Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of neuroendoscopic surgery and minimally invasive puncture surgery in the treatment of spontaneous cerebral hemorrhage. Methods: The English databases, including PubMed, OVID, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and the Chinese databases, such as CNKI, Wanfang and Weipu, were computer searched to collect the relevant literature on the treatment of spontaneous cerebral hemorrhage by neuroendoscopic surgery and minimally invasive puncture surgery. The included literature was meta-analyzed using Stata 17.0 software. Results: A total of 10 articles were included in the study. There were 344 patients in the neuroendoscopy group and 419 patients in the minimally invasive puncture group. Compared with the minimally invasive puncture group, the clearance rate of postoperative hematoma in the neuroendoscopy group was higher (MD = 19.71; 95% CI 4.84-34.57, Z = 2.60, P = 0.01 < 0.05), the amount of hematoma cleared was higher (MD = 16.5; 95% CI 5.95-27.04, Z = 3.07, P = 0.001 < 0.05), mRS score was lower (MD = -0.49; 95% CI -0.76 to -0.21, Z = -3.42, P = 0.001 < 0.05); GCS score was higher (MD = 0.74; 95% CI 0.05-1.43, Z = 2.09, P = 0.04 < 0.05). However, the operation time was longer (MD = 51.44; 95% CI 37.44-65.44, Z = 7.20, P = 0.0001 < 0.05) of patients in the neuroendoscopy group than those in the control group. Conclusion: Neuroendoscopic surgery is superior to minimally invasive puncture surgery in the treatment of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage in hematoma clearance and clearance rate, postoperative recovery, and postoperative consciousness recovery. Neuroendoscopic surgery has better efficacy and safety.
Read full abstract