Question: A 64-year-old male patient visited our cardiovascular outpatient department for regular follow-up for hypertension and coronary artery disease on July 24, 2008. Hypotension was noted; his systolic and diastolic blood pressure of 89 and 34 mmHg, respectively. So he was referred to our emergent department (ED) for further evaluation. According to his previous medical records, he had a past history of gallbladder stones inducing acute pancreatitis with pseudocyst formation over the pancreatic tail region, which was initially managed by pigtail tube drainage initially on March 21, 2008 (Figure A). Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) revealed pancreatic duct disruption on April 25, 2008. Hence, endoscopic papillotomy, common bile duct stone extraction and 7-French (Fr) plastic stent pancreatic duct insertion were subsequently performed. Antibiotics were prescribed and the patient was examined by abdominal sonography every week until the pseudocyst completely resolved. The pigtail drainage tube was removed when there was no further drainage and he was discharged on July 3, 2008. In our ED, the physical examination did not reveal any fever, abdominal pain, jaundice, or other specific discomfort. Blood counts were as follows: white blood cell 32,900/mm3 (normal, 4800–10,800/mm3); hemoglobin, 12.5 g/dL (normal, 12–16); and platelets, 613,000/mm3 (normal, 130,000–400,000/mm3). The differential count of white blood cell was neutrophils, 74%; lymphocyte, 19%; monocyte, 7%; eosinophils, 0%; and basophils, 0%. Serum biochemistry test results were as follows: alanine aminotransferase, 78 IU/L (normal, 0–40); alkaline phosphatase, 175 U/L (normal, 10–100); γ-glutamyltransferase, 223 U/L (normal, 8–61); total bilirubin, 0.4 mg/dL (normal, 0.2–1.6); C-reactive protein, 11.79 mg/dL (normal, 0–0.5); and amylase, 218 U/L (normal, <180). An abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan in our ED is shown in Figures B and C. Pigtail drainage and antibiotics treatment were given immediately. A pus-like discharge was found from the pig-tail drainage tube. What is the possible diagnosis? See the Gastroenterology web site (www.gastrojournal.org) for more information on submitting your favorite image to Clinical Challenges and Images in GI. Under the impression that the patient had persistent pancreatic duct disruption with autosplenectomy, ERCP was performed and the 7-Fr internal stent was replaced by an 8-Fr stent to decrease pancreatic duct pressure. The pigtail drainage tube was reimplanted from the pseudocyst to the pancreatic tail duct and gradually changed to a smaller size. However, persistent leukocytosis and thrombocytosis without clinical evidence of infectious disease were noted during this hospitalization. We consulted a hematologist and genetic studies showed mixed polyclonal blood cell counts. Hence, lymphoproliferative disease was less likely. Consequently, both functional and anatomic destruction of the spleen were highly suspected. Follow-up ERCP on October 22, 2008, disclosed a healed pancreatic duct (Figure D). Therefore, the external drainage tube was removed smoothly. Follow-up CT scan disclosed no recurrence of the pseudocyst and mild regeneration of spleen on February 22, 2009 (Figure E). The final diagnosis was pancreatic duct disruption with persistent pancreatic fluid leakage and splenic autodigestion. Autosplenectomy has been reported in a number of diseases, such as sickle cell anemia, idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, celiac disease, amyloidosis, and splenic irradiation.1Caro J. Hypersplenism and hyposplenism.in: Lichtman M.A. Beutler E. Kipps T.J. Williams hematology. 7th ed. McGraw-Hill Medical, New York2006Google Scholar In acute pancreatitis, pseudocyst direct invasion or splenic vessel thrombosis with subsequent liquefaction of a splenic infarction are the causes of splenic parenchymal destruction.2Hastings O.M. Jain K.M. Khademi M. et al.Intrasplenic pancreatic pseudocyst complicating severe acute pancreatitis.Am J Gastroenterol. 1978; 69: 182-186PubMed Google Scholar In this case, CT scan disclosed pancreatic tail and splenic abscess without pseudocyst formation or splenic vessel thrombosis. Therefore, autosplenectomy was caused by persistent pancreatic fluid leak and local abscess formation. This case also disclosed mild splenic regeneration after autodigestion. Splenic autodigestion should be taken into consideration when duct disruption occurs at pancreatic tail. Acute pancreatitis with splenic involvement often required aggressive treatment, including repeated percutaneous drainage, pancreatectomy, and/or splenectomy.3Heider R. Behrns K.E. Pancreatic pseudocysts complicated by splenic parenchymal involvement: results of operative and percutaneous management.Pancreas. 2001; 23: 20-25Crossref PubMed Scopus (38) Google Scholar Although splenic autodigestion is rare, it may be lethal if undiagnosed. Clinicians should maintain a high index of suspicion of splenic autodigestion when patients had acute pancreatitis history with persistent leukocytosis and thrombocytosis.