Scalp injuries are extremely common and although most scalp lacerations/ injuries can be primarily repaired, few require flap coverage. This article discusses the various ways in which we have reconstructed the scalp. This article is a case series of six different cases that required flap reconstruction where six different techniques were used to obtain wound cover with good outcomes. Patients who presented to various smaller hospitals/nursing homes with availability of only a general surgeon and no super specialists in Rural Bangalore with the need for scalp reconstruction were considered for the study. The operative outcome of six different methods of scalp reconstruction/ repair that include four different local flaps, a split skin graft with a wig and a pericranium burr hole drilling followed by split skin graft coverage have been studied.
 All six cases were followed up for a period of one month post intervention and all of them had good functional and cosmetic outcomes with no complications. There was no incidence of surgical site infection, seroma, or flap/graft failure in the 6 cases included in our study. Both grafts and flaps are equally good modalities in scalp reconstruction, but the choice for which to use should be based on the need of the patient and the type of wound. Grafts can be considered in conditions where there is adequate soft tissue cover over the scalp and in wounds with larger surface area. Grafts have the advantage of being technically simpler and are associated with fewer complications/failure but cannot be used in injuries where the bone is exposed. Flaps have better cosmetic outcome but are technically more challenging.