Split-thickness Skin Graft Donor Sites Research Articles

Clinical evaluation of the efficiency and safety of the Tromboguard® hemostatic dressing for donor sites of split-thickness skin graft: A multicenter study

Worldwide, burns are the fourth most frequent type of injury. The treatment of burn wounds requires a lot of experience and an interdisciplinary approach including both surgical treatment and pharmacological wound care. The most common management of burn wounds is debridement and wound closure through the use of skin grafts. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the hemostatic and antibacterial effects of the commercially available Tromboguard® foam dressing with an active layer containing alginates and chitosan. The site of application of the product was the donor fields for skin grafts. Findings proved that a polyurethane foam dressing with an active chitosan-alginate layer is a useful option for achieving rapid hemostasis, antimicrobial protection and effective healing at split-thickness skin graft donor sites. Substances present in the active layer promote clot formation and the wound healing process.

Effects of Medicinal Plants Extracts in Healing Split-Thickness Skin Graft Donor Site Wounds: A Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials

The literature on Split-Thickness Skin Graft (STSG) donor site dressings has not yet identified an ideal dressing, and most products tested by researchers for wound dressing are prohibitively expensive in Low- and Middle-income settings. Clinical trials using biological dressings have offered an alternative option for managing STSG donor sites wound. The aim of this systematic review is to find evidences regarding the effectiveness of medicinal plants on STSG donor site wound healing. A total of 249 papers were identified in the initial search. After removing duplicates and applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 6 Randomized Clinical Trials were deemed relevant and included in the final review. Over twenty years four medicinal plants have entered clinical trial to enhance STSG donor site wound healing. The medicinal plants reviewed have large effect size regarding time to complete wound healing and wound score. However, the effect size of Aloe vera regarding time to complete wound healing and pain control vary from study to study. No patient quality of life was assessed neither cost-effectiveness of these products. Medicinal plants are potential cost effective antimicrobial and wound healing products for STSG donor site wound dressing. However, more clinical researches including patient quality of life among outcome measures are needed.

Effectiveness of a Regenerative Epithelial Suspension (RES), on the pigmentation of split-thickness skin graft donor sites in children: the dRESsing pilot randomised controlled trial protocol

BackgroundPaediatric donor site wounds are often complicated by dyspigmentation following a split-thickness skin graft. These easily identifiable scars can potentially never return to normal pigmentation. A Regenerative Epidermal Suspension (RES)...

Efficacy of platelet-rich plasma in alleviating split skin graft morbidities.

Skin grafting is a routinely employed technique to cover the skin defect. Though the skin grafts are technically effortless, they are tiresome because of the prolonged duration of hospital stay, labor-intensive, demanding repeated dressings, and also create a second wound. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is one that has a higher concentration of platelets than the blood. Alpha granules of the platelets are rich in growth factors. To assess the effect of PRP on split-thickness skin graft uptake and donor site healing. In a single-center-based prospective study done from August 2018 to June 2020, 60 patients with acute and chronic wounds were divided into two equal groups. Autologous PRP was applied on the recipient wound bed and donor site in PRP group, and conventional methods like staples/sutures were used to anchor the skin grafts and standard of care of the donor site in a control group. Instantaneous graft adhesion was observed in all patients of PRP group. The first graft inspection was delayed. Seroma, hematoma, total number of dressings, and duration of stay in hospital were significantly reduced in the PRP group. Donor site pain in the postoperative period was notably reduced in PRP group. PRP also remarkably hastened the donor site healing. The application of PRP promotes graft take, minimizes complications, enhances donor site wound healing, mitigates donor site pain, and has immense economic benefits due to the reduced number of dressing changes and shorter hospital stay.

First do no harm: A patient-reported survey of split skin graft donor site morbidities following thin and super-thin graft harvest

The split-thickness skin graft (STSG) donor site is the commonest used during burn surgery which has its own complications and as such the focus should be on minimizing it. Modifications to practice in our unit which we believe aid this include limiting the amount of STSG taken and the harvest of super-thin STSGs, with 0.003–0.005 in. (0.08–0.13 mm) being the commonest dermatome settings used. A patient-reported survey via a mobile phone link to a questionnaire was sent to 250 patients who had a STSG for an acute burn between 1st August 2020 and 31st July 2021. Patient demographics were collected from electronic records including the thickness of the FTSG taken when recorded. Patient responses were statistically analyzed and logistic regression with backwards elimination was performed to explore which contributing factors led to an improved experience of the donor site. Questionnaire responses were obtained from 107 patients (43%). These were between one and two and a half years after the injury. Concerning early donor site issues, itch was a problem for 52% of patients, pain was a problem for 48% of patients. Less common problems (fewer than 25% of patients) were leaking donor sites, wound breakdown, and over-granulation. Regarding long-term outcomes, increased, decreased or mixed pigmentation at the donor site was reported by 32% patients at the time of the survey. Hyper-vascular donor sites were reported by 24% patients. Raised or uneven feeling donor sites were reported by 19% patients, firm or stiff donor sites by 13% patients, and altered sensation by 10% patients. At the time of the survey, 70% responders reported their donor site looked “the same or about the same as my normal skin”. Of these, 62 reported how long it took for this to happen, and it equates to a third looking normal at 6 months and half looking normal at a year. For the 32 patients who reported their donor site looking abnormal, 72% were “not bothered” by it. Patients with super-thin grafts (0.003–0.005 in.) were significantly more likely to have normal sensation, normal stiffness, and be less raised at their donor sites than those who had thin grafts (0.006–0.008 in.). This survey gives important information on patients’ experiences of donor site morbidity that may form part of an informed consent process and allow tailored advice. Furthermore, it suggests that super-thin grafts may provide a superior donor site experience for patients.

Novel Method of Split-Thickness Skin Graft Donor Site Management Using Combined Fenestrated Polyurethane Film and Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy

Background: Split-thickness skin graft (STSG) is a fundamental and versatile technique used in reconstructive surgery. Despite numerous studies addressing the management of STSG donor sites, there is still little consensus on the optimal dressing method. This study aimed to analyze the effectiveness of a novel method that combines a fenestrated polyurethane film with negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) over conventional moist dressings.Methods: Between January 2021 and December 2022, 23 patients who received STSG were retrospectively reviewed. In group A, a polyurethane film punctured with a 20-gauge needle was applied to the skin graft donor site. A NPWT system (CuraSys) was subsequently applied over the film. The conventional NPWT was replaced with a portable NPWT (PICO system) on the day of discharge. On the 14th postoperative day, the NPWT and film were removed. In group B, patients were administered a traditional moist dressing until epithelization. Postoperative pain, reepithelization rate, and dressing cost per cm² were compared.Results: Group A exhibited a lower mean pain score on all the measured days. Furthermore, group A demonstrated a significantly shorter time required for complete reepithelization (18.07±8.43 days vs. 28.20±5.25 days, P=0.003) and a lower dressing cost per square centimeter (6,517±6,162 KRW [4.82±4.56 USD] vs. 23,036±27,157 KRW [17.05±20.11 USD], P=0.006).Conclusion: The combination of fenestrated polyurethane film and NPWT resulted in reduced pain caused by dressing, a faster reepithelization rate, and lower dressing cost than that of conventional moist dressing.

Fasciocutaneous Free Tissue Transfer in Limb Salvage: Prior Flap as a Split-thickness Skin Graft Donor Site.

Free flap surgery for limb salvage has become the surgical standard for reconstruction of bone and soft tissue with success rates and flap survivals of 94%-95%. The soft tissue defect dictates the technique of coverage. In many cases, multiple techniques of soft tissue coverage are necessary, ranging from myocutaneous and fasciocutaneous free flaps to split-thickness skin grafts (STSGs). It has been shown that fasciocutaneous free flaps are not inferior to muscle flaps in treatment of lower leg limb salvage. Although a complete flap loss is rare, it is not uncommon to have partial flap necrosis, wound dehiscence, or secondary soft tissue defects, necessitating further minor reconstruction, which we call "touch up" skin grafts. In many of these secondary procedures, split thickness skin grafts are sufficient. We have been using the skin portion of the fasciocutaneous free flap as a donor site for harvesting STSGs for quite some time without disadvantages. We believe that minimizing additional donor site morbidity is of great importance. The free tissue transfer is insensate and readily available at the site of injury, making prepping and draping simple as well as cosmetically acceptable, as the transferred free tissue, unfortunately, is rarely a perfect fit. The associated pain, discomfort, and scar of an additional donor site can be avoided. In our case series, we did not experience any flap loss, infections, or complications. Thus, harvesting an STSG from a fasciocutaneous free flap seems to be a feasible option to be considered in limb salvage.

Reconstruction with an Anterolateral Thigh Free Flap Following a Skin Graft from the Same Donor Site for Tissue Use Efficacy: Two Case Reports

The coverage of extensive soft tissue defects requires several considerations, such as limited donor sites, reconstruction methods, and the outcome of functional recovery. In the cases described herein, when a significant soft tissue defect was present on an extremity, we opted for staged reconstruction. We first performed a split-thickness skin graft (STSG) to reduce the soft tissue defect, using the anterolateral thigh (ALT) as the donor site. In the second stage, the remaining soft tissue defect was reconstructed with an ALT free flap, utilizing the same lateral thigh area that had previously served as the STSG donor site. After the free flap procedure, we encountered several challenges in monitoring the ALT flap; however, all flaps ultimately survived. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of using an ALT free flap following STSG from the same donor site, demonstrating efficient tissue utilization. We believe this approach is beneficial for reconstructing extensive soft tissue defects, as it maximizes tissue use efficiency and reduces donor site morbidity when donor options are limited.

The Efficacy of Regeneration Oil and Almond Oil on Split-Thickness Skin Graft Donor Sites: A Single-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.

Essential oils are a complementary treatment and can play an important role in scar care. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the efficacy of a new essential oil (regeneration oil) with a control group on scar quality in healed split-thickness skin graft donor sites. A single-center blinded randomized controlled study was performed on 30 patients with healed split-thickness skin graft donor site. The patients were randomly allocated into blended regeneration oil (n = 14) and pure almond oil (n = 16) groups. Application of the assigned oil occurred twice a day for 6 months. Scarring (Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale), itching (ITCH Assessment Scale) and scar discoloration (colorimetry) of the donor sites were assessed after 1, 3 and 6 months. We found no statistically significant differences between the groups in any applied parameter. We observed comparable outcomes (scar quality, itchiness, colorit) in healed split-thickness skin graft donor sites for both oils. Regeneration oil and control oil presented comparable results regarding scar quality, itchiness and colorit in healed split-thickness skin graft donor sites after 6 months of application. Both oils are suitable for skin/scar care in split-thickness skin graft donor sites.

Role for platelet rich plasma as an adjuvant therapy in wound healing and burns

Abstract Background Platelet rich plasma (PRP) contains high concentrations of growth factors. Intuitively, these were thought to be of potential benefit in healing of chronic wounds, skin grafts and graft donor sites. This was echoed in retrospective studies and an individual case basis but had not been randomized. Methods A systematic search was carried out by two individuals, independently, on the MEDLINE, EMBASE and COCHRANE databases, according to PRISMA guidelines. All data analysis and statistics was pooled and analysed using the Cochrane RevMan Software. Results Split thickness grafts have been described by numerous authors, but PRP use did not offer a significant advantage in graft take in pooled results (MD 5.83, 95% CI − 0.69 to 12.25, random-effects, p = 0.08). The analysis of included randomized controlled trials has shown favourable split-thickness skin graft donor site healing in the PRP group (MD − 5.55, 95% CI − 7.40 to − 3.69, random-effects, p = < 0.00001) compared to the control group. For carpal tunnel syndrome, the pooled results showed no difference in functional scores vs steroid injections (SMD − 0.68, 95% CI − 1.47 to 0.10, randomeffects, p = 0.09) or indeed splinting groups. Conclusions With the current body of evidence, we conclude that the use of PRP as an adjuvant therapy in skin grafts, burns, carpal tunnel surgery or scars cannot be rationalised. A potential use of PRP is in donor site management but the cost of this would be difficult to justify. Level of evidence: Not ratable.

Evaluation of amnion versus calcium alginate as split-thickness skin graft donor site dressing: A randomised controlled trial

Background: Split-thickness skin graft (STSG) covers patient’s primary wound, but, at the expense of a donor-wound which heals by secondary intention. This study evaluated the efficacy of amnion and calcium alginate dressings at STSG donor sites in terms of healing duration, patient comfort and incidence of infection.
 Patients and methods: An open label randomised control trial was conducted during October 2018 to May 2019. Total 60 patients, aged 20-45 years, were randomly allocated to two equal groups. Amnion was applied to 30 donor sites in Group A and calcium alginate in 30 donor sites in Group B. Patients were phone-called on 1st, 3rd and 7th post-operative days and donor site pain scored using numerical rating scale. Donor site was opened on 10th postoperative day and signs of infection assessed. Lastly, the day on which donor site healed, revealing an epithelialized wound, was noted.
 Results: Group A included 30 patients (11 females, 19 males) having mean age of 31.23 years and Group B included 30 patients (12 females, 11 males) having mean age of 31.30 years. Average pain scores on 1st, 3rd and 7th post-operative days were 7.6, 6.6 and 4.4 in Group A and it was 8.2, 6.5 and 4.4 in Group B. Two cases of amnion, 4 of calcium alginate got infected. Average healing duration was 11 days in Group A; and it was 14 days in Group B (p-value = 0.000).
 Conclusion: Amnion shows quicker healing and better pain control than calcium alginate.

Longitudinal Evaluation of Biomarkers in Wound Fluids from Venous Leg Ulcers and Split-thickness Skin Graft Donor Site Wounds Treated with a Protease-modulating Wound Dressing.

Venous leg ulcers represent a clinical challenge and impair the quality of life of patients. This study examines impaired wound healing in venous leg ulcers at the molecular level. Protein expression patterns for biomarkers were analysed in venous leg ulcer wound fluids from 57 patients treated with a protease-modulating polyacrylate wound dressing for 12 weeks, and compared with exudates from 10 acute split-thickness wounds. Wound healing improved in the venous leg ulcer wounds: 61.4% of the 57 patients with venous leg ulcer achieved a relative wound area reduction of ≥ 40%, and 50.9% of the total 57 patients achieved a relative wound area reduction of ≥ 60%. Within the first 14 days, abundances of S100A8, S100A9, neutrophil elastase, matrix metalloproteinase-2, and fibronectin in venous leg ulcer exudates decreased significantly and remained stable, yet higher than in acute wounds. Interleukin-1β, tumour necrosis factor alpha, and matrix metalloproteinase-9 abundance ranges were similar in venous leg ulcers and acute wound fluids. Collagen (I) α1 abundance was higher in venous leg ulcer wound fluids and was not significantly regulated. Overall, significant biomarker changes occurred in the first 14 days before a clinically robust healing response in the venous leg ulcer cohort.

Role of topical application of aloe vera for accelerated wound healing of cutaneous burns wound: A case report

Abstract Background: Aloe vera is a cactus plant that thrives in warm areas. Since ancient times, it has been used to treat acute wounds. However, the efficacy of aloe vera for burns and split-thickness skin graft (STSG) donor sites is inconclusive. Materials and Methods: In this study, we have applied pure aloe vera gel extract as an adjunct to dressing second-degree (superficial) burn wounds and assessed the time for complete epithelization Results: The time taken for complete epithelization of the wound was 11 days when compared to the normal (evidence-based) time of 14 days.

A Pilot Study Using a Collagen/Oxidized Regenerative Cellulose Dressing for Split- Thickness Skin Graft Donor Sites to Reduce Pain and Bleeding Complications

BACKGROUND: Standardized treatment of split-thickness skin graft (STSG) donor sites is not established. Bleeding can necessitate premature dressing changes, interrupting the healing process and increasing pain. PURPOSE: A collagen/oxidized regenerated cellulose (C/ORC) dressing was used on the donor site. The authors hypothesized that the collagen matrix could decrease bleeding-related complications, reduce pain, and foster epithelialization. METHODS: The C/ORC matrix was applied to the donor site after hemostasis was achieved. Dressings were removed between postoperative days 4 and 7, and the patients’ pain levels, bleeding complications, and percentage healed were recorded. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients were treated with the C/ORC donor site dressing. Of these, 35 patients (89.7%) were receiving at least prophylactic anticoagulation, and no bleeding complications were recorded. The average area of donor sites was 123.8 cm2 (range, 20-528 cm2). Utilizing the Numerical Rating Scale, 25 patients (64.1%) reported no pain with dressing removal while 5 (12.8%) reported a decrease in pain. The percentage of epithelialization as assessed by treating clinician was at least equivalent to other modalities. CONCLUSIONS: The application of a C/ORC matrix to STSG donor wound sites resulted in no bleeding complications and excellent pain control while promoting epithelialization in the patients studied. Following this study, the C/ORC dressing has been incorporated into the authors’ standard protocol.

A prospective comparative study on the effectiveness of two different non-adherent polyurethane dressings on split-thickness skin graft donor sites

AimTo analyze differences in re-epithelization, exudate absorbency, ease and pain on dressing removal between ALLEVYN™ Non-Adhesive and Betaplast™ N. MethodologyPatients admitted to the general ward undergoing split skin grafting were recruited. Allevyn and Betaplast were applied on the donor site. Exudate absorption was assessed daily using an absorbency grading chart. Dressing change was done on post-operative day five. Ease of dressing removal and pain score using the Wong-Baker Pain Scale was assessed. The percentage of re-epithelization for each dressing was assessed. Results30 patients were recruited. There was a statistically significant difference in exudate absorption on post-operative day 3 (z = −2.006, p = 0.045, T = 236) and post-operative day 4 (z = −2.026, p = 0.0143, T = 188), pain score (z = −2.861, p = 0.004, T = 180), ease of removal (z = −2.668, p = 0.008, T = 126) and re-epithelization (z = −2.566, p = 0.009, T = 336) between Betaplast and Allevyn. ConclusionBetaplast may have faster re-epithelization, better exudate absorption, and is easier to remove while minimizing discomfort as compared to Allevyn.

53 Use of Polylactic-acid-membrane in Split-thickness Skin Graft Donor Sites: A Prospective, Comparative, Randomized Study

IntroductionPolyurethane film (PU) dressings are commonly applied for coverage of split-thickness skin graft (SSG) donor sites, while previous studies have suggested reduced morbidity using a polylactic acid membrane (PLM). To further investigate the optimal treatment approach, the presented study compared outcome of donor sites in patients receiving either PLM or PU.MethodsThis randomized clinical trial allocated patients requiring SSG to receive either PLM or PU at the donor-site. Primary endpoint was difference in donor site scar appearance between groups 3 months postoperatively (Vancouver Scar Scale – VSS). Secondary endpoints included pain, the number of and time required for wound dressing changes, and costs related to the wound dressing.Results30 patients were allocated to each group. The median VSS scored lower for patients receiving PLM (PU: 3 (Q1: 2; Q3: 4) vs. PLM: 2 (Q1: 1; Q3: 3); p=0.049). Pain during change of wound dressing (PU: 2.0 ± 0.2 vs. PLM: 0.5 ± 0.2; p< 0.001) and mobilization (PU: 0.8 ± 0.2 vs. PLM: 0.3 ± 0.1; p=0.032) was reduced in the PLM group. Patients with PLM required less dressing changes per day of hospital stay (PU: 0.44 ± 0.06 vs. PLM: 0.28 ± 0.02; p=0.015). Mean time for wound dressing changes per patient was higher in the PU group (PU: 74.50 ± 5.72 vs. PLM: 21.43 ± 2.61 min; p< 0.001). Costs were higher in the PLM group (PU: 67.83 ± 5.56 vs. PLM: 162.79 ± 21.76 €; p< 0.001).ConclusionsPLM improves outcome of SSG donor sites, however, higher treatment costs must be taken into consideration.

Skin Graft Donor Site Healing among Elderly Patients with Dermatoporosis - A Case Series.

We reviewed donor site wound healing among morbid ≥65-year-old patients after split-thickness skin graft (STSG) harvesting. Patients were treated for a pretibial laceration or hematoma in Kymenlaakso Central Hospital, Finland, between 2015 and 2019. Twelve morbid patients with a mean Charlson Comorbidity Index of 7.1 (range 4-12) and a mean age of 80.6 years (range 69-91) were studied. Nine patients were female. Eight had a chronic cutaneous fragility syndrome, eg, dermatoporosis. All donor site areas were located on the thigh and were less than 2% TBSA. One donor site infection occurred. STSG integration on the pretibial wound bed was successful with all patients, and none of the patients needed further operative treatment. Graft thickness varied between 0.010 to 0.014 inches. STSG donor sites healed within the normal range of 21 days in 50% of patients. Among two patients, healing took 25 days, and among four, 37 to 97 days. All donor sites healed via local wound care without the need for regrafting. 4Our study indicates that harvesting STSG from elderly and morbid patients with poor skin condition is safe and does not result in significant complications. Prolonged donor site healing can occur, which can be managed with regular local wound care.

Application of autologous platelet-rich plasma to graft donor sites to reduce pain and promote healing.

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is widely used for wound healing in medical care because of the numerous growth factors it contains. Traditionally, donor sites are left to heal with a primary dressing so wounds are not left open. However, a delay in healing accompanied by pain at a donor site is often seen. This study primarily throws light on the use of autologous PRP over split-thickness skin graft (STSG) donor sites to promote healing and reduce pain. The patients enrolled in this study in 2018-2019 were divided into two groups: the intervention group received autologous PRP applied topically at the donor site; in the control group, the wound was dressed traditionally. Pain scales were measured in the immediate postoperative period at six hours, 10 hours and 16 hours. The dressing was opened on the postoperative day 14 and observed for healing by an independent observer. A total of 100 patients were included in the study. Patients in the PRP group showed statistically significant faster healing at postoperative day 14 compared with the control group (p<0.05), who required dressings for 3-4 weeks postoperatively. Pain scale scores in the postoperative period were significantly less in the PRP group at six hours postoperatively compared with the control group (p<0.05). There was a reduced incidence of hypertrophic scar formation in the small number of patients in the PRP group who had developed hypertrophic scar previously. Application of PRP is a safe, cost-effective and easy method to achieve faster healing in graft donor site areas that are troublesome to both patients and doctors. It also reduces postoperative pain at donor sites. The authors recommend PRP is used more often in the management of donor sites for STSGs.

Systematic literature review of topical local anaesthesia or analgesia to donor site wounds.

BackgroundTopical local analgesic and anaesthetic agents have been used both pre- and immediately post-harvest on split-thickness skin graft (STSG) donor site wounds (DSW). There is no systematic review of their effectiveness in providing post-harvest analgesia, or of the possible toxic effects of systemic absorption. This study is designed to address the question of which agent, if any, is favoured over the others and whether there are any safety data regarding their use.MethodsSystematic literature review of randomised controlled trials of topical agents applied to STSG DSWs, with a view to providing analgesia. Studies identified via search of Cochrane and EBSCO databases. No restrictions on language or publication year. Primary outcomes: pain at the time of (awake) STSG, and post-harvest pain (up to first dressing change). Secondary outcome was serum medication levels relative to published data on toxic doses. Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool utilised in assessment of included studies. At least 2 reviewers screened and reviewed included studies. A narrative review is presented.ResultsThere were 11 studies meeting inclusion criteria. Overall methodological quality and patient numbers were low. Topical eutectic mixture of lidocaine and prilocaine pre-harvest affords good local anaesthesia in awake STSG harvesting. Topical bupivacaine (5 studies) or lidocaine (1 study) gave significantly better post-harvest anaesthesia/analgesia than placebo. Topical morphine performs no better than placebo. Topical local anaesthetic agents at reported doses were all well below toxic serum levels.ConclusionsTopical local anaesthetics (lidocaine or bupivacaine) provide good analgesia, both during and after STSG harvest, at well below toxic serum levels, but there are no good data determining the best local anaesthetic agent to use. There is no evidence morphine performs better than placebo.

Comparison between Aquacel and Aquacel Foam dressing on split-thickness skin graft donor site.

To compare the effectiveness of two commonly used moist dressings, Aquacel and Aquacel Foam (both ConvaTec Ltd., UK), in managing split-thickness skin graft (STSG) donor site wounds. Patients undergoing STSG harvesting for reconstruction were eligible for this quasi-experimental study. After reconstruction surgery, the Aquacel (A) or Aquacel Foam (AF) dressings were applied on the donor site wound. The STSG donor site was assessed by two trained research nurses daily. Clinical outcomes including pain on dressing removal, use of intravenous analgesics, signs and symptoms of wound infection, incidence of exudate leakage and percentage healed were recorded in a standardised form. Cost of the dressing change was retrieved from the hospital billing system. Of 50 patients recruited, 25 received dressing A and 25 received the AF dressing for their STSG donor site wound. The average pain score on dressing removal was significantly lower in the AF dressing group compared with the A dressing group (0.8±0.8 versus 3.1±1.5, respectively (p=0.04)). Regression analysis demonstrated that compared with dressing A, the AF dressing was associated with a lower average pain score (beta: -2.27, standard error: 0.33; p<0.001), lower likelihood of pro re nata (PRN) intravenous analgesic use (odds ratio (OR)=0.21, 95% confidence interval: 0.06-0.71; p=0.01) and lower likelihood of exudate leakage (OR=0.11, p=0.01). The differences in time to wound healing, infection and cost were not statistically significant between the two groups. In this study, the AF dressing demonstrated superior performance in pain response on dressing removal for STSG donor site wounds compared with dressing A. Large-scale randomised controlled trials should be conducted to confirm the findings.