Spontaneous Myocardial Infarction Research Articles

Association of Lipoprotein(a) With Recurrent Ischemic Events Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

This study evaluated the association between elevated levels of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and risk of recurrent ischemic events in patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Elevated levels of Lp(a) have been identified as an independent, possibly causal, risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in a general population study. A prospective single-center registry was used to identify 12,064 patients with baseline Lp(a) measurements who underwent PCI between 2003 and 2013. The primary outcomes were a composite of cardiovascular death, spontaneous myocardial infarction, and ischemic stroke. From the registry, 3,747 (31.1%) patients had high Lp(a) (>30mg/dL) and 8,317 (68.9%) patients had low Lp(a) (≤30mg/dL). During a median follow-up of 7.4 years, primary outcomes occurred in 1,490 patients, and the incidence rates of primary outcomes were 2.0 per 100 person-years in the high-Lp(a) group and 1.6 per 100 person-years in the low-Lp(a) group (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 1.17; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05-1.30; P = 0.004). Increased risk of recurrent ischemic cardiovascular events in the high-Lp(a) group was consistent in various subgroups including patients receiving statin treatment at discharge (aHR: 1.18; 95%CI: 1.03-1.34; P = 0.011). In addition, the risk of repeated revascularization was significantly higher in the high-Lp(a) group (aHR: 1.13; 95%CI: 1.02-1.25; P = 0.022). Elevated levels of Lp(a) were significantly associated with the recurrent ischemic events in patients who underwent PCI. This study provides a rationale for outcome trials to test Lp(a)-lowering therapy for secondary prevention in patients undergoing PCI.

Coronary artery bypass grafting or percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with severe three vessel disease

Recent randomized controlled trials confirmed the beneficial outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) compared with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with severe three-vessel coronary artery and left main disease. An increased long-term survival after CABG is associated with a reduction in spontaneous myocardial infarction and repeat revascularization rates. While PCI treats only flow-limiting lesions, CABG treats the whole coronary artery, preventing events in the future. Due to different clinical and anatomic factors affecting the outcomes, the heart team should formulate treatment assignment recommendations.

Colchicine in Patients With Chronic Coronary Disease in Relation to Prior Acute Coronary Syndrome

BackgroundColchicine reduces risk of cardiovascular events in patients post–myocardial infarction and in patients with chronic coronary disease. It remains unclear whether this effect is related to the time of onset of treatment following an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). ObjectivesThis study investigates risk for major adverse cardiovascular events in relation to history and timing of prior ACS, to determine whether the benefits of colchicine are consistent independent of prior ACS status. MethodsThe LoDoCo2 (Low-Dose Colchicine 2) trial randomly allocated patients with chronic coronary disease to colchicine 0.5 mg once daily or placebo. The rate of the composite of cardiovascular death, spontaneous myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or ischemia-driven coronary revascularization was compared between patients with no prior, recent (6-24 months), remote (2-7 years), or very remote (>7 years) ACS; interaction between ACS status and colchicine treatment effect was assessed. ResultsIn 5,522 randomized patients, risk of the primary endpoint was independent of prior ACS status. Colchicine consistently reduced the primary endpoint in patients with no prior ACS (incidence: 2.8 vs 3.4 events per 100 person-years; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.52-1.27), recent ACS (incidence: 2.4 vs 3.3 events per 100 person-years; HR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.51-1.10), remote ACS (incidence: 1.8 vs 3.2 events per 100 person-years, HR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.37-0.82), and very remote ACS (incidence: 3.0 vs 4.3 events per 100 person-years, HR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.51-0.96) (P for interaction = 0.59). ConclusionsThe benefits of colchicine are consistent irrespective of history and timing of prior ACS. (The LoDoCo2 Trial: Low Dose Colchicine for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease [LoDoCo2] ACTRN12614000093684)

The Impact of the ISCHEMIA Trial on Clinical Practice: an Interventionist's Perspective.

The International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches (ISCHEMIA) trial is the latest in a series of studies evaluating the role of coronary revascularization plus optimal medical therapy (invasive management) as compared to optimal medical therapy alone (conservative management) in the management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease. The "headline" results suggested invasive management did not reduce overall major adverse cardiac events in the intermediate term (~ 3.2years), although it did sustainably reduce angina. In addition, invasive management reduced spontaneous myocardial infarction, with potentially important beneficial consequences on both long-term mortality and quality of life. This review puts the ISCHEMIA trial into historical context, explores the trial's results and limitations and shows why revascularization remains an important adjunct to optimal medical therapy that should be considered by all patients with stable ischemic heart disease and the physicians who care for them.

Association of microvascular dysfunction with clinical outcomes in patients with non-flow limiting fractional flow reserve after percutaneous coronary intervention.

BackgroundWe sought to investigate prognostic implication of microvascular dysfunction as assessed by the index of microcirculatory index (IMR) in patients without residual obstructive CAD with non-flow limiting fractional flow reserve (FFR) (>0.80) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).MethodsA total of 570 patients who had both post-PCI FFR and IMR values were included in the present analysis; of these, 65 patients had FFR ≤ 0.80 and 505 had FFR > 0.80. Of the 505 patients with FFR > 0.80, 137 had high IMR and 368 had low IMR. The primary outcome of the present analysis is a composite of all-cause death, spontaneous myocardial infarction, or target-vessel revascularization. Impaired microvascular function was defined as IMR ≥ 25 (high IMR).ResultsDuring a median follow-up duration of 4.0 years, those with FFR > 0.80 and low IMR demonstrated lower rate or primary outcome event than those with FFR ≤ 0.80 (hazard ratio 0.49 [95% confidence interval 0.27–0.92], p = 0.026) and those with FFR > 0.80 and high IMR (hazard ratio 1.60 [0.99–2.16], p = 0.056). The patients with FFR > 0.80 and IMR ≥ 25 had similar rate of primary outcome event compared with those with FFR ≤ 0.80 (p = 0.49).ConclusionMicrovascular dysfunction following PCI is not rare and is associated with adverse events even in the setting of a non-flow limiting FFR; these results suggest that when performing coronary physiologic assessment following PCI, interrogating not only the epicardial vessel, but also the microvasculature is useful for the risk stratification in patients undergoing PCI.

Clinical Outcome of Rotational Atherectomy in Calcified Lesions in Korea-ROCK Registry.

Background and Objectives: Data is still limited regarding clinical outcomes of rotational atherectomy (RA) after percutaneous coronary intervention. We sought to evaluate clinical outcomes of RA. Materials and Methods: This multi-center registry enrolled patients who underwent RA during PCI from nine tertiary centers in Korea between January 2010 and October 2019. The primary endpoint was target-vessel failure (TVF; the composite outcome of cardiac death, target-vessel spontaneous myocardial infarction, or target-vessel revascularization). Results: Of 540 patients (583 lesions), the mean patient age was 71.4 ± 0.4 years, 323 patients (59.8%) were men, and 305 patients (56.5%) had diabetes mellitus. Technical success rate was 96.4%. In-hospital major adverse cerebral and cardiac events occurred in 63 cases (10.8%). At 1.5 years, 72 (16.0%) of TVFs were occurred. We evaluated independent predictors of TVF, which included current smoker (hazard ratio (HR), 1.92; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.17–3.16; p = 0.01), chronic renal disease (HR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.14–3.08; p = 0.013), history of cerebrovascular attack (HR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.24-3.68; p = 0.006), left ventricle ejection fraction (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97–0.999; p = 0.037), and left main disease (HR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.11–3.37; p = 0.019). Conclusions: From this registry, we demonstrated acceptable success rates, in-hospital and mid-term clinical outcomes of RA in the DES era.

Impact of sex on long-term cardiovascular outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndromes.

Women with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) generally present with more comorbidities and experience worse clinical outcomes compared with males. However, it is unclear whether this represents genuine sex-related difference or stems from clinical, procedural and socioeconomic factors. We analyzed consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), non-STEMI or unstable angina at a single tertiary-care center. Exclusion criteria were unknown sex, age < 18 years and PCI with bare metal stent or without stent placement. The study population was stratified according to sex. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) defined as the composite of death, spontaneous myocardial infarction, or stroke at 1year. Secondary endpoints were individual components of MACCE, target vessel revascularization (TVR) and clinically significant bleeding. Of the 7362 patients included, 5031 (68.3%) were men and 2331 (31.7%) women. Women were older and presented with a higher burden of comorbidities while men had more complex coronary anatomy. The incidence of 1year MACCE was significantly higher among women (8.0% versus 5.6%; p < 0.01) compared to men. Women also experienced a higher rate of bleeding (2.3% vs. 1.4%; p=0.02) while there were no differences between groups in terms of TVR (8.1% vs. 7.8%; p-value=0.83). Differences in outcomes were attenuated after multivariable adjustment. Findings were consistent across ACS subgroups. In a contemporary ACS population treated with drug-eluting stents, women experienced a higher crude rate of 1-year MACCE. This was no longer apparent after accounting for baseline imbalances.

Cardiac mortality in patients randomised to elective coronary revascularisation plus medical therapy or medical therapy alone: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

AimsThe value of elective coronary revascularisation plus medical therapy over medical therapy alone in managing stable patients with coronary artery disease is debated. We reviewed all trials comparing the two strategies in this population.Methods and resultsFrom inception through November 2020, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Google Scholar, and other databases were searched for randomised trials comparing revascularisation against medical therapy alone in clinically stable coronary artery disease patients. Treatment effects were measured by rate ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals, using random-effects models. Cardiac mortality was the pre-specified primary endpoint. Spontaneous myocardial infarction (MI) and its association with cardiac mortality were secondary endpoints. Further endpoints included all-cause mortality, any MI, and stroke. Longest follow-up data were abstracted. The study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021225598). Twenty-five trials involving 19 806 patients (10 023 randomised to revascularisation plus medical therapy and 9783 to medical therapy alone) were included. Compared with medical therapy alone, revascularisation yielded a lower risk of cardiac death [RR 0.79 (0.67–0.93), P < 0.01] and spontaneous MI [RR 0.74 (0.64–0.86), P < 0.01]. By meta-regression, the cardiac death risk reduction after revascularisation, compared with medical therapy alone, was linearly associated with follow-up duration [RR per 4-year follow-up: 0.81 (0.69–0.96), P = 0.008], spontaneous MI absolute difference (P = 0.01) and percentage of multivessel disease at baseline (P = 0.004). Trial sequential and sensitivity analyses confirmed the reliability of the cardiac mortality findings. All-cause mortality [0.94 (0.87–1.01), P = 0.11], any MI (P = 0.14), and stroke risk (P = 0.30) did not differ significantly between strategies.ConclusionIn stable coronary artery disease patients, randomisation to elective coronary revascularisation plus medical therapy led to reduced cardiac mortality compared with medical therapy alone. The cardiac survival benefit after revascularisation improved with longer follow-up times and was associated with fewer spontaneous MIs.

Comparison of Days Alive Out of Hospital With Initial Invasive vs Conservative Management

Traditional time-to-event analyses rate events occurring early as more important than later events, even if later events are more severe, eg, death. Days alive out of hospital (DAOH) adds a patient-focused perspective beyond trial end points. To compare DAOH between invasive management and conservative management, including invasive protocol-assigned stays, in the International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches (ISCHEMIA) randomized clinical trial. In this prespecified analysis of the ISCHEMIA trial, DAOH was compared between 5179 patients with stable coronary disease and moderate or severe ischemia randomized to invasive management or conservative management. Participants were recruited from 320 sites in 37 countries. Stays included overnight stays in hospital or extended care facility (skilled nursing facility, rehabilitation, or nursing home). DAOH was separately analyzed excluding invasive protocol-assigned procedures. Data were collected from July 2012 to June 2019, and data were analyzed from July 2020 to April 2021. Invasive management with angiography and revascularization if feasible or conservative management, with both groups receiving optimal medical therapy. The hypothesis was formulated before data lock in July 2020. The primary end point was mean DAOH per patient between randomization and 4 years. Initial stays for invasive protocol-assigned procedures were prespecified to be excluded. Of 5179 included patients, 1168 (22.6%) were female, and the median (interquartile range) age was 64 (58-70) years. The average DAOH was higher in the conservative management group compared with the invasive management group at 1 month (30.8 vs 28.4 days; P < .001), 1 year (362.2 vs 355.9 days; P < .001), and 2 years (718.4 vs 712.1 days; P = .001). At 4 years, the 2 groups' DAOH were not significantly different (1415.0 vs 1412.2 days; P = .65). In the invasive management group, 2434 of 4002 stays (60.8%) were for protocol-assigned procedures. There were no clear differences at any time point in DAOH when protocol-assigned procedures were excluded from the invasive management group. There were more hospital and extended care stays in the invasive management vs conservative management group during follow-up (4002 vs 1897; P < .001). Excluding protocol-assigned procedures, there were fewer stays in the invasive vs conservative group (1568 vs 1897; P = .001). Cardiovascular stays following the initial assigned procedures were lower in the invasive management group (685 of 4002 [17.1%] vs 1095 of 1897 [57.8%]; P < .001) due to decreased spontaneous myocardial infarction stays (65 [1.6%] vs 123 [6.5%]; P < .001) and unstable angina stays (119 [3.0%] vs 216 [11.4%]; P < .001). DAOH was higher for patients in the conservative management group in the first 2 years but not different at 4 years. DAOH was decreased early in the invasive management group due to protocol-assigned procedures. Hospital stays for myocardial infarction and unstable angina during follow-up were lower in the invasive management group. DAOH provides a patient-focused metric that can be used by clinicians and patients in shared decision-making for management of stable coronary artery disease. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01471522.

Difference in spontaneous myocardial infarction and mortality in percutaneous versus surgical revascularization trials: A systematic review and meta-analysis

ObjectivesIt has been hypothesized that the survival benefit of coronary artery bypass (CABG) compared with percutaneous interventions (PCI) may be associated with the reduction in spontaneous myocardial infarction (SMI) achieved by surgery. This, however, has not been formally investigated. The present meta-analysis aims to evaluate the association between the difference in SMI and in survival in PCI versus CABG randomized controlled trials (RCTs). MethodsA systematic search was performed to identify all RCTs comparing PCI with CABG for the treatment of coronary artery disease and reporting SMI outcomes. Generic inverse variance method was used to pool outcomes as natural logarithms of the incident rate ratios across studies. Subgroup analysis and interaction test were used to compare the difference of the primary outcome among trials that did and did not report a significant reduction in SMI- in the patients treated by CABG. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality; secondary outcome was SMI. ResultsTwenty RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. A statistically significant difference in SMI in favor of CABG was found in 7 of the included trials (35%). Overall, PCI was associated with significantly greater all-cause mortality (incident rate ratio, 1.13; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.28). At subgroup analysis, a significant difference in survival in favor of CABG was seen only in trials that reported a significant reduction in SMI in the surgical arm (P for interaction 0.02). ConclusionsIn the published PCI versus CABG trials, the reduction in all-cause mortality in the surgical arm is associated with the protective effect of CABG against SMI.

Quantitative Flow Ratio to Predict Nontarget Vessel-Related Events at 5 Years in Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Angiography-Guided Revascularization.

BackgroundIn ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction, angiography‐based complete revascularization is superior to culprit‐lesion‐only percutaneous coronary intervention. Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is a novel, noninvasive, vasodilator‐free method used to assess the hemodynamic significance of coronary stenoses. We aimed to investigate the incremental value of QFR over angiography in nonculprit lesions in patients with ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction undergoing angiography‐guided complete revascularization.Methods and ResultsThis was a retrospective post hoc QFR analysis of untreated nontarget vessels (any degree of diameter stenosis [DS]) from the randomized multicenter COMFORTABLE AMI (Comparison of Biolimus Eluted From an Erodible Stent Coating With Bare Metal Stents in Acute ST‐Elevation Myocardial Infarction) trial by assessors blinded for clinical outcomes. The primary end point was cardiac death, spontaneous nontarget vessel myocardial infarction, and clinically indicated nontarget vessel revascularization (ie, ≥70% DS by 2‐dimensional quantitative coronary angiography or ≥50% DS and ischemia) at 5 years. Of 1161 patients with ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction, 946 vessels in 617 patients were analyzable by QFR. At 5 years, the rate of the primary end point was significantly higher in patients with QFR ≤0.80 (n=35 patients, n=36 vessels) versus QFR >0.80 (n=582 patients, n=910 vessels) (62.9% versus 12.5%, respectively; hazard ratio [HR], 7.33 [95% CI, 4.54–11.83], P<0.001), driven by higher rates of nontarget vessel myocardial infarction (12.8% versus 3.1%, respectively; HR, 4.38 [95% CI, 1.47–13.02], P=0.008) and nontarget vessel revascularization (58.6% versus 7.7%, respectively; HR, 10.99 [95% CI, 6.39–18.91], P<0.001) with no significant differences for cardiac death. Multivariable analysis identified QFR ≤0.80 but not ≥50% DS by 3‐dimensional quantitative coronary angiography as an independent predictor of the primary end point. Results were consistent, including only >30% DS by 3‐dimensional quantitative coronary angiography.ConclusionsOur study suggests incremental value of QFR over angiography‐guided percutaneous coronary intervention for nonculprit lesions among patients with ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Long-term prognostic implications of revascularization in patients with known or suspected chronic coronary syndromes without ischemia in vasodilator stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance

AimsIn this study, we evaluated the association between symptoms-guided revascularization occurred within three months following a negative vasodilator stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance (negative stress-CMR) and long-term adverse events in patients with known or suspected chronic coronary syndrome (CCS). MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated 3517 patients in which the stress first-pass perfusion imaging revealed no ischemia. The primary endpoint was the composite of death, spontaneous myocardial infarction, heart failure (HF), or stroke. The association between symptoms-guided revascularization after a negative stress-CMR and the endpoint was assessed using the multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression model. ResultsThe mean age was 64.7 ± 11.9 years and 45.4% were females. Coronary angiography and revascularization following a negative stress-CMR were performed in 176 (5%) and 59 (1.7%) patients. At a median follow-up of 4.8 years (2.0–8.2), 529 (15%) patients experienced the primary endpoint (2.0 per 100 person-years). Revascularization following a negative CMR was associated with a higher incidence of the composite (4.85 vs. 1.96 per 100 person-years, p < 0.001) and each of the isolated components of the endpoint, except for the HF endpoint, in which differences were borderline significant. After multivariate adjustment, revascularization remained associated with an excess of risk (HR = 2.01, 95% CI:1.21–3.30; p = 0.007). ConclusionsIn CCS patients with persistent symptoms but without evidence of ischemia in vasodilator stress CMR, revascularization was associated with a higher risk of adverse clinical events.

Angiographic characteristics and long-term outcomes of single-vessel chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with and without previous myocardial infarction.

This study evaluated the angiographic characteristics and clinical outcomes of chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) among patients with and without a history of myocardial infarction (MI). The pathogenesis of CTO and myocardial viability are different in cases with or without previous MI. However, the lesion characteristics and clinical outcomes are unclear for these two groups. We reviewed consecutive patients who underwent single-vessel CTO PCI from 2010 to 2013. Patients were classified according to their history of MI. Acute procedural results were classified as optimal recanalization, suboptimal recanalization, or technical failure. The primary endpoint was the 5 year rate of cardiac death. We identified 2,191 eligible patients, including 859 patients (39.2%) with previous MI. The overall technical success rate was 74.4%. Relative to the non-MI group, the MI group had a larger reference vessel diameter (3.0 ± 0.5 vs. 2.9 ± 0.4 mm, p = .002), a lower proportion of Werner grade ≥ 1 collateral circulation (65.4 vs. 79.2%, p < .001), a higher proportion of optimal recanalization (63.1 vs. 58.6%, p = .006), and a higher 5-year rate of cardiac death (3.9 vs. 2.1%, p = .02). In the MI group, suboptimal recanalization was associated with a significantly higher 5-year rate of spontaneous MI, relative to optimal recanalization and technical failure (11.7 vs. 4.6 vs. 4.1%, p = .006). Patients with CTO and previous MI had a larger reference vessel diameter, lower level of collateral circulation, and higher proportion of optimal recanalization. However, suboptimal recanalization in these patients was associated with an increased risk of spontaneous MI.

Prognosis of spontaneous myocardial infarction and various definitions of periprocedural myocardial infarction in patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention

BackgroundDebate exists on the prognostic significance of spontaneous myocardial infarction (SMI) and periprocedural myocardial infarction (PMI), which could be diagnosed by various definitions. Methods and resultsA total of 10,724 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were consecutively enrolled and followed up for a median of 2.4 years. We evaluated outcomes of all-cause death, cardiac death, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Patients were stratified into three groups, including the No MI group, PMI group, and SMI group. PMI was defined based on different diagnostic criteria, including the third and fourth universal myocardial infarction (MI) definitions, the society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions (SCAI) definition, and the independent biomarker definition. Regardless of these definitions, the PMI groups were all associated with a significantly increased MACE risk at one year or 1000 days (all P < 0.05), but not all-cause or cardiac death. The SMI group was associated with a markedly elevated risk of death and MACE, but it showed no significant different risk of MACE to PMI using varying definitions. ConclusionsAccording to various PMI definitions, PMI and SMI were associated with an increased risk of MACE, but not death for PMI. No significantly different risk of MACE was observed between PMI and SMI.

Vasospastic Angina – Mechanistic Diversity Explored Through Two Unique Presentations

Vasospastic angina can mimic spontaneous myocardial infarction.

Drug-Coated Balloon Versus Drug-Eluting Stent for Small Coronary Vessel Disease: PICCOLETO II Randomized Clinical Trial.

This study sought to compare the performance of a novel drug-coated balloon (DCB) (Elutax SV, Aachen Resonance, Germany), with an everolimus-eluting stent (EES) (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, California) in patients with de novo lesions. Small vessel coronary artery disease (SVD) represents one of the most attractive fields of application for DCB. To date, several devices have been compared with drug-eluting stents in this setting, with different outcomes. The PICCOLETO II (Drug Eluting Balloon Efficacy for Small Coronary Vessel Disease Treatment) trial was an international, investigator-driven, multicenter, open-label, prospective randomized controlled trial where patients with de novo SVD lesions were randomized to DCB or EES. Primary study endpoint was in-lesion late lumen loss (LLL) at 6months (independent core laboratory), with the noninferiority between the 2 arms hypothesized. Secondary endpoints were minimal lumen diameter, percent diameter stenosis at angiographic follow-up, and the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events at 12months. Between May 2015 and May 2018, a total of 232 patients were enrolled at 5 centers. After a median of 189 (interquartile range: 160 to 202) days, in-lesion LLL was significantly lower in the DCB group (0.04 vs. 0.17mm; p=0.001 for noninferiority; p=0.03 for superiority). Percent diameter stenosis and minimal lumen diameter were not significantly different. At 12-month clinical follow-up, major adverse cardiac events occurred in 7.5% of the DES group and in 5.6% of the DCB group (p=0.55). There was a numerically higher incidence of spontaneous myocardial infarction (4.7% vs. 1.9%; p=0.23) and vessel thrombosis (1.8% vs. 0%; p=0.15) in the DES arm. In this multicenter randomized clinical trial in patients with de novo SVD lesions, a new-generationDCBwas found superior to EES in terms of LLL as the angiographic pattern and comparable in terms of clinicaloutcome.(DrugEluting Balloon Efficacy for Small Coronary Vessel Disease Treatment [PICCOLETO II]; NCT03899818).

Durable Polymer Versus Biodegradable Polymer Drug-Eluting Stents After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: The HOST-REDUCE-POLYTECH-ACS Trial.

Large-scale randomized comparison of drug-eluting stents (DES) based on durable polymer versus biodegradable polymer technology is currently insufficient in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The present study aimed to prove the noninferiority of the durable polymer DES (DP-DES) compared with the biodegradable polymer DES (BP-DES) in such patients. The HOST-REDUCE-POLYTECH-ACS (Harmonizing Optimal Strategy for Treatment of Coronary Artery Diseases-Comparison of Reduction of Prasugrel Dose or Polymer Technology in ACS Patients) trial is an investigator-initiated, randomized, open-label, adjudicator-blinded, multicenter, noninferiority trial comparing the efficacy and safety of DP-DES and BP-DES in patients with ACS. The primary end point was a patient-oriented composite outcome (a composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and any repeat revascularization) at 12 months. The key secondary end point was device-oriented composite outcome (a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization) at 12 months. A total of 3413 patients were randomized to receive the DP-DES (1713 patients) and BP-DES (1700 patients). At 12 months, patient-oriented composite outcome occurred in 5.2% in the DP-DES group and 6.4% in the BP-DES group (absolute risk difference, -1.2%; Pnoninferiority<0.001). The key secondary end point, device-oriented composite outcome, occurred less frequently in the DP-DES group (DP-DES vs BP-DES, 2.6% vs 3.9%; hazard ratio, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.46-0.98]; P=0.038), mostly because of a reduction in target lesion revascularization. The rate of spontaneous nonfatal myocardial infarction and stent thrombosis were extremely low, with no significant difference between the 2 groups (0.6% versus 0.8%; P=0.513 and 0.1% versus 0.4%; P=0.174, respectively). In ACS patients receiving percutaneous coronary intervention, DP-DES was noninferior to BP-DES with regard to patient-oriented composite outcomes at 12 months after index percutaneous coronary intervention. Registration: URL: https://wwwclinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02193971.

Abstract 16599: Impact of Race and Ethnicity on Long Term Outcomes Post Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Drug Eluting Stents

Introduction: Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of mortality worldwide, irrespective of race/ethnicity. Previous studies reported that minority patients with ACS have distinct clinical, genetic and socioeconomic backgrounds that may affect clinical outcomes. Hypothesis: To investigate post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) outcomes according to race/ethnicity in a contemporary ACS population. Methods: We included consecutive patients undergoing drug-eluting stent implantation for STEMI, non-STEMI or unstable angina (UA) between 2012-2017. The study population was stratified into Caucasian, African American, Hispanic and Asian. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) defined as a composite of death, spontaneous myocardial infarction or stroke at 1 year. Results: Of the 6800 patients included, 3377 (49.7%) were Caucasian, 1408 (20.7%) Hispanic, 1156 (17.0%) Asian and 859 (12.6%) African American. Caucasians were the oldest, Hispanics and Asians had the highest prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) and African Americans had more insulin dependent DM and chronic kidney disease. Hispanics and African Americans had the highest STEMI rate, while Asians were more likely to present with UA, have private insurance and be discharged on aspirin and clopidogrel. Compared to Caucasians, Asians had a lower rate of MACCE at 1 year (3.9% vs. 7.1%; p&lt;0.01) whereas Hispanics (6.2% vs. 7.1%; p-value=0.17) and African Americans (8.0% vs. 7.1%; p-value=0.38) had comparable outcomes. Differences were driven by fewer deaths in the Hispanic (2.1% vs. 4.2%; p&lt;0.01) and Asian (1.7% vs. 4.2%; p&lt;0.01) subgroups. Findings remained unchanged after adjusting for potential confounders [Figure]. Conclusions: Among patients undergoing PCI for ACS, Asian race is associated with favorable cardiovascular outcomes compared to Caucasian. No significant differences were observed for Hispanics and African Americans.

Prognostic impact of the atherogenic index of plasma in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

BackgroundThe association of the atherogenic index of plasma (AIP), an emerging lipid index that can predict the risk for cardiovascular disease, with adverse outcomes in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has not been determined. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate whether the AIP could independently predict adverse cardiovascular events in T2DM patients with ACS undergoing PCI.MethodsThis study was a retrospective analysis of a single-centre prospective registry involving 826 consecutive T2DM patients who underwent primary or elective PCI for ACS from June 2016 to November 2017. This study ultimately included 798 patients (age, 61 ± 10 years; male, 72.7%). The AIP was calculated as the base 10 logarithm of the ratio of the plasma concentration of triglycerides to high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C). All the patients were divided into 4 groups based on the AIP quartiles. The primary endpoint was a composite of death from any cause, non-fatal spontaneous myocardial infarction (MI), non-fatal ischaemic stroke, and unplanned repeat revascularization. The key secondary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal MI, and non-fatal ischaemic stroke.ResultsDuring a median follow-up period of 927 days, 198 patients developed at least one event. An unadjusted Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the incidence of the primary endpoint increased gradually with rising AIP quartiles (log-rank test, P = 0.001). A multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis revealed that compared with the lowest AIP quartile, the top AIP quartile was associated with significantly increased risk for the primary and key secondary endpoints (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.249, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.438 to 3.517, P < 0.001; and HR: 2.571, 95% CI: 1.027 to 6.440, P = 0.044, respectively).ConclusionsA higher AIP value on admission was independently and strongly associated with adverse cardiovascular events in T2DM patients with ACS undergoing PCI.

Colchicine in Patients with Chronic Coronary Disease

BackgroundEvidence from a recent trial has shown that the antiinflammatory effects of colchicine reduce the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with recent myocardial infarction, but evidence of such a risk reduction in patients with chronic coronary disease is limited.MethodsIn a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial, we assigned patients with chronic coronary disease to receive 0.5 mg of colchicine once daily or matching placebo. The primary end point was a composite of cardiovascular death, spontaneous (nonprocedural) myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or ischemia-driven coronary revascularization. The key secondary end point was a composite of cardiovascular death, spontaneous myocardial infarction, or ischemic stroke.ResultsA total of 5522 patients underwent randomization; 2762 were assigned to the colchicine group and 2760 to the placebo group. The median duration of follow-up was 28.6 months. A primary end-point event occurred in 187 patients (6.8%) in the colchicine group and in 264 patients (9.6%) in the placebo group (incidence, 2.5 vs. 3.6 events per 100 person-years; hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57 to 0.83; P<0.001). A key secondary end-point event occurred in 115 patients (4.2%) in the colchicine group and in 157 patients (5.7%) in the placebo group (incidence, 1.5 vs. 2.1 events per 100 person-years; hazard ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.57 to 0.92; P=0.007). The incidence rates of spontaneous myocardial infarction or ischemia-driven coronary revascularization (composite end point), cardiovascular death or spontaneous myocardial infarction (composite end point), ischemia-driven coronary revascularization, and spontaneous myocardial infarction were also significantly lower with colchicine than with placebo. The incidence of death from noncardiovascular causes was higher in the colchicine group than in the placebo group (incidence, 0.7 vs. 0.5 events per 100 person-years; hazard ratio, 1.51; 95% CI, 0.99 to 2.31).ConclusionsIn a randomized trial involving patients with chronic coronary disease, the risk of cardiovascular events was significantly lower among those who received 0.5 mg of colchicine once daily than among those who received placebo. (Funded by the National Health Medical Research Council of Australia and others; LoDoCo2 Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number, ACTRN12614000093684.)