH inhibition, with half-maximal inhibitory dose values of 0.5 and 0.4 micro g/kg, respectively, but plasma IGF-I levels were only lowered by SOM230 (-53%). In cynomolgus monkeys, a 2-wk infusion of SOM230, but to a much lesser extent of SMS 201-995, lowered plasma GH levels significantly (from 16.3 to 1.8 ng/ml, P = 0.007). Both in cynomolgus monkeys and beagle dogs, infusion of SOM230, but not SMS 201-995, lowered IGF-I levels significantly. In conclusion, SOM230 has a unique structure, binds almost universally to human ssts, and inhibits potently the GH/IGF-I axis cross-species. SOM230 is a candidate drug for clinical use.

Somatostatin (SRIF) modulates distinct signaling pathways in rat pituitary tumor cells; negative coupling of SRIF receptor subtypes 1 and 2 to arachidonic acid release.

The somatotropin release-inhibiting factor somatostatin-14 (SRIF) is known to activate distinct receptor subtypes (sst1-5). In rat pituitary tumor cells (GC cells), sst2 but not sst1 receptors mediate the SRIF-induced inhibition of intracellular concentration of Ca2+ ([Ca2+]i) and are negatively coupled to cAMP-dependent pathways. In the present study, transduction mechanisms coupling distinct SRIF receptors to their specific functional role were investigated with the use of both SRIF agonists with well-known affinity at individual SRIF receptors and the sst2 receptor antagonist L-Tyr(8) isomer of Cyanamid 154806 (CYN-154806). Our results demonstrate that sst1 and sst2 receptors are coupled to distinct signaling pathways in GC cells. In particular, sst2 receptors are negatively coupled to the cAMP-dependent pathway and this pathway is partially responsible for the sst2 receptor-mediated inhibition of [Ca2+]i. In addition, sst1 and sst2 receptors are both coupled to a decrease of arachidonic acid (AA) release with an efficacy similar to that of SRIF, suggesting that SRIF reduces AA release through either a partial activation of both receptors or the activation of one at a time. This finding is important given the well-accepted role for phospholipase A2 (PLA2) as a positive signaling component in transduction pathways of SRIF receptors. sst1 and sst2 receptor negative coupling to PLA2/AA pathways does not seem to be implicated in the SRIF-induced inhibition of [Ca2+]i. The possible role for the SRIF-mediated inhibition of AA release in GC cell function remains to be elucidated.

Somatostatin sst 2 receptor knock-out mice: localisation of sst 1–5 receptor mRNA and binding in mouse brain by semi-quantitative RT–PCR, in situ hybridisation histochemistry and receptor autoradiography

The peptide hormone/neurotransmitter somatostatin (somatotropin release inhibiting factor; SRIF) and its receptors (sst 1–sst 5) appear to regulate many physiological functions in the CNS. Semi-quantitative analysis of the densities of mRNA expression for sst 1–5 receptors and SRIF receptor binding sites were established in sst 2 receptor knock-out (KO) mice. Patterns of sst 1–5 receptor mRNA expression were largely conserved for sst 1,3,4 and sst 5 selective oligonucleotide probes; whereas sst 2 signals were completely absent in KO mouse brain. Autoradiographic analysis demonstrated [ 125I]LTT SRIF 28, [ 125I]CGP 23996 (two radioligands known to label all five recombinant SRIF receptors) and [ 125I]Tyr 3-octreotide (sst 2 and sst 5 receptor selective) binding in wild type (WT) mouse brain sections; yet no specific binding of [ 125I]Tyr 3-octreotide in KO mice. In contrast, [ 125I]LTT SRIF 28 and [ 125I]CGP 23996 binding was still present in a number of brain areas in KO mice, although to a lesser degree than in those regions where [ 125I]Tyr 3-octreotide binding was found, in WT animals. The present data suggest first, that both sst 2 receptor protein and mRNA were completely absent in the brain of these KO animals. Second, there was little evidence of compensatory regulation, at the mRNA level, of the other SRIF receptors as a consequence of the sst 2 KO. Third, the absence of any [ 125I]Tyr 3-octreotide binding, in KO mice, suggests that this particular ligand is selective for the sst 2 receptor subtype (under the conditions utilised); or that sst 5 receptors are only marginally expressed in brain. Fourth, there were regions where the binding of [ 125I]LTT SRIF 28 and [ 125I]CGP 23996 were moderately affected by the sst 2 KO, suggesting that additional SRIF receptors may well contribute to the binding of the aforementioned radioligands. Finally, since the relative distribution of these two ligands were not entirely superimposable, it suggests that their respective selectivity profiles towards the different SRIF receptor subtypes in situ are not identical.

Characterization of the human somatostatin receptor type 4 promoter

Somatostatin (SRIF) exerts inhibitory effects on virtually all endocrine and exocrine secretions. Five distinct SRIF receptor subtypes (sst 1–5) have been identified. In contrast to the other subtypes, very little is known about specific functions of sst4. We investigated structure and regulation of the human sst4 gene. A genomic clone containing the 5′ region of the sst4 gene was isolated. 1.5 kb of the promoter was sequenced and putative transcription factor binding sites were identified. The transcription start site was located 88 nucleotides upstream of the translation start site. A −984 sst4 promoter directed significant levels of luciferase expression in GH4 rat pituitary cells, Skut-1B endometrium cells, and BEAS-2B human bronchial epithelial cells, whereas only low activity was detected in JEG3 chorion carcinoma cells or COS-7 monkey kidney cells. A minimal −209 promoter allowed cell specific expression, its activity in COS-7 cells is not enhanced by co-transfection of the pituitary-specific transcription factor Pit-1. An enhancer element was localized between nt −459 and −984. We did not find any regulation of the sst4 promoter region analyzed by SRIF, forskolin, TPA, IGF-1, EGF, T3, glucocorticoids or 17β-estradiol. These studies identify the 5′ region of the sst4 gene. Furthermore, specific activity of the promoter in various cell lines is demonstrated.

The growth hormone (GH)-axis of GH receptor/binding protein gene-disrupted and metallothionein-human GH-releasing hormone transgenic mice: hypothalamic neuropeptide and pituitary receptor expression in the absence and presence of GH feedback.

Elevation of circulating GH acts to feed back at the level of the hypothalamus to decrease GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) and increase somatostatin (SRIF) production. In the rat, GH-induced changes in GHRH and SRIF expression are associated with changes in pituitary GHRH receptor (GHRH-R), GH secretagogue receptor (GHS-R), and SRIF receptor subtype messenger RNA (mRNA) levels. These observations suggest that GH regulates its own synthesis and release not only by altering expression of key hypothalamic neuropeptides but also by modulating the sensitivity of the pituitary to hypothalamic input, by regulating pituitary receptor synthesis. To further explore this possibility, we examined the relationship between the expression of hypothalamic neuropeptides [GHRH, SRIF, and neuropeptide Y (NPY)] and pituitary receptors [GHRH-R, GHS-R, and SRIF receptor subtypes (sst2 and sst5)] in two mouse strains with alterations in the GH-axis; the GH receptor/binding protein gene-disrupted mouse (GHR/BP-/-) and the metallothionein promoter driven human GHRH (MT-hGHRH) transgenic mouse. In GHR/BP-/- mice, serum insulin-like growth factor I levels are low, and circulating GH is elevated because of the lack of GH negative feedback. Hypothalamic GHRH mRNA levels in GHR/BP-/- mice were 232 +/- 20% of GHR/BP+/+ littermates (P < 0.01), whereas SRIF and NPY mRNA levels were reduced to 86 +/- 2% and 52 +/- 3% of controls, respectively (P < 0.05; ribonuclease protection assay). Pituitary GHRH-R and GHS-R mRNA levels of GHR/BP-/- mice were elevated to 275 +/- 55% and 319 +/- 68% of GHR/BP+/+ values (P < 0.05, respectively), whereas the sst2 and sst5 mRNA levels did not differ from GHR/BP intact controls as determined by multiplex RT-PCR. Therefore, in the absence of GH negative feedback, both hypothalamic and pituitary expression is altered to favor stimulation of GH synthesis and release. In MT-hGHRH mice, ectopic hGHRH transgene expression elevates circulating GH and insulin-like growth factor I. In this model of GH excess, endogenous (mouse) hypothalamic GHRH mRNA levels were reduced to 69 +/- 6% of nontransgenic controls, whereas SRIF mRNA levels were increased to 128 +/- 6% (P < 0.01). NPY mRNA levels were not significantly affected by hGHRH transgene expression. Also, MT-hGHRH pituitary GHRH-R and GHS-R mRNA levels did not differ from controls. However, sst2 and sst5 mRNA levels in MT-hGHRH mice were increased to 147 +/- 18% and 143 +/- 16% of normal values, respectively (P < 0.05). Therefore, in the presence of GH negative feedback, both hypothalamic and pituitary expression is altered to favor suppression of GH synthesis and release.

Modulation of pituitary somatostatin receptor subtype (sst1-5) messenger ribonucleic acid levels by changes in the growth hormone axis.

The role of individual components of the hypothalamic-pituitary-GH axis in the modulation of pituitary somatostatin (SRIF) receptor subtype (sst1-5) synthesis was assessed using multiplex RT-PCR to measure receptor messenger RNA (mRNA) levels in normal rats and spontaneous dwarf rats (SDRs). In SDRs, a strain with no immunodetectable GH, pituitary sst1 and sst2 mRNA levels were elevated, sst5 mRNA levels were reduced, and sst3 and sst4 mRNA levels did not significantly differ from those in normal controls. Treatment of SDRs with GH (72 h), but not insulin-like growth factor I, significantly decreased sst2 mRNA levels and increased sst4 and sst5 mRNA levels above vehicle-treated control levels. To test whether more rapid changes in circulating GH levels could alter SRIF receptor subtype expression, normal rats were infused (iv) with GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) for 4 h in the presence or absence of SRIF antiserum. GHRH infusion increased pituitary sst1 and sst2 and decreased sst5, but had no effect on sst3 and sst4 mRNA levels. Immunoneutralization of SRIF, which produced a rise in circulating GH levels, did not alter basal or GHRH-mediated SRIF receptor subtype expression. These observations indicate that acute suppression of SRIF tone does not regulate pituitary SRIF receptor subtype mRNA levels in vivo. The possibility that elevated circulating GH concentrations induced by GHRH infusion were responsible for the observed changes in SRIF receptor subtype mRNA levels was examined by infusing SDRs with GHRH for 4 h. GHRH did not increase sst1 mRNA levels in SDRs above their already elevated value. However, GHRH infusion produced an increase in sst2 and a decrease in sst5 mRNA levels similar to those observed in normal rats, indicating that the acute effects of GHRH on SRIF receptor subtype expression are independent of circulating GH levels. Primary rat pituitary cell cultures were incubated with GHRH (10 nM) or forskolin (10 microM) for 4 h to determine whether GHRH could directly mediate SRIF receptor subtype mRNA. GHRH treatment increased sst1 and sst2 mRNA levels and decreased sst5 mRNA levels, but had no effect on sst3 and sst4, similar to the results in vivo. The effect of forskolin mimicked that of GHRH on sst1, sst2, and sst5 mRNA, suggesting that GHRH acts through cAMP to directly mediate gene transcription or mRNA stability of these SRIF receptor subtypes. In addition, forskolin reduced sst3 and sst4 expression. These results strongly suggest that rat pituitary sst1, sst2, and sst5 mRNA levels are regulated both in vivo and in vitro by GHRH. The stimulatory action of GHRH on sst1 and sst2 and the inhibitory action on sst5 indicate that these receptor subtypes have independent and unique roles in the modulation of pituitary GH release.

Somatostatin receptors and the potential use of Sandostatin to interfere with vascular remodelling.

Graft vessel disease (GVD) is a major cause of graft loss after the first year following transplantation. GVD is a complex, multifunctional process that involves immunological as well as non-immunological events such as ischaemia/reperfusion injury. An important target cell to interfere with the development of GVD is the smooth muscle cell (SMC). Somatostatin (SRIF) analogues have been shown previously to inhibit the proliferation of SMC in vitro and in vivo. We provide evidence that Sandostatin, an octapeptide SRIF analogue that is known to have anti-proliferative properties on SMC proliferation, inhibits vascular remodelling in a rat angioplasty model. Furthermore, in two allotransplantation models, Sandostatin effectively interferes with the development of signs of chronic rejection/GVD. The role of the different SRIF receptor subtypes in chronic graft rejection is currently under investigation.